This paper explores the materialities of care employed by families of people incarcerated under El Salvador's gang crackdown, the State of Exception (SOE) declared in March 2022. Through ethnographic research, I analyze the significance of items like paquetes (packages) and varejones (wooden sticks) that mothers and grandmothers use in their practices of care. These items transcend their utilitarian purposes, embodying practices of care, power relationships, and innocence claims within a context of political and social repression. Families, particularly women, leverage these items to ensure the survival of their loved ones in prison and make statements about their innocence, while navigating the state's coercive apparatus. This study foregrounds the gendered labor of care under punitive governance, highlighting the intimate and immediate justice practiced through familial relationships. By examining the material processes of care in situations of carceral violence, this paper contributes to an understanding of care as a relational, gendered, and politically-charged practice, challenging the unjust policies upheld by the SOE and advocating for non-punitive responses to violence. Through a deep dive into the social lives, agency, and impacts of these objects, the paper offers insights into the broader implications of care work within hostile environments and underscores the connections between material culture and social justice.
AuyeroJ.KilanskiK. (2015). From “making toast” to “splitting apples”: Dissecting “care” in the midst of chronic violence. Theory and Society, 44(5), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9255-6
3.
Azul Originario, Centro de Estudios de la Diversidad Sexual y Genérica, Cristosal, Fundación de Estudios para la Aplicación del Derecho, Instituto de Derechos Humanos de la UCA, Red Salvadoreña de Defensoras de Derechos Humanos, & Servicio Social Pasionista. (2024). El modelo Bukele: Seguridad sin derechos humanos.
4.
BairdA. (2025). Masculine vulnerability, gangs, and perpetual violence. In MyrttinenH.LewisC.TouquetH.SchulzP.YousafF.LaruniE. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of masculinities, Conflict and Peacebuilding (1st ed., pp. 70–80). Routledge.
5.
BuseC.MartinD.NettletonS. (2018). Conceptualising ‘materialities of care’: Making visible mundane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12663
6.
Casa Presidencial [@PresidenciaSV]. (2022, April 5). Ante los rumores de que grupos terroristas quieren atentar contra la población en respuesta a las medidas severas contra la delincuencia, el Presidente @nayibbukele les envía un mensaje contundente. Https://t.co/neMoyVsaoz [Tweet]. Twitter. https://x.com/PresidenciaSV/status/1511158834827563013
7.
Código de Familia. (1993). Código de Familia, Pub. L. No. 677.
8.
CreswellJ. (2007). Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. In Qualitative inquiry and research design (pp. 53–84). SAGE Publications.
9.
Cristosal. (2023). Un año bajo el régimen de excepción: Una medida permanente de represión y de violaciones a los derechos humanos.
10.
CruzJ. M.SpeckM. (2022, October 13). Ending el salvador’s cycle of gang violence. United States Institute of Peace.
11.
De LeónJ. (2012). “Better to be hot than caught”: Excavating the conflicting roles of migrant material culture. American Anthropologist, 114(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01447.x
Discurso completo de Bukele en la Asamblea de la ONU: seguridad en El Salvador, redes sociales y más. (2024). [Broadcast]. CNN en Español. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUI1s-vusBA
14.
Doering-WhiteJ. (2018). Evidencing violence and care along the central American migrant trail through Mexico. Social Service Review, 92(3), 432–469. https://doi.org/10.1086/699196
15.
Doering-WhiteJ. (2021). ¡Qué mamada! (What a Joke!): Humor, hostility, and hospitality along the central American migrant trail. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 26(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12546
16.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
17.
FisherB.TrontoJ. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In AbelE. K.NelsonM. K. (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). State University of New York Press.
18.
GallagherJ. (2023). Bootstrap justice: The search for Mexico’s disappeared. Oxford University Press.
19.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). Basic Books.
HumeM. (2004). “It’s as if you don’t know, because you don’t do anything about it”: Gender and violence in El Salvador. Environment & Urbanization, 16(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600223
22.
HumeM. (2008). The myths of violence: Gender, conflict, and community in El Salvador. Latin American Perspectives, 35(162), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X08321957
KrystalliR. (2024). Good victims: The political as a feminist question. Oxford University Press.
25.
LeCompteM. D.SchensulJ. J. (1999). Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data (7th ed.). AltaMira Press.
26.
LundR.PandaS. M.DhalM. P. (2016). Narrating spaces of inclusion and exclusion in research collaboration – researcher-gatekeeper dialogue. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115611208
27.
MarkowitzA. (2022). Making dangerous places: Toward a feminist methodology amid extreme and chronic urban violence. University College London.
MathiasJ.Doering-WhiteJ.SmithY.HardestyM. (2021). Situated causality: What ethnography can contribute to causal inquiry in social work. Social Work Research, 45(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svaa027
30.
MéndezM. J. (2021, October 29). Acuerpar or giving One's body: Feminist dolidarity beyond empathic colonization. Virtual Colloquium Series, San Diego University
31.
Montaño VirreiraS. (2010Montaño VirreiraS.Calderón MagañaC. (Eds.) El cuidado en acción. In El cuidado en acción: Entre el derecho y el trabajo (pp. 13–68). Naciones Unidas, CEPAL.
SaldañaJ. (2020). Qualitative data analysis strategies. In LeavyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 876–911). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.33
36.
Sherman HeylB. (2007). Ethnographic interviewing. In AtkinsonP.DelamontS.CoffeyA.LoflandJ.LoflandL. H. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 369–383). Sage Publications.
SkiginN. (2024). Prosocial behavior amid violence: The deservingness heuristic and solidarity with victims. Political Psychology, 45(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12926
39.
StewartD.ShamdasaniP.RookD. (2009). Group depth interviews: Focus group research. In BickmanL.RogD. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 589–616). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n18
40.
TilleyC. (2006). Objectification. In TilleyC.KeaneW.KuechlerS.RowlandsM.SpyerP. (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 60–73). Sage Publications.
WildingP. (2010). ‘New violence’: Silencing women’s experiences in the favelas of Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(4), 719–747. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216 ( 10001343
43.
Zapata-AlmaG. (2019). Introduction to trauma and trauma-informed care.
44.
ZubillagaV.LlorensM.SoutoJ. (2015). Chismosas and alcahuetas: Being the mother of an empistolado within the everyday armed violence of a Caracas barrio. In AuyeroJ.BourgoisP.Scheper-HughesN. (Eds.), Violence at the urban margins (pp. 162–188). Oxford University Press.
45.
ZulverJ. M.TuriñoE.CórdovaE.Reyez LópezA. M.Zelmanovitz AxelrodI. (2024). Connecting, venting, and doing the “behind the scenes” work: Bringing feminist and decolonial insights to a comparative digital data collection project. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 22(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11097678
