This study systematically reviewed 55 articles on perceived park accessibility following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and, for the first time, proposed a three-dimensional “physical-social-individual” framework to elucidate the multifaceted outcomes on park perceived accessibility. The findings indicate that perceived accessibility, influenced by complex factors and group heterogeneity, predicts park usage outcomes more effectively than objective measures. The study underscores the need to address social equity and cultural contexts, especially in developing countries and vulnerable groups. It recommends integrating emerging assessment methods and quality-oriented park design with targeted interventions to promote inclusive urban planning and public health policies.
AddasAbdullah.2022. “Exploring the Pattern of Use and Accessibility of Urban Green Spaces: Evidence from a Coastal Desert Megacity in Saudi Arabia.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research29 (37): 55757–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19639-4
2.
Ayala-AzcárragaCristinaDiazDanielZambranoLuis. 2019. “Characteristics of Urban Parks and Their Relation to User Well-Being.” Landscape and Urban Planning189: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005
3.
BahrinyFaribaBellSimon. 2021. “Traditional Versus Modern? Perceptions and Preferences of Urban Park Users in Iran.” Sustainability13 (4): 2036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042036
4.
BallKylieJefferyRobert WCrawfordDavid ARobertsRebecca JSalmonJoTimperioAnna F. 2008. “Mismatch Between Perceived and Objective Measures of Physical Activity Environments.” Preventive Medicine47 (3): 294–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001
5.
BratmanGregory NHamiltonJ PaulDailyGretchen C. 2012. “The Impacts of Nature Experience on Human Cognitive Function and Mental Health.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1249 (1): 118–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
6.
CalabròAndreaVecchiariniMariangelaGastJohannaCampopianoGiovannaDe MassisAlfredoKrausSascha. 2019. “Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research.” International Journal of Management Reviews21 (3): 317–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12192
7.
CarterMayHorwitzPierre. 2014. “Beyond Proximity: The Importance of Green Space Useability to Self-Reported Health.” EcoHealth11: 322–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0952-9.
8.
CazalisVictorLoreauMichelBarragan-JasonGladys. 2023. “A Global Synthesis of Trends in Human Experience of Nature.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment21 (2): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2540
ChenChongxianLuoWeijingLiHaiweiZhangDantingKangNingYangXiaohaoXiaYu. 2020. “Impact of Perception of Green Space for Health Promotion on Willingness to Use Parks and Actual Use among Young Urban Residents.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17 (15): 5560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155560.
11.
DhirAmandeepTalwarShaliniKaurPuneetMalibariAreej. 2020. “Food Waste in Hospitality and Food Services: A Systematic Literature Review and Framework Development Approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production270: 122861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122861
12.
DipeoluAdedotun AyodeleIbemEziyi OffiaFadamiroJoseph Akinlabi. 2020. “Influence of Green Infrastructure on Sense of Community in Residents of Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment30 (6): 743–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1740853.
13.
DixitMalvikaSivakumarAruna. 2020. “Capturing the Impact of Individual Characteristics on Transport Accessibility and Equity Analysis.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment87: 102473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102473
14.
DukuEricMensahCollins AdjeiAmaduIddrisuAdzigbliWonder Kofi. 2023. “Changes in Urban Green Spaces in Coastal Cities and Human Well-Being: The Case of Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana.” Geo: Geography and Environment10 (1): e00119. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.119.
15.
DuntonGenevieve FridlundAlmanzaEstelaJerrettMichaelWolchJenniferPentzMary Ann. 2014. “Neighborhood Park Use by Children: Use of Accelerometry and Global Positioning Systems.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine46 (2): 136–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.009.
16.
El MurrKarlBoisjolyGenevieveWaygoodE. O. D.. 2023. “Measuring Accessibility to Parks: Analyzing the Relationship Between Self-Reported and Calculated Measures.” Journal of Transport Geography107: 103550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103550.
17.
FryDustinMcIntireRussell KKondoMichelle C. 2024. “Understanding Perceived Park Access and Physical Activity among Older Adults: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Health & Place88: 103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103258.
18.
Giles-CortiBillieDonovanRobert J. 2002. “The Relative Influence of Individual, Social and Physical Environment Determinants of Physical Activity.” Social Science & Medicine54 (12): 1793–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2.
19.
GrowHeleneSaelensBrianKerrJacquelineDurantNefertitiNormanGregorySallisJames. 2008. “Where Are Youth Active? Roles of Proximity, Active Transport, and Built Environment.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise40 (12): 2071–9. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181817baa
20.
HoehnerChristine MBrennan RamirezLaura KElliottMichael BHandySusan LBrownsonRoss C. 2005. “Perceived and Objective Environmental Measures and Physical Activity among Urban Adults.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine28 (2): 105–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
JonesAndyHillsdonMelvynCoombesEmma. 2009. “Greenspace Access, Use, and Physical Activity: Understanding the Effects of Area Deprivation.” Preventive Medicine49 (6): 500–05. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.012.
23.
KaczynskiAndrew THendersonKarla A. 2007. “Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity: A Review of Evidence About Parks and Recreation.” Leisure Sciences29 (4): 315–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701394865
24.
KaminskiAbigailBauerDana MarieBellKathleen PLoftinCynthia SNelsonErik J. 2021. “Using Landscape Metrics to Characterize Towns Along an Urban-Rural Gradient.” Landscape Ecology36 (10): 2937–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01287-7
25.
KingAbby CStokolsDanTalenEmilyBrassingtonGlenn SKillingsworthRichard. 2002. “Theoretical Approaches to the Promotion of Physical Activity: Forging a Transdisciplinary Paradigm.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine23 (2): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00470-1.
26.
KoppenGroTveitMari SundliSangÅsa OdeDramstadWenche. 2014. “The Challenge of Enhancing Accessibility to Recreational Landscapes.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography68 (3): 145–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.904399
27.
KoprowskaKarolinaKronenbergJakubKuźmaInga BŁaszkiewiczEdyta. 2020. “Condemned to Green? Accessibility and Attractiveness of Urban Green Spaces to People Experiencing Homelessness.” Geoforum113: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.017.
28.
LabibS. M.ShuvoFaysal KabirBrowningMatthew HEMRigolonAlessandro. 2020. “Noncommunicable Diseases, Park Prescriptions, and Urban Green Space Use Patterns in a Global South Context: The Case of Dhaka, Bangladesh.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17 (11): 3900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113900.
29.
LarkinAndrewHystadPerry. 2019. “Evaluating Street View Exposure Measures of Visible Green Space for Health Research.” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology29 (4): 447–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0017-1
30.
LarsonLincoln RJenningsVinieceCloutierScott A. 2016. “Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States.” PLoS one11 (4): e0153211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153211
31.
LättmanKatrinOlssonLars EFrimanMargareta. 2016. “Development and Test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (Pac) in Public Transport.” Journal of Transport Geography54: 257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.015
32.
LiJieFuJingGaoJunZhouRuiWangKeyueZhouKaiyue. 2023. “Effects of the Spatial Patterns of Urban Parks on Public Satisfaction: Evidence from Shanghai, China.” Landscape Ecology38 (5): 1265–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01615-z
33.
LiuDongKwanMei-PoYangZhenchuanKanZihan. 2024. “Comparing Subjective and Objective Greenspace Accessibility: Implications for Real Greenspace Usage among Adults.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening96: 128335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128335.
34.
MaLiangShiWenqianWuLongfeng. 2023. “Mediating Roles of Perceptions and Visiting Behavior in the Relationship Between Urban Greenspace Accessibility and Personal Health: Evidence from Lanzhou, China.” Applied Geography159: 103085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103085.
35.
MahdiarZohrehDaliMelasutra Md. 2016. “Exploring Adolescents’ Perception of Accessibility and Its Influence on Park Use.” Journal of Design and Built Environment16 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol16no1.1.
36.
McCormackGavin RCerinEsterLeslieEvaDu ToitLorinneOwenNeville. 2008. “Objective Versus Perceived Walking Distances to Destinations: Correspondence and Predictive Validity.” Environment and Behavior40 (3): 401–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507300560
37.
McCormackGavin RRockMelanieTooheyAnn MHignellDanica. 2010. “Characteristics of Urban Parks Associated with Park Use and Physical Activity: A Review of Qualitative Research.” Health & Place16 (4): 712–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
38.
McDonnellMark JPickettStewart TA. 1990. “Ecosystem Structure and Function Along Urban-Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology.” Ecology71 (4): 1232–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938259.
39.
McLeroyKenneth RBibeauDanielStecklerAllanGlanzKaren. 1988. “An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs.” Health Education Quarterly15 (4): 351–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401.
40.
MohamedAbdelbaseer AKronenbergJakub. 2025. “Users’ Experiences of Park Accessibility and Attractiveness Based on Online Review Analytics.” Scientific Reports15 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88500-8.
41.
MooreSpencerKestensYan. 2011. “Neighbourhood Environmental Correlates of Perceived Park Proximity in Montreal.” Canadian Journal of Public Health102: 176–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404890.
42.
MoranMika RRodríguezDaniel ACotinez-O'RyanAndreaMirandaJ Jaime. 2020. “Park Use, Perceived Park Proximity, and Neighborhood Characteristics: Evidence from 11 Cities in Latin America.” Cities105: 102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102817.
43.
MowenAndrewOrsega-SmithElizabethPayneLauraAinsworthBarbaraGodbeyGeoffrey. 2007. “The Role of Park Proximity and Social Support in Shaping Park Visitation, Physical Activity, and Perceived Health among Older Adults.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health4 (2): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.4.2.167.
44.
NeuvonenMarjoSievänenTuijaTönnesSusanKoskelaTerhi. 2007. “Access to Green Areas and the Frequency of Visits–a Case Study in Helsinki.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening6 (4): 235–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.003
45.
NoeElizabeth ElliotStolteOttilie. 2023. “Dwelling in the City: A Qualitative Exploration of the Human-Nature Relationship in Three Types of Urban Greenspace.” Landscape and Urban Planning230: 104633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104633
46.
NordhHelenaAamodtGeirNordbøEmma CA. 2024. “Greater Perceived Access to Green Spaces Near Homes: Safer and More Satisfied Residents.” Journal of Environmental Psychology96: 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102332.
47.
OrstadStephanie LMcDonoughMeghan HKlenoskyDavid BMattsonMarifranTropedPhilip J. 2017. “The Observed and Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Physical Activity among Urban-Dwelling Adults: The Moderating Role of Depressive Symptoms.” Social Science & Medicine190: 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.026.
48.
Pahlevan-SharifSaeedMuraPaoloWijesingheSarah NR. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews in Tourism.” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management39: 158–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001
49.
ParkKeunhyun. 2017. “Psychological Park Accessibility: A Systematic Literature Review of Perceptual Components Affecting Park Use.” Landscape Research42 (5): 508–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1267127.
50.
PazhouhanfarMahdiehFeiziBehshad. 2020. “Relationship Between Multidimensions of the Perceived Access and Usage of Urban Parks.” Alam Cipta13 (1): 47–53.
51.
PetrunoffNicholas AYiNg XianDickensBorameSiaAngeliaKooJoelCookAlex RLinWee Hwee, Ying, et al.2021. “Associations of Park Access, Park Use and Physical Activity in Parks with Wellbeing in an Asian Urban Environment: A Cross-Sectional Study.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity18: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01147-2.
52.
RahimiAkbarTarashkarMahsaJahantabBanafshe. 2021. “Contribution of Design Indicators in Perception of Social Capital, and Interference of Socio-Demographic Information in the Process.” Sustainability13 (7): 3589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073589
53.
RahmafitriaFitriDirgahayaniPuspitaPutroHeru Purboyo HRosyidieAriefHudalahDelik. 2023. “Tourism Accessibility in Protected Islands: The Case of the Komodo National Park, Indonesia.” Tourism Review78 (3): 966–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2022-0110.
54.
RigolonAlessandro. 2016. “A Complex Landscape of Inequity in Access to Urban Parks: A Literature Review.” Landscape and Urban Planning153: 160–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017.
55.
RoeJenny JThompsonCatharine WardAspinallPeter ABrewerMark JDuffElizabeth IMillerDavidMitchellRichardClowAngela. 2013. “Green Space and Stress: Evidence from Cortisol Measures in Deprived Urban Communities.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10 (9): 4086–103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10094086
56.
SallisJames FBaumanAdrianPrattMichael. 1998. “Environmental and Policy Interventions to Promote Physical Activity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine15 (4): 379–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00076-2.
57.
SchipperijnJasperCerinEsterAdamsMarc AReisRodrigoSmithGrahamCainKelliChristiansenLars B, Delfien, et al.2017. “Access to Parks and Physical Activity: An Eight Country Comparison.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening27: 253–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.010.
58.
ScottMolly MEvensonKelly RCohenDeborah ACoxChristine E. 2007. “Comparing Perceived and Objectively Measured Access to Recreational Facilities as Predictors of Physical Activity in Adolescent Girls.” Journal of Urban Health84: 346–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9179-1
59.
SlaterSandy JChristianaRichard WGustatJeanette . 2020. “Recommendations for Keeping Parks and Green Space Accessible for Mental and Physical Health during COVID-19 and Other Pandemics.” Preventing Chronic Disease17: E59. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200204.
60.
SogaMasashiGastonKevin J. 2016. “Extinction of Experience: The Loss of Human–Nature Interactions.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment14 (2): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
61.
StokolsDaniel. 1996. “Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion.” American Journal of Health Promotion10 (4): 282–98. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282.
62.
SugiyamaTakemiGiles-CortiBillieSummersJacquidu ToitLorinneLeslieEvaOwenNeville. 2013. “Initiating and Maintaining Recreational Walking: A Longitudinal Study on the Influence of Neighborhood Green Space.” Preventive Medicine57 (3): 178–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.015.
63.
TMArunKaurPuneetBrescianiStefanoDhirAmandeep. 2021b. “What Drives the Adoption and Consumption of Green Hotel Products and Services? A Systematic Literature Review of Past Achievement and Future Promises.” Business Strategy and the Environment30 (5): 2637–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2768
64.
TMArunKaurPuneetFerrarisAlbertoDhirAmandeep. 2021a. “What Motivates the Adoption of Green Restaurant Products and Services? A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Business Strategy and the Environment30 (4): 2224–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2755
WanCalvinShenGeoffrey Qiping. 2015. “Salient Attributes of Urban Green Spaces in High Density Cities: The Case of Hong Kong.” Habitat International49: 92–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.016.
68.
WanCalvinShenGeoffrey QipingChoiStella. 2020. “Effects of Physical and Psychological Factors on Users’ Attitudes, Use Patterns, and Perceived Benefits Toward Urban Parks.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening51: 126691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126691.
69.
WangDongBrownGregoryLiuYan. 2015b. “The Physical and Non-Physical Factors That Influence Perceived Access to Urban Parks.” Landscape and Urban Planning133: 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007
70.
WangDongBrownGregoryLiuYanMateo-BabianoIderlina. 2015c. “A Comparison of Perceived and Geographic Access to Predict Urban Park Use.” Cities42 (part A): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.003.
71.
WangDongBrownGregoryZhongGuopingLiuYanMateo-BabianoIderlina. 2015a. “Factors Influencing Perceived Access to Urban Parks: A Comparative Study of Brisbane (Australia) and Zhongshan (China).” Habitat International50: 335–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.032
72.
WangLuWangYuLuYuxin. 2023. “Impact of Community Park Recreational Space on the Physical Leisure Activities of the Elderly Based on the Sem Model.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Urban Climate, Sustainability and Urban Design.
73.
WardCarolinePalmerA. K.BrockettB. F. T.CostanzaRobertHatfieldJ.KubiszewskiIdaLangfordP.PickettKateWillisCheryl. 2023. “Perceptions, Preferences and Barriers: A Qualitative Study of Greenspace and Under-Representation in Leeds, Uk.” People and Nature5 (4): 1284–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10507.
74.
Wojnowska-HeciakMagdalenaSuchockaMarzenaBłaszczykMagdalenaMuszyńskaMagdalena. 2022. “Urban Parks as Perceived by City Residents with Mobility Difficulties: A Qualitative Study with in-Depth Interviews.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19 (4): 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042018.
75.
WolchJennifer RByrneJasonNewellJoshua P. 2014. “Urban Green Space, Public Health, and Environmental Justice: The Challenge of Making Cities ‘Just Green Enough’.” Landscape and Urban Planning125: 234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
76.
WuYangyiWeiYehua DennisLiuMeitongGarcíaIvis. 2025. “Urban Equity of Park Use in Peri-Urban Areas During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Landscape and Urban Planning256: 105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105269
77.
XiaoXiaoAultman-HallLisaManningRobertVoigtBrian. 2018. “The Impact of Spatial Accessibility and Perceived Barriers on Visitation to the Us National Park System.” Journal of Transport Geography68: 205–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.03.012.
78.
XiaoXiaoPerryElizabethManningRobertKrymkowskiDanielValliereWilliamReignerNathan. 2017. “Effects of Transportation on Racial/Ethnic Diversity of National Park Visitors.” Leisure Sciences39 (2): 126–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1151846.
79.
XuMingyu.2018. Research on Strategies to Improve Perceived Accessibility of Urban Public Open Spaces.China: Shenzhen University.
80.
YangWenyueYangRuyuGuoYuxuanYinWenyao. 2024. “Examining the Effects of Neighborhood Walking Environments and Green Spaces on the Likelihood of Residents Being Obese: A Residential Self-Selection Perspective.” Cities155: 105422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105422.
YasumotoShinyaNakayaTomokiJonesAndrew P. 2021. “Quantitative Environmental Equity Analysis of Perceived Accessibility to Urban Parks in Osaka Prefecture, Japan.” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy14: 337–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-020-09360-5.
83.
YenYatWangZhanqiShiYuminXuFengSoeungBunlySohailMuhammad TayyabRubakulaGelasJumaSahim Abdalla. 2017. “The Predictors of the Behavioral Intention to the Use of Urban Green Spaces: The Perspectives of Young Residents in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.” Habitat International64: 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.009.
84.
YilmazSerapDuzenliTugbaDincerDeryanur. 2017. “Evaluation of Factors Related to Well-Being Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Users.” FEB-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin26 (12): 7789–800.
ZhangJingyuanTanPuay Yok. 2019. “Demand for Parks and Perceived Accessibility as Key Determinants of Urban Park Use Behavior.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening44: 126420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126420.
87.
ZhangSaiZhouWeiqi. 2018. “Recreational Visits to Urban Parks and Factors Affecting Park Visits: Evidence from Geotagged Social Media Data.” Landscape and Urban Planning180: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.004
88.
ZhaoJingAzizFaziawati AbdulUjangNorsidah. 2024a. “Factors Influencing the Usage, Restrictions, Accessibility, and Preference of Urban Neighborhood Parks-a Review of the Empirical Evidence.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening100: 128473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128473.
89.
ZhaoXukaiHuangHeLinGuangsiLuYuxing. 2025. “Exploring Temporal and Spatial Patterns and Nonlinear Driving Mechanism of Park Perceptions: A Multi-Source Big Data Study.” Sustainable Cities and Society119: 106083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.106083
90.
ZhaoXukaiLuYuxingHuangWenwenLinGuangsi. 2024b. “Assessing and Interpreting Perceived Park Accessibility, Usability and Attractiveness Through Texts and Images from Social Media.” Sustainable Cities and Society112: 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105619.
91.
ZimringCraigJosephAnjaliNicollGayle LTsepasSharon. 2005. “Influences of Building Design and Site Design on Physical Activity: Research and Intervention Opportunities.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine28 (2): 186–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.025.
