How Remote Working and Placelessness Affect Future Planning for Innovation Districts: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract

Urban areas that foster economic growth through innovation are receiving more attention lately. Consequently, Innovation Districts (IDs), as place-based strategies for economic development, have become a crucial intervention in urban planning and land-use policy. The literature highlights the typology of IDs and the built environment attributes that shape them. However, there needs to be more understanding of the role of the built environment amid growing remote working and placelessness. Thus, this research conducts a systematic literature review to investigate how the future planning for Innovation Districts will be influenced and how it can tackle the challenge of rising placelessness.

Keywords

innovation districts innovation igniting urban areas future planning for innovative urban areas built environment place-based development placelessness remote working telework

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adekoya

O. D.

Adisa

T. A.

Aiyenitaju

. 2022. “Going Forward: Remote Working in the Post-COVID-19 Era.” Employee Relations: The International Journal 44 (6): 1410–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2021-0161 .

Adu-McVie

Yigitcanlar

Erol

Xia

. 2021. “Classifying Innovation Districts: Delphi Validation of a Multidimensional Framework.” Land Use Policy 111: 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105779 .

Akan

2022. Remote Working and Relocation After COVID-19. The Case Studies of Istanbul and Milan [Politecnico di Milano]. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/187807.

Allen

T. D.

Golden

T. D.

Shockley

K. M.

. 2015. “How Effective is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16 (2): 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273 .

Arefi

2004. “The Pedagogy of the American City: Revisiting the Concepts of Place, Non-Place, and Placelessness.” Urban Design International 9 (3): 103+. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000121

Bagwell

2008. “Creative Clusters and City Growth.” Creative Industries Journal 1 (1): 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1386/cij.1.1.31_1 .

Baily

M. N.

Montalbano

. 2018. “Clusters and Innovation Districts: Lessons from the United States Experience.” Economic Studies at Brookings: 1–35. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/clusters-and-innovation-districts-lessons-from-the-united-states-experience/.

Battaglia

Tremblay

D.-G.

. 2011. “22@ and the Innovation District in Barcelona and Montreal: A Process of Clustering Development Between Urban Regeneration and Economic Competitiveness.” Urban Studies Research 2011: e568159. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/568159 .

Benveniste

2020. These Companies’ Workers May Never Go Back to the Office | CNN Business. CNN, October 18. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/18/business/virtual-work-offices-pandemic/index.html.

10.

Bouba-Olga

2005. “Innovation, Proximities and Regional Development.” European Journal of Economic and Social Systems 18 (2): 285–305. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ejessy/0117.html

11.

Brynjolfsson

Horton

J. J.

Ozimek

Rock

Sharma

TuYe

H.-Y.

. 2020. COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data (Working Paper 27344). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27344.

12.

Casper

2007. “How do Technology Clusters Emerge and Become Sustainable?: Social Network Formation and Inter-Firm Mobility Within the San Diego Biotechnology Cluster.” Research Policy 36 (4): 438–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.018 .

13.

Caulfield

Charly

. 2022. “Examining the Potential Environmental and Travel Time Saved Benefits of Remote Working Hubs.” Transport Policy 127: 139–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.017 .

14.

Chen

N. C.

Nagakura

Larson

. 2016. “Social Media as Complementary Tool to Evaluate Cities—Data Mining Innovation Districts in Boston.” Spatial Analysis 2: 447–56. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.2.447 .

15.

Davies

2021. “COVID-19 and ICT-Supported Remote Working: Opportunities for Rural Economies.” World (Oakland, Calif) 2 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2010010 .

16.

Dayaram

Burgess

. 2021. “Regulatory Challenges Facing Remote Working in Australia.” In Handbook of Research on Remote Work and Worker Well-Being in the Post-COVID-19 Era, 202–19. IGI Global. Hershey, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6754-8.ch012 .

17.

Dingel

J. I.

Neiman

. 2020. “How Many Jobs Can be Done at Home?” Journal of Public Economics 189: 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235 .

18.

Engel

J. S.

Berbegal-Mirabent

Piqué

J. M.

. 2018. “The Renaissance of the City as a Cluster of Innovation.” Cogent Business & Management 5 (1): 1532777. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1532777 .

19.

Erdsiek

2021. Working From Home During COVID-19 and Beyond: Survey Evidence From Employers (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3875337). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875337

20.

Esmaeilpoorarabi

2019. “A Methodological Approach for Establishing Place Quality in Australian Innovation Districts.” PhD, Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/132153/ .

21.

Esmaeilpoorarabi

Yigitcanlar

Guaralda

Kamruzzaman

Md.

. 2018a. “Does Place Quality Matter for Innovation Districts? Determining the Essential Place Characteristics from Brisbane’s Knowledge Precincts.” Land Use Policy 79: 734–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.016 .

22.

Esmaeilpoorarabi

Yigitcanlar

Guaralda

Kamruzzaman

Md.

. 2018b. “Evaluating Place Quality in Innovation Districts: A Delphic Hierarchy Process Approach.” Land Use Policy 76: 471–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.027 .

23.

Esmaeilpoorarabi

Yigitcanlar

Kamruzzaman

Md.

Guaralda

. 2020a. “Conceptual Frameworks of Innovation District Place Quality: An Opinion Paper.” Land Use Policy 90: 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104166 .

24.

Esmaeilpoorarabi

Yigitcanlar

Kamruzzaman

Md.

Guaralda

. 2020b. “How Can an Enhanced Community Engagement with Innovation Districts be Established? Evidence from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.” Cities 96: 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102430 .

25.

Feldman

M. P.

Kogler

D. F.

. 2010. “Chapter 8-Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 1: 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7 .

26.

Fernandez

Bentley

. 2022. “Early Evolution of an Innovation District: Origins and Evolution of MID and RMIT University’s Social Innovation Precinct in Melbourne’s City North.” Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business 7 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2022.2.j111 .

27.

Ferreira

Claver

Pereira

Thomaz

. 2020. Remote Working and the Platform of the Future. Boston Consulting Group. Boston. https://web-assets.bcg.com/80/e1/8db524dc4b80abf09f0575cd0eea/bcg-remote-working-and-the-platform-of-the-future-oct-2020.pdf .

28.

Flecker

Schönauer

. 2016. “The Production of ‘Placelessness’: Digital Service Work in Global Value Chains.” In Space, Place and Global Digital Work, edited by Flecker

, 11–30. Palgrave Macmillan UK. London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_2 .

29.

Florida

Adler

Mellander

. 2017. “The City as Innovation Machine.” Regional Studies 51 (1): 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255324 .

30.

Fritsch

Wyrwich

. 2021. “Is Innovation (Increasingly) Concentrated in Large Cities? An International Comparison.” Research Policy 50 (6): 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104237 .

31.

Gallardo

Whitacre

. 2018. “21st Century Economic Development: Telework and Its Impact on Local Income.” Regional Science Policy & Practice 10 (2): 103–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12117 .

32.

Garcia

B. C.

Chavez

. 2014. “Network-Based Innovation Systems: A Capital Base for the Monterrey City-Region, Mexico.” Expert Systems with Applications 41 (12): 5636–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.014 .

33.

Gibson

C. B.

Gibbs

J. L.

. 2006. “Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (3): 451–95. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 .

34.

Golden

T. D.

2009. “Applying Technology to Work: Toward a Better Understanding of Telework.” Organization Management Journal 6 (4): 241–50. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2009.33 .

35.

Green

A. E.

Riley

. 2021. “Implications for Places of Remote Working.” In Handbook of Research on Remote Work and Worker Well-Being in the Post-COVID-19 Era, 161–80. IGI Global. Hershey, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6754-8.ch010 .

36.

Hall

B. H.

2011. Innovation and Productivity (Working Paper 17178). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17178.

37.

Hamdouch

2008. Conceptualizing Innovation Clusters and Networks (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1261972). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1261972.

38.

Hamidi

Zandiatashbar

. 2019. “Does Urban Form Matter for Innovation Productivity? A National Multi-Level Study of the Association Between Neighbourhood Innovation Capacity and Urban Sprawl.” Urban Studies 56 (8): 1576–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018767002 .

39.

Hamidi

Zandiatashbar

Bonakdar

. 2019. “The Relationship Between Regional Compactness and Regional Innovation Capacity (RIC): Empirical Evidence from a National Study.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142: 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.026 .

40.

Hardill

Green

. 2003. “Remote Working—Altering the Spatial Contours of Work and Home in the New Economy.” New Technology, Work and Employment 18 (3): 212–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00122 .

41.

Hermann

Paris

C. M.

. 2020. “Digital Nomadism: The Nexus of Remote Working and Travel Mobility.” Information Technology & Tourism 22 (3): 329–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00188-w .

42.

Hertel

Geister

Konradt

. 2005. “Managing Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Empirical Research.” Human Resource Management Review 15 (1): 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002 .

43.

Hislop

Axtell

. 2007. “The Neglect of Spatial Mobility in Contemporary Studies of Work: The Case of Telework.” New Technology, Work and Employment 22 (1): 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00182.x .

44.

Karunarathne

P. D.

2021. “A SWOT Analysis of Remote Working Based on Review of Literature.” International Journal of Business, Technology and Organizational Behavior (IJBTOB) 1 (4): 253–62. https://doi.org/10.52218/ijbtob.v1i4.102.

45.

Katz

Wagner

. 2014. “The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America.” Metropolitan Policy Program at BROOKINGS: 1–34. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/rise-of-innovation-districts/.

46.

Kayanan

C. M.

2022. “A Critique of Innovation Districts: Entrepreneurial Living and the Burden of Shouldering Urban Development.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54 (1): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211049445 .

47.

Kirby

2015. “The Possibility of Cyber-Placelessness- Digimodernism on a Planetary Platform.” In The Planetary Turn: Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Elias

A. J.

Moraru

, pp. 71–88. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

48.

Koh

W. T. H.

Tschang

F. T.

. 2003. An Analytical Framework for Science Parks and Technology Districts with an Application to Singapore (SSRN Scholarly Paper 626361). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.626361.

49.

Kortelainen

Albrecht

. 2021. “Placelessness of Urban Design and Industrial Branding in Small Town Planning.” Journal of Urban Design 26 (4): 405–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1877536 .

50.

Koslowski

N. C.

2016. “My Company is Invisible’—Generating Trust in the Context of Placelessness, Precarity and Invisibility in Virtual Work.” In Space, Place and Global Digital Work, 171–99. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3 .

51.

Kupfer

2007. “Mobility, Portability, and Placelessness.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (1): 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/jae.2007.0003.

52.

Lawrence

Hogan

Brown

. 2019. Planning for an Innovation District: Questions for Practitioners to Consider. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.op.0059.1902.

53.

Leon

2008. “Attract and Connect: The 22@Barcelona Innovation District and the Internationalisation of Barcelona Business.” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 10 (2/3): 235–46. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.235.

54.

Mariotti

2021. “Is Remote Working Emptying the City?” Regions 11: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2021.00001107.

55.

Mariotti

Di Matteo

Rossi

. 2022. “Who Were the Losers and Winners During the Covid-19 Pandemic? The Rise of Remote Working in Suburban Areas.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 9 (1): 685–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2139194 .

56.

Mariotti

Marino

M. D.

Bednář

. 2022. “Part 3: New Working Spaces and the Work Lives of Coworkers and Remote Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” In The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Working Spaces, 149–51. London: Routledge.

57.

McLean

2020. These Companies Plan to Make Working from Home the New Normal. As in Forever | CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/tech/work-from-home-companies/index.html.

58.

Metallo

Agrifoglio

Maria

. 2022. “Effective Management of a Remote Workforce for Covid-19: A Proposed Research Model Toward Smart Working Adoption Within Organizations.” In HR Analytics and Digital HR Practices- Digitalization Post COVID-19, 101–26. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7099-2 .

59.

Montague

2016. “Theory’s Role in Placelessness.” In Place and Placelessness Revisited, 49–60. New York: Routledge.

60.

Morisson

2020. “A Framework for Defining Innovation Districts: Case Study from 22@ Barcelona.” In Urban and Transit Planning: A Culmination of Selected Research Papers from IEREK Conferences on Urban Planning, Architecture and Green Urbanism, Italy and Netherlands (2017), 185–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_17 .

61.

Morisson

Bevilacqua

. 2019a. “Balancing Gentrification in the Knowledge Economy: The Case of Chattanooga’s Innovation District.” Urban Research & Practice 12 (4): 472–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1472799 .

62.

Morisson

Bevilacqua

.2019b. Beyond Innovation Districts: The Case of Medellinnovation District. In New Metropolitan Perspectives. Vol. 1, 3–11. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_1

63.

Moses

Williamson

H. F.

. 1967. “The Location of Economic Activity in Cities.” The American Economic Review 57 (2): 211–22. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150672178.

64.

Nikbakhsh

2022. Assesing the Impact of Authentic Leadership and the Conflict Management on the Performance of Remote-Working Employees: The Example of Software/Online Platform Development Companies. Estonia: Tallinn University of Technology.

65.

Offstein

E. H.

Morwick

J. M.

Koskinen

. 2010. “Making Telework Work: Leading People and Leveraging Technology for Competitive Advantage.” Strategic HR Review 9 (2): 32–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754391011022244 .

66.

O’Neill

2022. “An Exploratory Analysis of Remote Working Preferences Among Tech Workers and Managers in Ireland.” Masters, Dublin, National College of Ireland. https://doi.org/10/1/darrenoneill.pdf.

67.

Ozimek

2020. The Future of Remote Work (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3638597). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3638597.

68.

Pancholi

S. A.

2018. “A Conceptual Approach for Place Making in Knowledge and Innovation Spaces: Case Investigations from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney.” PhD, Queensland University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.120697 .

69.

Pancholi

Yigitcanlar

Guaralda

. 2015a. “Place Making Facilitators of Knowledge and Innovation Spaces: Insights from European Best Practices.” International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 6 (3): Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823

70.

Pancholi

Yigitcanlar

Guaralda

. 2015b. “Public Space Design of Knowledge and Innovation Spaces: Learnings from Kelvin Grove Urban Village, Brisbane.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 1 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0015-7 .

71.

Powell

W. W.

Snellman

. 2004. “The Knowledge Economy.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (1): 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037 .

72.

Quade

2022. “Virtual Team Leadership, Operation, and Technology Deployment: A New Model for Remote Working.” In Handbook of Research on Digital Transformation, Industry Use Cases, and the Impact of Disruptive Technologies, edited by Wynn

M. G.

, 165–81. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7712-7.ch010 .

73.

Relph

2008. Place and Placelessness 2008 Preface. https://www.academia.edu/31268799/Place_and_Placelessness_2008_Preface.

74.

Relph

2016. “The Paradox of Place and the Evolution of Placelessness.” In Place and Placelessness Revisited. New York: Routledge.

75.

Reshma

P. S.

Aithal

P. S.

Acharya

. 2015. “An Empirical Study on Working from Home: A Popular E-Business Model.” International Journal of Advance and Innovative Research 2 (2): 12–8. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2778931.

76.

Reuschke

Clifton

Long

. 2021. Remote Working-Spatial Implications in Wales. Welsh Parliament. Wales. https://www.gov.wales/smarter-working-remote-working-strategy-wales-html#93560.

77.

Rissola

Bevilaqua

Monardo

Trillo

. 2019. Place-Based Innovation Ecosystems: Boston-Cambridge Innovation Districts, 49 [JRC Technical Report]. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/183238.

78.

Rizmaldi

M. A.

Jayadi

. 2022. “How Remote Working Can Affect Employee Performance Using Scrum in Software Development Companies.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 100 (4): 4799–809. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:264404456.

79.

Rossi

Di Bella

. 2017. “Start-up Urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the Global Urbanization of Technology-Based Economies.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (5): 999–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17690153 .

80.

Sandel

2017. “Connected Innovation Neighborhoods and Innovation Districts.” In Smart Economy in Smart Cities: International Collaborative Research: Ottawa, St. Louis, Stuttgart, Bologna, Cape Town, Nairobi, Dakar, Lagos, New Delhi, Varanasi, Vijayawada, Kozhikode, Hong Kong, edited by Vinod Kumar

T. M.

, 1013–22. Springer. Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3_38 .

81.

Sanga

E. E.

Mbisso

D. A.

. 2020. “Sense of Place and Placelessness of Urban Open Spaces in Dar es Salaam.” Journal of Sustainable Development 13 (4): 191. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v13n4p191 .

82.

Seamon

Sowers

. 2008. “Place and Placelessness (1976): Edward Relph.” In Key Texts in Human Geography, 43–52. London: Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446213742.n6 .

83.

Sharp

Fastenrath

Tavassoli

Raven

Coenen

Goedegebuure

Wilson

. 2022. Mission-Oriented Innovation Districts: The Australian Context, May 5. https://apo.org.au/node/316519.

84.

Sinitsyna

Di Marino

Paas

. 2022. “Virtual Coworking and Remote Working: Lessons and Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic from Estonia and Norway.” In The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Working Spaces. 1, 153–64. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181163 .

85.

Smith

2006. “Space, Place, and Placelessness in the Culturally Regenerated City.” In Cultural Tourism. New York: Routledge.

86.

Sostero

Milasi

Hurley

Fernandez Macias

Bisello

. 2020. Teleworkability and the COVID-19 Crisis: A New Digital Divide? (JRC nr: JRC121193). European Commission. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/publications/teleworkability-and-covid-19-crisis-new-digital-divide_en.

87.

Urbaniec

Małkowska

Włodarkiewicz-Klimek

. 2022. “The Impact of Technological Developments on Remote Working: Insights from the Polish Managers’ Perspective.” Sustainability 14 (1): Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010552 .

88.

Wagner

Davies

Sorring

Vey

. 2017. Advancing a New Wave of Urban Competitiveness: The Role of Mayors in the Rise of Innovation Districts, 78. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. https://trid.trb.org/View/1473620 .

89.

Wang

2020. “A City of Placelessness: Digital Nomads and Tallinn’s Urban Future.” Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/127882 .

90.

Wang

Zhang

Liu

Zhang

. 2021. “On Innovation Capitalization: Empirical Evidence from Guangzhou, China.” Habitat International 109: 102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102323 .

91.

Xiaohui

Junyu

Chaolin

Xiaodong

Xiyu

Jun

Liang

. 2021. “Innovation Districts in Beijing: Evolution, Distribution, and Development Mechanisms.” In Chinese Urban Planning and Construction: From Historical Wisdom to Modern Miracles, 275–99. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65562-4_13 .

92.

Yang

Holtz

Jaffe

Suri

Sinha

Weston

Joyce

, N., et al. 2022. “The Effects of Remote Work on Collaboration among Information Workers.” Nature Human Behaviour 6 (1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4 .

93.

Yigitcanlar

Adu-McVie

Erol

. 2020. “How Can Contemporary Innovation Districts be Classified? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Land Use Policy 95: 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595 .

94.

Yin

R. K.

1994. “Discovering the Future of the Case Study Method in Evaluation Research.” Evaluation Practice 15 (3): 283–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(94)90023-X .

95.

Yin

R. K.

2015. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: Guilford Publications.

96.

Burke

Raad

. 2019. “Exploring Impact of Future Flexible Working Model Evolution on Urban Environment, Economy and Planning.” Journal of Urban Management 8 (3): 447–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.05.002 .

97.

Zandiatashbar

Kayanan

. 2020. “Negative Consequences of Innovation-Igniting Urban Developments: Empirical Evidence from Three US Cities.” Urban Planning 5 (3): 378–91. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i3.3067 .

98.

Zukin

2021. “Planetary Silicon Valley: Deconstructing New York’s Innovation Complex.” Urban Studies 58 (1): 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020951421 .