It remains common for the city to be treated as an undifferentiated unit in urban theory. This review of literature reveals that extant urban theory has been or can be inflected with a greater sense of intra- and interurban difference registering in implications for planning policy and practice pertaining to different substantive concerns and at different geographical scales. The article argues that we need to continue to pay attention to the spatially differentiated character of the urban if we are to advance urban planning thought and practice under contemporary conditions of extended urbanization.
AlexanderS.GleesonB.2019. Degrowth in the Suburbs. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
2.
AllmendingerP.HaughtonG.2012. “Post‐political Spatial Planning in England: A Crisis of Consensus?.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers37(1):89–103.
3.
AlonsoW.1964. Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
AlthubaityA.JonasA. E. G.1999. “Suburban Entrepreneurialism: Redevelopment Regimes and Co-ordinating Metropolitan Development in Southern California.” In The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation, edited by HallT.HubbardP., 149–72. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
5.
BastenL.2017. “In-betweens in Time a Space: The Governance of Suburbanism in the Ruhr.” In Old Europe, New Suburbanization, edited by PhelpsN. A.158–82. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
6.
BatheltH.GolfettoF.RinalloD.2014. Trade Shows in the Globalizing Knowledge Economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeauregardR.2018. Cities in an Urban Age: A Dissent. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BeckU.BonssW.LauC.2003. “The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme.” Theory, Culture & Society20(2):1–33.
9.
BergerA.KotkinJ., eds. 2018. Infinite Suburbia. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
10.
BerryB.ReesP.1969. “The Factorial Ecology of Calcutta.” American Journal of Sociology74:445–91.
11.
BontjeM.BurdackJ.2005. “Edge Cities, European-style: Examples from Paris and the Randstad.” Cities22:317–30.
12.
BoyangG.LiuW.DunfordM.2014. “State Land Policy, Land Markets and Geographies of Manufacturing: The Case of Beijing, China.” Land Use Policy36:1–12.
13.
BrennerN.2014. “Introduction: Urban Theory without an Outside.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by BrennerN., 14–30. Berlin, Germany: Jovis.
14.
BrennerN.2018. “Debating Planetary Urbanization: For an Engaged Pluralism.” Environment & Planning D36:570–90.
15.
BrennerN.SchmidC.2014. “The ‘Urban Age’ in Question.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38:731–55.
16.
BrennerN.SchmidC.2015. “Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?” City19:151–82.
17.
BurgessE. W.1925. “The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project.” In The City, edited by ParkR. E.BurgessE. W., 47–62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CanutoM. A.Estrada-BelliF.GarrisonT. G.HoustonS. D.AcuñaM. J.KováčM.ChatelainD.2018. “Ancient Lowland Maya Complexity as Revealed by Airborne Laser Scanning of Northern Guatemala.” Science361 (6409): eaau0137.
19.
CastellsM.1977. The Urban Question. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
20.
CastellsM.1983. The City and the Grassroots. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
21.
ClarkW. A. V.2000. “Monocentric to Polycentric: New Urban Forms and Old Paradigms.” In A Companion to the City, edited by BridgeG.WatsonS., 14–25. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22.
CochraneA.2018. “Here, There and Everywhere: Rethinking the Urban of Urban Politics.” In The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics, edited by WardK.JonasA. E. G.MillerB.WilsonD., 14–25. London, UK: Routledge.
23.
Commission of the European Communities. 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Brussels, Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
24.
CowenD.2014. The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
CoxK. R.2014. Making Human Geography. New York: Guilford.
26.
De JongJ. K.2013. New Suburbanisms. London, UK: Routledge.
27.
DodgshonR. A.1998. Society in Time and Space: A Geographical Perspective on Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
DoveyK.KingR.2011. “Forms of Informality: Morphology and Visibility of Informal Settlements.” Built Environment37:11–29.
29.
DuncanS.1989. “What Is Locality?” In New Models in Geography, vol. 2, edited by PeetR.ThriftN., 221–51. London, UK: Routledge.
30.
Dunham-JonesE.WilliamsonJ.2009. Retrofitting Suburbia: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
31.
EkersM.HamelP.KeilR.2012. “Governing Suburbia: Modalities and Mechanisms of Suburban Governance.” Regional Studies46:405–22.
ForesterJ.1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
34.
ForsythA.2013. “Suburbs in Global Context: The Challenges of Continued Growth.” Planning Theory and Practice14:403–06.
35.
ForsythA.2014. “Alternative Forms of the High-technology District: Corridors, Clumps, Cores, Campuses, Subdivisions, and Sites.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32:809–23.
36.
ForsythA.2016. “Investigating Research.” Planning Theory and Practice17:467–71.
FriedmannJ.MillerJ.1965. “The Urban Field.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners31:312–20.
39.
GalsterG.2019. “Why Shrinking Cities Are Not Mirror Images of Growing Cities: A Research Agenda of Six Testable Propositions.” Urban Affairs Review55 (1): 355–72.
40.
GalsterG.HansonR.RatcliffeM. R.WolmanH.ColemanS.FreihageJ.2001. “Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept.” Housing Policy Debate12:681–717.
41.
GansH.1968. People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions. New York: Basic Books.
42.
GarreauJ.1991. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday.
43.
GleesonB.LowN.2000. Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
44.
GottliebR.2007. Reinventing Los Angeles: Nature and Community in the Global City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45.
GottmannJ.1964. Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
GrantJ. L.2013. “Suburbs in Transition.” Planning Theory and Practice14:391–92.
47.
GwilliamM.BourneC.SwainC.PartA.1998. Sustainable Renewal of Suburban Areas. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
48.
HanesJ. E.1993. “From Megalopolis to Megaroporisu.” Journal of Urban History19 (2): 56–94.
49.
HanlonB.ShortJ. R.VicinoT. J.2010. City and Suburbs: New Metropolitan Realities in the US. London, UK: Routledge.
50.
HanlonB.VicinoT., eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Suburbanization. London, UK: Routledge.
51.
HarrisC. D.UllmanE. L.1945. “The Nature of Cities.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science242 (1): 7–17.
52.
HarrisR.2010. “Meaningful Types in a World of Suburbs.” In Suburbanization in Global Society, edited by ClapsonM.HutchinsonR., 15–50. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
53.
HarrisR.LarkhamP.1999. “Suburban Foundation, Form and Function.” In Changing Suburbs: Foundation, Form and Function, edited by HarrisR.LarkhamP., 1–31. London, UK: Spon.
54.
HarrisR.LewisR.1998. “Constructing a Fault(y) Zone: Misrepresentations of American Cities and Suburbs, 1900–1950.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers88:622–39.
55.
HarrisR.VormsC.2017. What’s in a Name? Talking about Urban Peripheries. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
56.
HarrisonJ.HoylerM., eds. 2015. Megaregions: Globalization’s New Urban Form?Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
57.
HarveyD.1985. The Urbanisation of Capital. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
HealeyP.2004. “The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28:45–67.
60.
HoranC.JonasA. E. G.1998. “Governing Massachusetts: Uneven Development and Politics in Metropolitan Boston.” Economic Geography74:83–95.
61.
JonasA. E. G.2006. “Pro Scale: Further Reflections on the ‘Scale Debate’ in Human Geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31:399–406.
62.
JonasA. E. G.PincetlS.2006. “Rescaling Regions in the State: The New Regionalism in California.” Political Geography25:482–505.
63.
KeilR.2014. “Constructing Global Suburbia, One Critical Theory at a Time.” In Doing Global Urban Research, edited by HarrisonJ.HoylerM., 169–81. London, UK: Sage.
64.
KeilR.2017. Suburban Planet: Making the World Urban from the Outside in. Cambridge: Polity.
65.
KeilR.2018a. “The Empty Shell of the Planetary: Re-rooting the Urban in the Experience of the Urbanites.” Urban Geography39:1589–602.
66.
KeilR.2018b. “Extended Urbanization, ‘Disjunct Fragments’ and Global Suburbanisms.” Environment & Planning D36:494–511.
KlingR.OlinS. C.PosterM. (Eds). 1995. Postsuburban California: The Transformation of Orange County Since World War II. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
KnoxP.2009. Metroburbia USA. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
70.
KolbD.2008. Sprawling Places. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
71.
KostofS.1991. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings through History. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
72.
LangR.KnoxP.2009. “The New Metropolis: Rethinking Megalopolis.” Regional Studies43:789–802.
73.
LauermannJ.2018. “Municipal Statecraft: Revisiting the Geographies of the Entrepreneurial City.” Progress in Human Geography42 (2): 205–24.
74.
LefebvreH. (1970) 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
75.
LewisR.1999. “Running Rings around the City: North American Industrial Suburbs, 1850-1950.” In Changing Suburbs, edited by HarrisR.LarkhamP., 146–67. London, UK: Spon.
76.
LiW.1998. “Anatomy of a New Ethnic Settlement: The Chinese Ethnoburb in Los Angeles.” Urban Studies35:479–501.
77.
LindstromB.1998. “Regional Cooperation and Sustainable Growth: Nine Councils of Government in Northeastern Illinois.” Journal of Urban Affairs20:327–42.
78.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH.2007. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
LynchK.1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press.
80.
MadanipourA.2017. Cities in Time: Temporary Urbanism and the Future of the City. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
81.
MartinD. B.2018. “Place-based or Place-positioned: Framing and Making the Spaces of Urban Politics.” In The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics, edited by WardK.JonasA. E. G.MillerB.WilsonD., 26–34. London, UK: Routledge.
82.
MasseyD. B.1984. Spatial Divisions of Labour. London, UK: MacMillan.
83.
MayerM.2000. “Social Movements in European Cities: Transitions from the 1970s to the 1990s.” In Cities in Contemporary Europe, edited by BagnascoA.Le GalesP., 131–52. Cambridge, MA: CUP.
84.
MayerM.2017. “Movements and Politics in the Metropolitan Region.” In Governing Cities through Regions: Canadian and European Perspectives, edited by KeilR.HamelP.BoudreauJ.-A.KipferS., 41–64. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier Press.
85.
McCannE.2011. “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers101 (1): 107–30.
86.
McGeeT. G.1991. “The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia: Expanding a Hypothesis.” In The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, edited by KoppelB.GinsburgN., 3–25. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
87.
McMillenD. P.McDonaldJ. F.1998. “Suburban Subcenters and Employment Density in Metropolitan Chicago.” Journal of Urban Economics43:157–80.
88.
MerrifieldA.2006. Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
89.
MerrifieldA.2013. “The Urban Question under Planetary Urbanization.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37:909–22.
90.
MiaoJ. T.PhelpsN. A.2018. “The Intrapreneurial State: Singapore’s Emergence in the Smart and Sustainable Urban Solutions Field.” Territory, Politics, Governance7 (3): 316–35.
91.
MolotchH.1976. “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place.” American Journal of Sociology82 (2): 309–332.
92.
MouldO.2014. “A Limitless Urban Theory? A Response to Scott and Storper’s ‘The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory’.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39:157–63.
93.
MurrayM.2017. The Urbanism of Exception: The Dynamics of Global City Building in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
94.
NelsonA. C.LangR.2011. Megapolitan America: A New Vision for Understanding America’s Metropolitan Geography. Chicago IL: American Planning Association.
95.
NeumanM.2005. “The Compact City Fallacy.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25:11–26.
96.
NichollsW.2009. “Place, Networks, Space: Theorising the Geographies of Social Movements.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers34:78–93.
97.
NussliR.2017. “Between Farming Village and Hedge Fund Centres: The Politics of Urbanization in the Border Zone of the Metropolitan Region of Zurich.” In Old Europe, New Suburbanization: Governance, Land and Infrastructure in the Suburbanization of Europe, edited by PhelpsN. A., 207–236. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
98.
O’ConnellJ. C.2013. The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development from Railroad Suburbs to Smart Growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
PahlR.1970. Whose City? And Other Essays on Sociology and Planning. London, UK: Longman.
101.
PhelpsN. A.2004. “Clusters, Dispersion and the Spaces In Between: For an Economic Geography of the Banal.” Urban Studies41 (5/6): 971–89.
102.
PhelpsN. A.2010. “Suburbs for Nations: Some Interdisciplinary Connections on the Suburban Economy.” Cities27:68–76.
103.
PhelpsN. A.2012a. An Anatomy of Sprawl: Planning and Politics in Britain. London, UK: Routledge.
104.
PhelpsN. A.2012. “The Growth Machine Stops? Urban Politics and the Making and Remaking of an Edge City.” Urban Affairs Review48 (5): 670–700.
105.
PhelpsN. A.2015. Sequel to Suburbia: Glimpses of America’s Post-suburban Future. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
106.
PhelpsN. A.2017. Interplaces: An Economic Geography of the Inter-urban and International Economy. Oxford, UK: OUP.
107.
PhelpsN. A.VallerD.2018. “Urban Development and the Politics of Dissonance.” Territory, Politics, Governance6 (1): 81–103.
108.
PhelpsN. A.2019. “City Systems Research: From Morphology to Relationality and Positionality.” International Journal of Urban Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2019.1637274.
109.
PhelpsN. A.MiaoJ. T.ZhangX.2020. “Polycentric Urbanization as Enclave Urbanization: A Research Agenda with Illustrations from the Yangtze River Delta Region (YRDR), China.” Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1851750.
110.
PhelpsN. A.OhashiH.2020. “Edge City Denied? The Rise and Fall of Tokyo’s Outer ‘Suburban Business Core Cities’.” Journal of Planning Education and Research40 (4): 379–392.
111.
PhelpsN. A.ParsonsN.BallasD.DowlingA.2006. Post-suburban Europe: Planning and Politics at the Margins of Europe’s Capital Cities. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
112.
PhelpsN. A.SilvaC.2018. “Mind the Gaps! A Research Agenda for Urban Interstices.” Urban Studies55:1203–22.
113.
PhelpsN. A.Tarazona VentoA.RoitmanS.2015. “The Suburban Question: Grass Roots Politics and Place Making in Spanish Suburbs—The Cases of Badalona and Getafe.” Environment & Planning C33:512–32.
114.
PhelpsN. A.Tewdwr-JonesM.. 2008. “If Geography Is Anything, Maybe It’s Planning’s Alter Ego? Reflections on Policy Relevance in Two Disciplines Concerned with Place and Space.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33:566–84.
115.
PhelpsN. A.WoodA. M.2011. “The New Post-suburban Politics?” Urban Studies48:2591–610.
116.
PhelpsN. A.WoodA. M.VallerD. C.2010. “A Post-suburban World? An Outline of a Research Agenda.” Environment & Planning A42:366–83.
117.
PhelpsN. A.WuF., eds. 2011. International Perspectives on Suburbanization: A Post-suburban World?Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
118.
RobinsonJ.2006. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
119.
RobinsonJ.2011. “Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35:1–23.
120.
RodgersS.BarnettC.CochraneA.2014. “Where Is Urban Politics?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38:1551–60.
121.
RoyA.2016. “What Is Urban about Critical Urban Theory?” Urban Geography37:810–23.
122.
RoyA.OngA., eds. 2011. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
123.
SaundersP.1983. Social Theory and the Urban Question. London, UK: Hutchinson.
124.
SchafranA.2014. “Rethinking Mega-regions: Sub-regional Politics in a Fragmented Metropolis.” Regional Studies48:587–602.
125.
ScheerB. C.PetkovM.1998. “Edge City Morphology: A Comparison of Suburban Commercial Centres.” Journal of the American Planning Association64:298–310.
126.
ScottA. J.RoweisS. T.1977. “Urban Planning in Theory and Practice: A Reappraisal.” Environment and Planning A9:1097–119.
127.
ScottA. J.StorperM.2015. “The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39:1–15.
128.
SewellW. H.Jr2008. “The Temporalities of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review6:517–37.
129.
SievertsT.2003. Cities without Cities. London, UK: Routledge.
130.
SievertsT.2011. “The In Between City as an Image of Society: From the Impossible Order to a Possible Disorder in the Urban Landscape.” In In Between Infrastructure: Urban Connectivity in an Age of Vulnerability, edited by YoungD.KeilR.WoodP., 19–27. Kelowna, Canada: Praxis (e)Press.
131.
SmithN.1982. “Gentrification and Uneven Development.” Economic Geography58:139–55.
StoneC. N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
134.
StorperM.ScottA. J.2016. “Current Debates in Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment.” Urban Studies53:1114–36.
135.
SweeneyG.HanlonB.2017. “From Old Suburb to Post-suburb: The Politics of Retrofit in the Inner Suburb of Upper Arlington, Ohio.” Journal of Urban Affairs39:241–59.
136.
TachievaG.2010. Repairing Sprawl. New York: Island Press.
137.
TalenE., ed. 2015. Retrofitting Sprawl: Addressing Seventy Years of Failed Urban Form. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
138.
TaylorP. J.2001. “Urban Hinterworlds: Geographies of Corporate Service Provision under Conditions of Contemporary Globalization.” Geography86:51–60.
139.
ThriftN.OldsK.1996. “Refiguring the Economic in Economic Geography.” Progress in Human Geography20:311–37.
140.
UrryJ.2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
141.
VallerD.PhelpsN. A.RadfordJ.2014. “Soft Space, Hard Bargaining: Planning for High-tech Growth in ‘Science Vale UK’.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32:824–42.
142.
WalkerR.2015. “Building a Better Theory of the Urban: A Response to ‘Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?’.” City19:183–91.
143.
WalksA.2013. “Suburbanism as a Way of Life, Slight Return.” Urban Studies50:1471–88.
144.
WirthL.1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” American Journal of Sociology44 (1): 1–24.
145.
WuF.2015. Planning for Growth. London, UK: Routledge.
146.
YeungH. W.-C.2005. “Rethinking Relational Economic Geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers30:37–51.
147.
YoungD.KeilR.2010. “Reconnecting the Disconnected: The Politics of Infrastructure in the In-between City.” Cities27:87–95.
