Government transparency is generally uncontroversial, intuitively appealing, and held to be a cornerstone of planning practice. This article systematically reviews planning scholars’ treatment of government transparency in the twenty-first century. We find that transparency frequently underpins key theoretical constructs and policy prescriptions, but scholars rarely define or operationalize the term and generally treat it as unproblematic. We then identify how transparency requirements can conflict with the goals of accountability, participation, and inclusion, and we conclude by discussing the implications for assessing the role of transparency in social change.
AndersonMartin. 1964. The Federal Bulldozer: A Critical Analysis of Urban Renewal, 1949–1962. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
ArnsteinSherry R.1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4): 216–24. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
3.
BauhrMonikaGrimesMarcia. 2014. “Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability.” Governance27 (2): 291–320. doi:10.1111/gove.12033.
4.
BeardVictoria A.2002. “Covert Planning for Social Transformation in Indonesia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202200102.
Boxer-MacomberLauri. 2003. “Too Much Sun? Emerging Challenges Presented by California & Federal Open Meeting Legislation to Public Policy Consensus-Building Processes.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 632442. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=632442.
BravermanBurt A.HepplerWesley R.1981. “Practical Review of State Open Records Laws.” George Washington Law Review49 (4): 720–60.
9.
ButlerWilliam Hale. 2013. “Collaboration at Arm’s Length: Navigating Agency Engagement in Landscape-Scale Ecological Restoration Collaboratives.” Journal of Forestry111 (6): 395–403. doi:10.5849/jof.13-027.
10.
CainBruce E.2015. Democracy More or Less: America’s Political Reform Quandary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ColeLuke W.FosterSheila R.2001. From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. New York: New York University Press.
12.
CordisAdriana S.WarrenPatrick L.2014. “Sunshine as Disinfectant: The Effect of State Freedom of Information Act Laws on Public Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics115 (July): 18–36. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.03.010.
13.
CroleySteven P.FunkWilliam F.1997. “The Federal Advisory Committee Act and Good Government.” Yale Journal on Regulation14:451–558.
14.
CummingsScott L.2008. “Mobilization Lawyering: Community Economic Development in the Figueroa Corridor.” Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law17 (1–2): 59–76.
15.
DanielsThomas L.2009. “A Trail Across Time: American Environmental Planning from City Beautiful to Sustainability.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (2): 178–92. doi:10.1080/01944360902748206.
16.
DavidoffPaul. 1965. “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners31 (4): 331–38. doi:10.1080/01944366508978187.
17.
DewarMargaret. 2006. “Selling Tax-Reverted Land: Lessons from Cleveland and Detroit.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (2): 167–80. doi:10.1080/01944360608976737.
EdelmanLauren B.TaleshShauhin A.2011. “To Comply or Not to Comply—That Isn’t the Question: How Organizations Construct the Meaning of Compliance.” In Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation, edited by ParkerChristineNielsenVibeke Lehmann, 103–22. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
20.
EllenIngrid GouldYagerJessicaHansonMelindaBosherLuke. 2016. “Planning for an Uncertain Future: Can Multicriteria Analysis Support Better Decision Making in Climate Planning?” Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (3): 349–62.
21.
EwingReidHajrasoulihaAmirNeckermanKathryn M.Purciel-HillMarnieGreeneWilliam. 2016. “Streetscape Features Related to Pedestrian Activity.” Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (1): 5–15.
22.
FensterMark. 2006. “The Opacity of Transparency.” Iowa Law Review91:885–949.
23.
FensterMark. 2010. “Seeing the State: Transparency as Metaphor.” Administrative Law Review62 (3): 617–72.
24.
FlyvbjergBentSkamris HolmMette K.BuhlSøren L.2005. “How (In)Accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects? The Case of Transportation.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 131–46. doi:10.1080/01944360508976688.
25.
FosterKathryn Ann. 1997. The Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
26.
FoxJonathan A.2007. “The Uncertain Relationship between Transparency and Accountability.” Development in Practice17 (4–5): 663–71. doi:10.1080/09614520701469955.
27.
FoxJonathan A.2015. “Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?” World Development72 (August): 346–61. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011.
28.
FriedlandRogerPivenFrances FoxAlfordRobert R.1977. “Political Conflict, Urban Structure, and the Fiscal Crisis.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1 (1–4): 447–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1977.tb00726.x.
29.
FulliloveMindy Thompson.2016. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do about It. New York: New Village Press.
30.
FungArchon. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review66 (s1): 66–75.
31.
FungArchonO’RourkeDara. 2000. “Reinventing Environmental Regulation from the Grassroots Up: Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory.” Environmental Management25 (2): 115–27. doi:10.1007/s002679910009.
32.
GoldsteinHarveyMaierGunther. 2010. “The Use and Valuation of Journals in Planning Scholarship: Peer Assessment versus Impact Factors.” Journal of Planning Education and Research30 (1): 66–75.
33.
GosnellHannahKellyErin Clover. 2010. “Peace on the River? Social-Ecological Restoration and Large Dam Removal in the Klamath Basin, USA.” Water Alternatives3 (2): 384–98.
34.
GrantJill L.2009. “Experiential Planning: A Practitioner’s Account of Vancouver’s Success.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (3): 358–70. doi:10.1080/01944360902965875.
35.
HanakEllenLundJayDinarArielGrayBrianHowittRichardMountJeffreyMoylePeterThompsonBarton “Buzz”. 2011. Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
36.
HoodChristopher. 2006. “Transparency in Historical Perspective.” In Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Edited by HoodChristopherHealdDavid, 3–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
HouckOliver A.2010. Taking Back Eden: Eight Environmental Cases that Changed the World. Washington, DC: Island Press.
38.
HuiIrisUlibarriNicolaCainBruce E.2018. “Patterns of Participation and Representation in a Regional Water Collaboration.” Policy Studies Journal. Published electronically November4. doi:10.1111/psj.12266.
39.
InnesJudith E.2004. “Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics.” Planning Theory3 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1177/1473095204042315.
40.
InnesJudith E.ConnickSarahBooherDavid. 2007. “Informality as a Planning Strategy.” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (2): 195–210. doi:10.1080/01944360708976153.
41.
JacobsonJoshua. 2016. “The Secretary’s Emails: The Intersection of Transparency, Security, and Technology.” Florida Law Review68:1441–68.
42.
Kassens-NoorEvaLauermannJohn. 2017. “How to Bid Better for the Olympics: A Participatory Mega-Event Planning Strategy for Local Legacies.” Journal of the American Planning Association83 (4): 335–45. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1361857.
43.
KwokaMargaret B.2016. “FOIA, Inc.” Duke Law Journal65:1361–1438.
44.
LavineAmyOderNorman. 2010. “Urban Redevelopment Policy, Judicial Deference to Unaccountable Agencies, and Reality in Brooklyn’s Atlantic Yards Project.” Urban Lawyer42:287–373.
LindstedtCatharinaNaurinDaniel. 2010. “Transparency Is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption.” International Political Science Review31 (3): 301–22. doi:10.1177/0192512110377602.
47.
MarantzNicholas J.2015. “What Do Community Benefits Agreements Deliver? Evidence from Los Angeles.” Journal of the American Planning Association81 (4): 251–67. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1092093.
48.
MeadeEllen E.StasavageDavid. 2008. “Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the US Federal Reserve.” The Economic Journal118 (528): 695–717. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02138.x.
49.
MohaiPaulSahaRobin. 2015. “Which Came First, People or Pollution? Assessing the Disparate Siting and Post-siting Demographic Change Hypotheses of Environmental Injustice.” Environmental Research Letters10 (11): 115008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115008.
50.
MonkkonenPaavo. 2016. “Understanding and Challenging Opposition to Housing Construction in California’s Urban Areas.” UCCS-CCRE Housing Policy White Paper. Sacramento, CA: University of California Center Sacramento.
51.
MooteMargaret A.McClaranMitchel P.1997. “Implications of Participatory Democracy for Public Land Planning.” Journal of Range Management50 (5): 473–81. doi:10.2307/4003701.
OlejarskiAmanda M.FarleyKathryn Webb. 2015. “The Little Blue Pill that Killed the Little Pink House: A Narrative of Eminent Domain.” Administration & Society47 (4): 369–92. doi:10.1177/0095399712473999.
55.
PacewiczJosh. 2016. “The City as a Fiscal Derivative: Financialization, Urban Development, and the Politics of Earmarking.” City & Community15 (3): 264–88. doi:10.1111/cico.12190.
56.
PedriniSerainaBächtigerAndréSteenbergenMarco R.2013. “Deliberative Inclusion of Minorities: Patterns of Reciprocity among Linguistic Groups in Switzerland.” European Political Science Review5 (3): 483–512. doi:10.1017/S1755773912000239.
57.
PozenDavid E.2017. “Freedom of Information Beyond the Freedom of Information Act.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review165:1097–1158.
58.
PozenDavid E.2018. “Transparency’s Ideological Drift.” Yale Law Journal128:100–65.
59.
QuickKathryn S.FeldmanMartha S.2011. “Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (3): 272–90. doi:10.1177/0739456X11410979.
60.
ReisnerMarc. 1993. Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water, Revised Edition. 2nd edition.New York: Penguin Books.
61.
SapotichneJoshuaSmithJames M.2012. “Venue Shopping and the Politics of Urban Development Lessons from Chicago and Seattle.” Urban Affairs Review48 (1): 86–110. doi:10.1177/1078087411420373.
62.
SchafferBoudet, HilaryOrtolanoLeonard. 2010. “A Tale of Two Sitings: Contentious Politics in Liquefied Natural Gas Facility Siting in California.” Journal of Planning Education and Research30 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1177/0739456X10373079.
63.
SchauerFrederick. 2011. “Transparency in Three Dimensions: David C. Baum Memorial Lecture.” University of Illinois Law Review2011:1339–58.
64.
ScholzJohn T.Stiftel.Bruce2005. “The Challenges of Adaptive Governance.” In Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning, edited by ScholzJohn T.StiftelBruce, 1–11. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
65.
SchudsonMichael. 2015. The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency, 1945–1975. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
ShenQing. 2001. “A Spatial Analysis of Job Openings and Access in a U.S. Metropolitan Area.” Journal of the American Planning Association67 (1): 53–68. doi:10.1080/01944360108976355.
67.
SiemiatyckiMatti. 2006. “Implications of Private-Public Partnerships on the Development of Urban Public Transit Infrastructure the Case of Vancouver, Canada.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (2): 137–51. doi:10.1177/0739456X06291390.
68.
SiemiatyckiMatti. 2007. “What’s the Secret?” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (4): 388–403. doi:10.1080/01944360708978520.
69.
SirianniCarmen. 2007. “Neighborhood Planning as Collaborative Democratic Design.” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (4): 373–87. doi:10.1080/01944360708978519.
70.
SteinerJürgBächtigerAndréSpörndliMarkusSteenbergenMarco R.2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SterkStewart E.1992. “Environmental Review in the Land Use Process: New York’s Experience with SEQRA.” Cardozo Law Review13:2041–96.
UlibarriNicola. 2018. “Collaborative Model Development Increases Trust in and Use of Scientific Information in Environmental Decision-Making.” Environmental Science & Policy82 (April): 136–42. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.022.
74.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1926. A Standard State Zoning Enabling Act. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
75.
WalshAnnmarie Hauck. 1978. The Public’s Business: The Politics and Practices of Government Corporations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
76.
WaltonRichard E.McKersieRobert B.1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
77.
WarrenMark E.MansbridgeJane. 2013. “Deliberative Negotiation.” In Negotiating Agreement in Politics, edited by MansbridgeJaneMartinCathie Jo, 86–120. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
78.
WelbornDavid M.LyonsWillamThomasLarry W.1989. “The Federal Government in the Sunshine Act and Agency Decision Making.” Administration & Society20 (4): 465–85. doi:10.1177/009539978902000404.
79.
WilsonWoodrow. 1913. The New Freedom: A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
