Vehicle sharing services (bikeshare, carshare, and e-scooters) offer the potential to improve mobility and accessibility for disadvantaged populations. This article reviews research related to equity and vehicle sharing, focusing on race/ethnicity, income, gender, age, and disability. We find evidence of disparities in use of shared vehicles, which is only partly explained by lack of physical proximity. Some studies reveal additional barriers to use, particularly for bikesharing. More research on barriers is necessary, particularly for carsharing. We identify several programs aimed at reducing barriers, though evidence of their impact is necessary to inform practice.
AldredRachelElliottBridgetWoodcockJameGoodmanAnna. 2017. “Cycling Provision Separated from Motor Traffic: A Systematic Review Exploring Whether Stated Preferences Vary by Gender and Age.” Transport Reviews37 (1): 29–55. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1200156.
2.
Alonso-AlmeidaMaría del Mar. 2019. “Carsharing: Another Gender Issue? Drivers of Carsharing Usage among Women and Relationship to Perceived Value.” Travel Behaviour and Society17:36–45.
3.
ArnellBernard Maxwell. 2019. “Shared Electric Scooters and Transportation Equity: A Multivariate Spatial Regression Analysis of Environmental Factors on Revealed Travel Behavior and Mode Shift Potential.” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
4.
BabagoliMasih A.KaufmanTanya K.NoyesPhilipSheffieldPerry E.2019. “Exploring the Health and Spatial Equity Implications of the New York City Bike Share System.” Journal of Transport & Health13:200–209.
5.
Bachand-MarleauJulieLeeBrian H. Y.El-GeneidyAhmed M.2012. “Better Understanding of Factors Influencing Likelihood of Using Shared Bicycle Systems and Frequency of Use.” Transportation Research Record2314 (1): 66–71.
6.
BaiShunhuaJiaoJunfeng. 2020. “Dockless E-scooter Usage Patterns and Urban Built Environments: A Comparison Study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN.” Travel Behaviour and Society20:264–72.
7.
Baltimore City. 2019. Dockless Vehicle Pilot Program Evaluation Report. Department of Transportation, Baltimore, MD.
8.
BarajasJesus M.2018. “How Equitable Is Bikesharing? Exploring Population Characteristics and Access to Employment.” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
9.
BarbourNataliaMenonNikhilZhangYuManneringFred L.2019. “Shared Automated Vehicles: A Statistical Analysis of Consumer Use Likelihoods and Concerns.” Transport Policy80:86–93.
10.
BarbourNataliaZhangYuManneringFred L.2019. “A Statistical Analysis of Bike Sharing Usage and Its Potential As an Auto-trip Substitute.” Journal of Transport & Health12:253–62.
11.
BeechamRogerJoWood. 2014a. “Characterising Group-cycling Journeys Using Interactive Graphics.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies47 (Part 2): 194–206.
12.
BeechamRogerJoWood. 2014b. “Exploring Gendered Cycling Behaviours Within a Large-scale Behavioural Data-set.” Transportation Planning and Technology37 (1): 83–97.
13.
BernatchezAnnie C.GauvinLiseFullerDanielDubéAnne SophieDrouinLouis. 2015. “Knowing About a Public Bicycle Share Program in Montreal, Canada: Are Diffusion of Innovation and Proximity Enough for Equitable Awareness?” Journal of Transport & Health2 (3): 360–68.
14.
BeyazitEda. 2011. “Evaluating Social Justice in Transport: Lessons to Be Learned from the Capability Approach.” Transport Reviews31 (1): 117–34.
15.
BiehlAlexErmagunAlirezaStathopoulosAmanda. 2018. “Community Mobility MAUP-ing: A Socio-spatial Investigation of Bikeshare Demand in Chicago.” Journal of Transport Geography66:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.008.
16.
BlumenbergEvelynPierceGregorySmartMichael. 2015. “Transportation Access, Residential Location, and Economic Opportunity: Evidence from Two Housing Voucher Experiments.” Cityscape17 (2): 89–112.
17.
BrownBrytanee. 2017. OakMob 101: A Case Study in Expanding Access to Shared Mobility. Oakland, CA: TransForm.
18.
BuckDarrenBuehlerRalphHappPatriciaRawlsBradleyChungPaytonBoreckiNatalie. 2013. “Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, D.C., Region.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2387:112–19.
19.
BuehlerRalphDillJennifer. 2016. “Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling.” Transport Reviews36 (1): 9–27.
20.
BurghardUtaDütschkeElisabeth. 2019. “Who Wants Shared Mobility? Lessons from Early Adopters and Mainstream Drivers on Electric Carsharing in Germany.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment71:96–109.
21.
BurkhardtJon E.Millard-BallAdam. 2006. “Who Is Attracted to Carsharing?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1986:98–105.
22.
CaspiOrNolandRobert B.2019. “Bikesharing in Philadelphia: Do Lower-income Areas Generate Trips?” Travel Behaviour and Society16:143–52.
23.
Castillo-ManzanoJosé I.Castro-NuñoMercedesLópez-ValpuestaLourdes. 2015. “Analyzing the Transition from a Public Bicycle System to Bicycle Ownership: A Complex Relationship.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment38:15–26.
24.
CerveroRobertGolubAaronNeeBrendan. 2007. “City CarShare: Longer-term Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1992:70–80.
25.
ChavisCelesteBarnesPhilipGrassoSusanBhuyanIstiak A.NickkarAmirreza. 2018. Bicycle Justice or Just Bicycles? Analyzing Equity in Baltimore’s Bike Share Program. Charlottesville, VA: Mid-Atlantic Transportation Sustainability Center, Morgan State University.
26.
ChenMengweiWangDianhaiSunYilinLiuChengxiBaiZhen. 2017. “Service Evaluation of Public Bicycle Scheme from a User Perspective: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2634:28–34.
27.
ChenZhiweiGuoYujieStuartAmy L.ZhangYuLiXiaopeng. 2019. “Exploring the Equity Performance of Bike-sharing Systems with Disaggregated Data: A Story of Southern Tampa.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice130:529–45.
City of Santa Monica. 2019. Shared Mobility Pilot Program Summary Report. Santa Monica, CA: City of Santa Monica.
30.
ClarkJulieCurlAngela. 2016. “Bicycle and Car Share Schemes as Inclusive Modes of Travel? A Socio-spatial Analysis in Glasgow.” Social Inclusion4 (3): 83–99.
31.
ClaytonWilliamParkinJohnBillingtonChris. 2017. “Cycling and Disability: A Call for Further Research.” Journal of Transport & Health6:452–62.
32.
ClewlowRegina R.2016. “Carsharing and Sustainable Travel Behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transport Policy51:158–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.013.
33.
ClewlowRegina R.FotiFletcherShepard-OhtaToshi. 2018. Measuring Equitable Access to New Mobility: A Case Study of Shared Bikes and Electric Scooters. San Francisco, CA: Populus Technologies.
34.
CollMarie-HélèneVandersmissenMarie-HélèneThériaultMarius. 2014. “Modeling Spatio-temporal Diffusion of Carsharing Membership in Québec City.” Journal of Transport Geography38:22–37.
35.
CostainCindyArdronCarolynHabibKhandker N.2012. “Synopsis of Users’ Behaviour of a Carsharing Program: A Case Study in Toronto.” Transportation Research Part A—Policy and Practice46 (3): 421–34. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.005.
36.
DaddioDavid William. 2012. “Maximizing Bicycle Sharing: An Empirical Analysis of Capital Bikeshare Usage.” Master thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
37.
DeMaioPaul. 2009. “Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future.” Journal of Public Transportation12 (4): 41–56.
38.
DiasFelipe F.LavieriPatricia S.GarikapatiVenu M.AstrozaSebastianPendyalaRam M.BhatChandra R.2017. “A Behavioral Choice Model of the Use of Car-sharing and Ride-sourcing Services.” Transportation44 (6): 1307–23.
39.
DickersonAnne E.MolnarLisa J.EbyDavid W.AdlerGeriBedardMichelBerg-WegerMarlaClassenSherrilene, et al.2007. “Transportation and Aging: A Research Agenda for Advancing Safe Mobility.” The Gerontologist47 (5): 578–90.
DillJenniferMcNeilNathanHowlandSteven. 2017. Peer-to-peer Carsharing: Short-term Effects on Travel Behavior in Portland, OR. Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center, Portland State University.
42.
DotsonJenniferBlairAdam. 2011. Carsharing in a Small City: Ithaca Carshare’s First Two Years. Ithaca, NY: Carshare.
43.
DuranAna ClaraAnaya-BoigEstherShakeJoshua DanielGarciaLeandro MartinRezendeLeandro Fórniasde SáThiago Hérick. 2018. “Bicycle-sharing System Socio-spatial Inequalities in Brazil.” Journal of Transport & Health8:262–70.
44.
EspinoJoelTroungVien. 2015. Electric Carsharing in Underserved Communities. Oakland, CA: The Greenlining Institute.
45.
FangKevin. 2019. “Do They Block the Way in San Jose? Where Do Riders Park Dockless, Shared Electric Scooters and Their Implications for Sidewalk Users.” Journal of Transport & Health14:100787.
46.
FangKevinAgrawalA. W.HooperAshley M.2019. How and Where Should I Ride This Thing? “Rules of the Road” For Personal Transportation Devices. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose State University.
47.
FerreroFrancescoPerboliGuidoRosanoMariangelaVescoAndrea. 2018. “Car-sharing Services: An Annotated Review.” Sustainable Cities and Society37:501–18.
48.
FirnkornJörgMüllerMartin. 2012. “Selling Mobility Instead of Cars: New Business Strategies of Automakers and the Impact on Private Vehicle Holding.” Business Strategy and the Environment21 (4): 264–80.
49.
FishmanElliot. 2016. “Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature.” Transport Reviews36 (1): 92–113. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036.
50.
FishmanElliot. 2019. Bike Share. New York: Routledge.
51.
FishmanElliotWashingtonSimonHaworthNarelleMazzeiArmando. 2014. “Barriers to Bikesharing: An Analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane.” Journal of Transport Geography41:325–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.005.
52.
FitchDillonMohiuddinHossainHandySusan. 2020. Investigating the Influence of Dockless Electric Bike-share on Travel Behavior, Attitudes, Health, and Equity. UC Office of the President, University of California Institute of Transportation Studies. doi: 10.7922/G2F18X0W. Accessed July 6, 2020. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2x53m37z.
FordWeixingLienJaimie W.MazalovVladimir V.ZhengJie. 2019. “Riding to Wall Street: Determinants of Commute Time Using Citi Bike.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications22 (5): 473–90.
55.
Forth. 2018. “The Future of Car Sharing: Electric, Affordable, and Community-centered.”Portland, OR: Forth.
56.
FullerDanielGauvinLiseKestensYan. 2013. “Individual- and Area-level Disparities in Access to the Road Network, Subway System and a Public Bicycle Share Program on the Island of Montreal, Canada.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine45 (Suppl 1): S95–100.
57.
FullerDanielGauvinLisKestensYanDanielM.FournierMichelMorencyPatrickDrouinLouis. 2011. “Use of a New Public Bicycle Share Program in Montreal, Canada.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine41 (1): 80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.002.
58.
GarrardJanHandySusanDillJennifer. 2012. “Women and Cycling.” In City Cycling, edited by PucherJohnBuehlerRalph, 211–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
GavinKristinBennettArontéAuchinclossAmy H.KatentaAnna. 2016. “A Brief Study Exploring Social Equity within Bicycle Share Programs.” Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research8 (3): 177–80.
60.
GieselFlemmingNobisClaudia. 2016. “The Impact of Carsharing on Car Ownership in German Cities.” Transportation Research Procedia19(2016): 215–224.
61.
GonzálezFelipeMelo-RiquelmeCarlosde GrangeLouis. 2016. “A Combined Destination and Route Choice Model for a Bicycle Sharing System.” Transportation43 (3): 407–23.
62.
GoodmanAnnaCheshireJames. 2014. “Inequalities in the London Bicycle Sharing System Revisited: Impacts of Extending the Scheme to Poorer Areas but Then Doubling Prices.” Journal of Transport Geography41:272–79.
63.
GoodmanAnnaGreenJudithWoodcockJames. 2014. “The Role of Bicycle Sharing Systems in Normalising the Image of Cycling: An Observational Study of London Cyclists.” Journal of Transport & Health1 (1): 5–8.
64.
GoodmanDanWitteAdrianStarkRae-LeighFrackeltonAlexandra. 2019. E-scooter Management in Midsized Cities in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center.
GrengsJoseph. 2010. “Job Accessibility and the Modal Mismatch in Detroit.” Journal of Transport Geography18 (1): 42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.012.
68.
GuoYanyongZhouJibiaoWuYaoLiZhibin. 2017. “Identifying the Factors Affecting Bike-sharing Usage and Degree of Satisfaction in Ningbo, China.” PLoS One12 (9): e0185100.
69.
HananelRavitBerechmanJoseph. 2016. “Justice and Transportation Decision-making: The Capabilities Approach.” Transport Policy49:78–85.
70.
HannigJames. 2016. “Community Disengagement: The Greatest Barrier to Equitable Bike Share.” In Bicycle Justice and Urban Transformation, edited by GolubAaronHoffmanMelody L.LugoAdonia E.SandovalGerardo F., 203–16. London, UK: Routledge.
71.
HansonSusan. 2010. “Gender and Mobility: New Approaches for Informing Sustainability.” Gender, Place & Culture17 (1): 5–23.
72.
HeinenEvaMdKamruzzamanTurrellGavin. 2018. “The Public Bicycle-sharing Scheme in Brisbane, Australia: Evaluating the Influence of Its Introduction on Changes in Time Spent Cycling Amongst a Middle- and Older-age Population.” Journal of Transport & Health10:56–73.
73.
HessAnn-KathrinSchubertIljana. 2019. “Functional Perceptions, Barriers, and Demographics Concerning E-cargo Bike Sharing in Switzerland.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment71:153–68.
74.
HirschJana A.Stratton-RaynerJoshuaWintersMeghanStehlinJohnHosfordKateMooneyStephen J.2019. “Roadmap for Free-floating Bikeshare Research and Practice in North America.” Transport Reviews39 (6): 706–32.
75.
HoeNina. 2015a. Bike Sharing in Low-income Communities: Perceptions and Knowledge—April–October 2015. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Institute for Survey Research.
76.
HoeNina. 2015b. Bike Sharing in Low-income Communities: Results from a Spring 2015 Baseline Survey. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Institute for Survey Research.
77.
HoeNinaKaloustianTalar. 2014. Bike Sharing in Low-income Communities: An Analysis of Focus Groups Findings. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Institute for Survey Research.
78.
HosfordKateLearScott A.FullerDanielTeschkeKayTherrienSuzanneWintersMeghan. 2018. “Who Is in the Near Market for Bicycle Sharing? Identifying Current, Potential, and Unlikely Users of a Public Bicycle Share Program in Vancouver, Canada.” BMC Public Health18:1326.
79.
HosfordKateWintersMeghan. 2018. “Who Are Public Bicycle Share Programs Serving? An Evaluation of the Equity of Spatial Access to Bicycle Share Service Areas in Canadian Cities.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2672 (36): 42–50.
80.
HosfordKateWintersMeghan. 2019. “Quantifying the Bicycle Share Gender Gap.” Transport Findings(November). Accessed January 6, 2020. https://doi.org/10.32866/10802
81.
HowlandStevenMcNeilNathanBroachJosephMacarthurJohnDillJennifer. 2018. “Bike Share and Equity in Low-income Communities of Color: What Opportunities Are There to Include Older Adults?” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
82.
HowlandStevenMcNeilNathanBroachJosephRankinsKennethMacArthurJohnDillJennifer. 2017. “Current Efforts to Make Bikeshare More Equitable: Survey of System Owners and Operators.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2662:160–67.
83.
HyunKateCronleyCourtney. 2019. Assessing Viability of Car-sharing for Low-income Communities. Arlington: University of Texas, Arlington Center for Transportation, Equity Decisions Dollars.
84.
JahanshahiDanialWeeBert vanKharazmiOmid Ali. 2019. “Investigating Factors Affecting Bicycle Sharing System Acceptability in a Developing Country: The Case of Mashhad, Iran.” Case Studies on Transport Policy7 (2): 239–49.
85.
JiYanjieFanYinglingErmagunAlirezaCaoXueningWangWeiDasKirti. 2017. “Public Bicycle as a Feeder Mode to Rail Transit in China: The Role of Gender, Age, Income, Trip Purpose, and Bicycle Theft Experience.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation11 (4): 308–17.
86.
JianSisiRashidiTaha HosseinDixitVinayak. 2017. “An Analysis of Carsharing Vehicle Choice and Utilization Patterns Using Multiple Discrete-continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Models.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice103:362–76.
87.
JiaoJunfengBaiShunhua. 2020. “Understanding the Shared E-scooter Travels in Austin, TX.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information9 (2): 135.
88.
KarkiTej KumarTaoLiu. 2016. “How Accessible and Convenient are the Public Bicycle Sharing Programs in China? Experiences from Suzhou City.” Habitat International53:188–94.
89.
KarnerAlexLondonJonathanRowangouldDanaManaughKevin. 2020. “From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice: Within, Through, and Beyond the State.” Journal of Planning Literature35(4): 440–459. doi: 10.1177/0885412220927691.
90.
KarnerAlexNiemeierDeb. 2013. “Civil Rights Guidance and Equity Analysis Methods for Regional Transportation Plans: A Critical Review of Literature and Practice.” Journal of Transport Geography33:126–34.
91.
KaufmanSarah M.Gordon-KovenLilyLevensonNolanMossMitchell L.2015. Citi Bike: The First Two Years. New York: Rudin Center, New York University.
92.
KavitiShruthiVenigallaMohan M.2019. “Assessing Service and Price Sensitivities, and Pivot Elasticities of Public Bikeshare System Users Through Monadic Design and Ordered Logit Regression.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives1, 100015.
93.
KavitiShruthiVenigallaMohan M.LucasKimberly. 2019a. “Portraying and Differentiating Profiles and Preferences of Casual Users and Registered Members of Capital Bikeshare.” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
94.
KavitiShruthiVenigallaMohan M.LucasKimberly. 2019b. “Travel Behavior and Price Preferences of Bikesharing Members and Casual Users: A Capital Bikeshare Perspective.” Travel Behaviour and Society15:133–45.
95.
Kawgan-KaganInes. 2015. “Early Adopters of Carsharing with and Without BEVs with Respect to Gender Preferences.” European Transport Research Review7 (4): 11.
96.
KentMargaretKarnerAlex. 2019. “Prioritizing Low-stress and Equitable Bicycle Networks Using Neighborhood-based Accessibility Measures.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation13 (2): 100–110.
97.
KimDaejinKoJoonhoParkYujin. 2015. “Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Sharing Program Participants’ Attitudes about Car Ownership and Program Participation.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment36:96–106.
98.
KimDaejinParkYujinKoJoonho. 2019. “Factors Underlying Vehicle Ownership Reduction among Carsharing Users: A Repeated Cross-sectional Analysis.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment76:123–37.
99.
KimDo-GyeongParkJaeyoungWooDong-JoonLeeChungwon. 2017. “Investigating the Characteristics of Carsharing Usage Patterns for Public Rental Housing Complexes: Case Study in South Korea.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2650:92–100.
100.
KimKyeongsu. 2015. “Can Carsharing Meet the Mobility Needs for the Low-income Neighborhoods? Lessons from Carsharing Usage Patterns in New York City.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice77:249–60.
101.
KodranskyMichaelLewensteinGabriel. 2014. Connecting Low-income People to Opportunity with Shared Mobility. New York: Institute for Transportation and Development Policy and Living Cities.
102.
KoppJohannaGerikeRegineAxhausenKay W.2015. “Do Sharing People Behave Differently? An Empirical Evaluation of the Distinctive Mobility Patterns of Free-floating Car-sharing Members.” Transportation42 (3): 449–69.
103.
LaneClayton. 2005. “PhillyCarShare: First-year Social and Mobility Impacts of Carsharing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1927:158–66.
104.
LDA Consulting. 2012. Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Report. Washington, DC: LDA Consulting.
105.
Le VineScottPolakJohn. 2019. “The Impact of Free-floating Carsharing on Car Ownership: Early-stage Findings from London.” Transport Policy75:119–27.
106.
LeeRichard J.SenerIpek N.Nathan JonesS.2017. “Understanding the Role of Equity in Active Transportation Planning in the United States.” Transport Reviews37 (2): 211–26. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1239660
LempertRainerZhaoJiayingDowlatabadiHadi. 2019. “Convenience, Savings, or Lifestyle? Distinct Motivations and Travel Patterns of One-way and Two-way Carsharing Members in Vancouver, Canada.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment71:141–52.
109.
LiShengxiao. 2020. “Living Environment, Mobility, and Wellbeing among Seniors in the United States: A New Interdisciplinary Dialogue.” Journal of Planning Literature35(3): 298–314. doi: 10.1177/0885412220914993.
Loukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2016. “A Gendered View of Mobility and Transport: Next Steps and Future Directions.” Town Planning Review87 (5): 547–65.
112.
LucasKaren. 2012. “Transport and Social Exclusion: Where Are We Now?” Transport Policy20:105–13.
113.
MacArthurJohnMcNeilNathanCummingsAustinBroachJoseph. 2020. “Adaptive Bike Share: Expanding Bike Share to People with Disabilities and Older Adults.” Transportation Research Record2674(8): 556–565. doi: 10.1177/0361198120925079.
114.
MartensKarel. 2016. Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. New York: Routledge.
115.
MartensKarelGolubAaron. 2018. “A Fair Distribution of Accessibility: Interpreting Civil Rights Regulations for Regional Transportation Plans.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18791014
116.
MartensKarelGolubAaronRobinsonGlenn. 2012. “A Justice-theoretic Approach to the Distribution of Transportation Benefits: Implications for Transportation Planning Practice in the United States.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice46 (4): 684–95.
117.
MartinElliot W.ShaheenSusan A.2010. Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose State University.
118.
McNeilNathanDillJenniferMacArthurJohnBroachJoseph. 2017. Breaking Barriers to Bike Share: Insights from Bike Share Users. Portland, OR: Portland State University, National Institute for Transportation Communities.
119.
McNeilNathanDillJenniferMacArthurJohnBroachJosephHowlandSteven. 2017. Breaking Barriers to Bike Share: Insights from Residents of Traditionally Underserved Neighborhoods. Portland, OR: Portland State University, National Institute Transportation Communities.
120.
McNeilNathanMacArthurJohnBroachJosephCummingsAustinStarkRae-LeighSandersRebeccaWitteAdrian. 2019. National Scan of Bike Share Equity Programs: Approaches and Best Practices for Promoting Equity in Bike Share. Portland, OR: Portland State University and Toole Design Group.
121.
Médard de ChardonCyrille. 2019. “The Contradictions of Bike-share Benefits, Purposes and Outcomes.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice121:401–19.
122.
Mobility Lab. 2019. Arlington County Shared Mobility (SMD) Pilot Evaluation Report. Arlington, VR: Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS).
123.
MooneyStephen J.HosfordKateHoweBillYanAnWintersMeghanBassokAlonHirschJana A.2019. “Freedom from the Station: Spatial Equity in Access to Dockless Bike Share.” Journal of Transport Geography74:91–96.
124.
MorencyCatherineHabibKhandker M. NurulGrassetVincentTazul IslamMd. 2012. “Understanding Members’ Carsharing (Activity) Persistency by Using Econometric Model.”Journal of Advanced Transportation46 (1): 26–38.
125.
MurphyEndaUsherJoe. 2015. “The Role of Bicycle-sharing in the City: Analysis of the Irish Experience.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation9 (2): 116–25.
126.
National Association of City Transportation Officials. 2019. Shared Micromobility in the U.S.: 2018. New York: National Association of City Transportation Officials.
127.
NiemeierDebbieQianXiaodong. 2018. High Impact Prioritization of Bikeshare Program Investment to Improve Underserved Communities’ Access to Jobs and Essential Services. Davis: National Center for Sustainable Transportation, University of California, Davis.
128.
OatesGabriela R.HambyBryant W.BaeSejongNorenaMaria C.Olivia HartH.FouadMona N.2017. “Bikeshare Use in Urban Communities: Individual and Neighborhood Factors.” Ethnicity & Disease27 (Suppl 1): 303.
129.
OgilvieFloraGoodmanAnna. 2012. “Inequalities in Usage of a Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme: Socio-demographic Predictors of Uptake and Usage of the London (UK) Cycle Hire Scheme.” Preventive Medicine55 (1): 40–45.
130.
OrrBrianaMacArthurJohnDillJennifer. 2019. “The Portland E-scooter Experience.” TREC Friday Seminar Series. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
131.
ParraDian C.GomezLuis F.PinzonJose D.BrownsonRoss C.MillettChristopher. 2018. “Equity in Cycle Lane Networks: Examination of the Distribution of the Cycle Lane Network by Socioeconomic Index in Bogotá, Colombia.” Cities & Health2 (1): 60–68.
132.
PendallRolfBlumenbergEvelynDawkinsCasey. 2016. What If Cities Combined Car-based Solutions with Transit to Improve Access to Opportunity?Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
133.
PereiraRafaelTim SchwanenH.BanisterDavid. 2017. “Distributive Justice and Equity in Transportation.” Transport Reviews37 (2): 170–91.
134.
PiatkowskiDanielMarshallWesleyAfzalanNader. 2017. “Can Web-based Community Engagement Inform Equitable Planning Outcomes? A Case Study of Bikesharing.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability10 (3): 296–309.
135.
Portland Bureau of Transportation. 2019. 2018 E-scooter Findings Report. Portland, OR: City of Portland.
136.
PrietoMarcBaltasGeorgeStanValentina. 2017. “Car Sharing Adoption Intention in Urban Areas: What Are the Key Sociodemographic Drivers?” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice101:218–27.
137.
PucherJohnBuehlerRalph, eds. 2012. City Cycling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
138.
QianXiaodongJallerMiguel. 2019. “Station-level Analysis for Bikeshare Activity in Disadvantaged Communities.” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
139.
QianXiaodongNiemeierDeb. 2019. “High Impact Prioritization of Bikeshare Program Investment to Improve Disadvantaged Communities’ Access to Jobs and Essential Services.” Journal of Transport Geography76:52–70.
140.
RandallCreighton. 2011. “Buffalo CarShare: Two Years in Review.” Final Report C-08-24, Prepared for NYS Energy Research and Development Authority & NYS Department of Transportation, Albany.
141.
ReillyKathleen H.NoyesPhilipCrossaAldo. 2020. “From Non-cyclists to Frequent Cyclists: Factors Associated with Frequent Bike Share Use in New York City.” Journal of Transport & Health16:100790.
142.
RicciMiriam. 2015. “Bike Sharing: A Review of Evidence on Impacts and Processes of Implementation and Operation.” Research in Transportation Business and Management15:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.03.003.
143.
RiggsWilliamKawashimaMatthew. 2020. “Exploring Best Practice for Municipal E-scooter Policy in the United States.” 99th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
144.
RixeyR. Alexander. 2013. “Station-level Forecasting of Bikesharing Ridership: Station Network Effects in Three U.S. Systems.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2387:46–55.
145.
RosenbloomSandra. 2007. “Transportation Patterns and Problems of People with Disabilities.” In The Future of Disability in America, edited by FieldM. J.JetteA. M., 519–560. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, Committee on Disability in America, National Academies Press.
146.
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. 2019. Powered Scooter Share Mid-pilot Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.
147.
SanchezThomas. 2018. The Right to Transportation: Moving to Equity. New York: Routledge.
148.
SandovalJuan OnesimoCerveroRobertLandisJohn. 2011. “The Transition from Welfare-to-work: How Cars and Human Capital Facilitate Employment for Welfare Recipients.” Applied Geography31 (1): 352–62.
149.
SchonerJessica E.LevinsonDavid M.2014. “The Missing Link: Bicycle Infrastructure Networks and Ridership in 74 US Cities.” Transportation41 (6): 1187–204.
150.
ShaheenSusan A.CorwinBellAdamCohenBalajiYelchuru. 2017. “Travel Behavior: Shared Mobility and Transportation Equity.” Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
151.
ShaheenSusan A.ChristensenMatthew J.de LimaIsabel Viegas. 2015. Bay Area Bike Share Casual Users Survey Report: A Comparative Analysis of Existing and Potential Bikesharing Users. Berkeley: University of California, Transportation Sustainability Research Center.
152.
ShaheenSusan A.CohenAdam P.2013. “Carsharing and Personal Vehicle Services: Worldwide Market Developments and Emerging Trends.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation7 (1): 5–34. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2012.660103.
153.
ShaheenSusan A.CohenAdam P.ChungM. S.2009. “North American Carsharing 10-year Retrospective.” Transportation Research Record2110:35–44. doi: 10.3141/2110-05.
154.
ShaheenSusan A.CohenAdam P.JaffeeMark. 2018. Innovative Mobility: Carsharing Outlook (Spring 2018). Berkeley: Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California.
155.
ShaheenSusan A.GuzmanStaceyZhangHua. 2010. “Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia Past, Present, and Future.” Transportation Research Record2143:159–67. doi: 10.3141/2143-20.
156.
ShaheenSusan A.MartinElliot W.BansalApaar. 2018. Peer-to-peer (P2P) Carsharing: Understanding Early Markets, Social Dynamics, and Behavioral Impacts. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies.
157.
ShaheenSusan A.MartinElliot W.ChanNelson D.CohenAdam P.PogodzinskiMike. 2014. Public Bikesharing in North America during a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends, and User Impacts. San José, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose State University.
158.
ShaheenSusan A.MartinElliot W.CohenAdam P.FinsonRachel S.2012a. Public Bike Sharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding | Research Report. San José, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
159.
ShaheenSusan A.MartinElliot W.CohenAdam P.FinsonRachel S.2012b. Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
Shared-Use Mobility Center. 2019. Electric and Equitable: Learning from the BlueLA Carsharing Pilot. Chicago, IL: Shared-Use Mobility Center.
162.
ShellerMimi. 2018. Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.
163.
SinghYamini J.2019. “Is Smart Mobility Also Gender-smart?” Journal of Gender Studies: 1–15. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2019.1650728.
164.
SiouiLouiselleMorencyCatherineTrepanierMartin. 2013. “How Carsharing Affects the Travel Behavior of Households: A Case Study of Montreal, Canada.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation7 (1): 52–69.
165.
SmithC. ScottJun-SeokOhLeiCheyenne. 2015. Exploring the Equity Dimensions of US Bicycle Sharing Systems. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Livable Communities Transportation Research Center for Livable.
166.
SmithC. ScottSchwietermanJoseph P.2018. E-scooter Scenarios: Evaluating the Potential Mobility Benefits of Shared Dockless Scooters in Chicago. Chicago, IL: Chaddick Institute Policy Series, Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development at DePaul University.
167.
SoltaniAliAllanAndrewAnh NguyenHaBerryStephen. 2019. “Bikesharing Experience in the City of Adelaide: Insight from a Preliminary Study.” Case Studies on Transport Policy7 (2): 250–60.
168.
SpurlockC. AnnaSearsJamesWong-ParodiGabrielleWalkerVictorJinLingTaylorMargaretDuvallAndrewGopalAnandToddAnnika. 2019. “Describing the Users: Understanding Adoption of and Interest in Shared, Electrified, and Automated Transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment71:283–301.
169.
StandingCraigStandingSusanBiermannSharon. 2019. “The Implications of the Sharing Economy for Transport.” Transport Reviews39 (2): 226–42.
170.
SteadThom. 2015. “Sharing Is Caring: An Analysis of Citi Bike’s Discounted Program for NYCHA Residents.” Master thesis, City and Regional Planning, Pratt Institute, New York.
171.
Steer Davies Gleave. 2016. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2015/16. London, UK: Carplus.
172.
Steer Davies Gleave. 2017. Carplus Annual Survey of Car Clubs 2016/17. London, UK: Carplus.
173.
StehlinJohn. 2016. “The Post-industrial ‘Shop Floor’: Emerging Forms of Gentrification in San Francisco’s Innovation Economy.” Antipode48 (2): 474–93.
174.
StewartSarah K.JohnsonDavid C.SmithWilliam P.2013. “Bringing Bike Share to a Low-income Community: Lessons Learned Through Community Engagement, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2011.” Preventing Chronic Disease10:120274. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120274.
175.
SunZiyiWangYacanZhouHuiyuJiaoJingjuanOverstreetRobert E. 2019. “Travel Behaviours, User Characteristics, and Social-economic Impacts of Shared Transportation: A Comprehensive Review.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: 1–28. doi:10.1080/13675567.2019.1663162.
176.
TyndallJustin. 2017. “Where No Cars Go: Free-floating Carshare and Inequality of Access.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation11 (6): 433–42. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2016.1266425.
177.
UrsakiJuliaAultman-HallLisa. 2016. “Quantifying the Equity of Bikeshare Access in U.S. Cities.” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
178.
VogelMarieHamonRonanLozenguezGuillaumeMerchezLucAbryPatriceBarnierJulienBorgnatPierre, et al.2014. “From Bicycle Sharing System Movements to Users: A Typology of Vélo’v Cyclists in Lyon based on Large-scale Behavioural Dataset.” Journal of Transport Geography41:280–91.
179.
WangJueyuLindseyGreg. 2017. “Equity of Bikeway Distribution in Minneapolis, Minnesota.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2605 (1): 18–31.
180.
WangJueyuLindseyGreg. 2019. “Neighborhood Socio-demographic Characteristics and Bike Share Member Patterns of Use.” Journal of Transport Geography79:1–1.
181.
WangKailaiAkarGulsah. 2019. “Gender Gap Generators for Bike Share Ridership: Evidence from Citi Bike System in New York City.” Journal of Transport Geography76:1–9.
182.
WangKailaiAkarGulsahChenYu-Jen. 2018. “Bike Sharing Differences among Millennials, Gen Xers, and Baby Boomers: Lessons Learnt from New York City’s Bike Share.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice116:1–14.
183.
WielinskiGrzegorzTrépanierMartinMorencyCatherine. 2015. “What about Free-floating Carsharing? A Look at the Montreal, Canada, Case.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2536:28–36.
184.
WielinskiGrzegorzTrépanierMartinMorencyCatherine. 2017a. “Carsharing versus Bikesharing: Comparing Mobility Behaviors.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2650:112–22.
185.
WielinskiGrzegorzTrépanierMartinMorencyCatherine. 2017b. “Electric and Hybrid Car Use in a Free-floating Carsharing System.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation11 (3): 161–69.
186.
WintersMeghanHosfordKateJavaheriSana. 2019. “Who Are the ‘Super-users’ of Public Bike Share? An Analysis of Public Bike Share Members in Vancouver, BC.” Preventive Medicine Reports15:100946.
187.
WoodcockJameTainioMarkoCheshireJamesO’BrienOliverGoodmanAnna. 2014. “Health Effects of the London Bicycle Sharing System: Health Impact Modelling Study.” British Medical Journal348:g425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g425.
188.
XinFeifeiChenYifanWangXiaoboChenXiaohong. 2018. “Cyclist Satisfaction Evaluation Model for Free-floating Bike-sharing System: A Case Study of Shanghai.” Transportation Research Record2672 (31): 21–32.
189.
YeJianhongWangDaogeZhangHuaYangHong. 2019. “What Kind of People Use Carsharing for Commuting? Case Study in Shanghai.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2673 (5): 770–78.
190.
YuWenyaChenChenJiaoBoshenZafariZafarMuennigPeter. 2018. “The Cost-effectiveness of Bike Share Expansion to Low-income Communities in New York City.” Journal of Urban Health95 (6): 888–98.
191.
ZhaoJinbaoWangJianDengWei. 2015. “Exploring Bikesharing Travel Time and Trip Chain by Gender and Day of the Week.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies58 (Part B): 251–64.
