The correlation between e-scooter sharing (ESS) and docked bikesharing (DBS) remains ambiguous. This study compared usage patterns between the two modes in Austin, Texas, aiming to unveil their evolving relationship. To account for nonlinear effects, generalized additive mixed models were employed. The findings indicate that both ESS and DBS programs achieved success in densely populated urban areas, areas with younger and higher-income populations, as well as on university campuses. However, a one-sided competitive relationship emerged, with ESS surpassing DBS. For policy implications, local governments should reassess and harmonize their policies to determine the cost-effectiveness of preserving a declining DBS program.
Aguilera-GarcíaÁlvaroGomezJuanSobrinoNatalia. 2020. “Exploring the Adoption of Moped Scooter-Sharing Systems in Spanish Urban Areas.”Cities96:102424.
2.
AlcornLouis G.JiaoJunfeng. 2023. “Bike-Sharing Station Usage and the Surrounding Built Environments in Major Texas Cities.”Journal of Planning Education and Research43:122–35.
3.
AmanJavad J. C.Smith-ColinJanilleZhangWenwen. 2021. “Listen to E-Scooter Riders: Mining Rider Satisfaction Factors from App Store Reviews.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment95:102856.
4.
AnselinLuc. 2013. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Vol. 4. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
BaiShunhuaJiaoJunfeng. 2020. “Dockless E-Scooter Usage Patterns and Urban Built Environments: A Comparison Study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN.”Travel Behaviour and Society20:264–72.
8.
BaiShunhuaJiaoJunfengChenYefuGuoJiani. 2021. “The Relationship between E-Scooter Travels and Daily Leisure Activities in Austin, Texas.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment95:102844.
9.
BlazaninGinaMondalAupalAsmussenKatherine E.BhatChandra R.2022. “E-Scooter Sharing and Bikesharing Systems: An Individual-Level Analysis of Factors Affecting First-Use and Use Frequency.”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies135:103515.
10.
BuehlerRalphBroaddusAndreaSweeneyTedZhangWenwenWhiteElizabethMollenhauerMike. 2021. “Changes in Travel Behavior, Attitudes, and Preferences among e-Scooter Riders and Nonriders: First Look at Results from Pre and Post e-Scooter System Launch Surveys at Virginia Tech.”Transportation Research Record2675 (9): 335–45.
11.
CaoZhejingZhangXiaohuChuaKelmanYuHonghaiZhaoJinhua. 2021. “E-Scooter Sharing to Serve Short-Distance Transit Trips: A Singapore Case.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice147:177–96.
12.
CaspiOrSmartMichael J.NolandRobert B.2020. “Spatial Associations of Dockless Shared e-Scooter Usage.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment86:102396.
13.
ChenPengZhouJiangpingSunFeiyang. 2017. “Built Environment Determinants of Bicycle Volume: A Longitudinal Analysis.”Journal of Transport and Land Use10 (1): 655–74.
14.
ChristoforouZoiBortoliAnne deGioldasisChristosSeidowskyRegine. 2021. “Who Is Using e-Scooters and How? Evidence from Paris.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment92:102708.
de ChardonCyrille MédardCarusoGeoffreyThomasIsabelle. 2017. “Bicycle Sharing System ‘Success’ Determinants.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice100:202–14.
El-AssiWaficMahmoudMohamed SalahHabibKhandker Nurul. 2017. “Effects of Built Environment and Weather on Bike Sharing Demand: A Station Level Analysis of Commercial Bike Sharing in Toronto.”Transportation44 (3): 589–613.
19.
Faghih-ImaniAhmadrezaEluruNaveenEl-GeneidyAhmed M.RabbatMichaelHaqUsama. 2014. “How Land-Use and Urban form Impact Bicycle Flows: Evidence from the Bicycle-Sharing System (BIXI) in Montreal.”Journal of Transport Geography41:306–14.
20.
FewsterRachel M.BucklandStephen T.SiriwardenaGavin M.BaillieStephen R.WilsonJeremy D.2000. “Analysis of Population Trends for Farmland Birds Using Generalized Additive Models.”Ecology81 (7): 1970–84.
GuTianqiKimInhiCurrieGraham. 2019. “To Be or Not to Be Dockless: Empirical Analysis of Dockless Bikeshare Development in China.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice119:122–47.
23.
HosseinzadehAryanAlgomaiahMajeedKlugerRobertLiZhixia. 2021. “Spatial Analysis of Shared e-Scooter Trips.”Journal of Transport Geography92:103016.
24.
HuSonghuaChenMingyangJiangYuanSunWeiXiongChenfeng. 2022. “Examining Factors Associated with Bike-and-Ride (BnR) Activities Around Metro Stations in Large-Scale Dockless Bikesharing Systems.”Journal of Transport Geography98:103271.
25.
HuSonghuaXiongChenfengLiuZhanqinZhangLei. 2021. “Examining Spatiotemporal Changing Patterns of Bike-Sharing Usage during COVID-19 Pandemic.”Journal of Transport Geography91:102997.
26.
HuSonghuaXiongChenfengYangMofengYounesHannahLuoWeiyuZhangLei. 2021. “A Big-Data Driven Approach to Analyzing and Modeling Human Mobility Trend under Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions during COVID-19 Pandemic.”Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies124:102955.
JiaoJunfengBaiShunhua. 2020. “Understanding the Shared e-Scooter Travels in Austin, TX.”ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information9 (2): 135.
29.
JingYiHuSonghuaLinHangfei. 2021. “Joint Analysis of Scooter Sharing and Bikesharing Usage: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.”Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
30.
LazarusJessicaPourquierJean CarpentierFengFrankHammelHenryShaheenSusan. 2020. “Micromobility Evolution and Expansion: Understanding How Docked and Dockless Bikesharing Models Complement and Compete: A Case Study of San Francisco.”Journal of Transport Geography84:102620.
31.
LiuMingminSeederSonyaLiHowell. 2019. “Analysis of E-Scooter Trips and Their Temporal Usage Patterns.”ITE Journal89 (6): 44–49.
32.
LuoHaoZhangZimoGkritzaKonstantinaCaiHua. 2021. “Are Shared Electric Scooters Competing with Buses? A Case Study in Indianapolis.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment97:102877.
33.
McKenzieGrant. 2019. “Spatiotemporal Comparative Analysis of Scooter-Share and Bike-Share Usage Patterns in Washington, DC.”Journal of Transport Geography78:19–28.
34.
MerlinLouis A.YanXiangXuYimingZhaoXilei. 2021. “A Segment-Level Model of Shared, Electric Scooter Origins and Destinations.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment92:102709.
35.
National Association of City Transportation Officials. 2020. “Shared Micromobility in the U.S.: 2019.”National Association of City Transportation Officials. https://nacto.org/shared-micromobility-2018/.
36.
NikiforiadisAndreasPaschalidisEvangelosStamatiadisNikiforosRaptopoulouAlexandraKostareliAthanasiaBasbasSocrates. 2021. “Analysis of Attitudes and Engagement of Shared e-Scooter Users.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment94:102790.
37.
NolandRobert B.SmartMichael J.GuoZiye. 2019. “Bikesharing Trip Patterns in New York City: Associations with Land Use, Subways, and Bicycle Lanes.”International Journal of Sustainable Transportation13 (9): 664–74.
38.
OrvinMuntahith MehadilFatmiMahmudur Rahman. 2021. “Why Individuals Choose Dockless Bike Sharing Services?”Travel Behaviour and Society22:199–206.
39.
PetersLukeMacKenzieDon. 2019. “The Death and Rebirth of Bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for Policy and System Design.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice130:208–26.
40.
ReckDaniel J.AxhausenKay W.2021. “Who Uses Shared Micro-Mobility Services? Empirical Evidence from Zurich, Switzerland.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment94:102803.
ShaheenSusan A.CohenAdam P.BroaderJacquelynDavisRichardBrownLesNeelakantanRadhaGopalakrishnaDeepak. 2020. “Mobility on Demand Planning and Implementation: Current Practices, Innovations, and Emerging Mobility Futures.”U.S. Department of Transportation, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, Washington, DC.
SunFeiyangChenPengJiaoJunfeng. 2018. “Promoting Public Bike-Sharing: A Lesson from the Unsuccessful Pronto System.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment63:533–47.
45.
WangTaoHuSonghuaJiangYuan. 2021. “Predicting Shared-Car Use and Examining Nonlinear Effects Using Gradient Boosting Regression Trees.”International Journal of Sustainable Transportation15:893–907.
46.
WoodSimon N.2004. “Stable and Efficient Multiple Smoothing Parameter Estimation for Generalized Additive Models.”Journal of the American Statistical Association99 (467):673–86.
47.
WoodSimon N.2017. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
48.
YanXiangYangWencuiZhangXiaojianXuYimingBejleriIlirZhaoXilei. 2021. “A Spatiotemporal Analysis of e-Scooters’ Relationships with Transit and Station-Based Bikeshare.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment101:103088.
49.
YangHongtaiHuoJinghaiBaoYongxingLiXuanYangLinchuanCherryChristopher R.2021. “Impact of e-Scooter Sharing on Bike Sharing in Chicago.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice154:23–36.
50.
YounesHannahZouZhenpengWuJiahuiBaiocchiGiovanni. 2020. “Comparing the Temporal Determinants of Dockless Scooter-Share and Station-Based Bike-Share in Washington, DC.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice134:308–20.
51.
ZanobettiAntonellaSchwartzJoelSamoliEviGryparisAlexandrosTouloumiGiotaAtkinsonRichardTertreAlain LeBobrosJanosCelkoMartinGorenAyana. 2002. “The Temporal Pattern of Mortality Responses to Air Pollution: A Multicity Assessment of Mortality Displacement.”Epidemiology13:87–93.
52.
ZhangWenwenBuehlerRalphBroaddusAndreaSweeneyTed. 2021. “What Type of Infrastructures Do e-Scooter Riders Prefer? A Route Choice Model.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment94:102761.
53.
ZhaoJinbaoDengWeiSongYan. 2014. “Ridership and Effectiveness of Bikesharing: The Effects of Urban Features and System Characteristics on Daily Use and Turnover Rate of Public Bikes in China.”Transport Policy35:253–64.
54.
ZhuRuiZhangXiaohuKondorDánielSantiPaoloRattiCarlo. 2020. “Understanding Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Bike-Sharing and Scooter-Sharing Mobility.”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems81:101483.
