This study revealed the inequitable societal impacts of E-scooters on disadvantaged populations. The study conducted a population distribution analysis to compare the use opportunities and space intrusion burdens of E-scooter sharing on four vulnerable population groups in Austin, Texas. Nearly all minority population experienced fewer E-scooter use opportunities. Ten percent of the minority population waited for a disproportionately longer time before a disturbance could be resolved. Ten percent of the low-income population were in a disadvantaged position in high opportunities and moderate burdens. Twenty percent of the physically disabled population faced more moderate-level burdens. The result did not show significant inequitable outcomes for the elderly population.
BaeChang-Hee ChristineSandlinGailBassokAlonKimSungyop. 2007. “The Exposure of Disadvantaged Populations in Freeway Air-Pollution Sheds: A Case Study of the Seattle and Portland Regions.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34 (1): 154–70. doi:10.1068/b32124.
3.
BaiShunhuaJiaoJunfeng. 2020. “From Shared Micro-Mobility to Shared Responsibility: Using Crowdsourcing to Understand Dockless Vehicle Violations in Austin, Texas.” Journal of Urban Affairs. doi:10.1080/07352166.2020.1798244.
4.
BastiaanssenJeroenJohnsonDanielLucasKaren. 2020. “Does Transport Help People to Gain Employment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence.” Transport Reviews40 (5): 607–28. doi:10.1080/01441647.2020.1747569.
5.
BhuyanIstiak A.ChavisCelesteNickkarAmirrezaBarnesPhilip. 2019. “GIS-Based Equity Gap Analysis: Case Study of Baltimore Bike Share Program.” Urban Science3 (2): 42. doi:10.3390/urbansci3020042.
6.
BlumenbergEvelyn. 2017. “Social Equity and Urban Transportation.” In The Geography of Urban Transportation, edited by G. Giuliano and S. Hanson, 4th ed., 332–58. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
BowenWilliam M.WellsMichael V.2002. “The Politics and Reality of Environmental Justice: A History and Considerations for Public Administrators and Policy Makers.” Public Administration Review62 (6): 688–98. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00251.
BrownAnne E.2017. “Car-Less or Car-Free? Socioeconomic and Mobility Differences among Zero-Car Households.” Transport Policy60:152–59. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.016.
10.
CaspiOrSmartMichael J.NolandRobert B.2020. “Spatial Associations of Dockless Shared E-Scooter Usage.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment86:102396. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102396.
11.
CerveroRobertSandovalOnésimoLandisJohn. 2002. “Transportation as a Stimulus of Welfare-to-Work: Private versus Public Mobility.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (1): 50–63. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202200105.
12.
ChavisBenjaminLeeCharles. 1987. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York: United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice.
13.
ChengLongDe VosJonasShiKunboYangMinChenXuewuWitloxFrank. 2019. “Do Residential Location Effects on Travel Behavior Differ between the Elderly and Younger Adults?.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment73:367–80. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.015.
DittaSaraUrbanMichael Crawford, and Canadian Electronic Library (Firm). 2016. Sharing the Road: The Promise and Perils of Shared Mobility in the GTHA. Toronto: Mowat Center, University of Toronto. http://www.deslibris.ca/ID/10065907.
17.
DuthieJenCervenkaKenWallerS. Travis. 2007. “Environmental Justice Analysis: Challenges for Metropolitan Transportation Planning.” Transportation Research Record2013 (1): 8–12. doi:10.3141/2013-02.
18.
FittHelenCurlAngelar. 2020. “The Early Days of Shared Micromobility: A Social Practices Approach.” Journal of Transport Geography86:102779. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102779.
19.
FlemingKelly L.2018. “Social Equity Considerations in the New Age of Transportation: Electric, Automated, and Shared Mobility.” Journal of Science Policy & Governance13 (1): 1–20.
20.
ForestBarnes. 2019. “A Scoot, Skip, and a JUMP Away: Learning from Shared Micromobility Systems in San Francisco.” Capstone Project. UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0515r58q.
21.
GolubAaronRobinsonGlennNeeBrendan. 2013. “Making Accessibility Analyses Accessible: A Tool to Facilitate the Public Review of the Effects of Regional Transportation Plans on Accessibility.” Journal of Transport and Land Use6 (3): 17–28. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v6i3.352.
22.
GösslingStefan. 2020. “Integrating E-Scooters in Urban Transportation: Problems, Policies, and the Prospect of System Change.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment79:102230.
23.
GrengsJoe. 2015. “Nonwork Accessibility as a Social Equity Indicator.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation9 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.719582.
24.
GriffinGreg P.JiaoJunfeng. 2019. “Crowdsourcing Bike Share Station Locations: Evaluating Participation and Placement.” Journal of the American Planning Association85 (1): 35–48. doi:10.1080/01944363.2018.1476174.
25.
HarwoodStacy Anne. 2003. “Environmental Justice on the Streets: Advocacy Planning as a Tool to Contest Environmental Racism.” Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (1): 24–38. doi:10.1177/0739456X03255431.
26.
HaufAustinDoumaFrank. 2019. “Governing Dockless Bike Share: Early Lessons for Nice Ride Minnesota.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2673:419–29. doi:10.1177/0361198119845651.
HoustonDouglasWuJunOngPaulWinerArthur. 2004. “Structural Disparities of Urban Traffic in Southern California: Implications for Vehicle-Related Air Pollution Exposure in Minority and High-Poverty Neighborhoods.” Journal of Urban Affairs26 (5): 565–92. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00215.x.
29.
JamesOwainSwiderskiJ.HicksJohnTeomanDenisBuehlerRalph. 2019. “Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders.” Sustainability11 (20): 5591. doi:10.3390/su11205591.
30.
JerrettMichaelBurnettRichard T.KanaroglouPavlosEylesJohnFinkelsteinNormGiovisChrisBrookJeffrey R.2001. “A GIS–Environmental Justice Analysis of Particulate Air Pollution in Hamilton, Canada.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space33 (6): 955–73. doi:10.1068/a33137.
31.
JiaoJunfeng. 2017. “Identifying Transit Deserts in Major Texas Cities Where the Supplies Missed the Demands.” Journal of Transport and Land Use10 (1): 529–40. doi:10.5198/jtlu.2017.899.
32.
JiaoJunfengBaiShunhua. 2020. “Understanding the Shared E-Scooter Travels in Austin, TX.” International Journal of Geo-Information9 (2): 135–47. doi:10.3390/ijgi9020135.
33.
KarnerAlexNiemeierDeb. 2013. “Civil Rights Guidance and Equity Analysis Methods for Regional Transportation Plans: A Critical Review of Literature and Practice.” Journal of Transport Geography33:126–34. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.017.
34.
KimSungyopUlfarssonGudmundur F.2004. “Travel Mode Choice of the Elderly: Effects of Personal, Household, Neighborhood, and Trip Characteristics.” Transportation Research Record1894 (1): 117–26. doi:10.3141/1894-13.
Loukaitou-SiderisAnastasiaLiggettRobinSungHyun-Gun. 2007. “Death on the Crosswalk: A Study of Pedestrian-Automobile Collisions in Los Angeles.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (3): 338–51. doi:10.1177/0739456X06297008.
38.
McQueenMichaelAbou-ZeidGabriellaMacArthurJohnCliftonKelly. 2021. “Transportation Transformation: Is Micromobility Making a Macro Impact on Sustainability?” Journal of Planning Literature36:46–61. doi:10.1177/0885412220972696.
39.
MilneDaveWatlingDavid. 2019. “Big Data and Understanding Change in the Context of Planning Transport Systems.” Journal of Transport Geography76:235–44. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.004.
40.
MohaiPaulPellowDavidRobertsJ. Timmons. 2009. “Environmental Justice.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources34 (1): 405–30. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348.
41.
MohlRaymond A.2004. “Stop the Road: Freeway Revolts in American Cities.” Journal of Urban History30 (5): 674–706. doi:10.1177/0096144204265180.
42.
MooneyStephen J.HosfordKateHoweBillYanAnWintersMeghanBassokAlonHirschJana A.2019. “Freedom from the Station: Spatial Equity in Access to Dockless Bike Share.” Journal of Transport Geography74:91–96. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009.
43.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Beth Zgoda, Transit Cooperative Research Program, and Transportation Research Board. 2020. Equity Analysis in Regional Transportation Planning Processes, Volume 2: Research. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. doi:10.17226/25886.
NiuHaifengSilvaElisabete A.2020. “Crowdsourced Data Mining for Urban Activity: Review of Data Sources, Applications, and Methods.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development146 (2): 04020007. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000566.
46.
O’BrienDaniel TumminelliSampsonRobert J.WinshipChristopher. 2015. “Ecometrics in the Age of Big Data: Measuring and Assessing ‘Broken Windows’ Using Large-Scale Administrative Records.” Sociological Methodology45 (1): 101–47. doi:10.1177/0081175015576601.
47.
ÖzkazançSeherÖzdemir SönmezFahriye Nihan. 2017. “Spatial Analysis of Social Exclusion from a Transportation Perspective: A Case Study of Ankara Metropolitan Area.” Cities67:74–84. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.013.
48.
RaphaelStevenRiceLorien. 2002. “Car Ownership, Employment, and Earnings.” Journal of Urban Economics52 (1): 109–30. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00017-7.
49.
RowangouldDanaKarnerAlexLondonJonathan. 2016. “Identifying Environmental Justice Communities for Transportation Analysis.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice88:151–62. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.002.
50.
RowangouldGregory M.2013. “A Census of the US Near-Roadway Population: Public Health and Environmental Justice Considerations.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment25:59–67. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.08.003.
51.
SchweitzerLisaValenzuelaAbel. 2004. “Environmental Injustice and Transportation: The Claims and the Evidence.” Journal of Planning Literature18 (4): 383–98. doi:10.1177/0885412204262958.
52.
SehatMojtabaNaieniKourosh HolakouieAsadi-LariMohsenForoushaniAbbas RahimiMalek-AfzaliHossein. 2012. “Socioeconomic Status and Incidence of Traffic Accidents in Metropolitan Tehran: A Population-Based Study.” International Journal of Preventive Medicine3 (3): 181–90.
53.
SextonKenOldenKennethJohnsonBarry L.1993. “‘Environmental Justice’: The Central Role of Research in Establishing a Credible Scientific Foundation for Informed Decision Making.” Toxicology and Industrial Health9 (5): 685–727. doi:10.1177/074823379300900504.
ShaheenSusanChanNelson. 2016. “Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections.” Built Environment42 (4): 573–88. doi:10.2148/benv.42.4.573.
56.
ShaheenSusanCohenAdam. 2019. “Shared Micromobility Policy Toolkit: Docked and Dockless Bike and Scooter Sharing.” Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00k897b5.
57.
TwaddellHannahZgodaBethAimenDavidMorrisAnne. 2019. Environmental Justice Analysis in Transportation Planning and Programming. FHWA-HEP-19-022. Washington, DC: ICF Consulting.
58.
Van HerzeleAnn. 2004. “Local Knowledge in Action: Valuing Nonprofessional Reasoning in the Planning Process.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (2): 197–212. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267723.
59.
YinJuelinQianLixianShenJunjie. 2019. “From Value Co-Creation to Value Co-Destruction? The Case of Dockless Bike Sharing in China.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment71:169–85. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.004.
60.
ZhaoZiliangShawShih-LungXuYangLuFengChenJieYinLing. 2016. “Understanding the Bias of Call Detail Records in Human Mobility Research.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science30 (9): 1738–62. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1137298.
