Proponents of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes claim the lanes reduce vehicle-trips by encouraging more people to carpool, but the evidence is mixed. This article reviews studies on the impacts of HOV lanes with a focus on behavioral models. This research makes a case for performance measures with direct welfare, congestion, or air pollution effects and focuses on papers that explicitly model carpool formation and allow for induced demand. Papers on individual regions find that HOV lanes may increase or decrease welfare, while more general papers find that the impact of HOV lanes depends on underlying parameters. The Clean Air Act assumes that HOV lanes reduce traffic volume and improve air quality and recommends HOV lanes to areas with poor air quality. This research finds there is no consensus on HOV lane impacts and, that using HOV lanes as a travel control measure may be misguided, but that further research is warranted.
ArnottR.De PalmaA.LindseyR.1993a. “Economics of a Bottleneck.”Journal of Urban Economics27:111–30.
2.
ArnottR.De PalmaA.LindseyR.1993b. “A Structural Model of Peak-Period Congestion: A Traffic Bottleneck with Elastic Demand.”American Economic Review83:161–79.
3.
BardE.1997. “Transit and Carpool Commuting and Household Vehicle Trip Making.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1598:25–31. (Paper No. 97657).
4.
Ben-AkivaM.AtheronT. J.1977. “Methodology for Short-range Travel Demand Predictions: Analysis of Carpooling Incentives.”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy11:224–61.
5.
BentoA. M.KaffineD.RothK.ZaragozaM.The Effects of Regulation in the Presence of Multiple Unpriced Externalities: Evidence from the Transportation Sector. In press.
6.
BoriboonsomsinK.BarthM.2008. “Impacts of Freeway High-occupancy Vehicle Lane Configuration on Vehicle Emissions.”Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment13:112–25.
7.
BraidR.1996. “Peak-load Pricing of a Transportation Route with an Unpriced Substitute.”Journal of Urban Economics40:179–97.
8.
BrownstoneD.GolobT.1992. “The Effectiveness of Ridesharing Incentives: Discrete-choice Models of Commuting in Southern California.”Regional Science and Urban Economics22:5–24.
9.
BureauB.GlachantM.2008. “Distributional Effects of Road Pricing: Assessment of Nine Scenarios for Paris.”Transportation Research Part A42:994–1007.
10.
BurrisM. W.HannayR. L.2003. “Equity Analysis of the Houston Quickride Project.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1859:87–92.
11.
BurrisM. W.LipnickyK.2009. “HOV Lanes or General Purpose Lanes?”Public Works Management and Policy14:130–47.
CaseyJ.2000. “HOV Performance Monitoring: Two Reports, Multiple Conclusions.” In 10th International Conference on High-Occupancy Vehicle Systems, pp. 145–168.
14.
CerveroR.2002. “Induced Travel Demand: Research Design, Empirical Evidence, and Normative Policies.”Journal of Planning Literature17:3–20.
15.
ChangM.WiegmannJ.SmithA.BilottoC.2008. A Review of HOV Lane Performance and Policy Options in the United States. Final Report to US DOT FHWA.
16.
DaganzoC. F.CassidyM. J.2008. “Effects of High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Freeway Congestion.”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological42:861–72.
17.
DahlgrenJ.1998. “High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes: Not Always More Effective than General Purpose Lanes.”Transportation Research A32:99–114.
18.
de PalmaA.KilaniM.LindseyR.2008. “The Merits of Separating Cars and Trucks.”Journal of Urban Economics64:340–61.
19.
DurantonG.TurnerM.2011. “The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from U.S. Cities.”American Economic Review101:2616–52.
20.
EliassonJ.MattssonL. G.2006. “Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing: Quantitative Methodology and a Cast Study for Stockholm.”Transportation Research Part A40:602–20.
21.
FergusonE.1997. “The Rise and Fall of the American Carpool: 1970-1990.”Transportation24:349–76.
HuangH. J.YangH.BellM. G.2000. “The Models and Economics of Carpools.”Annals of Regional Science34:55–68.
25.
JohnstonR.CeerlaR.1996. “The Effects of High-occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Travel and Emissions.”Transportation Research A30:35–50.
26.
JouR. C.WentM. C.ChenC. C.2005. “The Evaluation of High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on the Sun Yat-Sen Freeway in Taiwan.”Journal of Advanced Transportation39:169–92.
27.
KesslerJ.SchroeerW.1995. “Meeting Mobility and Air Quality Goals: Strategies that work.”Transportation22(3): 241–272.
28.
KonishiH.MunS.2010. “Carpooling and Congestion Pricing: HOV and HOT Lanes.”Regional Science and Urban Economics40:173–86.
29.
KwonJ.VaraiyaP.2008. “Effectiveness of California’s High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) System.”Transportation Research Part C16:98–115.
30.
LeeL. W.1984. “The Economics of Carpools.”Economic Inquiry22:128–35.
LemanC. K.SchillerP. L.PaulyK.1994. Re-Thinking HOV—High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities and the Public Interest. Report to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/retk.html. Accessed February 26, 2011.
33.
LevineN.WachsM.1998. “Factors Affecting Vehicle Occupancy Measurement.”Transportation Research A32:215–29.
34.
LevinsonD.2010. “Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review.”Transport Reviews30:33–57.
ManneringF.HamedM.1990. “Commuter Welfare Approach to High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Evaluation: An Exploratory Analysis.”Transportation Research A24:371–79.
38.
MartinP.PerrinJ.WuP.LambertP.2004. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes. Report to Utah Department of Transportation.
39.
McFaddenD.Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: ZarembkaP. ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York, NY: Academic Pres; 1974: 105–142.
40.
McNallyM.2005. The Four Step Model. In: HensherDButtonK, eds. Handbook of Transport Modeling, edited by. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
41.
McNallyM.ReckerW.1986. On the Formation of Household Travel/Activity Patterns: A Simulation Approach. Final Report to USDoT, University of California.
42.
NagaR.2007. “A Mathematical Model for Evaluating the Conversion of High Occupancy Vehicle Lane to High Occupancy/Toll Lane.”Unpublished, M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis.
43.
NolandR. B.CowartW. A.FultonL. M.2006. “Travel Demand Policies for Saving Oil during a Supply Emergency.”Energy Policy34:2994–3005.
44.
OrskiC. K.2001. “Carpool Lanes—An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone.”TR News214:24–26.
45.
PB Study Team. 2002. HOV Performance Program. Report to Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., Kaku Associates, Inc., Texas Transportation Institute, Strategic Consulting & Research and HS Public Affairs.
46.
PlotzJ.KonduriK.PendyalaR.2010. “To What Extent Can High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Reduce Vehicle Trips and Congestion?”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2178:170–76.
RamjerdiF.2006. “Equity Measures and Their Performance in Transportation.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1983:67–74.
49.
RasmussenE.2001. Games and Information. Blackwell Publishers.
50.
RodierC.JohnstonR. A.1997. “Travel, Emissions, and Welfare Effects of Travel Demand Management Measures.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1598:18–24.
51.
RouwendalJ.VerhoefE. T.2006. “Basic Economic Principles of Road Pricing: From Theory to Applications.”Transport Policy13:106–14.
52.
SafirovaE.GillinghamK.HarringtonW.NelsonP.2003. “Are HOT Lanes a Hot Deal? The Potential Consequences of Converting HOV to HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia.”Unpublished, Urban Complexities Issue Brief 03-03.
53.
SakanoR.BenjaminJ.Ben-AkivaM.2001. Evaluating Effects of Travel Demand Management in a Medium-Sized Urban Area. Report to the Urban Transportation Institute.
54.
SchoferJ.CzepielE.2000. “Success Factors and Decision Issues for High- Occupancy Vehicle Facilities.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1711:13–22.
SmallK.VerhoefE.2007. The Economics of Urban Transportation. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
SmallK.WinstonC.YanJ.2006. “Differentiated Road Pricing, Express Lanes and Carpools: Exploiting Heterogeneous Preferences in Policy Design.”Unpublished Working Paper 06-06-02, AEI–Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
TealR.1987. “Carpooling: Who, How and Why.”Transportation Research Part A21:203–14.
60.
UlbergC.JacobsonK.1988. “Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of HOV Lanes.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1181:13–24.
61.
VerhoefE.NijkampP.RietveldP.1996. “Second-Best Congestion Pricing: The Case of an Untolled Alternative.”Journal of Urban Economics40:279–302.
62.
VickreyW.1969. “Congestion Theory and Transport Investment.”American Economic Review59:251–60.
63.
WachsM.1991. “Policy Implications of Recent Behavioral Research in Transportation Demand Management.”Journal of Planning Literature5:333–41.
64.
WeinsteinA.SciaraG. C.2006. “Unraveling Equity in HOT Lane Planning: A View from Practice.”Journal of Planning Education and Research26:174–84.
65.
WellanderC.LeottaK.2001. “Gauging the Effectiveness of High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes; Applying Three Criteria to Available Data Reveals Benefits, Viability.”TR News214:12–19.
66.
YangH.1998. “When Should Carpool Lanes be Introduced in a Multi-lane Highway?”Journal of Advanced Transportation32:242–52.
67.
YangH.HuangH. J.1999. “Carpooling and Congestion Pricing in a Multi- lane Highway with High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes.”Transportation Research A33:139–55.
