One of the most common prophylactic techniques to solve prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is incorporation of antibiotics into acrylic bone cement to prevent bacterial colonization and proliferation by providing local antibiotic delivery directly at the implant site. Further, there has been a significant concern over the efficacy of commonly used antibiotics within bone cement due to the rise in multi-drug resistant (MDR) microorganisms. Selenium is an essential trace element that has multiple beneficial effects for human health and its chemotherapeutic action is well known. It was reported that nanostructured selenium enhanced bone cell adhesion and has an increased osteoblast function. In this context, we used the selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) to improve antibacterial and antioxidant properties of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and tri calcium phosphate (TCP)-based bone cements, and to reduce of the infection risk caused by orthopedic implants. As another novelty of this study, we proposed phosphatidylcholine (PC) as a unique and natural stabilizer in the synthesis of selenium nanoparticles. After the structural analysis of the prepared bone cements was performed, in vitro osteointegration and antibacterial efficiency were tested using MC3T-E1 (mouse osteoblastic cell line) and SaOS-2 (human primary osteogenic sarcoma) cell lines, and S. aureus (Gram positive) and E.coli (Gram negative) strains, respectively. More importantly, PC-SeNPs-reinforced bone cements exhibited significant effect against E. coli, compared to S. aureus and a dose-dependent antibacterial activity against both bacterial strains tested. Meanwhile, these bone cements induced the apoptosis of SaOS-2 through increased reactive oxygen species without negatively influencing the viability of the healthy cell line. Furthermore, the obtained confocal images revealed that PC-SeNPs (103.7 ± 0.56 nm) altered the cytoskeletal structure of SaOS-2 owing to SeNPs-induced apoptosis, when MC3T3-E1 cells showed a typical spindle-shaped morphology. Taken together, these results highlighted the potential of PC-SeNPs-doped bone cements as an effective graft material in bone applications.
TsarasGOsmonDRMabryT, et al.
Incidence, secular trends, and outcomes of prosthetic joint infection: a population-based study, olmsted county, Minnesota, 1969-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2012;
33: 1207–1212.
2.
SartelliMTranaC.Infections in trauma patients. In: Di SaverioSTugnoliGCatenaF, et al. (eds) Trauma surgery.
Milano:
Springer, 2014.
MoriartyTFKuehlRCoenyeT, et al.
Orthopaedic device-related infection: current and future interventions for improved prevention and treatment. EFORT Open Rev2016;
1: 89–99.
5.
KolarMUrbanekKLatalT.Antibiotic selective pressure and development of bacterial resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents2001;
17: 357–363.
6.
HarrisLGRichardsRG.Staphylococci and implant surfaces: a review. Inj Int J. Care Inj2006;
37: 3–14.
7.
RaymanMP.The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet2000;
356: 233–241.
8.
ChaudharySUmarAMehtaSK.Selenium nanomaterials: an overview of recent developments in synthesis, properties and potential applications. Prog Mater Sci2016;
83: 270–329.
9.
LiTLiFXiangW, et al.
Selenium-containing amphiphiles reduced and stabilized gold nanoparticles: kill cancer cells via reactive oxygen species. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016;
8: 22106–22112.
10.
SeleniusMRundlofAKOlmE, et al.
Selenium and the selenoprotein thioredoxin reductase in the prevention, treatment and diagnostics of cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal2010;
12: 867–880.
11.
PangKLChinKY.Emerging anticancer potentials of selenium on osteosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci2019;
20: 5318.
12.
Aboul-FadlT.Selenium derivatives as cancer preventive agents. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents2005;
5: 637–652.
13.
TranPAO’Brien-SimpsonNPalmerJA, et al.
Selenium nanoparticles as anti-infective implant coatings for trauma orthopedics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis: in vitro and in vivo assessment. Int J Nanomedicine2019;
14: 4613–4624.
14.
TranPAO’Brien-SimpsonNReynoldsEC, et al.
Low cytotoxic trace element selenium nanoparticles and their differential antimicrobial properties against S. aureus and E. coli. Nanotechnology2016;
27: 045101.
15.
Van OverscheldeOGuisbiersGSnydersR.Green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles by excimer pulsed laser ablation in water. APL Mater2013;
1: 042114.
16.
MeesDRPystoWTarchaPJ.Formation of selenium colloids using sodium ascorbate as the reducing agent.J. Colloid Interface Sci1995;
170: 254–260.
17.
ShakibaieMKhorramizadehMRFaramarziMA, et al.
Biosynthesis and recovery of selenium nanoparticles and the effects on matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression. Biotechnol Appl Biochem2010;
56: 7–15.
18.
ShirsatSKadamANaushadM, et al.
Selenium nanostructures: microbial synthesis and applications. RSC Adv2015;
5: 92799–92811.
19.
TangH-WLauK-CNgK-M.Nanosecond UV laser ablation of gold nanoparticles: Enhancement of ion desorption by thermal-driven desorption, vaporization, or phase explosion. J Phys Chem C2016;
120: 20368–20377.
20.
ShoeibiSMozdziakPGolkar-NarenjiA.Biogenesis of selenium nanoparticles using green chemistry. Top Curr Chem (Cham)2017;
375: 88.
21.
ChandramohanSSundarKMuthukumaranA.Reducing agents influence the shapes of selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) and subsequently their antibacterial and antioxidant activity. Mater Res Express2019;
6: 0850i2.
22.
BarnarbySSarkerNDowdellA, et al.
The spontaneous formation of selenium nanoparticles on gallic acid assemblies and their antioxidant properties. Fordham Undergrad Res J2013;
1: 3.
23.
ZhangCZhaiXZhaoG, et al.
Synthesis, characterization, and controlled release of selenium nanoparticles stabilized by chitosan of different molecular weights. Carbohydr Polym2015;
134: 158–166.
24.
XiaY-Y.Synthesis of selenium nanoparticles in the presence of silk fibroin. Mater Lett2007;
61: 4321–4324.
25.
RamadanMFSelim AskerMM.Antimicrobical and antivirial impact of novel quercetin-enriched lecithin. J Food Biochem2009;
33: 557–571.
26.
RamadanMF.Phenolipids: new generation of antioxidants with higher bioavailability. Austin J Nutr Food Sci2014;
1: 1005.
27.
GrafAAblingerEPetersS, et al.
Microemulsions containing lecithin and sugar-based surfactants: nanoparticle templates for delivery of proteins and peptides. Int J Pharm2008;
350: 351–360.
28.
ZhaiXZhangCZhaoG, et al.
Antioxidant capacities of the selenium nanoparticles stabilized by chitosan. J Nanobiotechnology2017;
15: 4.
29.
BoroumandSSafariMShaabaniE, et al.
Selenium nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and study of their cytotoxicity, antioxidant and antibacterial activity. Mater Res Express2019;
6: 0850d8.
30.
DhanjalSCameotraSS.Aerobic biogenesis of selenium nanospheres by Bacillus cereus isolated from coalmine soil. Microb Cell Fact2010;
9: 52–11.
31.
ASTM. Zeta potential of colloids in water and waste water.
USA:
ASTM Standard D, 1985, pp.4187–4182.
32.
AnsarSMChakrabortySKitchensCL.pH-Responsive mercaptoundecanoic acid functionalized gold nanoparticles and applications in catalysis. Nanomaterials (Basel)2018;
8: 339.
33.
Modrzejewska-SikorskaAKonowałEKlapiszewskiŁ, et al.
Lignosulfonate-stabilized selenium nanoparticles and their deposition on spherical silica. Int J Biol Macromol2017;
103: 403–408.
34.
DevikalaSKamarajPArthanareeswariM.Sensing of acetone vapours using polymer composite. Orient J Chem2016;
32: 2269-2274.
35.
WadhwaniSAGorainMBanerjeeP, et al.
Green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using Acinetobacter sp. SW30: optimization, characterization and its anticancer activity in breast cancer cells. Int J Nanomedicine2017;
12: 6841–6855.
36.
UskokovicVIyerMAWuVM.One ion to rule them all: the combined antibacterial, osteoinductive and anticancer properties of selenite-incorporated hydroxyapatite. J Mater Chem B2017;
5: 1430–1445.
37.
EbrahimiMBotelhoM.Biphasic calcium phosphates (BCP) of hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) as bone substitutes: Importance of physicochemical characterizations in biomaterials studies. Data Brief2017;
10: 93–97.
38.
FresnedaMARMartinJDBolivarJG, et al.
Green synthesis and biotransformation of amorphous Se nanospheres to trigonal 1D Se nanostructures: impact on Se mobility within the concept of radioactive waste disposal. Environ. Sci. Nano2018;
5: 2103–2116.
39.
WashburnNRYamadaKMSimonCGJr, et al.
High throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials2004;
25: 1215–1224.
40.
Hamedi-RadFGhaffariTRezaiiF, et al.
Effect of nanosilver on thermal and mechanical properties of acrylic base complete dentures. J Dent (Tehran, Iran)2014;
11: 495.
41.
ZhangXKangTLiangP, et al.
Biological activity of an injectable biphasic calcium phosphate/PMMA bone cement for induced osteogensis in rabbit model. Macromol Biosci2018;
18: 3.
42.
HamadWAbdullahAMMohamadD.Effect of zinc oxide on flexural and physical properties of PMMA composite. AIP Conference Proceedings2016;
1791: 020014.
43.
LiuQLiJZhouZ, et al.
Hydrophilic mineral coating of membrane substrate for reducing internal concentration polarization (ICP) in forward osmosis. Sci Rep2016;
6: 19593.
44.
PerniSThenaultVAbdoP, et al.
Antimicrobial activity of bone cements embedded with organic nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed2015;
10: 6317–6329.
45.
BilekOFohlerovaZHubalekJ.Enhanced antibacterial and anticancer properties of Se-NPs decorated TiO2 nanotube film. PLoS One2019;
14: e0214066.
46.
LiuWGolshanNHDengX, et al.
Selenium nanoparticles incorporated into titania nanotubes inhibit bacterial growth and macrophage proliferation. Nanoscale2016;
8: 15783–15794.
47.
Rodríguez-ValenciaCFreixeiroPSerraJ, et al.
In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial and osteogenic activity promoted by selenium-doped calcium phosphate coatings. Biomed Mater2017;
12: 015028.
48.
VanajaMAnnaduraiG.Coleus aromaticus leaf extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its bactericidal activity. Appl Nanosci2013;
3: 217–223.
49.
MartinJYSchwartzZHummertTW, et al.
Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res1995;
29: 389–401.
50.
ZitaAHermanssonM.Effects of bacterial cell surface structures and hydrophobicity on attachment to activated sludge flocs. Appl Environ Microbiol1997;
63: 1168–1170.
51.
GottenbosBGrijpmaDWvan der MeiHC, et al.
Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother2001;
48: 7–13.
52.
LiangXLiaoCSoupirML, et al.
Escherichia coli attachment to model particulates: the effects of bacterial cell characteristics and particulate properties. PLoS One2017;
12: e0184664.
WangLLiCHuangQ, et al.
Biofunctionalization of selenium nanoparticle with a polysaccharide from Rosa roxburghii fruit and its protective effect against H2O2-induced apoptosis in INS-1 cells. Food Funct2019;
10: 539–553.
55.
TangSWangTJiangM, et al.
Construction of arabinogalactans/selenium nanoparticles composites for enhancement of the antitumor activity. Int J Biol Macromol2019;
128: 444–451.
56.
YaoX-CWeiY-ZLuoH, et al.
Anti-myeloma properties and mechanism of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and allograft bone in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Med2019;
12: 1276–1281.
57.
ThomasMBMetokiNGeuliO, et al.
Quickly manufactured, drug eluting, calcium phosphate composite coating. Chem Select2017;
2: 753–758.
58.
PiJYangFJinH, et al.
Selenium nanoparticles induced membrane bio-mechanical property changes in MCF-7 cells by disturbing membrane molecules and F-actin. Bioorg Med Chem Lett2013;
23: 6296–6303.
59.
PalmerINelsonJSchattonW, et al.
Biocompatibility of calcium phosphate bone cement with optimized mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater2016;
104: 308–315.
60.
ChenXJDuanFDZhangHH, et al.
Sodium selenite-induced apoptosis mediated by ROS attack in human osteosarcoma U2OS cells. Biol Trace Elem Res2012;
145: 1–9.
61.
LuoHYangYDuanJ, et al.
PTEN-regulated AKT/FoxO3a/Bim signaling contributes to reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in selenite-treated colorectal cancer cells. Cell Death Dis2013;
4: e481.
