In this study, the surfaces of Ti–Ag casting alloys were modified by chemical treatment (acid etching combined with alkaline treatment) to produce hybrid micron and submicron porosities, sponge-like nanostructures and Ag-containing particles. The surface characteristics, ion release, pH values, antibacterial activities and cell responses of the chemically treated Ti–Ag (Ti–Ag(CT)) samples were investigated. The antibacterial activities of the Ti–Ag(CT) samples were assessed using Staphylococcus aureus, and these samples showed strong antibacterial activities that were attributed to Ag ion release and Ag-containing particles. The effects of Ti–Ag(CT) samples on cells were assessed using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts; samples with 1 and 3 wt.% Ag showed higher cell adhesion and higher alkaline phosphatase values than those of commercially available pure Ti samples. These results indicated that Ti–Ag casting alloys with 1 and 3 wt.% Ag modified by chemical treatment prevented bacterial infection and have latent capacities to promote osseointegration.
ChenQThouasGA.Metallic implant biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep2015;
87: 1–57.
2.
VoigtJMosierMDarouicheR.Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotics and antiseptics for preventing infection in people receiving primary total hip and knee prostheses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2015;
59: 6696–6707.
3.
SadoghiPLiebensteinerMAgreiterM, et al.
Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplast2013;
28: 1329–1332.
4.
ArciolaCRCampocciaDSpezialeP, et al.
Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections: a review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials2012;
33: 5967–5982.
5.
ApostuDLucaciuOBerceC, et al.
Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review. J Int Med Res2017;
46: 2104–2119.
6.
ChernousovaSEppleM.Silver as antibacterial agent: ion, nanoparticle, and metal. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl2013;
52: 1636–1653.
7.
QinHCaoHZhaoY, et al.
Antimicrobial and osteogenic properties of silver-ion-implanted stainless steel. ACS Appl Mater Interf2015;
7: 10785–10794.
8.
DuranNDuranMde JesusMB, et al.
Silver nanoparticles: a new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomedicine2016;
12: 789–799.
9.
FerrarisSSprianoS.Antibacterial titanium surfaces for medical implants. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016;
61: 965–978.
10.
WafaHGrimerRJReddyK, et al.
Retrospective evaluation of the incidence of early periprosthetic infection with silver-treated endoprostheses in high-risk patients. Bone Joint J2015;
97B: 252–257.
11.
NakajoKTakahashiMKikuchiM, et al.
Inhibitory effect of Ti-Ag alloy on artificial biofilm formation. Dent Mater J2014;
33: 389–393.
12.
ChenMYangLZhangL, et al.
Effect of nano/micro-Ag compound particles on the bio-corrosion, antibacterial properties and cell biocompatibility of Ti-Ag alloys. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017;
75: 906–917.
13.
ChenMZhangEZhangL.Microstructure, mechanical properties, bio-corrosion properties and antibacterial properties of Ti-Ag sintered alloys. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016;
62: 350–360.
14.
CochranDLJacksonJMBernardJP, et al.
A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2011;
26: 1324–1332.
15.
KangM-KMoonS-KKwonJ-S, et al.
Antibacterial effect of sand blasted, large-grit, acid-etched treated Ti–Ag alloys. Mater Res Bull2012;
47: 2952–2955.
16.
GittensRAMcLachlanTOlivares-NavarreteR, et al.
The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials2011;
32: 3395–3403.
17.
LiYWangWLiuH, et al.
Formation and in vitro/in vivo performance of “cortex-like” micro/nano-structured TiO2 coatings on titanium by micro-arc oxidation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2018;
87: 90–103.
18.
ZhaoGRainesALWielandM, et al.
Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials2007;
28: 2821–2829.
19.
ZhaoGZingerOSchwartzZ, et al.
Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure. Clin Oral Implant Res2006;
17: 258–264.
20.
ZhaoCZhuXLiangK, et al.
Osteoinduction of porous titanium: a comparative study between acid-alkali and chemical-thermal treatments. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater2010;
95: 387–396.
21.
OliveiraDPPalmieriACarinciF, et al.
Gene expression of human osteoblasts cells on chemically treated surfaces of Ti-6Al-4V-ELI. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2015;
51: 248–255.
22.
LeiZZhangHZhangE, et al.
Antibacterial activities and biocompatibilities of Ti-Ag alloys prepared by spark plasma sintering and acid etching. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2018;
92: 121–131.
23.
10993-12. ISO Biological evaluation of medical devices: sample preparation and reference materials, 2012.
24.
2801 JIS Z. Antimicrobial products-Test for antimicrobial activity and efficacy, 2000.
25.
10993-5 ISO. Biological evaluation of medical devices: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity, 2009.
26.
LinXZhouLLiS, et al.
Behavior of acid etching on titanium: topography, hydrophility and hydrogen concentration. Biomed Mater2014;
9: 015002–012013.
27.
2399 SN/T. Evaluation method for antimicrobial metallic materials, 2010.
28.
ChengHXiongWFangZ, et al.
Strontium (Sr) and silver (Ag) loaded nanotubular structures with combined osteoinductive and antimicrobial activities. Acta Biomater2016;
31: 388–400.
29.
OliveiraDPPalmieriACarinciF, et al.
Osteoblasts behavior on chemically treated commercially pure titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A2014;
102: 1816–1822.
30.
MendoncaGMendoncaDBAragaoFJ, et al.
Advancing dental implant surface technology – from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials2008;
29: 3822–3835.
31.
ZhangELiuC.Effect of surface treatments on the surface morphology, corrosion property, and antibacterial property of Ti-10Cu sintered alloy. Biomed Mater2015;
10: 045009.
32.
ZhangXWuHGengZ, et al.
Microstructure and cytotoxicity evaluation of duplex-treated silver-containing antibacterial TiO2 coatings. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2014;
45: 402–410.
33.
HuangYZhangXZhangH, et al.
Fabrication of silver- and strontium-doped hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotube bilayer coatings for enhancing bactericidal effect and osteoinductivity. Ceram Int2017;
43: 992–1007.
34.
OvingtonLG.The truth about silver. Ostomy Wound Manage2004;
50(9A Suppl): 1S–10S.
35.
GreulichCBraunDPeetschA, et al.
The toxic effect of silver ions and silver nanoparticles towards bacteria and human cells occurs in the same concentration range. RSC Adv2012;
2: 6981–6987.
36.
LiJWangGWangD, et al.
Alkali-treated titanium selectively regulating biological behaviors of bacteria, cancer cells and mesenchymal stem cells. J Colloid Interf Sci2014;
436: 160–170.
37.
MedveovAValkU.Staphylococcus aureus: characterisation and quantitative growth description in milk and artisanal raw milk cheese production. Struct Funct Food Eng. Epub ahead of print 22 August 2012. DOI: 10.5772/48175.
38.
KatsikogianniMMissirlisYF.Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cell Mater2004;
8: 37–57.
39.
ScheuermanTRCamperAKHamiltonMA.Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion. J Colloid Interface Sci1998;
208: 23–33.
40.
AgarwalRGarciaAJ.Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2015;
94: 53–62.
41.
AnselmeK.Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials (Review). Biomaterials2000;
21: 667–681.
42.
BacakovaLFilovaEParizekM, et al.
Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol Adv2011;
29: 739–767.
43.
TwedenKSCameronJDRazzoukAJ, et al.
Biocompatibility of silver-modified polyester for antimicrobial protection of prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis1997;
6: 553–561.
44.
HardesJStreitburgerAAhrensH, et al. The influence of elementary silver versus titanium on osteoblasts behaviour in vitro using human osteosarcoma cell lines. Sarcoma2007; Article ID 26539.
45.
ZhaoLLiuLWuZ, et al.
Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials2012;
33: 2629–2641.
46.
LopezMBassiMAConfaloneL, et al.
Titanium disk surfaces modulate dental implants osseointegration. Eur J Inflamm2012;
10: 43–47.
47.
AlbrektssonTJohanssonC.Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J2001;
10: S96–S101.
