Six antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, isolated from chronic diabetic foot infections, were chosen for studying the influence of different chitosan-based materials: chitosan solution and chitosan submicroparticles in both planktonic and 24 h-old biofilm-forming models. Chitosan solution occurred to be more effective in the reduction of bacterial populations than chitosan submicroparticles for both planktonic and biofilm-related Pseudomonas cells. It seems that the antimicrobial activity of the tested chitosan preparations depends on the individual bacterial strain susceptibility probably related to differences in the phenotypes and natural antioxidant abilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.
SimoesMSimoesLCVieiraMJ. A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT-Food Sci Technol2010; 43: 573–583.
6.
KumarMNVRMuzzarelliRAAMuzzarelliC. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev2004; 104: 6017–6084.
7.
DashMChielliniFOttenbriteRM. Chitosan – a versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci2011; 36: 981–1014.
8.
KrajewskaBWydroPJańczykA. Probing the modes of antibacterial activity of chitosan. Effects of pH and molecular weight on chitosan interactions with membrane lipids in Langmuir films. Biomacromolecules2011; 12: 4144–4152.
9.
KrajewskaB. Application of chitin- and chitosan-based materials for enzyme immobilization: a review. Enzyme Microb Technol2004; 35: 126–139.
10.
KongMChenXGXingK. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int J Food Microbiol2010; 144: 51–63.
11.
GoyRCde BrittoDAssaOBG. A review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polimeros: Cienc Tecnol2009; 19: 241–247.
12.
RabeaEBadawyMETStevensCV. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules2003; 4: 1457–1465.
13.
RaafatDSalHG. Chitosan and its antimicrobial potential – a critical literature survey. Microb Biotechnol2009; 2: 186–201.
14.
HelanderIMNurmiaho-LassilaELAhvenainenR. Chitosan disrupts the barrier properties of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol2001; 71: 235–244.
15.
ChungYCSuYPChenCC. Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristics of cell wall. Acta Pharmacol Sin2004; 25: 932–936.
16.
FriedmanMJunejaVK. Review of antimicrobial and antioxidative activities of chitosans in food. J Food Prot2010; 73: 1737–1761.
17.
MartinezLRMihuMRHanG. The use of chitosan to damage cryptococcus neoformans biofilms. Biomaterials2010; 31: 669–679.
18.
TaoYQianLHXieJ. Effect of chitosan on membrane permeability and cell morphology of Pseudomonas areuginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Carbohydr Polym2011; 86: 969–974.
19.
KimKWMinBJKimJT. Antimicrobial activity against foodborne pathogens of chitosan biopolymer films of different molecular weights. LWT-Food Sci Technol2011; 44: 565–569.
20.
OrgazBLobeteMMPugaCH. Effectiveness of chitosan against mature biofilm formed by food related bacteria. Int J Mol Sci2011; 12: 817–828.
21.
MartinezLRMihuMRTarM. Demonstration of antibiofilm and antifungal efficacy of chitosan against candidal biofilms, using an in vivo central venous chatheter model. JID2010; 201: 1436–1440.
22.
ZhangAMuHZhangW. Chitosan coupling makes microbial biofilms susceptible to antibiotics. Sci Rep2013; 3: 3364–3370.
23.
Chavez de PazLEResinAHowardKA. Antimicrobial effect of chitosan nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol2011; 7: 3892–3895.
24.
KandimallaKKBordenEOmtriRS. Ability of chitosan gels to dirupt bacterial biofilms and their applications in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. J Pharm Sci2013; 102: 2096–2101.
25.
TanHPengZLiQ. The use of quaternised chitosan-loaded PMMA to inhibit biofilm formation and downregulate the virulence-associated gene expression of antibiotic-resistant staphylococcus. Biomaterials2012; 33: 365–377.
26.
CalvoPRemunan-LopezCVila-JatoJL. Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J Appl Polym Sci1997; 63: 125–132.
27.
MarcinkiewiczJStrusMWalczewskaM. Influence of taurine haloamines (TauCl and TauBr) on the development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm: a preliminary study. Adv Exp Med Biol2013; 775: 269–283.
28.
RegielAIrustaSKyziołA. Preparation and characterization of chitosan-silver nanocomposite films and their antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Nanotechnology2013; 24: 015101–015101.
29.
JonassenHKjøniksenALHiorthM. Stability of chitosan nanoparticles cross-Linked with tripolyphosphate. Biomacromolecules2012; 13: 3747−3756–3747−3756.
30.
FernandesJTraviataFKFonsecaSC. In vitro screening for antimicrobial activity of chitosans and chitooligosaccharides, aiming at potential uses in functional textiles. J Microbiol Biotechnol2010; 20: 311–318.
31.
YounesISellimiSRinaudoM. Influence of acetylation degree and molecular weight of homogeneous chitosans on antibacterial and antifungal activities. Int J Food Microbiol2014; 185: 57–63.
LiangTWChenYYPanPS. Purification of chitinase/chitosanase from Bacillus cereus and discovery of an enzyme inhibitor. Int J Biol Macromol2014; 63: 8–14.
34.
RaafatDvon BargenKHaasA. Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound. Appl Environ Microbiol2008; 74: 3764–3773.
35.
SaxenaMJ. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RM-3 as a potential biocontrol agent. Mycopathologia2010; 170: 181–193.
36.
WangSLChiouSHChangWT. Production of chitinase from shellfish waste by Pseudomonas aeruginosa K-187. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B1997; 21: 71–78.
37.
Chan KG, Yin WF and Lim YL. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain YL84, a quorum-sensing strain isolated from compost. Genome Announc 2014; 2.
38.
MahmoudHAMelakeNAEl-SemaryT. Bactericidal activity of various antibiotics verus tetracycline-loaded chitosan microspheres against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Pharmaceut Anal Acta2012; 15: 1–9.
