A recently commercialised hydroxyapatite electrochemically assisted chemical deposition technique (BoneMaster) has been shown to induce increased bone apposition; whether this response is caused by the surface topography or chemistry is unknown. An in-vitro examination using human osteoblast-like cells was performed on a series of BoneMaster-coated surfaces. The chemistry was separated from the topography using a thin gold coating; Thermanox coverslips were used as a control. BoneMaster surfaces showed significantly greater alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin production compared with controls; however, no difference was found between the gold-coated and uncoated BoneMaster samples, indicating topography is the main contributing factor.
FurlongROsbornJ. Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatingsJ Bone Joint Surg [Br]1991; 73: 741–745.
2.
GoldringSClarkCWrightT. The problem in total joint arthroplasty: aseptic looseningJ Bone Joint Surg [Am]1993; 75: 799–799.
3.
CollierJPSurprenantVAMayorMB. Loss of hydroxyapatite coating on retrieved, total hip componentsJ Arthoplasty1993; 8: 389–393.
4.
MorscherEHeftiAAebiU. Severe osteolysis after third-body wear due to hydroxyapatite particles from acetabular cup coatingJ Bone Joint Surg [Br]1998; 80: 267–272.
5.
TsuiYDoyleCClyneT. Plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium substrates Part 1: Mechanical properties and residual stress levelsBiomaterials1998; 19: 2015–2030.
6.
YangYCChangE. Influence of residual stress on bonding strength and fracture of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings on Ti–6Al–4V substrateBiomaterials2001; 22: 1827–1836.
7.
ASTM C-633-01. Standard test method for adhesion or cohesion strength of thermal spray coatings. Pennsylvania: ASTM International, 2008.
8.
ZymanZWengJLiuX. Amorphous phase and morphological structure of hydroxyapatite plasma coatingsBiomaterials1993; 14: 225–228.
9.
RoesslerSSewingAStölzelM. Electrochemically assisted deposition of thin calcium phosphate coatings at near physiological pH and temperatureJ Biomed Mat Res A2003; 64: 655–663.
10.
SchliephakeHScharnweberDDardM. Biological performance of biomimetic calcium phosphate coating of titanium implants in the dog mandibleJ Biomed Mat Res A2003; 64: 225–234.
11.
CooperLFMasudaTWhitsonSW. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfacesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implant1999; 14: 37–37.
12.
LincksJBoyanBBlanchardC. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and compositionBiomaterials1998; 19: 2219–2219.
13.
KieswetterKSchwartzZHummertT. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cellsJ Biomed Mat Res A1996; 32: 55–63.
14.
BoyanBDSylviaVLLiuY. Surface roughness mediates its effects on osteoblasts via protein kinase A and phospholipase A2Biomaterials1999; 20: 2305–2310.
15.
BuserDSchenkRSteinemannS. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigsJ Biomed Mat Res A2004; 25: 889–902.
16.
DalbyMJMcCloyDRobertsonM. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depthsBiomaterials2006; 27: 1306–1315.
17.
LamersEFrank WalboomersXDomanskiM. The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix depositionBiomaterials2010; 31: 3307–3316.
18.
SvanborgLMAnderssonMWennerbergA. Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer levelJ Biomed Mat Res B2010; 92B: 462–469.
19.
ÖstmanP-OWennerbergAAlbrektssonT. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite™ PREVAIL® implants: A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic studyClin Implant Dent Relat Res2010; 12: 39–47.
20.
Tambasco de OliveiraPNanciA. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cellsBiomaterials2004; 25: 403–413.
21.
MaenoSNikiYMatsumotoH. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D cultureBiomaterials2005; 26: 4847–4855.
22.
Bøe BG, Röhrl SM, Heier T, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on titanium stems. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 13–19.
