Guided bone regeneration is a promising surgical procedure for reconstructing bone defects. In this study, three chitosan/polycation composite membranes for guided bone regeneration are produced by blending chitosan with poly-L-lysine, polyethyleneimine, and poly-L-ornithine. For all composite membranes, the surface characteristics including surface topography, chemistry, and wettability are examined by atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and contact angle assay. Their cytocompatibility is also evaluated with MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells at cell, protein, and gene levels through cell biology assays, western blot, and RT-PCR analysis. On chitosan/poly-L-lysine composite membrane, MC3T3-E1 cells present well-developed cytoskeletal organization and significantly higher adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation than those on chitosan and the other two composite membranes. Furthermore, MC3T3-E1 cells on chitosan/poly-L-lysine membrane exhibit increased phosphorylation levels of focal adhesion kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, and achieve an enhanced mRNA expression of fibronectin, Runx 2, RhoA, integrin α5, and integrin β1. From our results, we conclude that chitosan/ poly-L-lysine composite membrane possesses improved cytocompatibility with osteoblasts when compared to chitosan and holds potential for guided bone regeneration in the near future.
Guarino, V., Causa, F. and Ambrosio, L. ( 2007). Bioactive Scaffolds for Bone and Ligament Tissue, ExpertRev. Med. Devices, 4(3): 405-418.
2.
Sandberg, E. , Dahlin, C. and Linde, A. (1993). Bone Regeneration by the Osteopromotion Technique Using Bioabsorbable Membranes: An Experimental Study in Rats, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 51(10): 1106-1114.
3.
Chong, W.L., Chu, S.A., Dam, J.G. and Ong, K.S. ( 1999). Oral Rehabilitation Using Dental Implants and Guided Bone Regeneration, Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore, 28(5): 697-703.
4.
Khor, E. and Lim, L.Y. ( 2003). Implantable Applications of Chitin and Chitosan, Biomaterials, 24(13): 2339-2349.
5.
Muzzarelli, R.A., Mattioli-Belmonte , M., Tietz, C., Biagini, R., Ferioli, G., Brunelli, M.A., Fini, M., Giardino, R., Ilari, P. and Biagini, G. (1994). Stimulatory Effect on Bone Formation Exerted by a Modified Chitosan, Biomaterials, 15(13): 1075-1081.
6.
Malafaya, P.P. , Pedro, A.J., Peterbauer, A., Gabriel, C., Redl, H. and Reis, R.L. (2005). Chitosan Particles Agglomerated Scaffolds for Cartilage and Osteochondral Tissue Engineering Approaches with Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cells, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 16(12): 1077-1085.
7.
Teng, S.H., Lee, E.J., Yoon, B.H., Shin, D.S., Kim, H.E. and Oh, J.S. ( 2008). Chitosan/Nanohydroxyapatite Composite Membranes Via Dynamic Filtration for Guided Bone Regeneration, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. [Epub ahead of print].
8.
Morra, M. and Cassinelli, C. ( 2006). Biomaterials Surface Characterization and Modification , Int. J. Artif. Organs, 29(9): 824-833.
9.
Mingyu, C., Kai, G., Jiamou, L., Yandao, G., Nanming, Z. and Xiufang, Z. ( 2004). Surface Modification and Characterization of Chitosan Film Blended with Poly-L-lysine, J. Biomater. Appl., 19(1): 59-75.
10.
Hahn, S.K. and Hoffman, A.S. ( 2005). Preparation and Characterization of Biocompatible Polyelectrolyte Complex Multilayer of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly-L-lysine, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 37(5): 227-231.
11.
Webb, D.J., Donais, K., Whitmore, L.A., Thomas, S.M., Turner, C.E., Parsons, J.T. and Horwitz, A.F. ( 2004). FAK-Src Signalling through Paxillin, ERK and MLCK Regulates Adhesion Disassembly, Nat. Cell Biol., 6(2): 154-161.
12.
Abrams, G.A., Goodman, S.L., Nealey, P.F., Franco, M. and Murphy, C.J. ( 2000). Nanoscale Topography of the Basement Membrane Underlying the Corneal Epithelium of the Rhesus Macaque, Cell Tissue Res., 299(1): 39-46.
13.
Lai, C.F. , Chaudhary, L., Fausto, A., Halstead, L.R., Ory, D.S., Avioli, L.V. and Cheng, S.L. (2001). Erk is Essential for Growth, Differentiation, Integrin Expression, and Cell Function in Human Osteoblastic Cells, J. Biol. Chem., 276(17): 14443-14450.
14.
Mitra, S.K., Hanson, D.A. and Schlaepfer, D.D. ( 2005). Focal Adhesion Kinase: In Command and Control of Cell Motility, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 6(1): 56-68.
15.
Pratap, J., Lian, J.B., Javed, A., Barnes, G.L., van Wijnen, A.J., Stein, J.L. and Stein, G.S. ( 2006). Regulatory Roles of Runx2 in Metastatic Tumor and Cancer Cell Interactions with Bone, Cancer Metastasis Rev., 25(4): 589-600.
16.
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M. and Burridge, K. (1996). Rho-stimulated Contractility Drives the Formation of Stress Fibers and Focal Adhesions, J. Cell Biol., 133(6): 1403-1415.
17.
Moursi, A.M. , Globus, R.K. and Damsky, C.H. (1997). Interactions Between Integrin Receptors and Fibronectin are Required for Calvarial Osteoblast Differentiation in vitro. J. Cell Sci., 110(Pt 18): 2187-2196.
18.
Ogawa, K., Yui, T. and Okuyama, K. ( 2004). Three D Structures of Chitosan, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 34(1-2): 1-8.
19.
He, Y., Zhu, B. and Inoue, Y. ( 2004). Hydrogen Bonds in Polymer Blends, Prog. Polym. Sci., 29(10): 1021-1051.
20.
Ikada, Y. ( 1994). Surface Modification of Polymers for Medical Applications , Biomaterials, 15(10): 725-736.
21.
Wilson, C.J. , Clegg, R.E., Leavesley, D.I. and Pearcy, M.J. (2005). Mediation of Biomaterial-Cell Interactions by Adsorbed Proteins: A Review, Tissue Eng., 11(1): 1-18.
22.
Griffith, L.G. and Naughton, G. (2002). Tissue Engineering-Current Challenges and Expanding Opportunities, Science, 295(5557): 1009-1014.
23.
Wang, Y.X., Robertson, T.J., Spillman Jr, W.B. and Claus, R.O. ( 2004). Effects of the Chemical Structure and the Surface Properties of Polymeric Biomaterials on their Biocompatibility, Pharm. Res., 21(8): 1362-1373.
24.
Dalton, B.A. , McFarland, C.D., Gengenbach, T.R., Griesser, H.J. and Steele, J.G. (1998). Polymer Surface Chemistry and Bone Cell Migration, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 9(8): 781-799.
25.
Takebe, J., Itoh, S., Okada, J. and Ishibashi, K. ( 2000). Anodic Oxidation and Hydrothermal Treatment of Titanium Results in a Surface that Causes Increased Attachment and Altered Cytoskeletal Morphology of Rat Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in vitro, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 51(3): 398-407.
26.
Liao, H., Andersson, A.S., Sutherland, D., Petronis, S., Kasemo, B. and Thomsen, P. ( 2003). Response of Rat Osteoblast-like Cells to Microstructured Model Surfaces In Vitro, Biomaterials, 24(4): 649-654.
27.
Fischer, D., Li, Y., Ahlemeyer, B., Krieglstein, J. and Kissel, T. ( 2003). In Vitro Cytotoxicity Testing of Polycations: Influence of Polymer Structure on Cell Viability and Hemolysis, Biomaterials , 24(7): 1121-1131.
28.
Stevens, M.M. and George, J.H. (2005). Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface, Science, 310(5751): 1135-1138.
29.
Curtis, A. and Wilkinson, C. ( 1999). New Depths in Cell Behaviour: Reactions of Cells to Nanotopography, Biochem. Soc. Symp., 65: 15-26.
30.
Barnes, C.P., Sell, S.A., Boland, E.D., Simpson, D.G. and Bowlin, G.L.Nanofiber Technology: Designing the Next Generation of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 59(14): 1413-1433.
