Computed Tomography in Acute Severe Central Nervous System Complications in Children Treated for Cancer: Still a Useful Diagnostic Tool in the Emergency Setting
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2021
Computed Tomography in Acute Severe Central Nervous System Complications in Children Treated for Cancer: Still a Useful Diagnostic Tool in the Emergency Setting
We retrospectively checked patients who underwent chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from 2007 to 2016, in order to evaluate whether early computed tomography is useful in children treated for cancer with acute central nervous system complications. Out of a total sample of 443 patients, 52 children (11.7%) presented these complications. In the end, 31 patients were included, with a total of 33 events of central nervous system complications. The computed tomography was abnormal in 22 events (67%) and diagnostic for a specific complication in 20 events (61%), whereas it directly influenced the treatment in 16 events (48%). Computed tomography should be still considered a relevant diagnostic tool in the management of acute central nervous system complications in the emergency setting.
VagaceJMde la MayaMDCaceres-MarzalC, et al.Central nervous system chemotoxicity during treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;84(2):274–286.
2.
WeaverLSamkariA. Neurological complications of childhood cancer. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017;24(1):60–69.
3.
IguchiAKobayashiRYoshidaM, et al.Neurological complications after stem cell transplantation in childhood. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;24(6):647–652.
4.
NeilECHanmantgadSKhakooY, et al.Neurological complications of pediatric cancer. J Child Neurol. 2016;31(12):1412–1420.
5.
CordelliDMMasettiRBernardiB, et al.Status epilepticus as a main manifestation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58(5):785–790.
6.
CordelliDMMasettiRRicciE, et al.Life-threatening complications of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18(5):632–640.
7.
LimYJKimHJLeeYJ, et al.Clinical features of encephalopathy in children with cancer requiring cranial magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Neurol. 2011;44(6):433–438.
8.
BanerjeeJSHeymanMPalomakiM, et al.Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: risk factors and impact on the outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with Nordic protocols. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(1):e13–e18.
9.
BaytanBEvimMSGülerS, et al.Acute central nervous system complications in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;53(4):312–318.
10.
CordelliDMMasettiRZamaD, et al.Central nervous system complications in children receiving chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:105.
11.
ParasoleRPetruzzielloFMennaG, et al.Central nervous system complications during treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a single pediatric institution. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51:1063–1071.
12.
ZamaDGasperiniPBergerM, et al;Supportive Therapy Working Group of Italian Pediatric Haematology and Oncology Association (AIEOP). A survey on hematology-oncology pediatric AIEOP centres: The challenge of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2018;100(1):75–82.
13.
MasettiRCordelliDMZamaD, et al.PRES in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):890–901.
14.
BartynskiWS, BoardmanJF. Distinct imaging patterns and lesion distribution in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1320–1327.
15.
LamyCOppenheimCMéderJF, et al.Neuroimaging in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neuroimaging. 2004;14(2):89–96.
16.
FugateJERabinsteinAA. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations, pathophysiology and outstanding questions. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:914–925.
17.
KhanRBSadighiZSZabrowskiJ, et al.Imaging patterns and outcome of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome during childhood cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:523–526.
18.
DandoyCELinscottLLDaviesSM, et al.Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(11):2028–2032.
19.
NelsonTR. Practical strategies to reduce paediatric CT radiation dose. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(3):292–299.
