Deep brain stimulation is an elective surgical intervention that improves the function and quality of life in children with dystonia and other movement disorders. Both basal ganglia and thalamic nuclei have been found to be relevant targets for treatment of dystonia in children, including the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, in which stimulation can control dystonic spasms. Electrophysiological confirmation of correct electrode location within the ventralis intermediate nucleus is thus important for the success of the surgical outcome. The present work shows the evoked potentials response during contralateral median-nerve stimulation at the wrist at low frequency (9 Hz) provides physiological evidence of the electrode’s localization within the thalamus. We show the correlation between evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in 14 children undergoing implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes for secondary dystonia. High fidelity and reproducibility of our results provides a new approach to ensure the electrode localization in the thalamic subnuclei.
SangerTDDelgadoMRGaebler-SpiraDHallettMMinkJW; Task Force on Childhood Motor Disorders Classification and definition of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. Pediatrics2003;111(1):e89–e97.
2.
SangerTD. Deep brain stimulation for cerebral palsy: where are we now?Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;62(1):28–33.
3.
AlbaneseABhatiaKBressmanSB, et al.Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord. 2013;28(7):863–873.
4.
SangerTDKukkeSN. Abnormalities of tactile sensory function in children with dystonic and diplegic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22(3):289–293.
5.
SangerTDTarsyDPascual-LeoneA. Abnormalities of spatial and temporal sensory discrimination in writer’s cramp. Mov Disord. 2001;16(1):94–99.
6.
LinSWuYLiH, et al.Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus versus the subthalamic nucleus in isolated dystonia. J Neurosurg. 2019;1(aop):1–12.
7.
SangerTDRobisonAArguellesEFermanDLikerMark. Case report: targeting for deep brain stimulation surgery using chronic recording and stimulation in an inpatient neuromodulation monitoring unit, with implantation of electrodes in GPi and VIM in a 7-year-old child with progressive generalized dystonia. J Child Neurol. 2018;33(12):776–783.
8.
GhikaJVillemureJGMiklossyJ, et al.Postanoxic generalized dystonia improved by bilateral Voa thalamic deep brain stimulation. Neurology. 2002;58(2):311–313.
9.
SimonSLDouglasPBaltuchGHJaggiJL. Error analysis of MRI and Leksell stereotactic frame target localization in deep brain stimulation surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2005;83(1):1–5.
10.
DeistungASchäferASchweserFBiedermannUTurnerRReichenbachJR. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. Neuroimage. 2013;65:299–314.
11.
LemaireJJ, et al.Anatomy of the human thalamus based on spontaneous contrast and microscopic voxels in high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Oper Neurosurg. 2010;66(3 suppl):161–172.
12.
SchaltenbrandG. Atlas for Stereotaxy of the Human Brain. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme.
13.
FukushimaTMayanagiYBouchardG. Thalamic evoked potentials to somatosensory stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976;40(5):481–490.
14.
TsujiSShibasakiHKatoMKuroiwaYShimaF. Subcortical, thalamic and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;59(6):465–476.
15.
HanajimaRChenRAshbyP, et al.Very fast oscillations evoked by median nerve stimulation in the human thalamus and subthalamic nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(6):3171–3182.
16.
HanajimaRDostrovskyJOLozanoAM, et al.Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the thalamus and subthalamic nucleus (STN). Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(2):424–434.
17.
KlostermannFGobbeleRBuchnerHCurioG. Dissociation of human thalamic and cortical SEP gating as revealed by intrathalamic recordings under muscle relaxation. Brain Res. 2002;958(1):146–151.
18.
ShimaFMoriokaTTobimatsuSKavaklisOKatoMFukuiM. Localization of stereotactic targets by microrecording of thalamic somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurosurgery. 1991;28(2):223–230.
19.
EwertSHornAFinkelFLiNKühnAAHerringtonTM. Optimization and comparative evaluation of nonlinear deformation algorithms for atlas-based segmentation of DBS target nuclei. NeuroImage. 2019;184:586–598.
20.
HornALiNDembekTA, et al.Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging. NeuroImage. 2019;184:293–316.
21.
SangerTLikerMAeguellesE, et al.Pediatric deep brain stimulation using awake recording and stimulation for target selection in an inpatient neuromodulation monitoring unit. Brain Sci. 2018;8(7):135.
22.
FristonKAshburnerJFrithCD, et al.Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapping. 1995;3(3):165–189.
23.
MallatSG. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern1989;11(7):674–693.
24.
JohnstoneIMSilvermanBW. Needles and straw in haystacks: empirical Bayes estimates of possibly sparse sequences. Ann Stat. 2004;32(4):1594–1649.
25.
GalvanADevergnasAWichmannT. Alterations in neuronal activity in basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits in the parkinsonian state. Front Neuroanat. 2015;9:5.
26.
BeckerJThiesTPetry-SchmelzerJN, et al.The effects of thalamic and posterior subthalamic deep brain stimulation on speech in patients with essential tremor—a prospective, randomized, doubleblind crossover study. Brain Language. 2020;202:104724.
27.
FigeeMLuigjesJSmoldersR, et al.Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(4):386.
28.
MaybergHSLozanoAMVoonV, et al.Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron. 2005;45(5):651–660.
29.
KrackPDostrovskyJIlinskyI, et al.Surgery of the motor thalamus: problems with the present nomenclatures. Mov Disord. 2002;17(suppl 3):S2–S8.
30.
EliasWJZhengZADomerPQuiggMPouratianN. Validation of connectivity-based thalamic segmentation with direct electrophysiologic recordings from human sensory thalamus. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2025–2034.
31.
American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol. 8(2):200–202.
32.
BoorRGoebelBDoeppMTaylorMJ. Somatosensory evoked potentials after posterior tibial nerve stimulation—normative data in children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1998;2(3):145–152.
33.
GilmoreRLBassNHWrightEAGreathouseDStanbackKNorvellE. Developmental assessment of spinal cord and cortical evoked potentials after tibial nerve stimulation: effects of age and stature on normative data during childhood. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;62(4):241–251.
34.
PesentiAPrioriALocatelliM, et al.Subthalamic somatosensory evoked potentials in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2003;18(11):1341–1345.
35.
MiuraTSonooMShimizuT. Establishment of standard values for the latency, interval and amplitude parameters of tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(7):1367–1378.
