Nous analysons la structure des interactions informationnelles dans les groupes de discussion sur Internet. L'observation de réseaux sans échelle de variance infinie, validée ici empiriquement pour la première fois, confirme un potentiel de contagion interpersonnelle par l'information important, quoique imprévisible. Les fondements économétriques des méthodes de prévision classiques sembleraient donc mis en question.
BarabasiA.L.AlbertR.JeongH. (2000), Scale free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the worldwide web, Physica A, 281, 2115, 69–77.
5.
BassF.M. (1969), A new product growth model for consumer durables, Management Science, 15, 215–227.
6.
MiledBen H.Le LouarnP. (1994), Analyse comparative de deux échelles de mesure du leadership d'opinion: Validité et interprétation, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 9, 4, 23–51.
BorgsC.ChayesJ.T.MahdianM.SaberiA. (2004), Exploring the community structure of newsgroups, papier présenté à la 10e Conférence internationale “Knowledge, diversity and data mining”, Seattle, Washington.
9.
BrodinO. (2000), Les communautés virtuelles: Un potentiel marketing encore peu exploité, Décisions Marketing, 21, 46–56.
10.
BucklinR.LattinJ.M.AnsariA.GuptaS.BellD.CoupeyE.LittleJ.D.MelaC.MontgormeryA.SteckelJ. (2002), Choice and the Internet: From clickstream to research stream, Marketing Letters, 13, 3, 245–258.
11.
BurtR.S. (1987), Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion vs. structural equivalence, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 6, 1287–1335.
12.
BurtR.S. (1999), The social capital of opinion leaders, The Annals, 566, 37–54.
13.
ColemanJ.S.KatzE.MenzelH. (1966), Medical innovation; a diffusion study, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill Co.
14.
DavidP.A. (1985), Clio and the economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, 75, 323–337.
15.
DellarocasC.N. (2006), Strategic manipulation of internet opinion forums: implications for consumers and firms, papier de recherche, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
16.
DyeR. (2000), The buzz on buzz, Harvard Business Review, 78, 6, 139.
FisherE.BristorJ.GainerB. (1996), Creating or escaping community? An exploratory study of internet consumers' behaviour, in CorfmanK. P.LynchJ. (coord.), Advances in Consumer Research, 23, Provo, UT, Association for Consumer Research, 178–182.
19.
FreemanL. (1979), Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
20.
FrenzenJ.K.NakamotoK. (1993), Structure, cooperation and the flow of market information, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 3, 360–75.
21.
GalegherJ.SproullL.KieslerS. (1998), Legitimacy, authority and community in electronic support groups, Written Communication, 15, 4, 493–530.
22.
GatignonH.RobertsonT.S. (1991), Innovative decision processes, in RobertsonT. S.KassarjianH. H. (coord.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 316–348.
23.
GensollenM. (coord.) (2004), Biens informationnels et communautés médiatées, Revue d'Économie Politique, numéro hors-série « Marchés en ligne et communautés d'agents », mars, Paris, Dalloz, 9–40.
24.
GodesD.MayzlinD. (2004), Se servir de conversations en ligne pour étudier le bouche-à-oreille, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 19, 44, 89–111.
25.
GodinS. (2001), Les secrets du marketing viral, Paris, Maxima.
26.
GoldenbergJ.LibaiB.MullerE. (2001), Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth, Marketing Letters, 12, 3, 211–223.
27.
GranitzN.A.WardJ.C. (1996), Virtual community: A socia-cognitive approach, in CorfmanK. P.LynchJ. (coord.), Advances in Consumer Research, 23, Provo, Utah, Association for Consumer Research, 161–166.
28.
GranovandterM. (1973), The strengh of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6, 1360–1380.
Johnson-BrownJ.ReingenP.H. (1987), Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behaviour, Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 3, 350–362.
32.
KrugerA. (1997), Traitement de l'information et décision de choix d'un film: influence des caractéristiques individuelles et de la communication inter-personnelle, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon.
33.
LazarsfeldP.F.BerelsonB.R.GaudandH. (1948), The people choice, 2e édition, DC, Columbia University Press.
34.
LazegaE. (1998), Réseaux sociaux et structures relationnelles, Paris, PUF.
RichinsM.L. (1983), Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study, Journal of Marketing, 47, 1, 68–78.
37.
RobertsonT.S.MyersJ.H. (1969), Personality correlates of opinion leadership and innovative buying behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 2, 164–168.
38.
RogersE.M. (2003), Diffusion of innovations, 5e édition, New York, Free Press.
39.
SchellingT.S. (1978), Micromotives and macrobehaviour, New York, WW Norton and Co.
40.
SteyerA. (2005), Géométrie de l'interaction sociale: Le modèle de diffusion en avalanches spatiales, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 20, 3, 3–20.
41.
SteyerA.Garcia-BardidiaR.QuesterP. (2006), Online discussion groups as social networks: An empirical investigation of word-of mouth on the Internet, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 2, http://www.jiad.org/vol6/no2/steyer/index.htm.
42.
ValenteT. (1995), Network models of the diffusion of innovations, Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press.
43.
Van den BulteC.LilienG.L. (2001), Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort, American Journal of Sociology, 106, 5, 1409–1435.
44.
VernandteE. (2004), Targeting women's clothing fashion opinion leaders in media planning: An application for magazines, Journal of Advertising Research, 44, 1, 90–107.
45.
VernandteE.FlorèsL. (2004), Communiquer avec les leaders d'opinion en marketing: Comment et dans quels médias?, Décisions Marketing, 35, 23–37.
46.
WellmanB.GuliaM. (1999), Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone, in KollockP.SmithM. (coord.), Communities in cyberspace, New York, Routledge, 167–195.
47.
WhyteW.H.Jr. (1954), The web of word of mouth, Fortune, 50.
