La critique de presse constitue un acteur incontournable du champ cinématographique (Debenedetti, 2006): son influence s'exerce tant au niveau de l'offre (stratégies de distribution et de communication) que de la demande (processus de décision du consommateur) de films. Quels sont les enseignements de la recherche quant à son influence réelle sur le succès des films? Cet article propose une synthèse de la littérature consacrée à l'influence de la critique de presse sur les comportements de consommation cinématographique. Trois parties structurent cet état de l'art. La première concerne la définition de la critique et les antécédents individuels de sa consultation; la deuxième partie traite de l'impact de la consultation des critiques sur les choix et les ventes; la troisième, enfin, souligne les limites des travaux antérieurs et indique de nombreuses voies de recherche futures.
AshenfelterO.JonesG. (2000), The demand for expert opinion: Bordeaux wine, Les Cahiers de l'Observatoire des Conjonctures Vinicoles Européennes, 3, 1–17.
2.
AstousA.CarùA.KollO.SiguéS.P. (2005), Moviegoers' consultation of film reviews in the search for information: A multi-country study, International Journal of Arts Management, 7, 3, 32–45.
3.
AstousA.ColbertF. (2002), Moviegoers' consultation of critical reviews: Psychological antecedents and consequences, International Journal of Arts Management, 5, 1, 24–35.
4.
AstousA.TouilN. (1999), Consumer evaluations of movies on the basis of critics' judgments, Psychology and Marketing, 16, 8, 677–694.
5.
AustinB.A.GordonT.F. (1987), Movie genres: Toward a conceptualized model and standardized definitions, Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics and the Law, éd. AustinB., 4, 12–33.
6.
BasuroyS.ChatterjeeS.RavidS.A. (2003), How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets, Journal of Marketing, 67, 4, 103–117.
7.
BeckerG.S.StiglerG.J. (1977), De gustibus non est dispandum, American Economic Review, 67, 2, 76–90.
8.
BelkR.W. (1987), La consommation symbolique d'art et de culture, Économie et culture: les outils de l'économiste à l'épreuve, 4, Paris, La Documentation Française, 137–146.
9.
BenghoziP.J.ParisT. (à paraître), The economic and business models of prescription in the internet, Internet economics, éds. BrousseauE.CurienN., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BretonP.ProulxS. (1993), L'explosion de la communication, Paris, La Découverte.
12.
CameronS. (1995), On the role of critics in the culture industry, Journal of Cultural Economics, 19, 4, 321–331.
13.
ChangW.H. (1975), A typology study of movie critics, Journalism Quarterly, 52, 4, 721–725.
14.
ChangB.H.KiE.J. (2005), Devising a practical model for predicting theatrical movie success: Focusing on the experience good property, Journal of Media Economics, 18, 4, 247–269.
15.
ChossatV.GergaudO. (2003), Expert opinion and gastronomy: The recipe for success, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 2, 127–141.
16.
CNC (1989), Les habitués du cinéma, Paris, La Documentation Française.
17.
CNC (1992), La fréquentation occasionnelle du cinéma, Paris, La Documentation Française.
18.
CoulangeonP. (2005), Sociologie des pratiques culturelles, Paris, La Découverte.
19.
Cooper-MartinE. (1992), Consumers and movies: Information sources for experiential products, Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 756–761.
20.
CretonL. (2000), Critique et promotion dans l'univers cinématographique: Distinctions, conjonctions et dysphories, Entrelacs, mars (hors-série « Marketing du cinéma »), éd. LARA, Université de Toulouse le Mirail, 27–37.
21.
DebenedettiS. (2006), The role of media critics in the cultural industries, International Journal of Arts Management, 8, 3, 30–42.
22.
DebenedettiS.LarceneuxF. (2000), Typologie de la critique cinématographique et impact de la critique sur les entrées en salle, Entrelacs, mars (hors-série « Marketing du cinéma »), éd. LARA, Université de Toulouse le Mirail, 38–52.
23.
DeephouseD.L. (2000), Media reputation as strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories, Journal of Management, 26, 6, 1091–1112.
24.
DesaiK.K.BasuroyS. (2005), Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power, and critic's reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures, Psychology and Marketing, 22, 3, 203–223.
25.
EliashbergJ.ShuganS.M. (1997), Film critics: Influencers or predictors?, Journal of Marketing, 61, 2, 68–78.
26.
EvrardY.AurierP. (1999), La valeur de l'art, une approche relationnelle, Actes de la 4e Journée de recherche en marketing de Bourgogne: marketing des activités culturelles, des loisirs, du tourisme et du sport, éds. FilserM.BourgeonD., Dijon, IAE, 4–17.
27.
FarberS. (1976), The power of movie critic, American Scholar, 45, 3, 419–423.
28.
FestingerL. (1954), A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations, 7, 2, 117–140.
29.
HarrisR.J. (2004), A cognitive psychology of mass communication, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
30.
HatchuelA. (1995), Les marchés à prescripteurs. Crises de l'échange et genèse sociale, L'inscription sociale du marché, éds. JacobA.VérinA. H., Paris, L'Harmattan, 205–225.
31.
Hennig-ThurauT.HoustonM.B.WalshG.J. (2003), Determinants of motion picture box office and profitability: an interrelationship approach, papier de recherche no 4, septembre, Chair for Marketing and Media Research, Bauhaus-University of Weimar.
32.
HirschP.M. (1972), Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems, The American Journal of Sociology, 77, 4, 639–659.
33.
HirschP.M. (1975), Organization effectiveness and the institutional environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 3, 327–345.
34.
HirschmanE.C.PierosA.Jr. (1985), Relationship among indicators of success in Broadway plays and motion pictures, Journal of Cultural Economics, 9, 2, 35–63.
35.
Inédits (1997), État critique?, 7, printemps-été.
36.
JansenC. (2005), The performance of german motion pictures, profits and subsidies: Some empirical evidence, Journal of Cultural Economics, 29, 3, 191–212.
37.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. (1955), Personal influence, New York: The Free Press.
38.
LampelJ.ShamsieJ. (2000), Critical push: Strategies for creating momentum in the motion picture industry, Journal of Management, 26, 2, 233–257.
39.
LarceneuxF. (2001), Critical opinion as a tool in the marketing of cultural products: The experiential label, International Journal of Arts Management, 3, 2, 60–71.
40.
LeveneC. (1992), Marketing art-films to college students, papier de recherche, Wharton School, Université de Pennsylvanie.
41.
LevinA.M.LevinI.P.HeathC.E. (1997), Movie stars and authors as brand names: Measuring brand equity in experiential products, Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 175–181.
42.
LitmanB.R. (1983), Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study, Journal of popular Culture, 16, 159–175.
43.
LitmanB.R.KohlL.S. (1989), Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The '80s experience, The Journal of Media Economics, 2, 35–50.
44.
LovellG. (1997), Movies and manipulation: How studios punish critics, Columbia Journalism Review, 35, 5, 9–12.
45.
McCombsM.E.ShawD.L. (1972), The agenda setting function of the mass media, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–196.
46.
MiesenH. (2002), External search behaviour in cultural product markets: A study of readers of fiction, International Journal of Arts Management, 4, 3, 33–47.
47.
MorisetC.MiègeB. (2005), Les industries de contenu sur la scène médiatique, Réseaux, 23, 131, 145–186.
48.
NossiterJ. (2003), Mondovino, produit par Les Films de la croisade et Goatworks, édité en DVD par TF1 Vidéo.
49.
PollockT.G.RindovaV.P. (2003), Media legitimization effects in the market for initial public offerings, Academy of Management Journal, 46, 5, 631–642.
50.
PragJ.CasavantJ. (1994), An empirical study of the determinants of revenues and marketing expenditures in the motion picture industry, Journal of Cultural Economics, 18, 3, 217–235.
51.
PrédalR. (2004), La critique de cinéma, Paris, Armand Colin.
52.
RavidS.A. (1999), Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry, Journal of Business, 72, 4, 463–492.
53.
ReddyS.K.SwaminathanV.MotleyC.M. (1998), Exploring the determinants of Broadway show success, Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 3, 370–383.
54.
ReinsteinD.A.SnyderC.M. (2005), The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand of experience good: A case study of movie critics, Journal of Industrial Economics, 53, 1, 27–53.
55.
SgardJ. (1994), La critique est aisée, Critiquer la critique? Culture et médias, l'impossible mariage de raison, éd. RouxJ.-L., Grenoble: Ellug, 13–22.
56.
ShrumW. (1991), Critics and publics: Cultural mediation in highbrow and popular performing arts, The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 2, 347–375.
57.
SochayS. (1994), Predicting the performances of motion pictures, The Journal of Media Economics, 7, 4, 1–20.
58.
TerryN.ButlerM.De ArmondD.A. (2005), The determinants of domestic box office performance in the motion picture industry, Southwestern Economic Review, 32, 1, 137–148.
59.
VézinaR. (1997), ‘One of the best movie of the year!…’: An experiment on the influence of critics' recommendations on consumers, Actes de la 26e Conférence EMAC, 3, 20–23 mai, Warwick, 1300–1312.
60.
WallaceW.T.SeigermanA.HolbrookM.B. (1993), The role of actors and actresses in the success of films: How much is a movie star worth?, Journal of Cultural Economics, 17, 1, 1–27.
61.
WyattO.W.BadgerD.P. (1984), How reviews affect interest in and evaluation of films, Journalism Quarterly, 61, 4, 874–878.
62.
WyattO.W.BadgerD.P. (1990), Effects of information and evaluation in film criticism, Journalism Quarterly, 67, 2, 359–368.
63.
ZuckermanE.W. (1999), The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount, American Journal of Sociology, 104, 5, 1398–1438.
64.
ZuckermanE.W.KimT.-Y. (2003), The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 1, 27–67.
