Un placement de produits peut se caractériser par sa proéminence et son intégration. Cette recherche étudie les interactions possibles entre ces deux caractéristiques en s'appuyant sur le processus perceptuel. Les résultats d'une étude quantitative menée à partir de 32 662 expositions de spectateurs à des placements de marques dans des films visionnés sur support DVD montrent qu'un placement proéminent et intégré conduit à un meilleur souvenir spontané de la marque le jour suivant l'exposition (spontaneous day-after recall) qu'un placement proéminent qui n'est pas intégré, ce dernier conduisant à un meilleur souvenir de la marque qu'un placement intégré qui n'est pas proéminent. Les marques présentes dans des placements non proéminents et non intégrés étant les moins bien mémorisées.
AlfordB.L.EngellandB.T. (2004), Measurement validation in marketing research: a review and commentary, Journal of Business Research, 57, 2, 95–97.
2.
AnzaiY. (2003), The perception of Japanese university students concerning product placement in Hollywood movies, The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 46, 3, 107–116.
3.
BaddeleyA. (1997) Human memory: theory and practice (édition révisée), Londres, Psychology Press.
4.
BagozziR.P.SilkA.J. (1983), Recall, recognition, and the measurement of memory for print advertisement, Marketing Science, 2, 2, 95–134.
5.
BalasubramanianS.K. (1994), Beyond advertising and publicity: hybrid messages and public policy issues, Journal of Advertising, 23, 4, 29–46.
6.
BatraR.AtholaO.T. (1990), Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes, Marketing Letters, 2, 2, 159–170.
7.
BatraR.RayM. (1986), Situational effects of advertising: the moderating influence of motivation, ability and opportunity to respond, Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 4, 432–445.
8.
BattaisL. (2003), L'efficacité des actions de marketing direct sur les marchés de grande consommation: l'expérience BehaviorScan en France et en Allemagne, Décisions Marketing, 30, 63–75.
9.
BelchG.E. (1982), The effects of television commercial repetition on cognitive response and message acceptance, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 1, 56–65.
10.
BlackstonM. (2000), Pay attention! This advertising is effective, Admap, mars.
11.
BlondéK.RoozenI. (2007), An explorative study testing the effectiveness of product placement compared to 30-second commercials, papier présenté au 6e Congrès des Tendances Marketing Paris-Venise, Paris, 26–27 janvier.
12.
BréeJ. (1996), Le placement de produits dans les films: une communication originale, Décisions Marketing, 8, 65–74.
13.
BrennanI.BabinL.A. (2004), Brand placement recognition: the influence of presentation mode and brand familiarity, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 185–202.
14.
BrennanS.RosenbergerP.J.IIIHementeraV. (2004), Product placements in movies, an Australian consumer perspective and their ethicality and acceptability, Marketing Bulletin, 15, 1, 1–16.
15.
BressoudE.LehuJ.-M. (2008), Le placement de marques dans les films. Panorama, modalités d'exécution et efficacité, La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 233, 101–114.
16.
BressoudE.LehuJ.-M.RussellC. (2008), Integrating placement and audience characteristics to assess the recall of product placements in film: findings from a field study, papier présenté à la 7e Conférence internationale “Research in Advertising” (ICORIA), Anvers, Belgique, 27–28 juin.
17.
BundesenC. (1990), A theory of visual attention, Psychological Review, 97, 4, 523–547.
18.
BusharaK.O.WeeksR.A.IshiiK.CatalanM.J.TianB.RauscheckerJ.P.HallettM. (1999), Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 8, 759–766.
19.
CalderB.J.PhillipsL.W.TyboutA.M. (1982), The concept of external validity, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, 240–244.
20.
CampbellM.C.KirmaniA. (2000), Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: the effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 1, 69–83.
21.
CampbellM.C.MohrG.S.VerleghP. (2007), Examining effects of product placement and sponsorship disclosure: a flexible correction approach, papier présenté au La Londe Seminar in Marketing Communications and Consumer Behavior, La Londe, 5–8 juin.
22.
ChapmanR.M.McCraryJ.W.ChapmanJ.A. (1978), Short-term memory: the “storage”component of human brain responses predicts recall, Science, 202, 4373, 1211–1214.
23.
CNC (2005a), Le marché du cinéma en vidéo, CNC Info, le dossier du CNC, Spécial Vidéo, n° 293, mars.
24.
CNC (2005b), De la salle à la vidéo, CNC Info, le dossier du CNC, Spécial Vidéo, n° 293, mars.
25.
CostleyC.L.DasS.BrucksM. (1997), Presentation medium and spontaneous imaging effects on consumer memory, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 3, 211–231.
26.
CowleyE.BarronC. (2008), When product placement goes wrong. The effects of program liking and placement proeminence, Journal of Advertising, 37, 1, 89–98.
d'AstousA.ChartierF. (2000), A study of factors affecting consumer evaluations and memory of product placements in movies, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 22, 2, 31–40.
29.
DalliD. (2003), Il product placement cinematografico: oltre la pubblicità ?, papier présenté lors du 3e Congrès des Tendances Marketing, Venise, 18–29 novembre.
30.
DambronP. (1991), Sponsoring et politique de marketing, Paris, Éditions d'Organisation.
31.
DarpyD.VolleP. (2007), Comportement du consommateur, concepts et outils, Paris, Dunod.
32.
DaughertyT.GangadharbatlaH. (2005), A comparison of consumers' responses to traditional advertising and product placement strategies: implications for advertisers, papier présenté à la Conférence de l'AMA Winter Educators’, San Antonio, TX, 11–14 février.
33.
Deloitte (2005), TMT Trends: predictions, 2005: a focus on the media sector, LeePaul (coord.), Cabinet Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, États-Unis, Pays-Bas, Hong-Kong.
34.
DeLormeD.E.ReidL.N. (1999), Moviegoers' experiences and interpretations of brands in films revisited, Journal of Advertising, 28, 2, 72–95.
35.
DeLormeD.E.ReidL.N.ZimmerM.R. (1994), Brands in films: young moviegoer's experiences and interpretations, papier présenté à la Conférence de l'American Academy Advertising.
36.
DonatonS. (2004), Madison & Vine, New York, NY, Editions Advertising Age McGraw-Hill.
37.
DroulersO. (2000), Perception subliminale: une expérimentation sur le processus d'activation sémantique des marques, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 15, 4, 43–59.
38.
DunnS.W.BarbanA.M.KrugmanD.M.ReidL.N. (1990), Advertising: its role in modern marketing (7e édition), New York, NY, The Dryden Press (Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
39.
EdwardsS.M.LiH.LeeJ.H. (2002), Forced exposure and psychological reactance: antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads, Journal of Advertising, 31, 3, 83–96.
40.
EhrenbergA.S.C. (1974), Repetitive advertising and the consumer, Journal of Advertising Research, 14, 2, 25–34.
41.
EliashbergJ.ElberseA.LeendersM. (2006), The motion picture industry: critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions, Marketing Science, 25, 6, 638–661.
42.
EmlingS. (2008), Men in tights, for real, The Washington Times du 3 septembre.
43.
EngelB. (2005), Spring 2005 national consumer studies, Floride, Simons Market Research.
EvrardY.PrasB.RouxE. (2003) Market, Études et recherches en marketing (3e édition), Paris, Dunod.
46.
FalcyS. (1993), Pour une approche individuelle des processus de persuasion publicitaire, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 8, 3, 45–63.
47.
FilserM. (1993), Le comportement du consommateur, Paris, Dalloz.
48.
FontaineI. (2001), Le placement de marques dans les films: apports du cadre théorique de la mémoire implicite et proposition d'une méthodologie, Cahier de Recherche, avril, 287, Centre de recherche DMSP, Université Paris IX Dauphine, Paris.
49.
FontaineI. (2002a), Étude des réponses mémorielles et attitudinales des spectateurs exposés aux placements de marques dans les films, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université de Paris IX Dauphine, Paris.
50.
FontaineI. (2002b), Impact persuasif du rôle accordé aux marques au sein de supports non publicitaires: le cas du placement de marques dans les films, Actes du 18e Congrès de l'Association Française du Marketing, Lille, 23–24 mai, 177–200.
51.
FontaineI. (2006), Étude du changement d'attitude pour les marques placées dans les films: persuasion ou effet d'exposition ?, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 21, 1, 1–18.
52.
FreemanH. (2007), And the Oscar goes to … a suitcase?, The Guardian du vendredi 23 novembre.
53.
FriestadM.WrightP. (1994), The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1, 1–31.
54.
FriestadM.WrightP. (1995), The persuasion knowledge model: lay people's and research's beliefs about the psychology of persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1, 62–74.
55.
GalicianM.L. (2004), A rising independent filmmaker argues for product placement: an interview with Samuel A. Turcotte, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 223–226.
56.
GalicianM.L.BourdeauP.G. (2004), The evolution of product placements in Hollywood cinema: embedding high-involvement “heroic” brand image, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 15–36.
57.
GarzaS.D.CallisonC. (2005), The influence of movie genre on audience reaction to product placement, papier présenté à la Conférence de l'Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Advertising Division, 9–13 août, San Antonio, TX.
58.
GouldS.J.GuptaP.B.Grabner-KraüterS. (2000), Product placements in movies: a cross-cultural analysis of Austrian, French and American consumer' attitudes toward this emerging, international promotional medium, Journal of Advertising, 29, 4, 41–58.
59.
GrégoryP. (1993), Notes sur la persuasion subliminale: quelques acquis de la recherche marketing pour éclairer un mythe, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 8, 3, 79–93.
60.
GreenwaldA.G. (1992), New look 3: unconscious cognition reclaimed, American Psychologist, 47, 6, 766–779.
GuptaP.B.GouldS.J. (1997), Consumers' perceptions of the ethics and acceptability of product placements in movies: product category and individual differences, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 19, 1, 37–50.
63.
GuptaP.B.GouldS.J. (2007), Recall of products placed as prizes versus commercials in game show, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20, 1, 43–53.
64.
GuptaP.B.LordK.R. (1998), Product placement in movies: the effect of prominence and mode on audience recall, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20, 1, 48–59.
65.
HackleyC.TiwsakulR.A. (2006), Entertainment marketing and experiential consumption, Journal of Marketing Communications, 12, 1, 63–75.
66.
HackleyC.TiwsakulR.A.PreussL. (2008), An ethical evaluation of product placement: a deceptive practice?, Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 2, 109–120.
67.
BrittS. Henderson (1969), Are so-called successful advertising campaigns really successful?, Journal of Advertising Research, 9, 2, 3–9.
68.
HendonD.W. (1973), How mechanical factors affect ad perception, Journal of Advertising Research, 13, 4, 39–45.
69.
HudsonS.HudsonD. (2006), Branded entertainment: a new advertising technique or product placement in disguise?Journal of Marketing Management, 22, 5/6, 489–504.
70.
JolibertA.Didellon-CarsanaL. (2000), La mesure non hiérarchique de la structure mémorielle des connaissances, Décisions Marketing, 21, 89–97.
71.
JinC.VillegasJ. (2007), The effect of the placement of the product in film: consumers' emotional responses to humorous stimuli and prior brand evaluation, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15, 4, 244–255.
72.
JolibertA.JourdanP. (2006), Marketing Research: méthodes de recherche et d'études en marketing, Paris, Dunod, page 158.
73.
KammounM. (2008), Efficacité de la publicité, un état de l'art, La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 229, 111–119.
74.
KarrhJ.A. (1995), Brand placements in feature films: the practitioners's view, in MaddenCharles S. (coord.), Actes de la Conférence de l'American Academy of Advertising, Hankamer Université de Baylor, School of Business, Waco, TX, 182–188.
75.
KarrhJ.A. (1998), Brand placement: a review, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20, 2, 31–49.
76.
KarrhJ.A.McKeeK. BrittainPardunC.J. (2003), Practitioners' evolving views on product placement effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 2, 138–149.
77.
KishoreA. (2003), The death of the 30-second commercial, août, rapport du Yankee Group Media & Entertainment Strategies, Boston, MA.
78.
KriderR.E. (2006), Research opportunities at the movies, Marketing Science, 25, 6, 662–664.
79.
KrugmanH.E. (1965), The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement, The Public Opinion Quaterly, 29, 3, 349–356.
80.
KrugmanH.E. (1977), Memory without recall, exposure without perception, Journal of Advertising Research, 17, 4, 7–12.
81.
LawS.BraunK. (2000), I'll have what she's having: gauging the impact of product placements on viewers, Psychology & Marketing, 17, 12, 1059–1075.
82.
LawS.Braun-La TourK.A. (2004), Product placement: how to measure their impact, in ShrumL.J. (coord.), The psychology of entertainment, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 63–78.
83.
LeeA.Y. (2002), Effects of implicit memory on memory-based versus stimulus-based brand choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 4, 440–454.
84.
LehuJ.-M.BressoudE. (2008), Effectiveness of brand placement: new insights about viewers, Journal of Business Research, 61, 10, 1083–1090.
85.
LehuJ.-M. (2005a), Le placement de marques au cinéma, proposition de la localisation du placement à l'écran comme nouveau facteur d'efficacité potentielle, Décisions Marketing, 37, 17–31.
86.
LehuJ.-M. (2005b), Le placement de produits au cinéma: Hiérarchie des critères d'utilisation ou hiérarchie des étapes ? Une étude exploratoire qualitative auprès d'agents professionnels anglo-saxons, papier présenté lors du 4e Congrès des Tendances Marketing, Paris, 21–22 janvier.
87.
LehuJ.-M. (2006), La publicité est dans le film, Paris, Éditions d'Organisation.
88.
LindstromM. (2008), buy.ology, New York, NY, Doubleday.
89.
LiuS.S.StoutP.A. (1987), Effects of message modality and appeal on advertising acceptance, Psychology & Marketing, 4, 3, 167–187.
90.
LewickiP. (1986), Nonconscious social information processing, Orlando, Academic Press.
91.
LynchJ.G.Jr. (1982), On the external validity of experiments in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, 225–239.
92.
LynchJ.G.Jr. (1999), Theory and external validity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 3, 367–376.
93.
MackieD.E.AsuncionA.G. (1990), On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1, 5–16.
94.
MayerR.E.MorenoR. (1998), A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 2, 312–320.
95.
McGaughJ.L. (1966), Time-dependent processes in memory storage, Science, 153, 1351–1358.
96.
McGuireW.J. (1976), Some internal psychological factors influencing consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 4, 302–319.
97.
McKechnieS.A.ZhouJ. (2003), Product placement in movies: a comparison of Chinese and American consumers' attitudes, International Journal of Advertising, 22, 3, 349–374.
98.
Meyers-LevyJ.MalaviyaP. (1999), Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: an integrative framework of persuasion theories, Journal of Marketing, 63, 4, 45–60.
99.
MooreR.S.StammerjohanC.A.CoulterR.A. (2005), Banner advertiser-website context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes, Journal of Advertising, 34, 2, 71–84.
100.
MortonC.R.FriedmanM. (2002), “I saw it in the movies”: exploring the link between product placement beliefs and reported usage behaviour, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 24, 2, 33–40.
101.
NebenzahlI.D.SecundaE. (1993), Consumer's attitudes toward product placement in movies, International Journal of Advertising, 12, 1, 1–11.
102.
NelsonR.A. (2004), A product placement resource guide: recommended publications and websites, Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 1/2, 259–267.
103.
NelsonM.R. (2008), The hidden persuaders: then and now, Journal of Advertising, 37, 1, 113–126.
104.
NelsonM.R.DevathanN. (2006), Brand placements Bollywood style, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 3, 211–221.
105.
OngB.S.MeriD. (1994), Should product placement in movies be banned?, Journal of Promotion Management, 2, 2/4, 159–175.
106.
PaivioA. (1978), A dual coding approach to perception and cognition, in PickH.I.SaltzmanE. (coord.), Modes of perceiving and processing information, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 39–51.
107.
PardunC.J.McKeeK.B. (1999), Product placements as public relations: an exploratory study of the role of the public relations firm, Public Relations Reviews, 25, 4, 481–493.
108.
PetersonR.A. (2001), On the use of college students in social science research: insights from a second-order meta-analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 3, 450–61.
109.
PettyR.E.CacioppoJ.T. (1979), Issue-involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 10, 1915–1926.
110.
PietersR.WedelM. (2004), Attention capture and transfer in advertising: brand, pictorial, and text-size effects, Journal of Marketing, 68, 2, 36–50.
111.
PQ Media (2005), Product placement spending in media 2005 — History, analysis & forecast, 1974 to 2009, Stamford, CT, PQ Media LLC.
112.
PQ Media (2007), PQ Media market analysis finds global product placement spending grew 37% in 2006, Stamford, CT: PQ Media LLC, Mars.
113.
PratkanisA.R.AronsonE. (1992), The age of propaganda: the everyday use and abuse of persuasion, New York, WH Freeman.
114.
RosenD.L.SinghS.N. (1992), An investigation of the subliminal embed effect on multiple measures of advertising, Psychology & Marketing, 9, 2, 157–173.
115.
RosenzweigP. (2008), Common errors in marketing research — and how to fix them, Marketing Research, 20, 3, 6–12.
116.
RussellC.A. (1998), Toward a framework of product placement: theoretical propositions, Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 1, 357–362.
117.
RussellC.A. (2002), Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: the role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude, Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 3, 306–318.
118.
RussellC.A.BelchM. (2005), A managerial investigation into the product placement industry, Journal of Advertising Research, 45, 1, 73–92.
119.
RussellC.A.SternB.B. (2006), Consumers, characters, and products, Journal of Advertising, 35, 1, 7–21.
120.
SchejterA.M. (2004), Product placement as an international practice: moral, legal, regulatory and trade implications, papier présenté à la 32e Conférence sur la Recherche en Communication, Information et Internet, octobre, The National Center for Technology & Law, École de droit de l'Université George Mason, Arlington, VA.
121.
SchmollN.M.HaferJ.HiltM.ReillyH. (2006), Baby boomers' attitudes towards product placements, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 28, 2, 33–53.
122.
SchumacherP.HelmigB. (2007), The effect of executional variables of product placement on conscious and non-conscious brand processing and its consequences on brand evaluation, papier présenté à la 36e Conférence de l'European Marketing Academy, Reykjavik, 22–25 mai.
123.
SteortzE.M. (1987), The cost efficiency and communication effects associated with brand name exposure within motion pictures, Thèse de master, Université de West Virginia, Morgantown, WV.
124.
SévilleM. (2006), Doit-on renoncer à l'expérimentation en stratégie ?, papier présenté lors de la 15e Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique (AIMS), Annecy — Genève les 13–16 juin.
TheusK.T. (2006), Subliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: review of research, Psychology & Marketing, 11, 3, 271–290.
127.
TiwsakulR.HackleyC. (2005), Ethics and regulation of contemporary marketing communication practices: an exploration of the perceptions of UK-based consumers towards the ethical issues raised by product placement in British TV shows, papier de recherche, SoMo502, School of Management, Université de Londres, Royal Holloway, Egham, Surrey, Grande-Bretagne.
128.
TseA.C.B.LeeR.P.W. (2001), Zapping behaviour during commercial breaks, Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 3, 25–29.
129.
TurcotteS.A. (1995), Gimme a Bud! The feature film product placement industry, Thèse de master, Université de l'État du Texas, Austin, TX.
130.
Van der WaldtD.L.R.Du ToitL.S.RedelinghuysR. (2007), Does branded product placement in film enhance realism and product recognition by consumers?, African Journal of Business Management, 1, 2, 19–25.
131.
VollmersS.MizerskiR. (1994), A review and investigation into the effectiveness of product placements in films, in KingKaren W. (coord.), Actes de la Conférence de l'American Academy of Advertising, Athens, GA, 97–102.
132.
WeiM.-L.FischerE.MainK.J. (2008), An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27, 1, 34–44.
133.
WhittleseaB.W.A.PriceJ.R. (2001), Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: rethinking the mere exposure effect, Memory & Cognition, 29, 2, 234–246.
134.
WinerR.S. (1999), Experimentation in the 21st century: the importance of external validity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 3, 349–358.
