L'article montre l'existence d'un autre mode de traitement de l'information fondé sur une heuristique d'ancrage et d'ajustement catégoriel. En s'appuyant sur les schémas catégoriels associés à la marque, le consommateur peut parvenir à une évaluation rapide d'un produit nouveau, et éviter ainsi un traitement approfondi des caractéristiques de l'offre. En fonction du degré de typicalité du produit vis-à-vis des produits de la catégorie activée, la phase d'ancrage peut toutefois être remise en question, le consommateur procédera alors à un ajustement de sa première impression.
BeckwithN.E.LehmannD.R. (1975), The importance of halo effect in multi-attribute attitude models, Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 3, 265–275.
8.
BrewerM.B. (1988), A dual process model of impression formation, Advances in social cognition, éds. SrullT.K.WyerR.S.Jr., Hilllsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1, 1–36.
9.
CohenJ.B.BasuK. (1987), Alternative models of categorization: Toward a contingent processing framework, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 4, 455–472.
10.
DerbaixC.PhamM.T. (1989), Pour un développement des mesures de l'affectif en marketing : Synthèse des prérequis, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 4, 4, 71–87.
11.
EinhornH.J. (1970), The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making, Psychological Bulletin, 73, 3, 221–230.
12.
FazioR.H. (1990), Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework, Advances in social experimental psychology, éd. ZannaM.P., New York, Academic Press, 75–109.
13.
FazioR.H. (1995), Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinant, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility, Attitude strength: antecedents and consequences, éds. PettyR.E.KrosnickJ.A., Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 247–282.
14.
FazioR.H.PowellM.C.WilliamsC.J. (1989), The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 3, 280–288.
15.
FazioR.H.SanbonmatsuD.M.PowellM.C.KardesF.R. (1986), On the automatic activation of attitudes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 2, 229–238.
16.
FeldmanJ.M.LynchJ.G. (1988), Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention and behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 3, 421–435.
17.
FélixM. (1993), Communication non verbale et stratégie produit, une proposition de modèle de choix au point de vente : une application aux enfants, Thèse de doctorat, Université des Sciences et Technologies, Lille.
18.
FishbeinM. (1963), An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object, Human Relations, 16, 3, 233–239.
19.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
20.
FiskeS.T.PavelchakM.A. (1986), Category-based versus piecemal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect, éds. SorrentinoR.M.HigginsE.T., Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior, New York, Guilford Press, 167–203.
21.
FiskeS.T.NeubergS.L. (1990), A continuum model of impression formation: From category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information, motivation on attention and interpretation, éd. ZannaM.P., Advances in experimental social psychology, New York: Academic Press, 23, 1–74.
22.
FornellC.LarckerD. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, 39–50.
23.
GabrielP. (2003), Contingence de la décision : Influence de la situation sur le recueil et la prédiction du choix, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 18, 2, 31–46.
24.
GilbertD.T.HixonJ.G. (1991), The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 4, 509–517.
25.
GilbertD.T.PelhamB.W.KrullD.S. (1988), On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5, 733–740.
26.
HeiderF. (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York, Wiley.
27.
HerrP.M. (1986), Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, 1106–1115.
28.
HerrP.M. (1989), Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 1, 67–75.
29.
HerrP.M.ShermanS.J.FazioR.H. (1983), On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 4, 323–340.
30.
HigginsE.T.BarghJ.A.LombardiW. (1985), Nature of priming effects on categorization, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 1, 59–69.
31.
HigginsE.T.KingG.A.MavinG.H. (1982), Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions on recall, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 3, 35–47.
32.
HigginsE.T.RholesW.S.JonesC.R. (1977), Category accessibility and impression formation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 2, 141–154.
33.
JohanssonJ.K.DouglasS.P.NonakaI. (1985), Assessing the impact of country of origin product evaluations: A new methodological perspective, Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 4, 388–396.
34.
KruglanskiA.W.WebsterD.M. (1996), Motivated closing of the mind: ‘seizing’ and ‘freezing’, Psychological Review, 103, 2, 263–283.
35.
LadweinR. (1994), Le jugement de typicalité dans l'évaluation de l'extension de marque, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 9, 2, 1–18.
36.
LadweinR. (1995), Le jugement de typicalité comme heuristique de choix : Approche comparative, Actes de l'International Research Seminar, 22, éds. JolibertA.PetersonR.A.StrazzieriA., Aix-en-Provence, 351–362.
37.
LadweinR. (1998), Le jugement de typicalité et le choix de la marque : Le rôle de l'incertitude, Actes du Congrès de l'Association Française du Marketing, éd. SaportaB., Bordeaux, IAE, 519–536.
38.
LadweinR. (1999), Le comportement du consommateur et de l'acheteur, Paris, Économica.
39.
LingleJ.H.OstromT.H. (1979), Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2, 180–194.
40.
LynchJ.G.MarmorsteinH.WeigoldM.F. (1988), Choices from sets including remembered brands: Use of recalled attributes and prior overall evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2, 169–184.
41.
MaheswaranD. (1994), Country of origin as a stereotype: Effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations, Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 21, 354–365.
42.
MaheswaranD.MackieD.M.ChaikenS. (1992), Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effect of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 4, 317–336.
43.
MenonG.RaghubirP. (2003), Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: A mere-accessibility framework?, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 2, 230–243.
44.
OdouP.NicholsonP. (1998), L'influence des croyances stéréotypiques associées au pays d'origine d'un produit sur son évaluation : La mise en évidence du mode catégoriel de traitement de l'information, Actes du Congrès de l'Association Française du Marketing, éd. SaportaB., Bordeaux, IAE, 595–616.
45.
OdouP. (2000), L'utilisation des schémas catégoriels dans le processus d'évaluation d'un produit : une application aux catégories associées au pays d'un produit, Thèse de doctorat, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale.
46.
OdouP. (2002), Typicalité et processus catégoriel d'évaluation d'un produit : Une approche exploratoire sur le marché de l'automobile, Actes du Congrès de l'Association Française du Marketing, éds. SalernoF.UlagaW., 1, 473–491, Lille, IAE.
47.
Meyers-LevyJ.TyboutA.M. (1997), Context effects at encoding and judgment in consumption settings: The role of cognitive resources, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 1, 1–14.
48.
MichelG. (1998), L'impact de l'extension de marque sur l'évaluation de la marque : L'influence de la cohérence entre les associations de l'extension et celles de la marque, Actes du Congrès de l'Association Française du Marketing, éd. SaportaB., Bordeaux, IAE, 537–556.
49.
PayneJ.W.BettmanJ.R.JohnsonE.J. (1988), Adaptative strategy selection in decision making, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 3, 534–552.
50.
PinsonC. (1986), An implicit product theory approach to consumers' inferential judgments about products, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 3, 1, 19–38.
51.
PinsonC.JolibertA. (1997), Comportement du consommateur, Encyclopédie de gestion, éds. JoffreP.SimonY., Paris, Économica, 372–475.
52.
PhamM.T. (1996), Heuristiques et biais décisionnels en marketing, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 11, 4, 53–69.
53.
PhamM.T. (1998), Representativness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making, Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 2, 144–159.
54.
PhamM.T.CohenJ.B.PracejusJ.W.HughesG.D. (2001), Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 2, 167–188.
55.
PhamM.T.AvnetT. (2004), Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 4, 503–518.
56.
PraktanisA.R.GreenwaldA.G. (1989), A sociocognitive model of attitude structure and function, Advances in experimental social psychology, éd. BerkowitzL., San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 22, 245–285.
57.
SanbonmatsuD.M.FazioR.H. (1990), The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 4, 614–622.
58.
SchwarzN.CloreG.L. (1983), Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 3, 513–523.
59.
SchwarzN.BlessH. (1992), Constructing reality and its alternatives: Assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment, The construction of social judgments, éds. MartinL.L.TesserA., Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, 217–245.
60.
SimonsonI. (1992), The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 1, 105–118.
61.
SlovicP.LichtensteinS. (1971), Comparison of bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 6, 649–744.
62.
SmithE.R.FazioR.H.CejkaM.A. (1996), Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5, 888–898.
63.
SujanM. (1985), Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments, Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 1, 31–46.
64.
SwaitJ.AdamowiczW. (2001), The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1, 135–148.
65.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124–1131.
66.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1986), Rational choice and the framing of decisions, Journal of Business, 59, 4, 251–278.
67.
TyboutA.M.SternthalB.MalaviyaP.BakamitsosG.A.ParkS.-B. (2005), Information accessibility as moderator of judgments: The role of content versus retrieval ease, Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 1, 76–85.
68.
WrightP. (1975), Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying vs optimizing, Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 1, 60–67.
