Une compagnie peut-elle/doit-elle initier un marketing relationnel en entrant dans l'intimité de ses consommateurs? L'analyse du discours de 22 clients sur leur expérience de réception d'une carte envoyée par une compagnie lors de leur anniversaire montre que cette approche comporte des risques, si elle n'est pas soutenue par une connaissance des attitudes du client vis-à-vis de la relation business-to-customers et vis-à-vis de la stratégie retenue par la compagnie. Les résultats obtenus soulignent également l'importance des études s'intéressant au point de vue du consommateur avant d'opter pour un mode spécifique de communication avec lui.
ArborA.Yong-SoonK.RidgwayN.M. (1996), The importance of consumer market interactions as a form of social support for elderly consumers, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15, 1, 108–117.
2.
BaxterL.A.WilmotW.W. (1984), Secret tests: social strategies for acquiring information about the state of the relationship, Human Communication Research, 11, hiver, 171–201.
3.
BelkR.W. (1976), It's the thought that counts: a signed digraph analysis of gift giving, Journal of Consumer Research, 3, Décembre, 155–162.
4.
BelkR.W. (1979), Gift-giving behavior, Research in marketing, 2, éd. ShethJ., Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 95–126.
5.
BelkR.W. (1996), The perfect gift, Gift-giving: an inter-disciplinary anthology, éds. OtnesC.BeltraminiR.F., Bowling Green, OH, Bowling Green University Press, 59–84.
6.
BelkR.W.WallendorfM.SherryJ.F. (1989), The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: theodicy on the odyssey, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 1, 1–38.
7.
BelkR.W.CoonG.S. (1991), Can't buy me love: dating, money, and gifts, Advances in Consumer Research, 18, éds. HolmanR.H.SolomonM.S., Provo, UT, Association for Consumer Research, 521–527.
8.
BelkR.W.CoonG.S. (1993), Gift giving as agapic love: an alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 3, 393–417.
9.
BeltraminiR.F. (1992), Exploring the effectiveness of business gifts: a controlled field experiment, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 1, 87–91.
10.
BendapudiN.BerryL.L. (1997), Customers' motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers, Journal of Retailing, 73, 1, 15–37.
11.
BergadaàM.M. (1990), The role of time in the action of the consumer, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 3., 289–302.
12.
BerryL.L. (1983), Relationship marketing, Emerging perspectives on service marketing, éds. BerryL.L.ShostackG.L.OpahG., Chicago, IL, American Marketing Association, 25–28.
13.
BerryL.L. (1995), Relationship marketing of services — growing interest, emerging perspectives, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 4, 236–245.
14.
BerryL.L.ParasuramanA. (1991), Marketing services — Competing through quality, New York, Free Press.
15.
BloomP.N.MilneG.R.AdlerR. (1994), Avoiding misuse of new information technologies: legal and societal considerations, Journal of Marketing, 58, 1, 98–110.
16.
BrabantS.MooneyL.A. (1989), Him, her, or either: sex of person addressed and interpersonal communication, Sex Roles, 20, 1/2, 47–58.
17.
CharmazK. (2000), Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods, Handbook of qualitative research, éds. DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S., Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 509–535.
18.
ChealD. (1988), The gift economy, New York, Routledge.
19.
CialdiniR.B. (1985), Influence: science and practice, Glenview, IL, Scott, Foresman and Company.
20.
CzepielJ.A. (1990), Services encounters and service relationships, Journal of Business Research, 20, 13–21.
21.
CrosbyL.A.StephensN. (1987), Effects of relationship marketing on satisfaction, retention, and prices in the life insurance industry, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 4, 404–411.
22.
CrosbyL.A.EvansK.R.CowlesD. (1990), Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective, Journal of Marketing, 54, 3, 68–81.
23.
DavisJ. (1972), Gifts and the U.K. economy, Man, 7, 3, 408–429.
24.
DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (1994), Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, Sage publications.
25.
DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (2000), Handbook of qualitative research, 2e édition, Thousand Oaks, Sage publications.
26.
DodsonK.J.BelkR.W. (1996), The birthday card mine-field, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, éds. CorfmanK.LynchJ.G.Jr., Provo, UT, Association for Consumer Research, 14–20.
27.
DorschM.J.KelleyS.W. (1994), An investigation into the intentions of purchasing executives to reciprocate vendor gifts, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 4, 315–327.
FournierS. (1998), Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, mars, 343–373.
30.
FournierS.DobschaS.MickD.G. (1998), Preventing the premature death of relationship marketing, Harvard Business Review, 76, 1, 42–51.
31.
GlaserB.StraussA.L. (1967), The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, Chicago, Aldine.
32.
GouldS.J.WeilC.E. (1991), Gift-giving roles and gender self-concepts, Sex Roles, 24, 9/10, 617–637.
33.
GouldnerA.W. (1960), The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement, American Sociological Review, 25, Avril, 161–178.
34.
GreenbergM.S. (1980), A theory of indebtedness, Social exchange: advances in theory and research, éds. GergenK.J.GreenbergM.S.WillisR.H., New York, Plenum, 1–26.
35.
GundlachG.T.MurphyP.E. (1993), Ethical and legal foundations of relational marketing exchanges, Journal of Marketing, 57, 4, 35–46.
36.
HirschmanE.C. (1986), Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: philosophy, method, and criteria, Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 237–49.
37.
HydeL. (1979), The gift, New York, Vintage.
38.
JonesE.E. (1964), Ingratiation, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
39.
JonesE.E.WortmanC.B. (1973), Ingratiation: an attributional approach, Morristown, N. J., General Learning Press.
RuthJ.A.OtnesC.C.BrunelF.F. (1999), Gift receipt and the reformulation of interpersonal relationships, Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 4, 385–402.
51.
SherryJ.F.Jr. (1983), Gift giving in anthropological perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 2, 157–168.
52.
SherryJ.F.Jr.McGrathM.A.LevyS.J. (1993), The dark side of the gift, Journal of Business Research, 28, 3, 225–244.
53.
ShethJ.ParvatiyarA. (1995), Relationship marketing in consumer markets: antecedents and consequences, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 4, 255–271.
54.
ShurmerP. (1971), The gift game, New Society, 18, décembre, 1242–1244.
55.
ThompsonC.J.LocanderW.B.PollioH.O. (1989), Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 2, 133–146.
56.
TrawickF.I.SwanJ.E.RinkD.R. (1989), Industrial buyer evaluation of the ethics of salesperson gift giving: value of the gift and customer vs. prospect status, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 9, 2, 31–37.
57.
WeinerB. (1986), An attributional theory of motivation and emotion, New York, Springer-Verlag.
58.
WisemanJ.P.DuckS. (1995), Having and managing enemies: a very challenging relationship, Confronting relationship challenges, éds. DuckS.WoodJ.T., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 43–72.
59.
WolfinbargerM.F.GillyM.C. (1996), An experimental investigation of self-symbolism in gifts, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, éds. CorfmanK.LynchJ.G.Jr., Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 458–462.
