Introduction: Archiving Qualitative Data in Practice: Ethical Feedback

Abstract

French

Over the past twenty years the normative framework that underpins social science research has undergone major shifts. Among the most salient changes is the growing incentive to archive, share and reuse research data. Today, many governments, funding agencies, research infrastructures and editors are pushing what is commonly known as Open Research Data (ORD). By reflecting on concrete experiences of data sharing, the different contributions to this issue point to the ethical challenges posed by this new trend. Through a fine objectivation of the archiving work, they call to take distance from the bureaucratic framework imposed by the new ethics and ORD policies and to think of data sharing as a situated, contextual and dynamic process. The cost of the exercise as well as the sensitivity of certain data and subjects suggest opting for flexible approaches that leave a certain autonomy and freedom of appraisal to researchers.

Keywords

Data management plan (DMP)ethics Open research data (ORD)Open science archive

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acord

Harley

(2012) Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0. New Media & Society 15(3): 379–397.

Alsheikh-Ali

Qureshi

Al-Mallah

Ioannidis

JPA

(2011) Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLOS One 6(9). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0024357

Anderson

Schonfeld

(2009) Data-sharing dilemmas: Allowing pharmaceutical company access to research data. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 31(3): 17–19.

Arzberger

Schroeder

Beaulieu

Bowker

Casey

Laaksonen

Wouters

(2004) Promoting access to public research data for scientific, economic, and social development. Data Science Journal 3: 135–152.

Béliard

Eideliman

(2008) Au-delà de la déontologie. Anonymat et confidentialité dans le travail ethnographique. In: Fassin

Bensa

(eds) Politiques de l’enquête. Epreuves ethnographiques. Paris: La Découverte, 123–141.

Bishop

(2005) Protecting respondents and enabling data sharing: Reply to Parry and Mauthner. Sociology 39(2): 333–336.

Bishop

(2009) Ethical sharing and reuse of qualitative data. Australian Journal of Social Issues 44: 255–272.

Bornat

(2005) Recycling the evidence: Different approaches to the Reanalysis of gerontological data. Forum for Development Studies 6(1). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/504/1084

Both

Garcia

(2014) Le chercheur, l’archiviste et le webmaster: la polyphonie patrimoniale? Le cas de beQuali, banque d’enquêtes qualitatives en sciences sociales. In: Saou-Dufrene

(ed.) Heritage and Digital Humanities: How Should Training Practices Evolve? Zurich: Berlin: Lit Verlag, 353–363.

10.

Bourrier

(2013) Embarquements. Socio-anthropologie 27: 21–34.

11.

Bull

Cheah

Denny

Jao

Marsh

Merson

Wassenaar

(2015) Best practices for ethical sharing of individual-level health research data from low-and middle-income settings. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10(3): 302–313.

12.

Charbonneau

(2013) Strategies for data management engagement. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 32(3): 365–374.

13.

Chartron

Schöpfel

(2017) Open access et Open science en débat. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication 11. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/3331

14.

Chartron

(2016) Stratégie, politique et reformulation de l’open access. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication (8). Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/1836

15.

Chartron

(2018) L’Open science au prisme de la Commission européenne. Éducation et sociétés (1): 177–193.

16.

Claeson

(1995) Street addicts in the political economy. Alisse Waterston. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9: 515–518.

17.

Cliggett

(2015) Preservation, sharing, and technological challenges of longitudinal research in the digital age. In: Sanjek

Tratner

(eds) eFieldnotes: Makings of Anthropology in a Digital World. Philadelphia: Penn Press, 231–250.

18.

Cooper

(2007) Sharing data and results in ethnographic research: Why this should not be an ethical imperative. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2(1): 3–19.

19.

Corti

Backhouse

(2005) Acquiring qualitative data for secondary analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(2). Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502361

20.

Corti

Thompson

(1998) Are you sitting on your qualitative data? Qualidata’s mission. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1(1): 85–89.

21.

Corti

Foster

Thompson

(1995) Archiving qualitative research data. Social Research Update 10. Available at: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html

22.

Corti

Witzel

Bishop

(2005) On the potentials and problems of secondary analysis. An introduction to the FQS special issue on secondary analysis of qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(1). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/498

23.

Corti

(2006) Qualitative archiving and data sharing: Extending the reach and impact of qualitative data. IASSIST Quarterly 29(3): 8–13.

24.

Costello

(2009) Motivating online publication of data. BioScience 59(5): 418–427.

25.

Cragin

Palmer

Carlson

Witt

(2010) Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 368: 4023–4038.

26.

Curty

Crowston

Specht

Grant

Dalton

(2017) Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLOS One 12(12). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189288

27.

Davenport

Patil

(2012) Data scientist: The sexiest job of the 21st century. Harvard Business Review 90(10): 70–76.

28.

Duchesne

Garcia

(2014) Bequali: une archive qualitative au service des sciences sociales. In: Cornu

Fromageau

Muller

(eds) Les archives de la recherche. Problèmes et enjeux de la construction du savoir scientifique. Paris: L’Harmattan, 49–70.

29.

Duchesne

(2015) L’analyse secondaire des enquêtes qualitatives en sociologie politique, à l’épreuve de l’expérimentation. Proposition de numéro pour la Revue Française de science politique. Version revue après avis du comité de rédaction.

30.

Duchesne

(2017) La réanalyse des enquêtes qualitatives à l’épreuve de l’expérimentation. Recherches Qualitatives 2(21): 1–6.

31.

Duchesne

Noûs

(2019) Apories de la mise en banque: retour d’expérience sur la réutilisation d’enquêtes qualitatives. Tracés. Revue de Sciences Humaines 19: 89–100.

32.

Fecher

Friesike

Hebing

(2015) What drives academic data sharing? PLOS One 10(2). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118053

33.

Feldman

Shaw

(2019) The epistemological and ethical challenges of archiving and sharing qualitative data. American Behavioral Scientist 63(6): 699–721.

34.

Fielding

(2004) Getting the most from archived qualitative data: Epistemological, Ppactical and professional obstacles. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7(1): 97–104.

35.

Flichy

(2003) L’innovation technique. Paris: La Découverte.

36.

Geiger

Moore

Savage

(2010) The archive in question. Available at: eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/921/

37.

Guedon

(2015) Open data and science: Towards optimizing the research process. Available at: https://www.dataone.org/webinars/open-data-and-science-towards-optimizing-research-process

38.

Gupta

Ferguson

(eds) (1997) Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Duram; London: Duke University press.

39.

Haddow

Bruce

Sathanandam

Wyatt

(2011) ‘Nothing is really safe’: A focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17(6): 1140–1146.

40.

Hammersley

(1997) Qualitative data archiving: Some reflections on its prospects and problems. Sociology 31(1): 131–142.

41.

Harding

Harper

Stone

O’Neill

Berger

Harris

Donatuto

(2013) Conducting research with tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. Environmental Health Perspectives 120(1): 6–10.

42.

Heers

Ferrez

Morgan de Paula

(2017) Data sharing and re-use: Researcher practices, attitudes and needs. FORS Survey of Social Science Researchers in Switzerland. FORS.

43.

Huyghe

Cailly

Oppenchaim

(2018) Partage des données d’enquêtes en recherche qualitative : approche juridique, éthique, déontologique et épistémologique. Rapport de recherche CITERES. Available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01790983

44.

Ibekwe-SanJuan

Paquienséguy

Lyon

(2015) Open, big, collaboration: trois utopies de l’innovation au 21ème siècle. In: Broudoux

(ed.) Big Data – Open Data: Quelles valeurs ? Quels enjeux: Actes du colloque « Document numérique et société ». Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur, 15–29.

45.

Irwin

(2013) Qualitative secondary data analysis: Ethics, epistemology and context. Progress in Development Studies 13(4): 295–306.

46.

Jackson

(1990) ‘I am a fieldnote’: Fieldnotes as a symbol of professional identity. In: Sanjek

(ed.) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca : London: Cornell University Press, 3–33.

47.

Jeng

(2016) Toward a conceptual framework for data sharing practices in social sciences: A profile approach. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 53(1): 1–10.

48.

Kaye

Terry

Juengst

Coy

Harris

Chalmers

Bezuidenhout

(2018) Including all voices in international data-sharing governance. Human Genomics 12. Available at: https://humgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40246-018-0143-9

49.

Kim

Stanton

(2013) Institutional and individual influences on scientists’ data sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 50(1): 1–14.

50.

Kostkova

(2018) Disease surveillance data sharing for public health: The next ethical frontiers. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14(1). Available at: https://lsspjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-018-0078-x

51.

Kowalczyk

Shankar

(2011) Data sharing in the sciences. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 45: 247–294.

52.

Laferté

(2006) Des archives d’enquêtes ethnographiques pour quoi faire? Les conditions d’une revisite. Genèses 63(2): 25–45.

53.

Le Roux

Vidal

(2000) Verbatim: Une expérience de capitalisation d’entretiens qualitatifs. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 65(1): 58–67.

54.

Mauthner

Parry

Backett-Milburn

(1998) The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data. Sociology 32(4): 733–745.

55.

Mauthner

Parry

(2009) Qualitative data preservation and sharing in the social sciences: On whose philosophical terms? Australian Journal of Social Issues 44(3): 291–307.

56.

Mauthner

Parry

(2013) Open access digital data sharing: Policies, principles and practices. Social Epistemology 27(1): 47–67.

57.

Mbuagbaw

Foster

Cheng

Thabane

(2017) Challenges to complete and useful data sharing. Trials 18(1): Available at: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-017-1816-8

58.

Mennes

Biswal

Castellanos

Milham

(2013) Making Data Sharing Work: The FCP/INDI Experience. NeuroImage 82: 683–691.

59.

Moore

(2012) The politics and ethics of naming: Questioning anonymisation in (archival) research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(4): 331–340.

60.

Moore

(2007) (Re) using qualitative data? Sociological Research Online 12(3): 1–13.

61.

Moore

(2017) A genealogy of open access: Negotiations between openness and access to research. Revue électronique de la Société française des sciences de l’information et de la communication 11(2). Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/3220

62.

Mouton

(2008) Les ethnologues et leurs archives. Passion, possession et appropriation. Journal des africanistes 78(1/2): 221–233.

63.

Müller

(2006) Archives orales et entretiens ethnographiques. Un débat entre Florence Descamps et Florence Weber, animé par Bertrand Müller. Genèses 62(1): 93–109.

64.

Ottenberg

(1990) Thirty years of fieldnotes: Changing relationships to the text. In: Sanjek

(ed.) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 139–160.

65.

Parry

Mauthner

(2004) Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology 38(1): 139–152.

66.

Pasquetto

Randles

Borgman

(2017) On the reuse of scientific data. Data Science Journal 16(0). Available at: https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2017-008/

67.

Pearce

Smith

(2011) Data sharing: Not as simple as it seems. Environmental Health 10(1). Available at: https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-069X-10-107

68.

Pisani

AbouZahr

(2010) Sharing health data: Good intentions are not enough. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88(6): 462–466.

69.

Prost

Schöpfel

(2015) Les données de la recherche en SHS. Une enquête à l’Université de Lille 3. Rapport final de recherche, Lille 3.

70.

Pryor

(2012) Managing Research Data. London: Facet Publishing.

71.

RéAnalyse (2010) Expérimentation d’archivage et d’analyse secondaire des enquêtes qualitatives, Agence nationale de la recherche. Available at: https://reanalyse.hypotheses.org/files/2014/09/Projet-ANR-r%C3%A9Analyse.pdf

72.

Royal Society (2012) Science as an Open Enterprise: Open Data for Open Science. London: The Royal Society Science Policy Centre.

73.

Rioufreyt

(2019) L’outil et la méthode: des fonctionnalités techniques des CAQDAS à leurs usages méthodologiques. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique/Bulletin of Sociological Methodology 143: 7–27.

74.

Sansone

Rocca-Serra

(2012) On the evolving portfolio of community standards and data sharing policies: Turning challenges into new oppportunities. GigaScience 1: 1–3.

75.

Schmid

(2008) Inside the national anthropological archives: An interview with Robert Leopold. Anthropology News 49(1): 32–33.

76.

Schmidt

Gemeinholzer

Treloar

(2016) Open data in global environmental research: The Belmont Forum’s Open Data Survey. PLOS One 11(1). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0146695

77.

Schöpfel

(2015) Open access – The rise and fall of a community-driven model of scientific communication. Learned Publishing 28(4): 321–325.

78.

Schumacher

VandeCreek

(2015) Intellectual capital at risk: Data management practices and data loss by faculty members at five American universities. International Journal of Digital Curation 10(2): 96–109.

79.

Science Staff (2011) Challenge and opportunities. Science 133(6018): 692–693.

80.

Scot

(2006) Les archives britanniques des sciences sociales. Deux études de cas: UK Data Archive (UKDA) et Qualidata. Genèses 63(2): 46–65.

81.

Sheather

(2009) Confidentiality and sharing health information. BMJ 338. Available at: https://www.bmj.com/content/338/bmj.b2160.full

82.

Shore

Wright

(1999) Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5(4): 557–575.

83.

Silverman

Parezo

(1995) Preserving the Anthropological Record. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.

84.

Takashima

Maru

Mori

Mano

Noda

Muto

(2018) Ethical concerns on sharing genomic data including patients’ family members. BMC Medical Ethics 19(1). Available at: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-018-0310-5

85.

Tenopir

Allard

Douglass

Aydinoglu

Read

Frame

(2011) Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS One 6(6). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021101

86.

Tenopir

Dalton

Allard

Frame

Pjesivac

Birch

Pollock

Dorsett

(2015) Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide. PLOS One 10(8). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134826

87.

Thompson

(2019) Interview with Paul Thompson. In: Thompson

Pioneers of Social Research, 1996–2018. Essex: UK Data Service, 1–65. Available at: https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk//QualiBank/Document/?id=q-be954c48-9477-41ea-b436-4ddbe57119ec

88.

Thompson

(1978) The Voice of the Past: Oral History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

89.

Thorne

(2000) Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing 3(3): 68–70.

90.

Van den Eynden

Knight

Vlad

(2016) Open Research: Practices, Experiences, Barriers and Opportunities. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive.

91.

Wallis

Rolando

Borgman

(2013) If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLOS One 8(7). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067332

92.

Watson

(2015) When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? Genome Biology 16(1). Available at: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0669-2

93.

Wicherts

Bakker

(2012) Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too? Intelligence 40(2): 73–76.

94.

Yilmaz

(2013) Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education 48(2): 311–325.

95.

Zeitlyn

(2000) Archiving anthropology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(3). Available at: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1034/2236