This article is a call to explore the potential for the renewal of knowledge and theory that may be found in the study of groups, individuals, and phenomena that escape our operations of categorization or that are left untreated because we cannot understand or explain them, or simply because we do not notice or comprehend them while we are in the field or analysing our materials. We have termed these materials that are unnoticed, set aside, or swept under the rug “research residuals”. The introduction to this thematic dossier bets on the possibility that knowledge can be produced using materials that had hitherto been considered unfit for interpretation.
BazsangerIDodierN (1997) Totalisation et altérité. Revue française de sociologie38(1): 37–66.
2.
BeaudSWeberF (1998) Guide de l’enquête de terrain. Paris: La Découverte.
3.
BizeulD (1998) Le récit des conditions d’enquête - Exploiter l’information en connaissance de cause. Revue française de sociologie39(4): 751–87.
4.
BoltanskiL (2011) On Critique - A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge UK: Polity, translated by ElliotGregory.
5.
BourdieuP (1977) Une classe objet. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales17-18: 2–5.
6.
BourdieuP (1990) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
7.
BourdieuP (2006) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, translated by NiceRichard.
8.
BourdieuPChamboredonJCPasseronJC (1991) The Craft of Sociology - Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, edited by BeateKrais, translated by NiceRichard.
9.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Cambridge UK: Polity.
10.
BurawoyM (2003) L’étude de cas élargie - Une approche réflexive, historique et comparée de l’enquête de terrain. In CefaïD (ed.) L’enquête de terrain. Paris: La Découverte, 425–464.
11.
EmighRJ (1997) The Power of Negative Thinking - The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory. Theory and Society26(5): 649–84.
12.
FavreP (2007) La bibliographie invisible. In FavrePFillieuleOJobardF (eds) L’atelier du politiste. Paris: La Découverte, 353–63.
13.
GuionnetCRétifS (eds) (2015) Exploiter les difficultés méthodologiques - Une ressource pour l’analyse en sciences sociales. Rennes: PUR.
14.
HamidiC (2012) De quoi un cas est-il le cas ? Penser les cas limites. Politix100: 85–98.
15.
JaquetC (2014) Les transclasses ou la non-reproduction. Paris: PUF.
16.
LaporteA (1999) Facteurs socio-culturels et présentation de soi dans différents contextes d’enquête - Analyse d’un exemple de discordance. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique63: 29–45.
17.
PasseronJCRevelJ (2005) Penser par cas - Raisonner à partir de singularités. In PasseronJRevelJ (eds) Penser par cas. Paris: Presses de l’EHESS: 9–44.
18.
RaginCBeckerH (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations Social Inquiry. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
SchiltzMA (2005) Faire et défaire des groupes - L’information chiffrée sur les « populations difficiles à atteindre ». Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique86 : 30–54.
20.
SchwartzO (1993) L’empirisme irréductible. Postface in Anderson N Le Hobo - Sociologie du sans-abri. Paris: Nathan, 265–308.
21.
SchwartzNBlessH (1995) Mental Construal Processes and the Emergence of Context Effects in Attitude Measurement. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique48: 101–19.
22.
ScottJC (2009) The Art of Not Being Governed - An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
