In this systematic literature review we examined evidence for Second Step, a social-emotional learning curriculum implemented as a Tier 1 practice with elementary students. We applied Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education to evaluate if Second Step elementary could be considered an evidence-based practice. We found 37 studies meeting inclusion criteria, of which 13 met our weighted CEC quality indicator coding criterion (80%) to be considered methodologically sound. Following CEC guidelines, we classified three of 13 studies as having positive effects, while eight had neutral/mixed effects, and two were missing data preventing effect size calculation needed for classification. With three non-randomized group studies demonstrating positive effects and eight studies with neutral/mixed effects, the ratio of positive to neutral/mixed did not meet the minimum criterion of 3:1 or greater, so we placed Second Step elementary into CEC’s mixed evidence category of evidence-based classifications. We then discuss educational implications of these findings and future research directions.
AllenG. E.CommonE. A.GermerK. A.LaneK. L.BuckmanM. M.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence base for active supervision in pre-k–12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/fqff
2.
BradshawC. P.PasE. T.DebnamK. J.JohnsonS. L. (2021). A randomized controlled trial of MTSS-b in high schools: Improving classroom management to prevent EBDS. Remedial and Special Education, 42(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/ghwfvh
3.
CarreroK. M.LaneK. L.OakesW. P. (2026). Meeting student and educator well-being needs within comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T) models of prevention: A practical response to the national mental health crisis [Manuscript in preparation].
4.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.CrnoboriM.BruhnA. L.OakesW. P. (2011). Self-determination interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Mapping the knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 100–116. https://doi.org/gh2xhd
5.
Castro-OlivoS. M.TranO. K.BegumG. F.ArellanoE. M.GarciaN. M.TungC. Y. (2013). A comprehensive model for promoting resiliency and preventing violence in schools. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly “the California School Psychologist,” 17(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137365699.0012
CommonE. A.BuckmanM. M.LaneK. L.OakesW. P.RoyerD. J.ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M.SherodR. L. (2021). Project enhance: Assessing professional learning needs for implementing comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T) models of prevention. Education and Treatment of Children, 44(3), 125–144. https://doi.org/k7bs
13.
CommonE. A.LaneK. L.RoyerD. J. (2017). Research to inform practice: Group comparison and single-case research design quality indicator matrix using council for exceptional children 2014 standards check for understanding (CFU). ci3t.org/practice.
14.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 220–234. https://doi.org/gcmc43
15.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for exceptional children standards for evidence-based practices in special education.
16.
DomitrovichC. E.DurlakJ. A.StaleyK. C.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Social-emotional competence: An essential factor for promoting positive adjustment and reducing risk in school children. Child Development, 88(2), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12739
17.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/gqh
18.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020a). Behavior-specific praise in pk–12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919843075
19.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020b). The impact of coaching on teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise in preK-12 settings: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919839221
20.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624
21.
GageN. A.WhitfordD. K.KatsiyannisA. (2018). A review of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports as a framework for reducing disciplinary exclusions. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/gfgxx6
22.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164. https://doi.org/fqzj
23.
GeselS. A.LeJeuneL. M.ChowJ. C.SinclairA. C.LemonsC. J. (2021). A meta-analysis of the impact of professional development on teachers’ knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy in data-based decision-making. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420970196
24.
GrummM.HeinS.FingerleM. (2012). Children’s subjective perceptions of an aggression prevention program. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6(1–2), 97–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-2012-11071
25.
HarrisL. (1991). The metropolitan life survey of the American teacher, 1991: The first year: New teachers’ expectations and ideals. Metropolitan Life Insurance.
26.
HolsenI.SmithB. H.FreyK. S. (2008). Outcomes of the social competence program second step in Norwegian elementary schools. School Psychology International, 29(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034307088504
27.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
28.
JonesS. M.BrownJ. L.Lawrence AberJ. (2011). Two-year impacts of a universal school-based social-emotional and literacy intervention: An experiment in translational developmental research. Child Development, 82(2), 533–554. https://doi.org/bbzksd
29.
KnightM. A.Haboush-DeloyeA.GoldbergP. M.GrobK. (2019). Strategies and tools to embrace prevention with upstream programs: A novel pilot program for enhancing social and emotional protective factors in middle school students. Children & Schools, 41(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdz020
30.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
31.
LaneK. L.BaldyT.BeckerT.BradshawC. P.DolanV.DymnickiA. B.FreemanB.HolianL.LemireS.McIntoshK.MoultonS.NeseR.Payno-SimmonsR.PorowskiA.SutherlandK. S. (2025). Teacher-delivered behavioral interventions in grades k–5. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
32.
LaneK. L.BuckmanM. M.OakesW. P.FlemingK. K.LaneN. A.LaneK. S.Swinburne RomineR. E.SherodR. L.AllenG. E. (2025). Examining the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on elementary students’ internalizing and externalizing behaviors in schools implementing tiered systems. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 33, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266241248446
33.
LaneK. L.CommonE. A.RoyerD. J.MullerK. (2014). Group comparison and single-case research design quality indicator matrix using council for exceptional children 2014 standards. https://www.ci3t.org/practice
34.
LaneK. L.CommonE. A.RoyerD. J.OakesW. P. (2022). Conducting systematic reviews of the literature: Guidance for quality appraisals. In TankersleyM. J.CookB. G.LandrumT. J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 32, pp. 109–130). Emerald Insight. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0735-004X20220000032007
35.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with EBD attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/ggzxz4
36.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.CantwellE. D.RoyerD. J. (2019). Building and installing comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T) models of prevention: A practical guide to supporting school success (v1.3). KOI Education.
37.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2014). Comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models of prevention: Why does my school—and district—need an integrated approach to meet students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs?Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/gcmc7f
38.
McIntoshK.TyS. V.MillerL. D. (2014). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on internalizing problems: Current evidence and future directions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 209–218. https://doi.org/f6k4h6
National Association of School Psychologists and American School Counselor Association. (2021). School reentry considerations: Supporting student social and emotional learning and mental and behavioral health. https://www.nasponline.org/x55825.xml.
41.
PaterniteC. E.ButtsE. (2013). Advancing the ISF in states. In BarretS.EberL.WeistM. (Eds.), Advancing education effectiveness: Interconnecting school mental health and schoolwide positive behavior support (pp. 83–95). Koi Education.
42.
PeltierC.VanDerHeydenA. M.HottB. L. (2022). Strategies to help students solve addition and subtraction word problems. Beyond Behavior, 31(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/ms2z
43.
Pérez-ClarkP.RoyerD. J.AustinK. S.LaneK. L. (2022). A systematic review of second step social-emotional learning in middle schools. Remedial and Special Education, 44(5), 395–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221131913
44.
RobitailleJ. (2018, March8). How early can youth begin learning SEL? (it may be earlier than you think!). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment / Devereux Students Strengths Assessment (DECA/DESSA) Blog Series. https://tinyurl.com/robitaille2018
45.
RoseC. A.EspelageD. L. (2012). Risk and protective factors associated with the bullying involvement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 37(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700302
46.
RosenblattJ. L.EliasM. J. (2008). Dosage effects of a preventive social-emotional learning intervention on achievement loss associated with middle school transition. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 29(6), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-008-0153-9
47.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.MessengerM. L. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K-12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742916688655
48.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2019). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K-12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751054
49.
SchlosserR. W. (2006). The role of systematic reviews in evidence-based practice, research, and development. Focus, A Publication of the National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research, 15, 1–4. http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/focus/focus15/
50.
ShiJ.CheungA. C. K. (2024). Effective components of social emotional learning programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(4), 755–771.
51.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2019). Sustaining and scaling positive behavioral interventions and supports: Implementation drivers, outcomes, and considerations. Exceptional Children, 86(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919855331
52.
SweigartC. A.CollinsL. W.EvanovichL. L.CookS. C. (2016). An evaluation of the evidence base for performance feedback to improve teacher praise using CEC’s quality indicators. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 419–444. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44684119
53.
TaylorR. D.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/gbn2ck
54.
TosteJ. R.TalbottE.CummingM. M. (2023). Special issue preview: Introducing the next generation of quality indicators for research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 357–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231174106
55.
TsengV. (2013). Strengthening the use and usefulness of education research. In Leveraging learning: The evolving role of federal policy in education research (pp. 34–36). The Aspen Institute.
56.
U.S. Department of Education. (2023). 45th annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep.
57.
U.S. Surgeon General. (2021). Protecting youth mental health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
58.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company.
59.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What works clearinghouse procedures handbook, version 4.1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
60.
WhitcombS. A.MerrellK. W. (2012). Understanding implementation and effectiveness of strong start k-2 on social-emotional behavior. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-0490-9
61.
WynneM. E.AusikaitisA. E.SatchwellM. (2013). Adult outcomes for children and adolescents with EBD: Understanding parents’ perspectives. SAGE Open, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013483133
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
