In this systematic review, we evaluated the quality and rigor of the current evidence base for the Second Step social-emotional learning program in middle schools. Eleven studies were coded using the Council for Exceptional Children Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education with an 80% weighted criterion. We determined five studies met the weighted 80% criteria and one study demonstrated a positive effect as defined by Council for Exceptional Children. The other four studies demonstrated neutral/mixed results, and we therefore classified Second Step for middle schools in the mixed evidence category. We discuss the strengths of evaluated studies and future directions for research.
CommonE. A.LaneK. L.RoyerD. J. (2017). Research to inform practice: Group comparison and single-case research design quality indicator matrix using Council for Exceptional Children 2014 standards check for understanding (CFU) (Unpublished tool). http://www.ci3t.org/practice
5.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
6.
CookB. G.CollinsL. W.CookS. C.CookL. (2020). Evidence-based reviews: How evidence-based practices are systematically identified. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12213
CostelloE. J.MustilloS.ErkanliA.KeelerG.AngoldA. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(8), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.837
9.
DomitrovichC. E.BradshawC. P.GreenbergM. T.EmbryD.PoduskaJ. M.IalongoN. S. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention: Logic and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20452
10.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
11.
*EspelageD. L.LowS.PolaninJ. R.BrownE. C. (2013). The impact of a middle school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.021
*EspelageD. L.LowS.Van RyzinM. J.PolaninJ. R. (2015). Clinical trial of second step middle school program: Impact on bullying, cyberbullying, homophobic teasing, and sexual harassment perpetration. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0052.1
14.
*EspelageD. L.RoseC. A.PolaninJ. R. (2015). Social-emotional learning program to reduce bullying, fighting, and victimization among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514564564
15.
*EspelageD. L.RoseC. A.PolaninJ. R. (2016). Social-emotional learning program to promote prosocial and academic skills among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515627475
16.
FarmerT. W.HammJ. V.LeungM. C.LambertK.GravelleM. (2011). Early adolescent peer ecologies in rural communities: Bullying in schools that do and do not have a transition during the middle grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(9), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9684-0
17.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.NaoomS. F.WallaceF. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335549
18.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624
19.
FoulkesL.BlakemoreS. J. (2016). Is there heightened sensitivity to social reward in adolescence?Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.016
20.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164.
21.
GreshamF. (2015). Evidence-based social skills interventions for students at risk for EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 36(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514556183
22.
HayesS. C.PistorelloJ.LevinM. E. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 976–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012460836
23.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
KauffmanJ. M.BadarJ. (2018). The scandalous neglect of children’s mental health: What schools can do. Routledge.
26.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. (2018). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth. Pearson Education.
27.
KernL.Hilt-PanahonA.SokolN. G. (2009). Further examining the triangle tip: Improving support for students with emotional and behavioral needs. Psychology in the Schools, 46(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20351
28.
KnollL. J.LeungJ. T.FoulkesL.BlakemoreS. J. (2017). Age-related differences in social influence on risk perception depend on the direction of influence. Journal of Adolescence, 60, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.07.002
29.
LaneK. L. (2003). Identifying young students at risk for antisocial behavior: The utility of “teachers as tests.”Behavioral Disorders, 28, 360–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290302800404
30.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. S. (2018). Instructional choice: An effective, efficient, low-intensity strategy to support student success. Beyond Behavior, 27(3), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618786965
31.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.CantwellE. D.RoyerD. J. (2016). Building and installing comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T) models of prevention: A practical guide to supporting school success. KOI Education.
32.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2014). Comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models of prevention: Why does my school—and district—need an integrated approach to meet students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs?Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.893977
McIntoshK.GoodmanS. (2016). Integrated multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Publications.
35.
McIntoshK.TyS. V.MillerL. D. (2014). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on internalizing problems: Current evidence and future directions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(4), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713491980
36.
MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.LaneK. L.RoyerD. J.CantwellE. D.CommonE. A.BuckmanM. (2021). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of a comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered model of prevention. Remedial and Special Education, 42(4), 207–219.
37.
MerikangasK. R.HeJ. P.BursteinM.SwansonS. A.AvenevoliS.CuiL.BenjetC.GeorgiadesK.SwendsenJ. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in US adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(10), 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017
38.
MundschenkD.SimpsonR. (2014). Defining emotional or behavioral disorders: The quest for affirmation. In GarnerP.KauffmanJ.ElliottJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of emotional and behavioral difficulties (2nd ed., pp. 43–54). SAGE.
39.
PatterniteC. E.ButtsE. (2013). Chapter 7: Advancing the ISF in states. In BarretS.EberL.WeistM. (Eds.), Advancing education effectiveness: Interconnecting school mental health and schoolwide positive behavior support (pp. 83–95). Koi Education.
40.
RapeeR. M.OarE. L.JohncoC. J.ForbesM. K.FardoulyJ.MagsonN. R.RichardsonC. E. (2019). Adolescent development and risk for the onset of social-emotional disorders: A review and conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 123, 103501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103501
41.
RoseC. A.Monda-AmayaL. E.EspelageD. L. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361247
42.
RoseC. A.SimpsonC. G.MossA. (2015). The bullying dynamic: Prevalence of involvement among a large-scale sample of middle and high school youth with and without disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 52(5), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21840
43.
SimonsenB.SugaiG. (2013). PBIS in alternative education settings: Positive support for youth with high-risk behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 3–14.
SpragueJ. R.SugaiG.HornerR.WalkerH. M. (1999). Using office discipline referral data to evaluate school-wide discipline and violence prevention interventions. OSSC Bulletin, 42(2), n2. . https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080010301
46.
*SpragueJ. R.WalkerH.GollyA.WhiteK.MyersD. R.ShannonT. (2001). Translating research into effective practice: The effects of a universal staff and student intervention on indicators of discipline and school safety. Education and Treatment of Children, 24(4), 495–511. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42900505
47.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior support in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(3), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266020100030101
48.
*SullivanT. N.SutherlandK. S.FarrellA. D.TaylorK. A. (2015). An evaluation of second step: What are the benefits for youth with and without disabilities?Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515575616
49.
*SullivanT. N.SutherlandK. S.FarrellA. D.TaylorK. A.DoyleS. T. (2017). Evaluation of violence prevention approaches among early adolescents: Moderating effects of disability status and gender. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(4), 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0629-9
50.
TaylorR. D.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
*TopN.LiewJ.LuoW. (2016). Effects of second step curriculum on behavioral and academic outcomes in 5th and 8th grade students: A longitudinal study on character development. Research on Youth and Language, 10(1), 24–27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167262.pdf
53.
*TopN.LiewJ.LuoW. (2017). Family and school influences on youths’ behavioral and academic outcomes: Cross-level interactions between parental monitoring and character development curriculum. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2017.1279118
54.
*Van Schoiack-EdstromL.FreyK. S.BelandK. (2002). Changing adolescents’ attitudes about relational and physical aggression: An early evaluation of a school-based intervention. School Psychology Review, 31(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086151
55.
WagnerM. (2014). Longitudinal outcomes and post-high school status of students with Emotional d Behavioral Disorders. In WalkerH. M.GreshamF. M. (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based practices for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Applications in schools (pp. 86–103). Guildford.
56.
WalkerH. M.YellM. L.MurrayC. (2014). Identifying EBD students in the context of schooling using the federal ED definition: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. In GarnerP.KauffmanJ.ElliotJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of emotional and behavioral difficulties (pp. 55–67). SAGE.
57.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse procedures handbook, version 4.1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
58.
WynneM. E.AusikaitisA. E.SatchwellM. (2013). Adult outcomes for children and adolescents with EBD: Understanding parents’ perspectives. SAGE Open, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013483133
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
