This systematic review examines the social and emotional learning (SEL) intervention literature to address questions of whether and how students with disabilities are considered in studies of universal SEL interventions in middle and high schools. From the articles identified for initial review (n = 4,355), 166 met the inclusionary criteria. Among these, 19 studies explicitly mentioned including students with disabilities. Five studies included analyses of students with disabilities as a subgroup, with varying results. Additional analyses focus on evidence of attention to varied learning needs in curricular materials or training of facilitators. Findings demonstrate scant attention to students with disabilities in reports of universal SEL interventions, leaving open questions about their inclusion and effects of participation. Opportunities for addressing these questions in future research are described.
*AberJ. L.BrownJ. L.JonesS. M. (2003). Developmental trajectories toward violence in middle childhood: Course, demographic differences, and response to school-based intervention. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649-39.2.324
2.
*AllenJ. P.PhilliberS. (2001). Who benefits most from a broadly targeted prevention program? Differential efficacy across populations in the Teen Outreach program. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(6), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.1040
3.
Al-YagonM. (2016). Perceived close relationships with parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(6), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415620569
4.
AugustG. J.PiehlerT. F.MillerF. G. (2018). Getting “SMART” about implementing multi-tiered systems of support to promote school mental health. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.10.001
5.
*BavarianN.LewisK. M.DuboisD. L.AcockA.VuchinichS.SilverthornN.. . . FlayB. R. (2013). Using social-emotional and character development to improve academic outcomes: A matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial in low-income, urban schools. The Journal of School Health, 83(11), 771–779.
6.
*BotvinG. J. (1985). The Life Skills Training Program as a health promotion strategy: Theoretical issues and empirical findings. Special Services in the Schools, 1(3), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v01n03_03
7.
*BradshawC. P.DebnamK. J.Lindstrom JohnsonS.PasE. T.HershfeldtP.AlexanderA.. . . LeafP. J. (2014). Maryland’s evolving system of social, emotional, and behavioral interventions in public schools: The Maryland Safe and Supportive Schools Project. Adolescent Psychiatry, 4(3), 194–206.
8.
*CaldarellaP.ShatzerR. H.GrayK. M.YoungK. R.YoungE. L. (2011). The effects of school-wide positive behavior support on middle school climate and student outcomes. RMLE Online, 35(4), 1–14.
CarrE. G.DunlapG.HornerR. H.KoegelR. L.TurnbullA. P.SailorW.. . . FoxL. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070200400102
11.
CASEL. (2015). 2015 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs—Middle and high school edition. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org/middle-and-high-school-edition-casel- guide/
*ChafouleasS.SanettiL.JafferyR.FallonL. (2012). An evaluation of a classwide intervention package involving self-management and a group contingency on classroom behavior of middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(1), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9135-8
14.
Committee for Children. (1997). Second step: A violence prevention curriculum: Middle school/junior high.
15.
Committee for Children. (2008). Second step: Student success through prevention program.
16.
CookC. R.GreshamF. M.KernL.BarrerasR. B.ThorntonS.CrewsS. D. (2008). Social skills training for secondary students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders: A review and analysis of the meta-analytic literature. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426608314541
*CramerK. M.Castro-OlivoS. (2016). Effects of a culturally adapted social-emotional learning intervention program on students’ mental health. Contemporary School Psychology, 20(2), 118–129.
19.
*DalyL. A.HadenS. C.HaginsM.PapouchisN.RamirezP. M. (2015). Yoga and emotion regulation in high school students: A randomized controlled trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015, Article 794928. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/794928
20.
DeshlerD. D. (2005). Adolescents with learning disabilities: Unique challenges and reasons for hope. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 122–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593609
21.
DomitrovichC. E.DurlakJ. A.StaleyK. C.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Social-emotional competence: An essential factor for promoting positive adjustment and reducing risk in school children. Child Development, 88(2), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12739
22.
*DudleyB. S.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1996). Conflict-resolution training and middle school students’ integrative negotiation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(22), 2038–2052.
23.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
*EspelageD. L.RoseC. A.PolaninJ. R. (2015). Social-emotional learning program to reduce bullying, fighting, and victimization among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514564564
28.
*EspelageD. L.RoseC. A.PolaninJ. R. (2016). Social-emotional learning program to promote prosocial and academic skills among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515627475
*FarrellA. D.MeyerA. L.WhiteK. S. (2001). Evaluation of responding in peaceful and positive ways (RIPP): A school-based prevention program for reducing violence among urban adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 30(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3004_02
31.
*FelverJ. C.ClawsonA. J.MortonM. L.Brier-KennedyE.JanackP.DiFlorioR. A. (2019). School-based mindfulness intervention supports adolescent resiliency: A randomized controlled pilot study. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(sup1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1461722
32.
*FlanaganR.PovallL.DellinoM.ByrneL. (1998). A comparison of problem solving with and without rational emotive behavior therapy to improve children’s social skills. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 16(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024986327879
33.
*FlayB. R.AllredC. G. (2003). Long-term effects of the Positive Action® program. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(1), S6–S21. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.27.1.s1.2
34.
GrantS.HamiltonL. S.WrabelS. L.GomezC. J.WhitakerA.Leschitz, . . . RAND Education. (2017). Social and emotional learning interventions under the Every Student Succeeds Act: Evidence review. RR-2133-WF. RAND Corporation.
35.
GreenbergM. T.DomitrovichC. E.WeissbergR. P.DurlakJ. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The Future of Children, 27(1), 13–32.
36.
GreshamF. M.SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700303
37.
*GuoS.WuQ.SmokowskiP. R.BacallaoM.EvansC. B. R.CotterK. L. (2015). A longitudinal evaluation of the Positive Action program in a low-income, racially diverse, rural county: Effects on self-esteem, school hassles, aggression, and internalizing symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2337–2358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0358-1
38.
*HechtM. L.GrahamJ. W.ElekE. (2006). The drug resistance strategies intervention: Program effects on substance use. Health Communication, 20(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc2003_6
39.
HeckmanJ. J.KautzT. D. (2013). Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition (NBER Working paper no. 19656). The National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w19656
40.
HornerR. H.KincaidD.SugaiG.LewisT.EberL.BarrettC.. . . JohnsonN. (2014). Scaling up school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: Experiences of seven states with documented success. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713503685
41.
HumphreyN.KalamboukaA.WigelsworthM.LendrumA.DeightonJ.WolpertM. (2011). Measures of social and emotional skills for children and young people: A systematic review. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410382896
42.
HussarB.ZhangJ.HeinS.WangK.RobertsA.CuiJ.SmithM.Bullock MannF.BarmerA.DiligR. (2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved February, 20, 2020 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020144
43.
JonesS. M.DoolittleE. J. (2017). Social and emotional learning. The Future of Children, 27(1), 3–11.
44.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140040501
45.
LandrumT. J.TankersleyM.KauffmanJ. M. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders?The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 148–156.
46.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2014). Comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models of prevention: Why does my school—and district—need an integrated approach to meet students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs?Preventing School Failure, 58(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.893977
47.
*LembergerM. E.SeligJ. P.BowersH.RogersJ. E. (2015). Effects of the Student Success Skills program on executive functioning skills, feelings of connectedness, and academic achievement in a predominantly Hispanic, low-income middle school district. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00178.x
48.
*LewisK. M. P. D.DuBoisD. L. P. D.BavarianN. P. D.AcockA. P. D.SilverthornN. P. D.DayJ. P. D.. . . FlayB. R. D. P. (2013). Effects of Positive Action on the emotional health of urban youth: A cluster-randomized trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(6), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.012
49.
LowS.SmolkowskiK.CookC. (2016). What constitutes high-quality implementation of SEL programs? A latent class analysis of Second Step® implementation. Prevention Science, 17(8), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0670-3
50.
MahoneyJ. L.WeissbergR. P. (2018). SEL: What the research says. Educational Leadership, 76(2), 34–35.
51.
MargalitM.Al-YagonM. (2002). The loneliness experience of children with learning disabilities. In WongB. Y. L.DonahueM. (Eds.), Social dimensions of learning disabilities (pp. 53–75). Erlbaum.
52.
*MauricioA. M.DillmancarpentierF.HoranJ. (2005). An experimental evaluation of an Internet-delivered conflict resolution skills curriculum in a secondary school setting. Journal of School Violence, 4(3), 37–48.
MeyerA.RoseD. H.GordonD. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST.
55.
*Moore McBrideA.ChungS.RobertsonA. (2016). Preventing academic disengagement through a middle school–based social and emotional learning program. Journal of Experiential Education, 39(4), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916668901
56.
*Multisite Violence Prevention Project. (2009). The ecological effects of universal and selective violence prevention programs for middle school students: A randomized trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014395
NelsonJ. M.HarwoodH. R. (2011). A meta-analysis of parent and teacher reports of depression among students with learning disabilities: Evidence for the importance of multi-informant assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 48(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20560
*OysermanD.BybeeD.TerryK. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188
63.
PavriS. (2004). General and special education teachers’ preparation needs in providing social support: A needs assessment. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700410
64.
PavriS.Hegwer-DiVitaM. (2006). Meeting the social and emotional needs of students with disabilities: The special educators’ perspective. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500242200QSR International Pty Ltd. (2018). NVivo for Mac [Computer software].
65.
QuachD.Jastrowski ManoK. E.AlexanderK. (2016). A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of mindfulness meditation on working memory capacity in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(5), 489–496. doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.024
66.
*RenshawT. L.JimersonS. R. (2012). Enhancing student attitudes via a brief, universal-level bullying prevention curriculum. School Mental Health, 4(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-011-9069-2
67.
RoseC. A.Monda-AmayaL. E. (2012). Bullying and victimization among students with disabilities: Effective strategies for classroom teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211430119
68.
RoweH. L.TrickettE. J. (2018). Student diversity representation and reporting in universal school-based social and emotional learning programs: Implications for generalizability. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9425-3
69.
RyanS.LaiJ.WeissJ. A. (2017). Mental health service use among youth with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000500
70.
*ShopeJ. T.CopelandL. A.MarcouxB. C.KampM. E. (1996). Effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program. Journal of Drug Education, 26(4), 323–337.
71.
ShusterB. C.GustafsonJ. R.JenkinsA. B.LloydB. P.CarterE. W.BernsteinC. F. (2017). Including students with disabilities in positive behavioral interventions and supports: Experiences and perspectives of special educators. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300716675734
72.
*SibingaE. M. S.EllenJ. M.GhazarianS. R.WebbL. (2016). School-based mindfulness instruction: An RCT. Pediatrics, 137(1), 1–8.
73.
SkladM.DiekstraR.RitterM. D.BenJ.GravesteijnC. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment?Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21641
74.
*SpencerM. S.BrownM.GriffinS.AbdullahS. (2008). Outcome evaluation of the intergroup project. Small Group Research, 39(1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407313416
75.
*StevahnL.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SchultzR. (2002). Effects of conflict resolution training integrated into a high school social studies curriculum. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603902
76.
*SullivanT. N.SutherlandK. S.FarrellA. D.TaylorK. A. (2015). An evaluation of second step: What are the benefits for youth with and without disabilities?Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515575616
77.
*SullivanT. N.SutherlandK. S.FarrellA. D.TaylorK. A.DoyleS. T. (2017). Evaluation of violence prevention approaches among early adolescents: Moderating effects of disability status and gender. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(4), 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0629-9
78.
TaylorR. D.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
79.
The Promise of Social-Emotional Learning. (2018). Educational Leadership, 76(2).
80.
WagnerM.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.EpsteinM. H.SumiW. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266050130020201
81.
*WalterH. J.KayeA. J.DenneryK. M.DeMasoD. R. (2019). Three-year outcomes of a school-hospital partnership providing multitiered mental health services in urban schools. Journal of School Health, 89(8), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12792
82.
WeissbergR. P.CaplanM.HarwoodR. L. (1991). Promoting competent young-people in competence-enhancing environments—A systems-based perspective on primary prevention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(6), 830–841.
83.
WeissbergR. P.DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC.GullottaT. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future. In WeissbergR. P.DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 3–19). Guilford Press.
84.
*WendtS.HippsJ.AbramsA.GrantJ.ValosekL.NidichS. (2015). Practicing transcendental meditation in high schools: Relationship to well-being and academic achievement among students. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0066-6
85.
WileyA. L.SipersteinG. N. (2015). SEL for students with high-incidence disabilities. In DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.WeissbergR. P.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 213–228). Guilford Press.
86.
WilliamsonA. A.ModeckiK. L.GuerraN. G. (2015). SEL programs in high school. In DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 181–196). Guilford Press.
87.
YeagerD. S. (2017). Social and emotional learning programs for adolescents. The Future of Children, 27(1), 73–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
