Understanding reading development requires attention to both student characteristics and school contexts. Using ECLS-K:2011 data, we investigated how language and disability status—and their interaction—relate to reading outcomes from kindergarten through fifth grade; how school-level Response to Intervention (RTI) implementation relates to reading growth; and whether RTI implementation moderates the associations between student characteristics and reading growth. Results showed that multilingual students and students with disabilities began with lower reading scores and exhibited slower growth compared to English-monolingual students and students without disabilities. A significant interaction between language and disability status emerged for linear growth, suggesting a more complex pattern for multilingual students with disabilities. Although RTI alone was not linked to reading growth, it moderated the relations of student characteristics with reading trajectories. These findings highlight the need to consider both student- and school-level factors and to strengthen educational practices that effectively support the diverse and evolving needs of learners.
Al OtaibaS.StewartJ.van DijkW.ConnerC.FreudenthalD. R.RivasB.YovanoffP.AllorJ. (2025). Comparing Tier 1 reading instruction with Tier 3 or special education intervention through an observational snapshot of school-implemented Response to Intervention across grades 1–5. Reading and Writing, 38, 1129–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10534-7
2.
Al OtaibaS.van DijkW.StewartJ.EdwardsA. A.Russell FreudenthalD.AllorJ.SchatschneiderC.YovanoffP. (2024). Measuring elementary student reading gain in the context of school-implemented multitiered systems of support. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325241268563
3.
Al OtaibaS.WagnerR. K.MillerB. (2014). “Waiting to fail” redux: Understanding inadequate Response to Intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(3),129–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714525622
4.
AustinC. R.VaughnS.McClellandA. M. (2017). Intensive reading interventions for inadequate responders in grades K–3: A synthesis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(4),191–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717714446
5.
BaluR.ZhuP.DoolittleF.SchillerE.JenkinsJ.GerstenR. (2015). Evaluation of Response to Intervention practices for elementary school reading (NCEE2016–4000). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
6.
BarrioB. L. (2021). Understanding culturally responsive practices in teacher preparation: An avenue to address disproportionality in special education. Teaching Education, 32(4),437–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1796956
7.
BashirA. S.HookP. E. (2009). Fluency: A key link between word identification and comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(2),196–200. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/08-0074
8.
BerkeleyS.ScanlonD.BaileyT. R.SuttonJ. C.SaccoD. M. (2020). A snapshot of RTI implementation a decade later: New picture, same story. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5),332–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420915867
9.
BraunG.KummS.BrownC.WalteS.HughesM. T.MagginD. M. (2018). Living in Tier 2: Educators’ perceptions of MTSS in urban schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(10),1114–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13
10.
BrownJ. E.DoolittleJ. (2008). A cultural, linguistic, and ecological framework for Response to Intervention with English language learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(5),66–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804000509
11.
BuchananN. T.PerezM.PrinsteinM. J.ThurstonI. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. American Psychologist, 76,1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000905
12.
BurnsM. K.AppletonJ. J.StehouwerJ. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4),381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300406
13.
BurnsM. K.MakiK. E.BrannK. L.McComasJ. J.HelmanL. A. (2020). Comparison of reading growth among students with severe reading deficits who received intervention to typically achieving students and students receiving special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420918840
14.
Cárdenas-HaganE. (2018). Cross-language connections for English learners’ literacy development. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(1),14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218762583
15.
CastilloW.GillbornD. (2022). How to “QuantCrit”: Practices and questions for education data researchers and users (Working Paper No.22–546). https://doi.org/10.26300/v5kh-dd65
16.
CavazosL. O.OrtizA. A. (2020). Incorporating oral language assessment into MTSS/RTI frameworks: The potential of personal narrative assessment. Bilingual Research Journal, 43(3),323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2020.1826367
17.
CavendishW.EspinosaA. (2013). Teacher preparation for student diversity and disabilities: Changing roles in Response to Intervention models. Advances in Special Education, 25,189–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-4013(2013)0000025013?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate
18.
ChallJ. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. McGraw Hill.
19.
ChardD. J.VaughnS.TylerB. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5),386–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350050101
20.
ChoE.CapinP.RobertsG.RobertsG.VaughnS. (2019). Examining sources and mechanisms of reading comprehension difficulties: Comparing English learners and non-English learners within the simple view of reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6),982–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000332
21.
ChristensonS. L. (2003). The family-school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(4),454–482. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.4.454.26995
22.
ChungS. C.ChenX.GevaE. (2019). Deconstructing and reconstructing cross-language transfer in bilingual reading development: An interactive framework. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50,149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.01.003
23.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2017). The intersectional gap: How bilingual students in the United States are excluded from inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9),906–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1296032
24.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
CoyneM. D.OldhamA.DoughertyS. M.LeonardK.KoriakinT.GageN. A.BurnsD.GillisM. (2018). Evaluating the effects of supplemental reading intervention within an MTSS or RTI reading reform initiative using a regression discontinuity design. Exceptional Children, 84(4),350–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918772791
26.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2),222–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222
DukeN. K.CartwrightK. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
29.
FarmerT. W.LeeD. L.TherrienW. (2022). Targeted universalism and tiered systems of adaptive support: Centering intervention on the developmental needs of students with exceptionalities. In FarmerT. W.TalbottE.LeeD.McMasterK.AcevesT. (Eds.), Handbook of special education research: Theory, methods, & developmental processes (pp. 354–365). Routledge.
30.
FienH.NelsonN. J.SmolkowskiK.KostyD.PilgerM.BakerS. K.SmithJ. L. M. (2021). A conceptual replication study of the enhanced core reading instruction MTSS-reading model. Exceptional Children, 87(3),265–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920953763
31.
FitzmauriceG. M.LairdN. M.WareJ. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. Wiley.
32.
FixsenD.NaoomS.BlaseK.FriedmanR.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.
33.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3),195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442150
34.
GallagherM. A.ScrivnerS. (2024). Teachers’ beliefs about language diversity and multilingual learners: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 95, 822–861. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241257533
35.
GerstenR.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE2009–4045). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
36.
GilbertJ. K.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BoutonB.BarqueroL. A.ChoE. (2013). Efficacy of a first-grade responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2),135–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.45
37.
GilmourA. F.FuchsD.WehbyJ. H. (2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3),329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795830
HeY.ArcilaJ. (2025). Engaging multilingual families through equitable partnerships: A literature review. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251338836
40.
HooverJ. J.Soltero-GonzálezL. (2018). Educator preparation for developing culturally and linguistically responsive MTSS in rural community elementary schools. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(3),188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417753689
41.
HurlbutA. R.YoungJ.BoggsC.YoungJ. (2023). Response to Intervention in reading: A literature review and critical synthesis. International Journal of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education, 4,64–81. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijlcle.v4i.33175
42.
KangasS. E. (2021). “Is it language or disability?”: An ableist and monolingual filter for English Learners with disabilities. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3),673–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3029
43.
KangasS. E.DaiS.ArdashevaY. (2023). The intersection of language and disability progress of English learners with disabilities on NAEP reading. The Journal of Special Education, 58, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669231213054
44.
KearnsD. M.WalkerM. A.BorgesJ. C.DuffyM. E. (2022). Can reading practitioners and researchers improve intensive reading support systems in a large urban school system?Journal of Research in Reading, 45(3),488–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12406
45.
KendeouP.McMasterK. L.ChristT. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3,62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707
46.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4),547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
47.
KresslerB.ChapmanL. A.KunkelA.HoveyK. A. (2020). Culturally responsive data-based decision making in high school settings. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(4),214–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219855737
48.
LiG.YangL. (2015). A multilevel analysis of Asian immigrant children’s reading achievement in the early years: Evidence from the ECLS-K data. Frontiers of Education in China, 10(1),110–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397055
49.
LiuK.ThurlowM.BarreraM.GuvenK.ShyyanV. (2005). Graduation exam participation and performance (2000-2001) of English language learners with disabilities (ELLs with Disabilities Report 3). National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
50.
LoeraG.RuedaR.NakamotoJ. (2011). The association between parental involvement in reading and schooling and children’s reading engagement in Latino families. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(2),133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071003731554
51.
MarrsH.De LeonM.LawlessT. (2022). Use of English language proficiency data to better assess reading growth for English language learners. School Psychology Review, 51(4),427–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1917971
52.
MattisonR. E.WoodsA. D.MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M. (2023). Longitudinal trajectories of reading and mathematics achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(2),132–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221085668
53.
MollK.SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (2020). Introduction to the special issue “comorbidities between reading disorders and other developmental disorders.”Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(1),1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1702045
54.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44,472–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411414010
55.
NajarianM.TourangeauK.NordC.Wallner-AllenK.Vaden-KiernanN. (2019). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten class of 2010–11 (ECLS-K:2011), third-grade, fourth-grade, and fifth-grade psychometric report (NCES 2020-123). National Center for Education Statistics.
56.
NakagawaS.JohnsonP. C.SchielzethH. (2017). The coefficient of determination R^2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(134), 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
57.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. U.S. Department of Education.
58.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2010). Reading framework for the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. U.S. Department of Education.
OroscoM. J.KlingnerJ. (2010). One school’s implementation of RTI with English language learners: “Referring into RTI.”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3),269–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355474
61.
OslundE. L.EllemanA. M.WallaceK. (2021). Factors related to data-based decision-making: Examining experience, professional development, and the mediating effect of confidence on teacher graph literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(4),243–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420972187
62.
PeraltaY.KohliN.KendeouP.DavisonM. L.LockE. F. (2024). Modeling the interrelation of reading and mathematics achievement trajectories: Is their development intertwined?Reading and Writing, 37, 1267–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10442-2
63.
PullenP. C.van DijkW.GonsalvesV. E.LaneH. B.AshworthK. E. (2018). RTI and MTSS: Response to Intervention and multi-tiered systems of support: How do they differ and how are they the same, if at all? In PullenP. C.KennedyM. (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention and multitiered systems of support (pp. 5–10). Routledge.
64.
Richards-TutorC.BakerD. L.GerstenR.BakerS. K.SmithJ. M. (2016). The effectiveness of reading interventions for English learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82,144–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585483
65.
RobertsG. J.HallC.ChoE.CotéB.LeeJ.QiB.Van OoyikJ. (2022). The state of current reading intervention research for English learners in grades K–2: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1),335–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09629-2
66.
RobinsonM.ToddR. L. (2023). Teacher perceptions of Tier 2 reading interventions. Consortium of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education.
67.
RuizM. I. (2020). Beyond traditional Response to Intervention: Helping rural educators understand English learners’ needs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(1),35–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519894661
68.
SamuelsonC. W.DobisC. H.DavisD. S.GrifenhagenJ. F. (2025). Barriers to implementation and strategies for improvements in elementary school tiered reading intervention processes. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 41(6), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2025.2481068
69.
SandbergK. L.ReschlyA. L. (2011). English learners: Challenges in assessment and the promise of curriculum-based measurement. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2),144–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361260
70.
SandersM. G. (2012). Sustaining programs of school, family, and community partnerships: A qualitative longitudinal study of two districts. Educational Policy, 26(6),845–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811417591
71.
SavitzR. S.AllenA. A.BrownC. (2022). Variations in RTI literacy implementation in grades 6-12: A national study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 61(1),18–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.1887416
72.
SheltonA.WexlerJ.SilvermanR. D.StapletonL. M. (2019). A synthesis of reading comprehension interventions for persons with mild intellectual disability. Review of Educational Research, 89(4),612–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319857041
73.
SinkC. A.OckermanM. S. (2016). School counselors and multi-tiered system of supports: Cultivating systemic change and equitable outcomes. The Professional Counselor, 6(3),203–219. https://doi.org/10.15241/csmo.6.3.v
74.
StevensE. A.WalkerM. A.VaughnS. (2017). The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5),576–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416638028
75.
SwansonE.StevensE. A.ScammaccaN. K.CapinP.StewartA. A.AustinC. R. (2017). The impact of Tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in grades 4–12: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 30, 1639–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9743-3
76.
ThurlowM. L.BremerC.AlbusD. (2011). 2008-09 publicly reported assessment results for students with disabilities and ELLs with disabilities (Technical Report 59). National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
77.
TourangeauK.NordC.LêT.Wallner-AllenK.Vaden-KiernanN.BlakerL.NajarianM. (2019). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten class of 2010–11 (ECLS-K:2011) user’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 Kindergarten–fifth grade data file and electronic codebook, public version (NCES 2019-051). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.
78.
TrainorA. A.RomanoL. (2023). Intersectional research as a methodology for shaping transition research in support of equitable postschool outcomes. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(3),169–180. https://doi.org/21651434231169990
79.
WanzekJ.StevensE. A.WilliamsK. J.ScammaccaN.VaughnS.SargentK. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6),612–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775110
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
