Recent advocacy efforts and state policies have recognized the identification of and support for students with dyslexia as a critical issue for schools. Current issues related to dyslexia identification include the lack of a universal definition for dyslexia and the possible confusion created by state legislation related to dyslexia. Tackling these issues in schools may include using current research to implement hybrid models of identification, evaluating and improving screening tools for dyslexia risk, and addressing data-based decision-making through response-to-intervention frameworks.
Al OtaibaS.BakerK.LanP.AllorJ.RivasB.YovanoffP.KamataA. (2019). Elementary teacher’s knowledge of response to intervention implementation: A preliminary factor analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00171-5
2.
Al OtaibaS.WagnerR. K.MillerB. (2014). “Waiting to fail” redux: Understanding inadequate response to intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(3), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714525622
3.
BlumenthalS.BlumenthalY.LembkeE. S.PowellS. R.Schultze-PetzoldP.ThomasE. R. (2021). Educator perspectives on data-based decision making in Germany and the United States. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420986120
4.
CattsH. W.NielsenD. C.BridgesM. S.LiuY. S.BontempoD. E. (2015). Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498115
5.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et. seq. (2004). https://sites.ed.gov/idea/
13.
JohnsonE. S.JenkinsJ. R.PetscherY.CattsH. W. (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00291.x
14.
LyonG. R.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.
15.
MiciakJ.FletcherJ. M. (2020). The critical role of instructional response for identifying dyslexia and other learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420906801
16.
National Center on Improving Literacy. (2021). State of dyslexia: Explore dyslexia legislation and related initiatives in the United States of America. https://improvingliteracy.org/state-of-dyslexia
OdegardT. N.FarrisE. A.MiddletonA. E.OslundE.Rimrodt-FriersonS. (2020). Characteristics of students identified with dyslexia within the context of state legislation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420914551
PengP.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ChoE.EllemanA. M.KearnsD. M.PattonS.ComptonD. L. (2020). Is “response/no response” too simple a notion for RTI frameworks? Exploring multiple response types with latent profile analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420931818
21.
PetscherY.FienH.StanleyC.GearinB.GaabN.FletcherJ. M.JohnsonE. (2019). Screening for dyslexia. National Center on Improving Literacy. https://www.improvingliteracy.org
22.
ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E. (2020). The American experience: Towards a 21st century definition of dyslexia. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1793545
23.
StokerG.DrummondK.MassengaleC.BahrC.LinS.VaughnS. (2019). Dyslexia and related disorders reporting study. American Institutes for Research.
TosteJ. R.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.GilbertJ. K.ChoE.BarqueroL. A.BoutonB. D. (2014). Understanding unresponsiveness to Tier 2 reading intervention: Exploring the classification and profiles of adequate and inadequate responders in first grade. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(4), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713518336
26.
U.S. Department of Education. (2021, May). Students with disabilities. Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg
27.
WagnerR. K.ZirpsF. A.EdwardsA. A.WoodS. G.JoynerR. E.BeckerB. J.LiuG.BealB. (2020). The prevalence of dyslexia: A new approach to its estimation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420920377
