A systematic review of transition literature was conducted on 743 articles published in 22 special education journals from 1990 to 2015. Demographic data and topics of transition-related articles were coded to identify the trends in transition literature. Results found only 4.1% of articles in those journals focused on transition. Student participants were primarily White males with a specific learning disability or intellectual disability. Key topics of transition (e.g., self-determination, transition planning) were supported by several studies in the literature. Yet, crucial topics (e.g., transportation skills, interagency collaboration) contained little research support. A summary of the current trends in transition research and implications for future research are discussed.
AlwellM.CobbB. (2006). A map of the intervention literature in secondary special education transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 29, 3–27. doi:10.1177/08857288060290010301
2.
BaerR. M.DavisoA. W.III.FlexerR. W.QueenR. M.MeindlR. S. (2011). Students with intellectual disabilities: Predictors of transition outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 132–141. doi:10.1177/0885728811399090
3.
CarterE. W.BrockM. E.Bottema-BeutelK.BartholomewA.BoehmT. L.Cease-CookJ. (2013). Methodological trends in secondary education and transition research: Looking backward and moving forward. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 15–24. doi:10.1177/2165143413475659
4.
CarterE. W.SwedeenB.MossC. K.PeskoM. J. (2010). “What are you doing after school?” Promoting extracurricular involvement for transition-age youth with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45, 275–283. doi:10.1177/1053451209359077
5.
Chadsey-RuschJ. C.RuschF. R.O’ReillyM. F. (1991). Transition from school to integrated communities. Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 23–33.
6.
Clement-HeistK.SiegelS.Gaylord-RossR. (1992). Simulated and in situ vocational, social skills training for youths with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 336–345. doi:10.1177/001440299205800406
7.
DouglasK. H.AyresK. M.LangoneJ. (2015). Comparing self-management strategies delivered via an iPhone to promote grocery shopping and literacy. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 446–465.
8.
FieldS.SarverM. D.ShawS. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349. doi:10.1177/07419325030240060501
9.
FinnJ. E.KohlerP. D. (2009). A compliance evaluation of the transition outcomes project. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 17–29. doi:10.1177/0885728808315332
10.
FlowersC.TestD. W.Povenmire-KirkT. C.DiegelmannK. M.Bunch-CrumpK. R.Kemp-InmanA.GoodnightC. I. (2018). A demonstration model of interagency collaboration for students with disabilities: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Special Education, 51, 211–221. doi:10.1177/0022466917720764
11.
GrigalM.HartD.MiglioreA. (2011). Comparing the transition planning, postsecondary education, and employment outcomes of students with intellectual and other disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 4–17. doi:10.1177/0885728811399091
12.
HaberM. G.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.RoweD. A.BartholomewA. L.TestD. W.FowlerC. H. (2015). What works, when, for whom, and with whom. Review of Educational Research, 86, 123–162. doi:10.3102/0034654315583135
13.
HarveyM. W. (2002). Comparison of postsecondary transitional outcomes between students with and without disabilities by secondary vocational education participation: Findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25(2), 99–122. doi:10.1177/088572880202500202
14.
HughesC.EisenmanL. T.HwangB.KimJ.KillianD. J.ScottS. V. (1997). Transition from secondary special education to adult life: A review and analysis of empirical measures. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 85–104.
KelleyK. R.BartholomewA.TestD. W. (2013). Effects of the self-directed IEP delivered using computer-assisted instruction on student participation in educational planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 67–77. doi:10.1177/0741932511415864
17.
KimK. H.MorningstarM. E. (2007). Enhancing secondary special education teachers’ knowledge and competencies in working with culturally and linguistically diverse families through online training. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 116–128. doi:10.1177/08857288070300020201
18.
KohlerP. D. (1993). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied?Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 107–121. doi:10.1177/088572889301600201
19.
KohlerP. D. (1996). Taxonomy for transition programming: Linking research and practice. Champaign: Transition Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
20.
KohlerP. D.GothbergJ. E.FowlerC.CoyleJ. (2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. Available at www.transitionta.org
21.
KohlerP. D.GreeneG. (2004). Strategies for integrating transition-related competencies into teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 146–162. doi:10.1177/088840640402700206
22.
KrausL. (2017). 2016 disability statistics annual report. Durham: University of New Hampshire.
23.
LandmarkL. J.JuS.ZhangD. (2010). Substantiated best practices in transition: Fifteen plus years later. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 165–176. doi:10.1177/0885728810376410
24.
LangoneG. A.LangoneJ.McLaughlinP. J. (1991). Evaluating the impact of a secondary transitional teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 94–102. doi:10.1177/088840649101400203
25.
LarsonS. A.EschenbacherH. J.AndersonL. L.TaylorB.PettingellS.HewittA.. . . BourneM. L. (2017). In-home and residential long-term supports and services for persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities: Status and trends through 2015. Minneapolis: Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
26.
LeakeD.BooneR. (2007). Multicultural perspectives on self-determination from youth, parent, and teacher focus groups. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 104–115. doi:10.1177/08857288070300020101
27.
MadausJ. W.GelbarN. W.DukesL. L.Faggella-LubyM.LalorA. R.KowittJ. S. (2013). Thirty-five years of transition topics: A review of CDTEI issues from 1978 to 2012. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 7–14. doi:10.1177/2165143413476734
28.
MazzottiV. L.TestD. W.WoodC. L.RichterS. (2010). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ knowledge of postschool options. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 25–40. doi:10.1177/0885728809338714
29.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.de BreyC.SnyderT.WangX.Wilkinson-FlickerS.. . . HinzS. (2017). Condition of education 2017 (NCES 2017-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
30.
MechlingL.O’BrienE. (2010). Computer-based video instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to use public bus transportation. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 230–241.
31.
MorningstarM. E.ClarkG. M. (2003). The status of personnel preparation for transition education and services: What is the critical content? How can it be offered?Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 227–237. doi:10.1177/088572880302600208
32.
MorningstarM. E.KimK. H.ClarkG. M. (2008). Evaluating a transition personnel preparation program: Identifying transition competencies of practitioners. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 47–58. doi:10.1177/088840640803100105
33.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
34.
NoonanP. M.EricksonA. G.MorningstarM. E. (2013). Effects of community transition teams on interagency collaboration for school and adult agency staff. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 96–104. doi:10.1177/2165143412451119
35.
NoyesD. A.SaxC. L. (2004). Changing systems for transition: Students, families, and professionals working together. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 35–44.
36.
OertleK. M.TrachJ. S. (2007). Interagency collaboration: The importance of rehabilitation professionals’ involvement in transition. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73(3), 36–44.
37.
OesterreichH. A.KnightM. G. (2008). Facilitating transitions to college for students with disabilities from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 300–304. doi:10.1177/1053451208314733
38.
Povenmire-KirkT. C.DiegelmannK.CrumpK.SchnorrC.TestD.FlowersC.AspelN. (2015). Implementing CIRCLES: A new model for interagency collaboration in transition planning. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42, 51–65. doi:10.3233/JVR-140723
39.
Povenmire-KirkT. C.LindstromL.BullisM. (2010). De escuela a la vida adulta/From school to adult life: Transition needs for Latino youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 41–51. doi:10.1177/0885728809359004
40.
PowersK.GeenenS.PowersL. E. (2009). Similarities and differences in the transition expectations of youth and parents. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 132–144. doi:10.1177/0885728809346302
41.
RamasamyR. (1995). Effectiveness of high school curricula for the transition of Apache special and general education students. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 51–58. doi:10.1177/088572880002300204
42.
RodriguezR. J.CavendishW. (2013). Differences in the relationship between family environments and self-determination among Anglo, Latino, and female students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 152–162. doi:10.1177/2165143412461524
43.
RoweD. A.TestD. W. (2010). The effects of computer-based instruction on the transition planning process knowledge of parents of students with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 35, 102–115. doi:10.2511/rpsd.35.3-4.102
44.
SantamaríaL. J.SantamaríaA. P. (2015). Counteracting educational injustice with applied critical leadership: Culturally responsive practices promoting sustainable change. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17, 22–42. doi:10.18251/ijme.v17i1.1013
45.
SitlingtonP. L.FrankA. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 97–111. doi:10.2307/1510654
46.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859
47.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
TrainorA. A. (2008). Using cultural and social capital to improve postsecondary outcomes and expand transition models for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 148–162. doi:10.1177/0022466907313346
50.
TrainorA. A.LindstromL.Simon-BurroughsM.MartinJ. E.SorrellsA. M. (2008). From marginalized to maximized opportunities for diverse youths with disabilities: A position paper of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 56–64. doi:10.1177/0885728807313777
WagnerM. M.D’AmicoR.MarderC.NewmanL.BlackorbyJ. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
54.
WagnerM. M.NewmanL. A.JavitzH. S. (2014). The influence of family socioeconomic status on the post-high-school outcomes of youth with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37, 5–17. doi:10.1177/2165143414523980
55.
WalteS.CushingL. S.AthamanahL. S.PoseyK. (2017). Seeking the perspectives of transition-age students with significant disabilities since 1990. Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities Online Journal, 4(1), 47–62.
56.
WillM. (1983). OSERS programming for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges for school to working life. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
