Model Drawing Strategy for Fraction Word Problem Solving of Fourth-Grade Students With Learning Disabilities

Abstract

This study used a multiple probe across participants design to examine the effects of a model drawing strategy (MDS) intervention package on fraction comparing and ordering word problem–solving performance of three Grade 4 students. MDS is a form of cognitive strategy instruction for teaching word problem solving that includes explicit instruction in drawing bar diagrams to represent problem components. Results suggest the intervention package was effective for improving the fraction word problem solving of students with learning disabilities and that effects were maintained 2 and 4 weeks after intervention. Implications of these findings and indications for future research are discussed.

Keywords

learning disabilities exceptionalities learning strategies and direct instruction instruction mathematics elementary special education single-subject research methodology academic achievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Booth

J. L.

Newton

K. J.

Twiss-Garrity

L. K.

(2014). The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.001

Booth

J. L.

Siegler

R. S.

(2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79, 1016–1031. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01173.x

Cassel

Reid

(1996). Use of a self-regulated strategy intervention to improve word problem-solving skills of students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 153–172. doi:10.1007/BF02110230

Dennis

M. S.

Knight

Jerman

(2015). Teaching high school students with learning disabilities to use model drawing strategy to solve fraction and percentage word problems. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60, 10–21. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.954514

Empson

S. B.

Junk

Dominguez

Turner

(2006). Fractions as the coordination of multiplicatively related quantities: A cross-sectional study of children’s thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 1–28. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-9000-6

Gabriel

Coché

Szucs

Carette

Rey

(2013). A componential view of children’s difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12.

Gaertner

M. N.

Kim

DesJardins

S. L.

McClarty

K. L.

(2014). Preparing students for college and careers: The causal role of algebra II. Research in Higher Education, 55, 143–165. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9322-7

Gast

D. L.

Lloyd

B. P.

Ledford

(2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In Gast

D. L.

Ledford

(Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 251–296). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Hecht

S. A.

Vagi

K. J.

(2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 843–859. doi:10.1037/a0019824

10.

Hunt

J. H.

Empson

S. B.

(2014). Exploratory study of informal strategies for equal sharing problems of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 208–220. doi:10.1177/0731948714551418

11.

Jitendra

A. K.

DiPipi

C. M.

Perron-Jones

(2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem-solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities an emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23–38. doi:10.1177/00224669020360010301

12.

Jitendra

A. K.

Griffin

C. C.

McGoey

Gardill

M. C.

Bhat

Riley

(1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345–355. doi:10.1080/00220679809597564

13.

Jitendra

A. K.

Hoff

Beck

M. M.

(1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using a schema-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 50–64. doi:10.1177/074193259902000108

14.

Jordan

N. C.

Hansen

Fuchs

L. S.

Siegler

R. S.

Gersten

Micklos

(2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 45–58.

15.

Keijzer

Terwel

(2003). Learning for mathematical insight: A longitudinal comparative study on modelling. Learning and Instruction, 13, 285–304.

16.

Kho

T. H.

(1987). Mathematical models for solving arithmetic problems. In Proceedings of the Fourth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematical Education (ICMI-SEAMS) Mathematical Education in the 1990’s (Vol. 4, pp. 345–351). Singapore: Institute of Education.

17.

Kingsdorf

Krawec

(2014). Error analysis of mathematical word problem solving across students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 66–74. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12029

18.

Kratochwill

T. R.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Horner

R. H.

Levin

J. R.

Odom

S. L.

Rindskopf

D. M.

Shadish

W. R.

(2013). Single case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794

19.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Scruggs

T. E.

Shiah

(1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 89–98.

20.

Mayer

R. E.

(2013). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In Silver

E. A.

(Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 123–138). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1985)

21.

Mazzocco

M. M.

Myers

G. F.

Lewis

K. E.

Hanich

L. B.

Murphy

M. M.

(2013). Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiates middle school students with mathematics learning disability (dyscalculia) versus low mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 371–387.

22.

Misquitta

(2011). A review of the literature: Fraction instruction for struggling learners in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 109–119.

23.

Montague

(2011). Effective instruction in mathematics for students with learning difficulties. In Wyatt-Smith

Elkins

Gunn

(Eds.), Multiple perspectives on difficulties in learning literacy and numeracy (pp. 295–313). New York, NY: Springer.

24.

Montague

Applegate

Marquard

(1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 223–232.

25.

Montague

Enders

Dietz

(2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 262–272.

26.

Montague

Krawec

Enders

Dietz

(2014). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle-school students of varying ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 469–481. doi:10.1037/a0035176

27.

Moran

A. S.

Swanson

H. L.

Gerber

M. M.

Fung

(2014). The effects of paraphrasing interventions on problem solving accuracy for children at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 97–105. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12035

28.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://www.corestandards.org

29.

S. F.

Lee

(2005). How primary five pupils use the model method to solve word problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 60–83.

30.

Zhou

Y. D.

(2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40, 27–52.

31.

Osana

H. P.

Pitsolantis

(2013). Addressing the struggle to link form and understanding in fractions instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 29–56.

32.

Pantziara

Philippou

(2012). Levels of students’ “conception” of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 61–83.

33.

Parker

R. I.

Vannest

K. J.

(2009). An improved effect size for single case research: Non-overlap of all pairs (NAP). Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367.

34.

Parker

R. I.

Vannest

K. J.

Davis

J. L.

Sauber

S. B.

(2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299.

35.

Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2014). Assessment anchors and eligible content: Mathematics grade 4. Retrieved from http://www.education.pa.gov/K-12/Assessment%20and%20Accountability/PSSA/Pages/Assessment-Anchors.aspx#tab-1

36.

Plunk

A. D.

Tate

W. F.

Bierut

L. J.

Grucza

R. A.

(2014). Intended and unintended effects of state-mandated high school science and mathematics course graduation requirements on educational attainment. Educational Researcher, 43, 230–241. doi:10.3102/0013189X14540207

37.

Rittle-Johnson

Koedinger

K. R.

(2005). Designing knowledge scaffolds to support mathematical problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 313–349.

38.

Siegler

Carpenter

Fennell

Geary

Lewis

Okamoto

Wray

(2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade (IES Practice Guide, NCEE 2010-4039). What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/15

39.

Siegler

R. S.

Duncan

G. J.

Davis-Kean

P. E.

Duckworth

Claessens

Engel

. . . Chen

(2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697.doi:10.1177/0956797612440101

40.

Stafylidou

Vosniadou

(2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 503–518.

41.

Swanson

H. L.

(2014). Does cognitive strategy training on word problems compensate for working memory capacity in children with math difficulties? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 831–848. doi:10.1037/a0035838

42.

Swanson

H. L.

Lussier

Orosco

(2013). Effects of cognitive strategy interventions and cognitive moderators on word problem solving in children at risk for problem solving difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 170–183. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12019

43.

Torbeyns

Schneider

Xin

Siegler

R. S.

(2015). Bridging the gap: Fraction understanding is central to mathematics achievement in students from three different continents. Learning and Instruction, 37, 5–13. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.002A

44.

van Garderen

. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 496–506.

45.

Vukovic

R. K.

Siegel

L. S.

(2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 25–38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00298.x

46.

Witt

J. C.

Elliott

S. N.

(1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In Kratochwill

T. R.

(Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). London, England: Routledge.

47.

Zheng

Flynn

L. J.

Swanson

H. L.

(2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem solving and math disabilities a selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 97–111. doi:10.1177/0731948712444277