Understanding rational numbers is critical for secondary mathematics achievement. However, students with mathematics difficulties (MD) struggle with rational number topics, including fractions, decimals, and percentages. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe the instructional foci of rational number interventions, determine the overall effect size, and explore potential moderators. Forty-three studies were included and 150 effect sizes were meta-analyzed using robust variance estimation. The majority of studies focused on teaching fraction magnitude and arithmetic. An overall effect size of g = 1.02 [0.80, 1.25] was found for rational number interventions favoring treatment conditions over business as usual control. Proximal measures contributed to higher effect sizes than distal measures. Limitations included a high number of fraction interventions contributing to the overall effect size and a large amount of heterogeneity among study effect sizes.
*BarbieriC. A.RodriguesJ.DysonN.JordanN. C. (2020). Improving fraction understanding in sixth graders with mathematics difficulties: Effects of a number line approach combined with cognitive learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 628–648.
2.
BarnettS. M.CeciS. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
3.
BloomH. S.HillC. J.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072
4.
BoalerJ. (1993). Encouraging the transfer of “school” mathematics to the “real world” through the integration of process and content, context and culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(4), 341–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273906
5.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
CalhoonM. B.EmersonR. W.FloresM.HoushinsD. E. (2007). Computational fluency performance profile of high school students with mathematics disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28(5), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280050401
8.
CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed.). Russell SAGE Foundation.
9.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 504–511.
10.
*CoureyS. J. (2006). Informal knowledge and fraction instruction in third grade [Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
11.
*DennisM. S.KnightJ.JermanO. (2016). Teaching high school students with learning disabilities to use model drawing strategy to solve fraction and percentage word problems. Preventing School Failure, 60(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.954514
12.
DennisM. S.SharpE.ChovanesJ.ThomasA.BurnsR. M.CusterB.ParkJ. (2016). A meta-analysis of empirical research on teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 31(3), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12107
DeWolfM.BassokM.HolyoakK. J. (2015). From rational numbers to algebra: Separable contributions of decimal magnitude and relational understanding of fractions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.013
15.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.KostyD.MaddoxS. A.SmolkowskiK.FienH.BakerS. K.KimmelG. L. (2021). Kindergarteners at risk for severe mathematics difficulties: Investigating tipping points of core mathematics instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420972185
16.
*DysonN. I.JordanN. C.RodriguesJ.BarbieriC.RinneL. (2018). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
17.
EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2019a). Interventions to improve fraction skills for students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918817504
18.
*EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2019b). SRSD fractions: Helping students at risk for disabilities add/subtract fractions with unlike denominators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(5), 399–412.
*FloresM. M.HintonV. M.MeyerJ. M. (2020). Teaching fraction concepts using the concept-representational-abstract sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518795477
22.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.BurchM.HamlettC. L.OwenR.HospM.JancekD. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.293
23.
*FuchsL. S.MaloneA. S.SchumacherR. F.NamkungJ.HamletC. L.JordanN. C.SieglerR. S.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2016). Supported self-explaining during fraction intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000073
24.
FuchsL. S.Newman-GoncharR.SchumacherR.DoughertyB.BuckaN.KarpK. S.WoodwardJ.ClarkeB.JordanN. C.GerstenR.JayanthiM.KeatingB.MorganS. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades (WWC 2021006). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://whatworks.ed.gov/
25.
*FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.JordanN. C.SieglerR.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446
26.
*FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA.WangA.HamlettC. L.JordanN. C.SieglerR.ChangasP. (2016). Effects of intervention to improve at-risk fourth graders’ understanding, calculations, and word problems with fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1086/686303
27.
*FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.SterbaS. K.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA.HamlettC. L.JordanN. C.GerstenR.SieglerR. S.ChangasP. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034341
28.
*FuchsL. S.WangA.PreacherK. J.MaloneA. S.FuchsD.PachmayrR. (2021). Addressing challenging mathematics standards with at-risk learners: A randomized controlled trial on the effects of fractions intervention at third grade. Exceptional Children, 87(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920924846
29.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
30.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202
31.
GerstenR.JordanN. C.FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040301
32.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
33.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation of meta-regression within dependent effect-size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
34.
*HintonV. M.FloresM. M. (2019). The effects of the concrete-representational-abstract sequence for students at risk for mathematics failure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(2019), 493–516.
35.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
36.
*HughesE. M. (2011). The effects of concrete-abstract sequenced instruction on struggling learners acquisition, retention, and self-efficacy of fractions [Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
37.
*HughesE. M. (2019). Point of view modeling to teach simplifying fractions to middle school students with mathematical learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 17(1), 41–57.
38.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J. (2021). A descriptive analysis of the error patterns observed in the fraction-computation solution pathways of students with and without learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419872256
39.
*JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.StarJ. R.RodriguezM. C. (2016). The effects of schema-based instruction on the proportional thinking of students with mathematics difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414554228
40.
*JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.DupuisD. N.KarlS. R. (2017a). A randomized trial of the effects of schema-based instruction on proportional problem-solving for student with mathematics problem-solving difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416629646
41.
*JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R.KarlS. R.SimonsonG. R.SlaterS. C. (2017b). Investigating a tier 1 intervention focused on proportional reasoning: A follow-up study. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 340–358. https://doi/10.1177/0014402917691017
42.
*JitendraA. K.StarJ. R. (2012). An exploratory study contrasting high- and low-achieving students’ percent word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2012), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.003
43.
JordanN.ResnickI.RodriguesJ.HansenN.DysonN. (2016). Delaware longitudinal study of fraction learning: Implications for helping children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416662033
44.
*JosephL. M.HunterA. D. (2001). Differential application of a cue card strategy for solving fraction problems: Exploring instructional utility of the cognitive assessment system. Child Study Journal, 31(2), 123–136.
*KellyB.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300108
47.
KennedyC. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson Education.
48.
*KimS. A.WangP.MichaelsC. A. (2015). Using explicit C-R-A instruction to teach fraction word problem solving to low-performing Asian English learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030999
49.
*KiuharaS. A.RouseA. G.DaiT.WitzelB. S.MorphyP.UnkerB. (2020). Constructing written arguments to develop fraction knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000391
50.
*LeeJ. (2018). The effectiveness of fraction interventions for fifth graders with mathematics difficulties [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin]. Texas Scholar Works.
51.
LeiQ.MasonR. A.XinY. P.DavisJ. L.DavidM.LoryC. (2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research on mathematics word problem-solving interventions for English learners with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 35(4), 201–217.
52.
Lortie-ForguesH.SieglerR. S. (2017). Conceptual knowledge of decimal arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000148
53.
Lortie-ForguesH.TianJ.SieglerR. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult?Developmental Review, 38(2015), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008
54.
Losinski, EnnisR. P.SandersS.WisemanN. (2019). An investigation of SRSD to teach fractions to students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918813980
55.
MaloneA. S.FuchsL. S. (2017). Error patterns in ordering fractions among at-risk fourth-grade students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416629647
56.
*MaloneA. S.FuchsL. S.SterbaS. K.FuchsD.Foreman-MurrayL. (2019). Does an integrated focus on fractions and decimals improve at-risk students’ rational number magnitude performance?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59(2019), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101782
57.
MathurM. B.VanderWeeleT. J. (2020). Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta- analyses. Applied Statistics, 69(5), 1091–1119.
58.
MazzoccoM. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? (1st ed., pp. 29–47). Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
59.
*McKevettN. M.KrommingaK. R.RuedyA.RoessleinR.RunningK.CoddingR. S. (2019). The effects of motion math: Bounce on students’ fraction knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(1), 25–35.
MisquittaR. (2011). A review of the literature: Fraction instruction for struggling learners in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00330.x
62.
*MoranoS. (2017). Effects of a fraction equivalence intervention combining CRA-I and number line representations [Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University]. PennState Electronic Theses and Dissertations for Graduate School.
63.
*MorrisJ. R. (2019). Effects of an explicit instruction and video modeling intervention with augmented reality on the rational number mathematics outcomes of students with disabilities [Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University]. PennState Electronic Theses and Dissertations for Graduate School.
64.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices Council of Chief State School. (2010). Common Core State Standards (Mathematics). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
65.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Author.
66.
NiY.ZhouY. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
67.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
68.
PowellS. R.GilbertJ. K.FuchsL. S. (2019). Variables influencing algebra performance: Understanding rational numbers is essential. Learning and Individual Differences, 74(2019), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101758
69.
PustejovskyJ. E.ChenM.HamiltonB. (2021). scdhlm: A web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.5.2) [Web application]. https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
70.
*ReneauJ. L. (2012). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to connect manipulatives, problem solving schemas, and equations in word problems with fractions [Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University]. The Research Repository @ WVU.
71.
ResnickI.RinneL.BarbieriC.JordanN. C. (2019). Children’s reasoning about decimals and its relation to fraction learning and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 604–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000309
72.
RoessleinR. I.CoddingR. S. (2019). Fraction interventions for struggling elementary math learners: A review of the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22196
ScarlatoM. C.BurrW. A. (2002). Teaching fractions to middle-school students. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2(1), 23–38.
75.
SchumacherR. F.JayanthiM.GerstenR.DiminoJ.SpalloneS.HaymondK. S. (2018). Using the number line to promote understanding of fractions for struggling fifth graders: A formative pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(4), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12169
76.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.005
77.
SharpE. (2018). The model drawing strategy: Fraction word problem solving for students with learning disabilities [Doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
78.
SharpE.DennisM. S. (2017). Model drawing strategy for fraction word problem solving of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 181–192.
79.
ShinM.BryantD. P. (2015). Fraction interventions for students struggling to learn mathematics: A research synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 36(6), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515572910
80.
ShinM.BryantD. P. (2017). Improving the fraction word problem solving of students with mathematics learning disabilities: Interactive computer application. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 76–86.
81.
SieglerR. S. (2016). Magnitude knowledge: The common core of numerical development. Developmental Science, 19(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12395
82.
SieglerR. S.Lortie-ForguesH. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12077
83.
SieglerR. S.PykeA. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200
84.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(2011), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
85.
SimsekO. (2016). Use of a game-based app as a learning tool for students with mathematics learning disabilities to increase fraction knowledge/skill [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global.
86.
SmallH. H. (2011). The effects of direct instruction in teaching addition and subtraction of decimals and decimal word problems on students at risk for mathematics failure [Master’s Thesis, Utah State University]. ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global.
87.
SnilstveitB.VojtkovaM.BhavsarA.StevensonJ.GaarderM. (2016). Evidence and gap maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 79(2016), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015
88.
StafylidouS.VosniadouS. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015
89.
StevensE. A.RodgersM. A.PowellS. R. (2018). Mathematics interventions for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517731887
90.
TestD. W.EllisM. F. (2005). The effects of LAP fractions on addition and subtraction of fractions with students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(1), 11–24.
91.
TianJ.SieglerR. S. (2018). Which type of rational numbers should students learn first?Educational Psychology Review, 30, 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9417-3
92.
TiptonE. (2013). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with binary dependent effects. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1070
93.
TorbeynsJ.SchneiderM.XinZ.SieglerR. S. (2015). Bridging the gap: Fraction understanding is central to mathematics achievement in students from three different continents. Learning and Instruction, 37(2015), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.002
94.
VamvakoussiX.VosniadouS. (2004). Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: A conceptual change approach. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.013
95.
VamvakoussiX.VosniadouS. (2010). How many decimals are between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676603
96.
Van HoofJ.DegrandeT.CeulemansE.VerschaffelL.DoorenW. V. (2018). Towards a mathematically more correct understanding of rational numbers: A longitudinal study with upper elementary school learners. Learning and Individual Differences, 61(2018), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.010
97.
Van HoofJ.VanderwalleJ.VerchaffelL.Van DoorenW. (2015). In search for the natural number bias in secondary school students’ interpretation of the effect of arithmetical operations. Learning and Instruction, 37(2015), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.004
98.
Van HoofJ.VanvakoussiX.Van DoorenV. W.VershaffelL. (2017). The transition from natural to rational number knowledge. In GearyD. C.BerchD. B.OchosendorfR.KoepkeK. M. (Eds.), Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts: Vol. 3. Mathematical cognition and learning (1st ed., pp. 102–126). Academic Press.
99.
WangA. Y.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.GilbertJ. K.KrowkaS.AbramsonR. (2019). Embedding self-regulation instruction within fractions intervention for third graders with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419851750
100.
WattS. J. (2013). Teaching algebra-based concepts to students with learning disabilities: The effects of preteaching using a gradual instructional sequence [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
101.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse procedures handbook (Version 4.1). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
102.
WoodwardJ. (2017). The concept of magnitude and what it tells us about how struggling students learn fractions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 640–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416659445
103.
WoodwardJ.BaxterJ.RobinsonR. (1999). Rules and reasons: Decimal instruction for academically low achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1401_2
104.
ZhangD.SteckerP.HuckabeeS.MillerR. (2016). Strategic development for middle school students struggling with fractions: Assessment and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 515–531.
