This study examined the degree to which the three of the four essential characteristics of self-determination (autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment) predicted quality of life–related adult outcome constructs using secondary analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. The pattern of predictive relationship was complex. Most findings were concentrated in a high-incidence disability group, with autonomy predicting higher financial independence, employment, social relationships, independent living, and postsecondary education. For those with intellectual disability, there was also a positive relationship between autonomy and inclusive residential opportunities. Implications of the complex pattern of findings for research and practice are discussed.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
LachapelleY.WehmeyerM. L.HaelewyckM. C.CourboisY.KeithK. D.SchalockR.. . .WalshP. N. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00743.x
5.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
7.
SchalockR. L. (2000). Three decades of quality of life. In WehmeyerM. L.PattonJ. R. (Eds.), Mental retardation in the 21st century (pp. 335–356). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
8.
SchalockR. L.BonhamG. S.VerdugoM. A. (2008). The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life: Implications for program planning and evaluation in the field of intellectual disabilities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 181–190.
9.
SchalockR. L.Borthwick-DuffyS.BradleyV.BuntixW. H. E.CoulterD. L.CraigE. P. M.. . .YeagerM. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
10.
SchalockR. L.BrownI.BrownR.CumminsR. A.FelceD.MatikkaL.. . .ParmenterT. (2002). Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40, 457–470.
11.
SchalockR. L.GardnerJ. F.BradleyV. (2007). Quality of life: Applications for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
12.
SchalockR. L.VerdugoM. A.JenaroC.WangM.WehmeyerM.JianchengX.LachapelleY. (2005). Cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 298–311. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[298:csoqol]2.0.co;2
13.
ShogrenK. A. (2013). A social-ecological analysis of the self-determination literature. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 496–511. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.6.496
14.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.LittleT. D. (2013). Autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization: Exploring data on self-determination from NLTS2. Exceptional Children, 80, 221–235.
15.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A.LittleT. D. (in press). Measuring the early adulthood outcomes of young adults with disabilities: Developing constructs using NLTS2 data. Exceptionality.
16.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733
17.
SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2): Study design, timeline and data collection plan. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
18.
StancliffeR. J. (1997). Community living-unit size, staff presence, and residents’ choice-making. Mental Retardation, 35, 1–9. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(1997)035<0001:CLSSPA>2.0.CO;2
19.
StancliffeR. J. (2001). Living with support in the community: Predictors of choice and self-determination. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 91–98. doi:10.1002/mrdd.1013
20.
StancliffeR. J.WehmeyerM. L. (1995). Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 319–328.
21.
WalkerH. M.CalkinsC.WehmeyerM. L.WalkerL.BaconA.PalmerS. B.. . .JohnsonD. R. (2011). A social-ecological approach to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19, 6–18. doi:10.1080/09362835.2011.537220
22.
WehmeyerM. L. (2003). A functional theory of self-determination: Definition and categorization. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 174–181). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
23.
WehmeyerM. L. (2006). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113
24.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
25.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
26.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
27.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
