We examined the effect of three components of self-determination—autonomy, empowerment, and self-realization—on the postsecondary enrollment of English learners with disabilities, using quasi-experimental propensity score modeling and data from the U.S. National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Results support the hypothesis that self-determination components affect postsecondary school enrollment. English learners with disabilities with higher autonomy scores were more likely to enroll in 2-year colleges, and those with higher empowerment scores were more likely to enroll in 4-year colleges. However, prior research found that English learners with disabilities are less likely to act autonomously or report empowerment-related behaviors than other students with disabilities or students in the general population. Considering the increasing importance of postsecondary education, the current study’s findings demonstrate the importance of promoting both the self-determined behaviors of this dually identified population of students and the learning environment supports that facilitate the practice of self-determination.
BeckerS. O.IchinoA. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.
2.
BerryH. G.WardM.CaplanL. (2012). Self-determination and access to postsecondary education in transitioning youths receiving supplemental security income benefits. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35(2), 68–75.
3.
BurkeK. M.RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM.Mumbardo-AdamC.UyanikH.BehrensS. (2018). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 1, 1–13.
4.
BurrE.HaasE.FerriereK. (2015). Identifying and supporting English learner students with learning disabilities: Key issues in the literature and state practice (REL 2015-086). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
5.
CaliendoM.KopeingS. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.
6.
CavendishW. (2017). The role of gender, race/ethnicity, and disability status on the relationship between student perceptions of school and family support self-determination. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416629359
7.
ChirkovV.KimY.RyanR. M.KaplanU. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internationalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97
8.
ChouY.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS.LeeJ. H. (2017). Comparisons of self-determination among students with autism, intellectual disability, and learning disabilities: A multivariate analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 124–132.
9.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.MorganA. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 108–114.
10.
CoxD. R. (1970). Analysis of binary data. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
12.
DuGoffE. H.SchulerM.StuartE. A. (2014). Generalizing observational study results: Applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Services Research, 49(1), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12090
13.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 77–84.
14.
GothbergJ. E.GreenG.KohlerP. D. (2019). District implementation of research -based practices for transition planning with culturally and linguistically diverse youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 42(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418762794
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236.
17.
HoganA.RobertsB. (2015, December). Occupational employment projections to 2024. Monthly Labor Review. U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2015.49
18.
HussarB.ZhangJ.HeinS.WangK.RobertsA.CuiJ.SmithM.Bullock MannF.BarmerA.DiligR. (2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020-144). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
19.
JavitzH.WagnerM. (2003). Analysis of potential bias in the sample of local education agencies (LEAs) in the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International.
20.
JavitzH.WagnerM. (2005). Analysis of potential bias in the Wave 1 and Wave 2 respondents to the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International.
21.
JoshiG. S.BouckE. G. (2017). Examining postsecondary education predictors and participation for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415572894
22.
JuS.ZengW.LandmarkL. J. (2017). Self-determination and academic success of students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(3), 180–189.
LinD.PsatyB.KronmalR. (1988). Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics, 54(3), 948–963.
25.
LiuA. Y.LipscombS.JohannA. (2017). The characteristics and experiences of English learner students with disabilities in secondary school: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. (Working Paper No. 56). Mathematica Policy Research.
26.
LongM. C.CongerD.IatarolaP. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Education Research Journal, 49(2), 285–322.
27.
MartinJ. E.Van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the Self-Directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 299–316.
28.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). English language learners in public schools. The condition of education. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp
30.
NewmanL.GarciaE.TrainorA.ChongM. (2021). National picture of the self-determination characteristics of secondary school English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420982923
31.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from NLTS2 (NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
32.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
33.
PetcuS. D.Van HornM. L.ShogrenK. A. (2017). Self-determination and the enrollment in and completion of postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(14), 225–234.
34.
RodriguezR. J.CavendishW. (2013). Differences in the relationship between family environments and self-determination among Anglo, Latino, and female students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412461524
35.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
36.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
37.
RoystonP.CarlinJ. B.WhiteI. R. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: New features for Mim. Stata Journal, 9(2), 252–264.
38.
ShogrenK. A. (2011). Culture and self-determination: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research and practice. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728811398271
39.
ShogrenK. A. (2012). Hispanic mothers’ perceptions of self-determination. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 170–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2511/027494812804153561
40.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.Garnier VillarrealM.LittleT. D. (2014). Exploring essential characteristics of self-determination for diverse students using data From NLTS2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(3), 168–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413486927
41.
ShogrenK. A.LeeJ.PankoP. (2017). An examination of the relationship between postschool outcomes and autonomy, psychological, empowerment, and self-realization. The Journal of Special Education, 5(2), 115–124.
42.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2016). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment in predicting outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37(1), 55–62.
43.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A.RaleyS. K.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). Exploring the effect of disability, race-ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on scores on the self-determination inventory: Student report. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918782150
44.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA. J.LittleT. J.LopezS. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263.
45.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488–509.
46.
SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) sampling plan.
47.
TrainorA. A. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380030501
48.
TrainorA. A. (2007). Perceptions of adolescent girls with LD regarding self-determination and postsecondary transition planning. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035514
49.
TrainorA. A. (2010). Reexamining the promise of parent participation in special education: An analysis of cultural and social capital. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01086
50.
TrainorA. A.CarterE. W.KarpurA.MartinJ.MazzottiV.MorningstarM. E.NewmanL. A.RojewskiJ. W. (2020). A framework for research in transition: Identifying important areas and intersections for future research. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419864551
51.
TrainorA. A.MurrayA.KimH. (2016). English learners with disabilities in high school: Population characteristics, transition programs, and postschool outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515626797
52.
TrainorA. A.NewmanL.GarciaE.WoodleyH.TraxlerR. E.DescheneD. N. (2019). Postsecondary education-focused transition planning experiences of English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 43–55.
ValdesK.GodardP.WilliamsonC.Van CampenJ.McCrackenM.JonesR. (2013). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Data documentation and dictionary. SRI International.
55.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NCSER 2007-3006). SRI International.
56.
WaitollerF. R.King ThoriusK. A. (2016). Cross-Pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
57.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(4), 302–314.
58.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Student self-report measure of self-determination for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(4), 282–293.
59.
WehmeyerM. L. (1997). Student-directed learning and self-determination. In AgranM. (Ed.), Student-directed learning: Teaching self-determination skills (pp. 28–59). Brooks/Cole Publishing.
60.
WehmeyerM. L. (2000). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale: Procedural guidelines (Rev. ed.). The Arc of the United States.
61.
WehmeyerM. L. (2004). Beyond self-determination: Causal agency theory. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16(4), 337–359.
62.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. J. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
63.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. H. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195–210.
64.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. D.BoultonA. (2012). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination: A randomized-trial placebo control group study. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153.
65.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 4.1). Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
66.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399.
67.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 25–36.
68.
ZhangD. (2005). Parent practices in facilitating self-determination skills: The influences of culture, socioeconomic status, and children’s special education status. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 154–162.
69.
ZimmermanM. A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(1), 71–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
