Despite the growing body of research validating the use of curriculum-based measurement, few studies have focused on using this type of assessment with English learners. Proper assessment of English learners is essential for progress monitoring, determining language proficiency, predicting achievement, and identifying students with disabilities. However, because of linguistic and cultural factors, traditional norm-referenced standardized tests of achievement may not be valid for language minority students. In light of these issues, as well as the growing gap in achievement between language minority and language majority students, greater accountability in the education of English learners is needed. This article delineates some of the challenges in the assessment of English learners in schools, reviews studies that have used curriculum-based measurement with English learners, and outlines the usefulness of such an approach as part of a problem-solving model with this population. Limitations and areas for future research related to the use of curriculum-based measurement with English learners are also presented.
Abedi, J. ( 2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Research , 33, 4-14.
2.
Abedi, J. ( 2006). Psychometric issues in the ELL assessment and special education eligibility. Teachers College Record, 108, 2282-2303.
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
4.
Ardoin, S.P., & Christ, T.J. ( 2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109-125.
5.
Ardoin, S.P., Witt, J.C., Suldo, S.M., Connell, J.E., Koenig, J.L., Resetar, J.L., et al. (2004). Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probes when conducting universal screening. School Psychology Review, 33, 218-233.
6.
Ascher, C. ( 1991). Testing bilingual students: Do we speak the same language ? PTA Today, 16, 7-9.
7.
Baker, S.K., & Good, R. ( 1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students . School Psychology Review, 24, 561-578.
8.
Baker, S.K., Plasencia-Peinado, J., & Lezcano-Lytle, V. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement with language- minority students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 175-213). New York: Guilford .
9.
Bentz, J., & Pavri, S. ( 2000). Curriculum-based measurement in assessing bilingual students: A promising new direction. Diagnostique, 25, 229-248.
10.
Betts, J., Muyskens, P., & Marston, D. ( 2006). Tracking the progress of students whose first language is not English towards English proficiency: Using CBM with English language learners. MinneTESOL/WITESOL Journal, 23, 15-37.
11.
Busch, T.W., & Reschly, A.L. ( 2007). Progress monitoring in reading: Using curriculum-based measurement in a response-to-intervention model. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 223-230.
12.
Christ, T.J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Estimates of the standard error of measurement for curriculum-based measures of oral reading fluency . School Psychology Review, 36, 130-146.
13.
Christenson, S.L., Sinclair, M.F., Lehr, C.A., & Hurley, C.M. ( 2000). Promoting successful school completion. In K. Minke & G. Bear (Eds.), Preventing school problems-promoting school success: Strategies and programs that work (pp. 211-257). Bethesda, MD : National Association of School Psychologists.
14.
City of New York Department of Education. ( 2006). ELLs in New York City: Student demographic data report . New York: Author.
15.
Collier, V.P. ( 1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617-641.
16.
Collier, V.P. ( 1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509-531.
17.
Deno, S.L. ( 1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
18.
Deno, S.L. ( 1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford.
19.
Deno, S.L. ( 1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement . Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5-10.
20.
Domínguez de Ramírez, R., & Shapiro, E.S. (2006). Curriculum based measurement and the evaluation of reading skills of Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 35, 356-369.
21.
Domínguez de Ramírez, R., & Shapiro, E.S. (2007). Cross-language relationship between Spanish and English oral reading fluency among Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classes. Psychology in the Schools, 44(8), 795-806.
22.
Englebert-Johnson, S.R. ( 1997). A comparison of English as a foreign language, learning disabled, and regular class pupils on curriculum based measures of reading and written expression and the pupil rating scale revised. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
23.
Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. ( 2007). America’s children: Key national indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved September 6, 2007, from www.childstats.gov
24.
Francis, D.J., Santi, K.L., Barr, C., Fletcher, J.M., Varisco, A., & Foorman, B.R. ( 2008). Form effects of the estimation of students’ oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology , 46, 315-342.
25.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. ( 1986). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals. Journal of Special Education, 20, 69-82.
26.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Walz, L., & Getmann, G. ( 1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
27.
Graves, A.W., Plasencia-Peinado, J., Deno, S.L., & Johnson, J.R. ( 2005). Formatively evaluating the reading progress of first-grade English learners in multiple-language classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 215-225.
28.
Haager, D., & Windmueller, M.P. (2001). Early reading intervention for English language learners at-risk for learning disabilities: Student and teacher outcomes in an urban school. Learning Disability Quarterly , 24, 235-250.
29.
Hintze, J.M., Daly, E.J., & Shapiro, E.S. ( 1998). An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 27, 433-445.
30.
Hintze, J.M., & Shapiro, E.S. ( 1997). Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula ? Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351-375.
31.
Jacob, S., & Hartshorne, T.S. (2007). Ethics and law for school psychologists (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
32.
Jenkins, J.R., & Jewell, M. ( 1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
33.
Kindler, A.L. ( 2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 2000-2001 summary report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs.
34.
Kirsch, I., Braun, H., Yamamoto, K., & Sum, A. ( 2007). America’s perfect storm: Three forces changing our nation’s future. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
35.
Klein, J.R., & Jimerson, S.R. (2005). Examining ethnic, gender, language, and socioeconomic bias in oral reading fluency scores among Caucasian and Hispanic students. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 23-50.
36.
Klein, S., Bugarin, R., Beltranena, R., & McArthur, E. ( 2005). Language minorities and their educational and labor market indicators: Recent trends. Education Statistics Quarterly , 6(1-2). Retrieved January 26, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_6/1_2/7_2.asp
37.
Laija-Rodriguez, W., Ochoa, S.H., & Parker, R. ( 2006). The cross-linguistic role of cognitive academic language proficiency on reading growth in Spanish and English. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 87-106.
38.
Lam, T.C. ( 1993). Testability: A critical issue in testing language minority students with standardized achievement tests. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 179-191.
39.
Lau, M.Y., & Blatchley, L.A. (2009). A comprehensive, multidimensional approach to assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse students. In J. M. Jones (Ed.), The psychology of multiculturalism in the schools: A primer for practice, training, and research (pp. 139-171). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
40.
Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman-Davis, P. (2002). Supplemental reading instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: Improve reading 30 minutes at a time. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 242-251.
41.
Lopez, E.C., Lamar, D., & Scully-Demartini, D. (1997). The cognitive assessment of limited English proficient children: Current problems and practical recommendations . Cultural Diversity and Mental Health, 3, 117-130.
42.
Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. ( 1985). Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special and regular education settings. Exceptional Children, 52, 266-276.
43.
McMaster, K.L., Wayman, M.M., & Cao, M. ( 2006). Monitoring the reading progress of secondary-level English learners: Technical features of oral reading and maze tasks. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31, 17-31.
44.
Medina, J. ( 2002, October 9). Bilingual education on ballot in two states . New York Times. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com
45.
Minneapolis Public Schools, English Language Learners Department. (2006). Languages spoken in Minneapolis public schools as of May 2006. Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://ell.mpls.k12.mn.us/ELL_Pie_Charts.html
46.
Moore, L.M. ( 1997). An evaluation of the efficacy of curriculum based measurement reading measures in the assessment of Hispanic children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
47.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. ( 2005). The nation’s report card, 2005, Assessment results . Retrieved May 1, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nrc/reading_math_2005/
48.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
49.
Ortiz, S.O., & Flanagan, D.P. (2002). Best practices in working with culturally diverse families. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 337-350). Bethesda, MD : National Association of School Psychology.
50.
Pelligrino, J. W., Jones, L. R., & Mitchell, K. J. (Eds.). (1999). Enhancing the participation and meaningful assessment of all students in NAEP. In Grading the nation’s report card (pp. 87-113). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51.
Reschly, A.L., Busch, T.W., Betts, J., Deno, S.L., & Long, J. ( 2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the cor-relational evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
52.
Reschly, D.J. ( 2005). Viewpoint. Child outcomes and school psychology service delivery: Response to Naglieri. NASP Communique, 33(5), 20-21.
53.
Roehrig, A.D., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S.M., Hudson, R.F., & Torgeson, J.K. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 343-366.
54.
Rothstein, R. ( 2000, November 8). Bilingual Ed: Debunking double talk. New York Times. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com
55.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
56.
Sanchez, G.I. ( 1932). Group differences and Spanish-speaking children-A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16, 549-558.
57.
Sanchez, G.I. ( 1934). Bilingualism and mental measures-A word of caution. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18, 765-772.
58.
Santoro, L.E., Jitendra, A.K., Starosta, K., & Sacks, G. ( 2006). Reading well with Read Well: Enhancing the reading performance of English language learners. Remedial and Special Education , 27, 105-115.
59.
Shinn, M.R., & Bamonto, S. ( 1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 175-213). New York: Guilford .
60.
Stecker, P.M., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 128-134.
61.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Mathes, P.G., Cirino, P.T., Carlson, C.D., Pollard-Durodola, S.D., et al. (2006). Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 56-73.
62.
Wiley, H.I., & Deno, S.L. ( 2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207-214.
63.
Willner, L.S., Rivera, C., & Acosta, B.D. ( 2008). Descriptive study of state assessment policies for accommodating English language learners. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Center for Equity and Excellence in Education. Retrieved October 28, 2008, from http://ceee.gwu.edu/AA/BestPractices.pdf
