In this study, we tested the outcomes of access to a response to intervention (RtI) model in kindergarten or in first grade on end-of-Grade-2 reading achievement and placement in special education. Across five schools, 214 students who began having access to Tier 2 intervention in kindergarten or first grade were compared in Grades 1 and 2 with 208 cohort peers who were average readers and 102 historical control condition second grade poor readers who did not receive Tier 2 intervention. Results demonstrated significant effects on reading achievement for access to RtI in kindergarten at the end of first grade (effects averaged 0.48), but not in second grade, except for students who were English language learners (ELLs), who showed an advantage through the end of second grade. Students with access to RtI overall had significantly higher outcomes at the end of Grade 2 than students in the historical control, with no differences resulting from ELL status. No significant difference in the proportion of students placed in special education was noted; however, a greater proportion of the students found eligible as with learning disabilities had poor reading scores if they were placed after participating in RtI.
BlachmanB. A.TangelD. M.BallE. W.BlackR. S.McGrawC. K. (1999). Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children. Reading and Writing, 11, 239–273.
2.
California Department of Education. (2008). Growth academic performance index (API) demographics. Retrieved from http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2007/
3.
CattsH. W.ComptonD.TomblinJ. B.BridgesM. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 166–181.
4.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BoutonB.GilbertJ. K.BarqueroL. A.. . . CrouchR. C. (2010). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 327–340.
6.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.UnderwoodP. S. (2007). A second chance in second grade: The independent and cumulative impact of first- and second-grade reading instruction and students’ letter-word reading skill growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 199–233.
7.
CoyneM. D.Kame’enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C.HarnB. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104.
8.
CrossonA. C.LesauxN. K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23, 475–494.
9.
CunninghamA. (1990). Explicit vs. implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 429–444.
10.
DentonC. A.KethleyC.NimonK.KurzT. B.MathesP. G.MinyiS.SwansonE. A. (2010). Effectiveness of a supplemental early reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Exceptional Children, 76, 394–416.
11.
DionE.BrodeurM.GosselinC.CampeauM.FuchsD. (2010). Implementing research-based instruction to prevent reading problems among low-income students: Is earlier better?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 87–96.
12.
Division for Learning Disabilities. (2008). Thinking about response to intervention and learning disabilities: A teacher’s guide. Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.
13.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
14.
DunnL.DunnL. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–3rd Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
15.
EngelmannS.BrunerE. (1995). Reading Mastery II (Rainbow ed.). Worthington, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
16.
FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.CattsH. W.TomblinJ. B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In ParisS. G.StahlS. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369–394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.
18.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ThompsonA.Al OtaibaS.YenL.YangN. J.. . . O’ConnorR. E. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.
19.
FuchsL. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172–186.
20.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7–21.
21.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (2003). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
22.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A.ShinnM.BrattenJ.ShinnM.LaimonL.. . . FlindtN. (2004). Technical Adequacy and Decision Making Utility of DIBELS (Tech. Rep. 7). Eugene: University of Oregon.
23.
HintzeJ. M.RyanA. L.StonerG. (2003). Concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy for Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. School Psychology Review, 32, 541–546.
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
25.
JeanM.GevaE. (2009). The development of vocabulary in English as a second language and its role in predicting word recognition ability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 153–185.
26.
JenkinsJ. R.O’ConnorR. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 99–149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
KaminskiR. R.GoodR. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215–227.
28.
KauffmanJ. M.ConroyM.GardnerR.IIIOswaldD. (2008). Cultural sensitivity in the application of behavior principles to education. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 239–262.
29.
KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 363–380.
30.
KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S.OlsonR. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300.
31.
KiefferM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39, 484–486.
32.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.BarlettaL. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or learning disabilities?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 108–128.
33.
LeeJ.GriggW.DonahueP. (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
34.
Linan-ThompsonS.VaughnS.PraterK.CirinoP. T (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners: At-risk for reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 390–398.
35.
LovettM.SteinbachK. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Does the benefit decrease for older children?Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 189–210.
36.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.LesauxN. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 701–711.
37.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.LesauxN. (2011). The gap between Spanish speakers’ word reading and word knowledge: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 82, 1544–1560.
38.
MarstonD.MuyskensP.LauM.CanterA. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision-making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187–200.
39.
MaslenB. L.MaslenJ. (2000). Bob books. New York, NY: Scholastic.
40.
McMasterK.FuchsD.FuchsL.ComptonD. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445–463.
41.
MellardD. F.McKnightM.WoodsK. (2009). Response to intervention screening and progress-monitoring practices in 41 local schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 186–195.
42.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.
43.
O’ConnorR. E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 43–54.
44.
O’ConnorR. E. (2007). Teaching word recognition: Strategies for students with learning difficulties. New York, NY: Guilford.
45.
O’ConnorR. E.BellK. M.HartyK. R.LarkinL. K.SackorS.ZigmondN. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 474–485.
46.
O’ConnorR. E.BocianK.Beebe-FrankenbergerM.LinklaterD. (2010). Responsiveness of students with language difficulties to early intervention in reading. Journal of Special Education, 43, 220–235.
47.
O’ConnorR. E.FulmerD.HartyK.BellK. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and child outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440–455.
48.
O’ConnorR. E.JenkinsJ. R. (1999). The prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197.
49.
O’ConnorR. E.JenkinsJ. R.SlocumT. A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 202–217.
50.
O’ConnorR. E.Notari-SyversonA.VadasyP. F. (1996). Ladders to Literacy: The effects of teacher-led phonological activities for kindergarten children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 117–130.
51.
O’ConnorR. E.Notari-SyversonA.VadasyP. F. (2005). Ladders to Literacy: A kindergarten activity book (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
52.
PerfettiC.BeckI.BellL.HughesC. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.
53.
QuirogaT.Lemos-BrittonZ.MostafapourE.AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (2002). Phonological awareness and beginning reading in Spanish-speaking ESL first graders: Research into practice. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 85–111.
54.
RashotteC. A.MacPheeK.TorgesenJ. K. (2001). The effectiveness of a group reading instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 119–134.
55.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
SimmonsD. C.CoyneM. D.KwokO.McDonaghS.HarnB. A.Kame’enuiE. J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 158–173.
57.
SnowC.BurnsS.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulty in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
58.
SpeeceD. L. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 487–493.
59.
SpeeceD. L.RichieK. D.SilvermanR.SchatschneiderC.WalkerC. Y.AndrusikK. N. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258–276.
60.
SpeeceD. L.SchatschneiderC.SilvermanR.CaseL. P.CooperD.JacobsD. M. (2011). Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response-to-intervention framework. Elementary School Journal, 111, 585–607.
61.
StanovichK. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
62.
TangelD.BlachmanB. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness training on kindergarten children’s invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 233–261.
63.
TillyD. (2003, December). Heartland Area Education Agency’s evolution from four to three tiers: Our journey—our results. Paper presented at the National Research Center of Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
64.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.RoseE.LindamoodP.ConwayT.GarvanC. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593.
65.
VadasyP. F.JenkinsJ. R.AntilL. R.WayneS. K.O’ConnorR. E. (1997). The effectiveness of one-to-one tutoring by community tutors for at-risk beginning readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 126–139.
66.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.TudorS. (2007). Effectiveness of para-educator supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508–525.
67.
VadasyP. F.WayneS. K.O’ConnorR. E.JenkinsJ. R.PoolK.FirebaughM.PeytonJ. (2005). Sound Partners: A tutoring program in phonics-based early reading. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
68.
VanDerHeydenA. M.WittJ. C.GilbertsonD. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256.
69.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.HickmanP. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
70.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.MurrayC.ScammacaN.Linan-ThompsonS.WoodruffT. L. (2009). High and low responders to early reading intervention: Response to intervention. Exceptional Children, 75, 165–183.
71.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G.PrattA.ChenR.DencklaM. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early identification as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
72.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.ZhangH.SchatschneiderC. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480.
73.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2011). Is a three-tier reading intervention model associated with reduced placement in special education?Remedial and Special Education, 32, 167–175.
