To evaluate whether performance differences between good and poor readers relate to reading-specific cognitive factors that result from engaging in reading activities and other experiential factors, the authors gave students in Grades 4 and 6 a perceptual identification test of words not only drawn from their personal lexicon but also varying in familiarity. During the experimental phase, on a video monitor for a duration of 60 ms, age-matched and reading-matched groups were each shown a set of pretested words varying in personal familiarity. After a 5-s delay, a “test” word was displayed, at which point participants were asked to decide whether the second word was the same as or different from the first. Measures of accuracy and reaction times for correct responses indicated that differences between reader groups still existed, despite attempts to minimize the contribution of experiential factors. Remedial interventions are discussed.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Alario, F.X., De Cara, B., & Ziegler, J.C. (2007). Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: Evidence from beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(3), 205-219.
3.
Alexander, J.R.M., & Martin, F. (2004). The end of the reading age: Grade and age effects in early schooling. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 403-416.
4.
Allington, R.L. (1978). Sensitivity to orthographic structure as a function of grade and reading ability. Journal of Reading Behavior , 10, 437-439.
5.
Allington, R.L. (2006). Research and the three tier model. Reading Today, 23(5), 20.
6.
Allington, R.L., & Fleming, J.T. (1978). The misreading of high frequency words. Journal of Special Education, 12(4), 417-421.
7.
Bachman, J., Mamen, M., & Fergusson, H. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. Pyschological Bulletin, 96, 560-568.
8.
Baker, L., Mackler, K., Sonnenschein, S., & Serpell, R. (2001). Parents' interactions with their first-grade children during storybook reading and relations with subsequent home reading activity and reading achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 39(5), 415-438.
9.
Boder, E., & Jarrico, S. (1982). The Boder test of reading-spelling patterns: A diagnostic screening test for subtypes of reading disability. New York: Grune and Stratton.
10.
Bowers, P.G., Sunseth, K., & Golden, J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress . Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(1), 31-53.
11.
Bruck, M., & Waters, G. (1990). Effects of reading skill on component spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(4), 425-437.
12.
Bryant, P., & Goswamy, U. (1986). Strengths and weaknesses of the reading-level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen and Fergusson. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 101-103.
13.
Cataldo, S., & Ellis, N.C. (1988). Interactions in the development of spelling, reading and phonological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 11(2), 86-109.
14.
Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(4), 331-361.
15.
Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition process . Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 143-153.
16.
Clay, M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155-173.
17.
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
18.
Corcos, E., & Willows, D. (1993). The role of visual processing in good and poor readers' utilization of orthographic information in letter strings. In S. F. Wright & R. Groner (Eds.), Facets of dyslexia and its remediation (pp. 95-106). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.
19.
Cunningham, A. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 45-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Cunningham, A. (2006). Accounting for children's orthographic learning while reading text: Do children self-teach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 56-77.
21.
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K.E. (1998). The impact of print exposure on word recognition. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 235-262). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R.G. (1974). Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colours, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186-202.
23.
Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. New York: Viking Adult.
24.
Duncan, L.G., & Johnson, R.S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 405-439.
Eckert, T., Dunn, E.K., Codding, R.S., Begeny, J.C., & Kelinmann, A.E. (2006). Assessment of mathematics and reading performance: An examination of the correspondence between direct assessment of student performance and teacher report. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 247-265.
27.
Ehri, L.C. (1998). Research on learning to read and spell: A personal-historical perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 97-114.
28.
Ehri, L.C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 19-36.
29.
Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167-188.
30.
Ellis, N., & Cataldo, S. (1992). Spelling is integral to learning to read. In C. Robson & C. Sterling (Eds.), Psychology, spelling and education (pp. 122-142). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
31.
Frith, U. (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London/ New York: Academic Press.
32.
Frith, U. (1986). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia . Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 69-81.
33.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 57-61.
34.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Power, M.H., & Dailey, A.M. (1985). Bias in the assessment of handicapped children . American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 185-198.
35.
Gardner, M.F. (1982). Test of Visual-Motor Skills (Non-Motor). Seattle, WA: Special Child.
36.
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(2), 256-281.
37.
Gillon, G.T. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice . New York: Guilford.
38.
Graham, F.K., & Kendall, B.S. (1960). Memory-for-Design test: Revised general manual . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 147-188.
39.
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L.C., & Perin, D. (2002). Do adult literacy students make the same word-reading and spelling errors as children matched for word-reading age? Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(3), 221-244.
40.
Gustafson, S. (2001). Cognitive abilities and print exposure in surface and phonological types of reading disability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(4), 351-375.
41.
Harm, M.W., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662-720.
42.
Joshi, R.M., & Aaron, P.G. (2002). Naming speed and word familiarity as confounding factors in decoding. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 160-171.
43.
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T.D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In L. F. Zhang (Ed.), Perspectives on cognitive learning, and thinking styles (pp. 227-247). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
46.
Laxon, V., Gallagher, A., & Masterson, J. (2002). The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter-length and graphemic complexity on children's reading accuracy . British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 269-287.
47.
Leong, C.K., Cheng, S.C., & Das, J.P. (1985). Simultaneous-successive syntheses and planning in Chinese readers. International Journal of Psychology, 20(1), 19-31.
48.
Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527.
49.
Logan, G.D. (1992). Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 883-914.
50.
Logan, G.D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13(2), 123-146.
51.
Logan, G.D. (2005). Attention, automaticity, and executive control . In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
52.
Lorsbach, T.C., & Worman, L.J. (1989). The development of explicit and implicit forms of memory in learning disabled children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(1), 67-76.
53.
Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., & Slaghuis, W. (1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology , 3, 225-267.
54.
MacGinitie, W.H., Kamous, J., Kowalski, R.L., MacGinities, R.K., & McKay, T. (1978). Gates-MacGinities Reading Test (2nd ed.). Chicago: Riverside.
55.
Marchand-Martella, N.E., Ruby, S.F., & Martella, R.C. (2007). Intensifying reading instruction for students within a three-tier model: Standard-protocol and problem solving approaches within a response-to-intervention (RTI) system. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 3(5), 1-11.
56.
Meyer, M.S., Wood, F.B., Hart, L.A., & Felton, R.H. (1998). Longitudinal course of rapid naming in disabled and nondisabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 91-114.
57.
NaturalSoft. (2007). NaturalReader [Computer software]. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.naturalreaders.com
O'Connor, R.E., Harty, K.R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 532-538.
60.
Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
61.
Parrila, R., Kirby, J.R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development?Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 3-26.
62.
Raven, J.C. (1947). Progressive Matrices. London : Lewis.
63.
Savage, R. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing, 17(3), 301-324.
64.
Semel-Mintz, E., & Wiig, E. (1982). Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
65.
Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., Sarkari, S., Billingsley, R.L., & Denton, C. (2007). Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study. Neuropsychology , 21(4), 485-496.
66.
Slosson, R.L., & Nicholson, C.L. (1963). The Slosson Oral Reading Test (SORT). East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational.
67.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-406.
68.
Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10(1), 72-100.
69.
Stanovich, K.E. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. In D. B. Gray & G. R. Lyon (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 273-307). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
70.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing . Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402-433.
71.
Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., & Cunningham, A.E. (1991). Beyond phonological processes: Print exposure and orthographic processing. In D. P. Shankweiler & S. A. Brady (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 219-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72.
Thompson, G.B. (1985). Orthographic structures: Grapheme patterns in child and adult texts. Journal of Research in Reading, 8(1), 32-44.
73.
Tiu, R.D., Jr., Thompson, L.A., & Lewis, B.A. (2003). The role of IQ in a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 36(5), 424-436.
74.
Vellutino, F., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., & Scanlon, D.M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40.
75.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601-638.
76.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Tanzman, M. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems operationalizing word identification, phonological coding and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279-324). Baltimore: Brookes.
77.
Waters, G.S., Bruck, M., & Malus Abramowitz, M. (1988). The role of linguistic and visual information in spelling: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45(3), 400-421.
78.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
79.
Willows, D.M. (1990). Visual processes in learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 163-193). New York: Academic Press.
80.
Willows, D.M., Corcos, E., & Kershner, J.R. (1988). Disabled and normal readers' visual processing and visual memory of item and spatial-order information in unfamiliar symbol strings. Paper presented at the 24th International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.
81.
Willows, D.M., Corcos, E., & Kershner, J.R. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive factors in disabled and normal readers' perception and memory of unfamiliar visual symbols. In S. F. Wright & R. Groner (Eds.), Facets of dyslexia and its remediation (pp. 163-178). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
82.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 387-407.
