Research has emphasized the importance of phonological awareness, phonemic decoding, and automaticity in reading development. Special and general education teachers need valid, efficient, and effective early literacy indicators for schoolwide screening and monitoring that adequately predict reading outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the interrelationships and predictiveness of kindergarten early literacy indicators from the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) within the context of a path analysis. The results support the validity of kindergarten DIBELS in predicting ever more complex reading skills in a developmental progression from the middle of kindergarten to second grade.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383-414). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
4.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vermeulen, K., & Fulton, C.M. (2006). Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 334-351.
5.
Bishop, A. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading achievement: A comparison of fall and winter kindergarten screenings. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 189-200.
6.
Blachman, B.A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483-502). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Blaiklock, K.E. (2004). The importance of letter knowledge in the relationship between phonological awareness and reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 36-57.
8.
Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. E. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Burke, M., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2007). Concurrent validity of first grade early literacy indicators. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 66-77.
11.
Carnine, D., & Granzin, A. (2001). Setting learning expectations for students with disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 466-472.
12.
Carver, R.P. (1993). Merging the simple view of reading with rauding theory. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 439-455.
13.
Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
14.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press .
15.
Coyne, M.D., Kame'enui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 62-72.
16.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1997). Terra Nova. Monterey, CA: Author.
17.
Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945.
18.
Cutting, L.E., & Denckla, M.B. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 673-705.
19.
Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R.G. (1974). Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186-202.
20.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
21.
Ehri, L., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly , 14, 135-164.
22.
Ehri, L.C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116-125.
23.
Ehri, L.C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is necessary for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167-188.
25.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Stahl, S.A., & Willows, D.M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
26.
Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Willows, D.M., Schuster, B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250-287.
27.
Elliott, J., Lee, S.W., & Tollefson, N. (2001). A reliability and validity study of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills-Modified. School Psychology Review, 30, 33-49.
28.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D.L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency vs. nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-21.
29.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
30.
Good, R.H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R.A. (2001). Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 679-700). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
31.
Good, R.H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford.
32.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326-336.
33.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for Development of Educational Achievement.
34.
Good, R., Kaminski, R., Laimon, D., & Johnson, D. (1992). Advances in assessment for the primary prevention of early academic problems (The Oregon Conference Monograph). Eugene: University of Oregon.
35.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
36.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Smith, S. (1998). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review, 27, 45-56.
37.
Goodman, K. (2005). Editorial. Education Week, 25, 32-33.
38.
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
39.
Grossen, B. (1997). Thirty years of research: What we know about how children learn to read: A synthesis of research on reading from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning .
40.
Hagan-Burke, S., Burke, M.D., & Crowder, C. (2006). The convergent validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Test of Word Reading Efficiency for the beginning of first grade. Assessment for Effective Intervention , 31, 1-15.
41.
Herrmann, J.A., Matyas, T., & Pratt, C. (2006). Meta-analysis of the nonword reading deficit in specific reading disorder. Dyslexia, 12, 195-221.
42.
Hintze, J.M., Ryan, J.M., & Stoner, G. (2003). Convergent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. School Psychology Review , 32, 541-557.
43.
Hoover, W., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
44.
Hoyle, R.H., & Panter, A.T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
46.
Jöreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
48.
Kame'enui, E.J. (1993). Diverse learners and the tyranny of time: Don't fix blame; fix the leaky roof. Reading Teacher, 46, 376-383.
49.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H., III. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
50.
Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 285-305.
51.
Katzir, T., Youngsuk, K., Wolf, M., O'Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., et al. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51-81.
52.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
53.
Lindsley, O.R. (1972). From Skinner to precision teaching: The child knows best. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let's try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 1-11). Arlington, VA : Council for Exceptional Children.
54.
Lovitt, T.C. (1967, December). Assessment of children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, pp. 233-239.
MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L.B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structural analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
57.
Manzo, K.K. (2005). National clout of DIBELS test draws scrutiny. Education Week, 25, 1-12.
58.
Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford .
59.
McDonald, R.P., & Ho, R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
60.
Metsala, J., & Ehri, L.C. (1998). Word recognition in beginning reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). MPLUS user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
62.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
63.
National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
64.
No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. 6301 et. seq. (2002).
65.
O'Conner, R.E., & Jenkins, J.R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159-197.
66.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
67.
Pikulski, J.J., & Chard, D.J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension . Reading Teacher, 58, 510-519.
68.
Pressley, M., Hilden, K., & Shankland, R. (2005). An evaluation of end-Grade-3 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Speed reading without comprehension, predicting little (technical report).
69.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29-53.
70.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B.R., Perfettii, C.A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
71.
Reid, D.K., Hresko, W.P., & Hammill, D.D. (2001). Test of Early Reading Ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
72.
Ritchey, K.D., & Speece, D.L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 31, 301-327.
73.
Rouse, H.L., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (2006). Validity of the Dynamic Indicators for Basic Early Literacy Skills as an indicator of early literacy for urban kindergarten children. School Psychology Review , 35, 341-355.
74.
Scarborough, H.S., & Parker, J.L. (2003). Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ, and psychosocial problems from Grade 2 to Grade 8. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 47-71.
75.
Schatschneider, C., Flecher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Carlson, C.D., & Foorman, B.R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265-282.
76.
Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2004). Using our current understanding of dyslexia to support early identification and intervention. Journal of Child Neurology, 16, 759-765.
77.
Shanahan, T. (2005). Review of the DIBELS: The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Skills, 6th edition. In R. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook . Available at http://www.unl.edu/buros
78.
Shapiro, E.S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York : Guilford.
79.
Shaywitz, S.E., Fletcher, J.M., Holahan, J.M., Shneider, A.E., Marchione, K.E., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence. Pediatrics, 104, 1351-1359.
80.
Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (Eds.). (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81.
Smith, S., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (1998). Phonological awareness: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kame'enui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 61-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82.
Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika , 54, 371-384.
83.
Speece, D.L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K.D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. Journal of Special Education, 36, 223-233.
84.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
85.
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Cramer, B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175-190.
86.
Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S.L. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 109). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
87.
Torgesen, J.K. (1998). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator, 22, 32-39.
88.
Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-26.
89.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K., Conway, T., et al. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 34, 33-58.
90.
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Parkton, MD: York.
91.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 276-286.
92.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217-234.
93.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). TOWRE: Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
94.
Treiman, R., & Rodriguez, K. (1999). Young children use letter names in learning to read words. Psychological Science, 10, 334-338.
95.
Vellutino, F., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., & Scanlon, D.M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45, 2-40.
96.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
97.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
98.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Hecht, S.A., Barker, T.A., Burgess, S.R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468-479.
99.
Walker, H.M., & Shinn, M.R. (2002). Interventions for achieving prevention goals and outcomes for at-risk children and youth. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions academic and behavior problems: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 1-26). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists .
100.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
101.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
102.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-238.
103.
Woodcock, R.M. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test- Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corporation .
