The Effects of a Comprehensive Reading Program on Reading Outcomes for Middle School Students With Disabilities

Abstract

Reading achievement scores for adolescents with disabilities are markedly lower than the scores of adolescents without disabilities. For example, 62% of students with disabilities read below the basic level on the NAEP Reading assessment, compared to 19% of their nondisabled peers. This achievement gap has been a continuing challenge for more than 35 years. In this article, we report on the promise of a comprehensive 2-year reading program called Fusion Reading. Fusion Reading is designed to significantly narrow the reading achievement gap of middle school students with reading disabilities. Using a quasi-experimental design with matched groups of middle school students with reading disabilities, statistically significant differences were found between the experimental and comparison conditions on multiple measures of reading achievement with scores favoring the experimental condition. The effect size of the differences were Hedges’s g = 1.66 to g = 1.04 on standardized measures of reading achievement.

Keywords

adolescent reading reading disabilities reading interventions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

K. L.

Entwisle

Olson

(2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72, 167–180.

Allington

R. L.

McGill-Franzen

Camilli

Williams

Graff

Zeig

. . . Nowak

(2010). Addressing summer reading setback among economically disadvantaged elementary students. Reading Psychology, 31, 411–427.

Bemboom

McMaster

(2013). A comparison of lower-and higher-resourced tier 2 reading interventions for high school sophomores. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 28, 184–195.

Berkeley

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995–2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 423–436.

Blackorby

Schiller

Mallik

Hebbeler

Huang

Javitz

. . . Williamson

(2010). Patterns in the identification of and outcomes for children and youth with disabilities (NCEE 2010-4005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Bloom

Hill

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

(2007, March). Using empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect size. Paper presented at the Application of Effect Sizes in Research on Children and Families: Understanding Impacts on Academic Emotional, Behavioral, and Economic Outcomes conference, Washington, DC.

Brasseur-Hock

I. F.

Hock

M. F.

Kieffer

M. J.

Biancarosa

Deshler

D. D.

(2011). Adolescent struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 438–452.

Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/tta_Main.pdf

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.

10.

Corrin

Somers

M. A.

Kemple

J. J.

Nelson

Sepanik

(2008). The enhanced reading opportunities study: Findings from the second year of implementation (NCEE 2009-4036). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

11.

Dalton

Glennie

Ingels

Wirt

(2009). Late high school dropouts: Characteristics, experiences, and changes across cohorts: A descriptive analysis report. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.

12.

Dettmers

Trautwein

Ludtke

Kunter

Baumert

(2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 467–482.

13.

Editorial Board. (2013, August 7). New York’s Common Core test scores. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/opinion/new-yorks-common-core-test-scores.html?_r=0

14.

Edmonds

M. S.

Vaughn

Wexler

Reutebuch

Cable

Tackett

K. K.

Schnakenberg

J. W.

(2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998

15.

Elmore

R. E.

(2005). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

16.

Fuchs

Burish

(2010). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 85–91.

17.

Fuchs

L. S.

Mathes

P. G.

Simmons

D. C.

(1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making class-rooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.

18.

Fullan

(2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

19.

Gajria

Litendra

Sood

Sacks

(2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225.

20.

Galuschka

Ise

Krick

Schulte-Korne

(2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLOS, 9(8), e105843.

21.

Gersten

Fuchs

L. S.

Williams

J. P.

Baker

(2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320. doi:10.3102/00346543071002279

22.

Hammill

D. D.

Wiederholt

J. L.

Allen

E. A.

(2006). Test of silent contextual reading fluency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

23.

Hock

M. F.

Brasseur

I. F.

Deshler

D. D.

Catts

H. W.

Marques

Mark

C. A.

Wu Stribling

(2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 21–38.

24.

Hock

M. F.

Brasseur-Hock

I. F.

(2009). Literacy interventions for adolescent struggling readers. In Paris

S. R.

Fisher

Headley

(Eds.), Adolescent literacy, field tested: Effective solutions for every classroom (pp. 129–142). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

25.

Hock

M. F.

Brasseur-Hock

I. F.

Deshler

D. D.

(2012). Technical report: Fusion reading program. Lawrence, KS: The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.

26.

James-Burdumy

Mansfield

Deke

Carey

Lugo-Gil

Hershey

. . . Faddis

(2009). Effectiveness of selected supplemental reading comprehension interventions: Impacts on a first cohort of fifth-grade students—Executive summary (NCEE 2009-4058). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

27.

Joyce

Showers

Scanlon

Schnaubelt

(1998). A second chance to learn to read. Educational Leadership, 55, 27–30.

28.

Kemple

Corrin

Nelson

Salinger

Herrmann

Drummond

(2008). The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Early impact and implementation findings (NCEE 2008-4015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

29.

Knight

(2007). Coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

30.

Knight

(Ed.). (2009). Coaching: Approaches and perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

31.

Lichtenstein

Blackorby

(1995). Who drops out and what happens to them? Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 18, 6–11.

32.

Lipsey

M. W.

Puzio

Yun

Hebert

M. A.

Steinka-Fry

Cole

M. W.

. . . Busick

M. D.

(2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research. Available at http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/

33.

Lovett

Barron

Frijters

(2013). Word identification difficulties in children and adolescents with reading disabilities: Intervention research findings. In Swanson

H. L.

Harris

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 329–360). New York, NY: Guilford.

34.

Lovett

Lacerenza

De Palma

Frijters

(2012). Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 151–169.

35.

Markus

Nurius

(1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.

36.

McDonald

J. P.

Klein

E. J.

Riordan

(2009). Going to scale with new school designs: Reinventing high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

37.

National Assessment Governing Board. (2013). Reading framework for the 2013 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

38.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The condition of education 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/overview.asp

39.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: Reading 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

40.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.

41.

Northwest Evaluation Association. (2011, January). Technical manual for measure of academic progress & measure of academic progress for primary grades. Portland, OR: Author.

42.

Palincsar

A. S.

Brown

A. L.

(1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

43.

Pearson. (2012). AIMSweb technical manual (R-CBM and TEL). Eden Prairie, MN: Author.

44.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

45.

Richardson

J. T. E.

(2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147.

46.

Scammacca

Roberts

Vaughn

Edmonds

Wexler

Reutebuch

C. K.

Torgesen

J. K.

(2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

47.

Schiller

Wei

Thayer

Blackorby

Javitz

Williamson

(2012). A randomized control trial of the impact of the Fusion Reading Intervention on reading achievement and motivation for adolescent struggling readers. Manuscript submitted for publication.

48.

Sencibaugh

(2007). Meta-analysis of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities: Strategies and implications. Reading Improvement, 44, 6–22.

49.

Shen

Leslie

J. M.

Spybrook

J. K.

(2012). Are principal background and school processes related to teacher job satisfaction? A multilevel study using Schools and Staffing Survey 2003–04. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 200–230.

50.

Simmons

Fogerty

Oslund

E. L.

Simmons

Hairrell

Davis

. . . Fall

A.-M.

(2014). Integrating content knowledge-building and student-regulated comprehension practices in secondary English language arts classes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 309–330.

51.

Singer

Willett

(2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

52.

Slavin

R. E.

Cheung

Groff

Lake

(2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 290–322.

53.

Swanson

H. L.

(1999a). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 129–140.

54.

Swanson

H. L.

(1999b). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504–532.

55.

Swanson

H. L.

Hoskyn

(1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277–321. doi:10.3102/00346543068003277

56.

Torgesen

J. K.

(2005). Recommendations for actions to accelerate the reading development of struggling readers in Florida’s middle schools. Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research.

57.

Torgesen

Myers

Schirm

Stuart

Vartivarian

Mansfield

. . . Haan

(2006). National assessment of Title I: Interim report. Volume II: Closing the reading gap: First year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

58.

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). What Works Clearinghouse: Talent development middle grades program (Mathematica Policy Research under contract ED-07-CO-0062). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=617 and http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=434

59.

U.S. Department of Labor. (2003). Statistical fact sheet: Wages and hour fiscal year 2003 enforcement continues record climb. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/whd/statistics/200318.htm

60.

Vaughn

(2006). An interview with Sharon Vaughn: The state of reading research and instruction for struggling readers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 169–174.

61.

Vaughn

Roberts

Klingner

Swanson

Bordman

(2013). Collaborative strategic reading: Findings from experienced implementers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 137–163.

62.

Vaughn

Swanson

Solis

(2013). Reading comprehension for adolescents with significant reading problems. In Swanson

Harris

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 373–387). New York, NY: Guilford.

63.

Vaughn

Wanzek

(2014). Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful Impacts. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29, 46–53.

64.

Vaughn

Wexler

Roberts

Barth

A. A.

Cirino

P. T.

Romain

M. A.

. . . Denton

C. A.

(2011). Effects of individualized and standardized interventions on middle school students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77, 391–407.

65.

Wang

McCall

Jiao

Harris

(2013). Construct validity and measurement invariance of computerized adaptive testing: Application to measures of academic progress using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3, 88–100.

66.

Wanzek

Vaughn

Roberts

Fletcher

J. M.

(2011). Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 73–87.

67.

Williams

K. T.

(2001). GRADE: Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.