This essay concerns the ways in which qualitative social science research characters are constructed, and in turn read, by others. The persuasiveness of narratives is based as much on the reader’s response to the character—similar to the ways in which readers respond to literary characters—in emotional ways as it is on the rational presentation of evidence. This essay acknowledges the author’s subjectivity in relation to this topic; reviews the notions of narrative perspective, fidelity, emplotment, and verisimilitude; explores the role of narrative in social science research reports; presents background on how readers respond to literary characters; and applies these understandings to make the case that reading the presentation of social science research characters shares much with the ways in which readers respond to the actions of literary characters. The essay concludes with an argument that the construction of social science research reports includes the selective construction of participants as actors in a drama that in turn has an emotional impact on readers and with a description of the implications of this phenomenon for writers and readers of qualitative social science research reports.
AllenQ. (2015). “I’m trying to get my A”: Black male achievers talk about race, school and achievement. Urban Review, 47, 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0315-4
BazermanC. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
BloomeD.BaileyF. (1992). Studying language and literacy through events, particularity, and intertextuality. In BeachR.GreenJ. L.KamilM. L.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 181-210). National Conference on Research in English & National Council of Teachers of English.
6.
BrooksC.WarrenR. P. (1938). Understanding poetry. Henry Holt and Company.
7.
BrownB. (2021). Atlas of the heart: Mapping meaningful connection and the language of human experience. Random House.
8.
BrunerJ. (1987). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
9.
CastanoE.Giner-SorollaR. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 804-818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
10.
Chávez-MorenoL. C. (2022). The continuum of racial literacies: Teacher practices countering whitestream bilingual education. Research in the Teaching of English, 57(2), 108-132. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202232151
11.
ChristakisN. A. (2019). Blueprint: The evolutionary origins of a good society. Little, Brown and Co.
12.
ClarkR.IvaničR. (1997). The politics of writing. Routledge.
13.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
ColeM. (2002b). Alexander Luria, cultural psychology and the resolution of the crisis in psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 40(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040540014
CoulterC. A.SmithM. A. (2009). The construction zone: Literary elements in narrative research. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 577-590. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0935378
18.
CraneR. S. (1953). Languages of criticism and the structure of poetry. University of Toronto Press.
19.
CushmanE. (1996). Rhetorician as agent of social change. College Composition and Communication, 47, 29-41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/358270
20.
CushmanE. (1999). Critical literacy and institutional language. Research in the Teaching of English, 33(3), 245-274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171439
21.
CushmanE.Guinsatao MonbergT. (1998). Re-centering authority: Social reflexivity and re-positioning in composition research. In FarrisC.AnsonC. (Eds.), Under construction: Working at the intersections of composition theory, research, and practice (pp. 166-180). Utah State University Press.
22.
CzarniawskaB. (2004). Narratives in social science research: Introducing qualitative methods. Sage.
DietzeP.KnowlesE. D. (2021). Social class predicts emotion perception and perspective-taking performance in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220914116
25.
DixonJ. (1975). Growth through English: Set in the perspective of the seventies (3rd ed). National Association for the Teaching of English.
EasonC. (2008). Fabulous creatures, mythical monsters, and animal power symbols: A handbook. Greenwood.
29.
EmigJ. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders (NCTE Research Report No. 13). National Council of Teachers of English.
30.
EmihovichC. (1995). Distancing passion: Narratives in social science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080105
31.
FaulknerW. (1951). Requiem for a nun. Random House.
32.
FleishmanL.FogelN.FridmanI.ShifY. (2017). The effect of school performance on property values: A literature review and a case study. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 10(3), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-09-2016-0035
33.
FlorianiA. (1993). Negotiating what counts: Roles and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5(3-4), 241-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90002-R
34.
GallasK.SmagorinskyP. (2002). Approaching texts in school. The Reading Teacher, 56(1), 54-61.
35.
GayolY.RosasP.SmagorinskyP. (Eds.) (2020). Developing culturally and historical sensitive teacher education: Global lessons from a literacy education program. Bloomsbury.
36.
GeertzC. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford University Press.
37.
GenetteG. (1972). Figures III. Editions du Seuil.
38.
GinnF. (2017). Domestic wild: Memory, nature and gardening in suburbia. Routledge.
39.
GoodsonI. F.GillS. R. (2011). The narrative turn in social research. Counterpoints, 386, 17-33.
40.
GuilleminM.BarnardE.AllenA.StewartP.WalkerH.RosenthalD.GillamL. (2018). Do research participants trust researchers or their institution?Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618763253
41.
HahnU.OaksfordM.HarrisA. J. L. (2013). Testimony and argument: A Bayesian perspective. In ZenkerF. (Ed.), Bayesian argumentation (pp. 15-38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0_2
42.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
43.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
44.
Herodotus. (425 BCE/2013). The histories: The complete translation, backgrounds, commentaries. (BlancoW., Trans.; RobertsJ. T., Ed.). W.W. Norton.
45.
HillR. T. G. (1997). Methodological approaches to Native American narrative and the role of performance. American Indian Quarterly, 21(1), 111-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/1185590
46.
HolleyK. A.ColyarJ. (2009). Rethinking texts: Narrative and the construction of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 680-686. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09351979
47.
HolleyK. A.ColyarJ. (2012). Under construction: How narrative elements shape qualitative research. Theory Into Practice, 51, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.662866
48.
JohnsonT. S.SmagorinskyP.ThompsonL.FryP. G. (2003). Learning to teach the five-paragraph theme. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 136-176. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171635
49.
KapplerS. (2013). Coping with research: Local tactics of resistance against (mis-)representation in academia. Peacebuilding, 1(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2013.756279
50.
KinlochV.BurkhardT.PennC. (2017). When school is not enough: Understanding the lives and literacies of Black youth. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201729199
51.
KrausM. W.CôtéS.KeltnerD. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716-1723.
52.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610387613
LabovW. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
55.
LeeE. M. (2017). “Where people like me don’t belong”: Faculty members from low-socioeconomic-status backgrounds. Sociology of Education, 90(3), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717710495
56.
LuegK.LundholtM. W. (Eds.). (2021). Routledge handbook of counter-narratives. Routledge.
57.
LuriaA. R. (1987a). The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory. Harvard University Press.
58.
LuriaA. R. (1987b). The man with a shattered world: The history of a brain wound (SolotaroffL., Trans.). Harvard University Press.
McCartheyS. J. (1998). Constructing multiple subjectivities in classroom literacy contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 32, 126-160. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171378
61.
NystrandM. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Academic Press.
62.
OkokoJ. M.TunisonS.WalkerK. D. (Eds.). (2023). Varieties of qualitative research methods. Springer.
63.
PalaganasE. C.SanchezM. C.MolintasM. P.CaricativoR. D. (2017). Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. The Qualitative Report, 22(2), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2552
PicowerB. (2009). The unexamined Whiteness of teaching: How White teachers maintain and enact dominant racial ideologies. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320902995475
67.
PurvesA. C.PurvesW. C. (1986). Viewpoints: Cultures, text models, and the activity of writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(2), 174-197. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte198615615
68.
RabinowitzP. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Cornell University Press.
69.
RabinowitzP.SmithM. W. (1997). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. Teachers College Press.
70.
RansomJ. C. (1941). The new criticism. New Directions.
71.
RejanA. (2017). Reconciling Rosenblatt and the New Critics: The quest for an “experienced understanding” of literature. English Education, 50(1), 10-41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i26492329
72.
RicoeurP. (1983). Time and narrative (McLaughlinK.PellauerD., Trans.; Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
73.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
74.
RosenblattL. M. (1985). The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research. In CooperC. R. (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure (pp. 33-53). Ablex.
SacksO. (1987). Introduction. In LuriaA. R. (Ed.), The man with a shattered world: The history of a brain wound (SolotaroffL., Trans.) (pp. vii–xxii; xvii.). Harvard University Press.
77.
SacksO. (2014). Luria and “romantic science.” In YasnitskyA.van der VeerR.FerrariM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 517-528). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028097.028
78.
SaidE. (1978). Orientalism. Ballentine Books.
79.
SaksA. L. (Ed.). (1996). Should novels count as dissertations in education?Research in the Teaching of English, 30(4), 403-427. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171550
80.
SamuelstuenM. S.BråtenI. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x
81.
SchamaS. (1996). Landscape and memory. Vintage.
82.
SmagorinskyP. (1991). The writer’s knowledge and the writing process: A protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 339-364.
83.
SmagorinskyP. (1995). The social construction of data: Methodological problems of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of Educational Research, 65, 191-212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306500
84.
SmagorinskyP. (1997). Personal growth in social context: A high school senior’s search for meaning in and through writing. Written Communication, 14, 63-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014001002
85.
SmagorinskyP. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308317815
86.
SmagorinskyP. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: The psychology of art and the actor under the direction of perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 319-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2010.518300
SmagorinskyP. (2018b). Literacy in teacher education: “It’s the context, stupid.”Journal of Literacy Research, 50(3), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X187846
89.
SmagorinskyP. (2019). Warranting evidence in social science research reports. Research in the Teaching of English, 53(3), 273-275.
90.
SmagorinskyP. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from?: Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71, 133-169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516069
91.
SmagorinskyP. (2024). L. S. Vygotsky and English in education and the language arts. Routledge & International Federation of Teachers of English.
92.
SmagorinskyP.CameronT.O’Donnell-AllenC. (2007). Achtung maybe: A case study of the role of personal connection and art in the literary engagement of students with attentional difficulties. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 333-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560701501552
93.
SmagorinskyP.JohnsonL. L. (2021). Empathic framing during concept development in book club discussions in a service-learning teacher education class. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 8(2), 206-238. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.18853
94.
SmagorinskyP.LongS. L. (2024). An eight-year longitudinal study of an English Language Arts teacher’s developmental path through multiple contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 59(1), 47-83. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte2024591147
SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (1982). What’s in a story: Critical issues in story comprehension. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of instruction (pp. 213-267). Erlbaum.
TolliverS. R. (2021). Recovering Black storytelling in qualitative research: Endarkened storywork. Routledge.
100.
TremmelR. (2001). Seeking a balanced discipline: Writing teacher education in first-year composition and English education. English Education, 34(1), 6-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40173242
101.
Von VugtM.Van LangeP. M. A. (2006). The altruism puzzle: Psychological adaptations for prosocial behavior. In SchallerM.SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 237-262). Psychology Press.
102.
VygotskyL. S. (1971). The psychology of art (Scripta Technica, Inc., Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1925)
103.
VygotskyL. S. (2019). L.S. Vygotsky’s pedological works: Volume 1. Foundations of pedology (KelloggD.VeresovN., Trans.). Springer.
104.
WertschJ. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
105.
WilsonE. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage Books.
106.
WolfS. A.BallentineD.HillL. (1999). The right to write: Preservice teachers’ evolving understandings of authenticity and aesthetic heat in multicultural literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 34(1), 130-184.
