Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students’ written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.
AiH.LuX. (2010, June8–12). A web-based system for automatic measurement of lexical complexity [Paper presentation]. 27th Annual Symposium of the Computer-Assisted Language Consortium CALICO-10, Amherst, MA, United States.
2.
AiH.LuX. (2013). A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing. In Dıaz-NegrilloA.BallierN.ThompsonP. (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp. 249–264). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
3.
AnsonC. M. (2000). Response and the social construction of error. Assessing Writing, 7(1), 5–21.
4.
AshwellT. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227–258.
5.
AtkinsonD.RamanathanV. (1995). Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/language programs. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 539–568. http://doi.org/10.2307/3588074
6.
BerlinJ. (1987). Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900–1985. Southern Illinois University Press.
7.
BiberD.GrayB. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
8.
BiberD.NekrasovaT.HornB. (2011). The effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: A meta-analysis (ETS Research Report RR-11-05). ETS.
9.
BitchenerJ.FerrisD. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
10.
BraineG. (1996). ESL students in first-year writing courses: ESL versus mainstream classes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 91–107.
11.
BreretonJ. (Ed.). (1996). The origins of composition studies in the American college, 1875–1925. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjsd2
12.
BrittonE. R.LeonardR. L. (2020). The social justice potential of critical reflection and critical language awareness pedagogies for L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 1–12.
13.
CaraganajahA. S. (2011). The place of world Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57(4), 586–619.
14.
CarrollJ. B. (1964). Language and thought. Prentice-Hall.
15.
ConnersR. J. (2000). The erasure of the sentence. College Composition and Communication, 52(1), 96–128.
16.
ConnorsR.LunsfordA. (1988). Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication, 39(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/357695
17.
CostinoK. A.HyonS. (2007). “A class for students like me”: Reconsidering relationships among identity labels, residency status, and students’ preferences for mainstream or multilingual composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.001
18.
CostinoK. A.HyonS. (2011). Sidestepping our “scare words”: Genre as a possible bridge between L1 and L2 compositionists. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 24–44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.001
CrossleyS. A.McNamaraD. S. (2009). Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 119–135. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002
21.
De CostaP.Green-EneixC.LiW. (2021). Embracing diversity, inclusion, equity and access in EMI-TNHE: Towards a social justice-centered reframing of English language teaching. RELC Journal, 52(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211018540
22.
DoolanS. M. (2017). Comparing patterns of error in Generation 1.5, L1, and L2 first-year composition writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.11.002
23.
DoolanS. M.MillerD. (2012). Generation 1.5 written error patterns: A comparative study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001
24.
EcksteinG. (2013). Perspectives on plagiarism. WOE, 23(2), 99–104.
25.
EcksteinG. (2018). Re-examining the tutor informant role for L1, L2, and generation 1.5 writers. The Peer Review, 2(2), 1–26.
26.
EcksteinG.FerrisD. R. (2018). Comparing L1 and L2 texts and writers in first-year composition. TESOL Quarterly, 521, 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.376
27.
EcksteinG.CharitonJ.McCollumR. M. (2011). Multi-draft composing: An iterative model for academic argument writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 162–172. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.004
28.
EcksteinG.FerrisD.SibbaldK. (2021). What do students think about their own writing? Insights for teaching new college writers. Writing & Pedagogy, 12(2), 307–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.19540
29.
FathmanA.WhalleyE. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In KrollB. (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FerrisD. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In HylandK.HylandF. (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge University Press.
31.
FerrisD. R.BrownJ.LiuH. S.StineM. E. A. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 207–234. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247706
32.
FerrisD. R.EcksteinG. (2020). Language matters: Examining the language-related needs and wants of writers in a first-year university writing course. Journal of Writing Research, 12(2), 321–364. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.02
33.
FerrisD. R.EcksteinG.DeHondG. (2017). Self-directed language development: A study of first-year college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 514, 418–440.
34.
FerrisD. R.RobertsB. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
35.
FerrisD. R.WaldM.JensenL. (2015). Writing instructors’ perceptions of international student writers: What teachers want and need to know. CATESOL Journal, 272, 55–72.
36.
HafernikJ. J. (1991). Relationships among English writing experience, contrastive rhetoric, and English expository prose of L1 and L2 college writers [Doctoral dissertation]. UMI9114840.
37.
HartshornK. J.EvansN. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30 week study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1, 6–34.
38.
HartshornK. J.EvansN. W.MerrillP. F.SudweeksR. R.Strong-KrauseD.AndersonN. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 84–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781
39.
HartshorneJ. K.TenebaumJ. B.PinkerS. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
40.
HartwellP. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47(2), 105–127.
41.
HaswellR. H. (1983). Minimal marking. College English, 45(6), 600–604.
42.
HinkelE. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L2 and L1 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 275–301.
43.
HinkelE. (2011). What research on second language writing tells us and what it doesn’t. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 2, 523–538.
44.
HornerB.TetreaultL. (Eds.). (2017). Crossing divides: Exploring translingual writing pedagogies and programs. University Press of Colorado.
45.
HusterK. (2012). The grammar and vocabulary challenges of generation 1.5 Hmong college women in academia. Hmong Studies Journal, 13(1), 1–30. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
46.
HylandK. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Longman.
JohnsonJ.LeeE.SchreiberB.FahimN. (Eds.). (2020). Promoting social justice for multilingual writers on college campuses [Special issue]. Composition Forum. https://compositionforum.com/issue/44/
49.
JuzwikM.CurcicS.WolbersK.MoxleyK.DimlingL.ShanklandR. (2006). Writing into the twenty-first century: An overview of research on writing, 1999–2004. Written Communication, 23(4), 451–476.
KangE.HanZ. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 99, 1–18.
52.
KollnM.HancockC. (2005). The story of English grammar in United States schools. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 11–31.
53.
KurzerK. (2018). Dynamic written corrective feedback in developmental ESL writing classes. TESOL Quarterly, 521, 5–33. https://doi.gov/10.1002/tesq.366
54.
LekiI.CummingA.SilvaT. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. Routledge.
55.
LernerN. (2005). The teacher-student writing conference and the desire for intimacy. College English, 68(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.2307/30044673
56.
LinnarudM. (1986). Lexis in composition. Lund Studies in English.
57.
LuX. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
58.
LuX. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859
LuX.AiH. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
61.
LunsfordA.LunsfordK. (2008). Mistakes are a fact of life: A national comparative study. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 781–806.
62.
MacDonaldS. P. (2007). The erasure of language. College Composition and Communication, 58(4), 585–625.
63.
MarshallS. (2020). Understanding plurilingualism and developing pedagogy: Teaching in linguistically diverse classes across the disciplines at a Canadian university. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1676768
64.
MarshallS.MooreD. (2013). 2B or not 2B plurilingual? Navigating languages literacies, and plurilingual competence in postsecondary education in Canada. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 472–499.
65.
MarshallS.MooreD. (2018). Plurilingualism amid the panoply of lingualisms: Addressing critiques and misconceptions in education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(1), 19–34.
66.
MatsudaP. K. (1999). Composition studies and ESL writing: A disciplinary division of labor. College Composition and Communication, 50(4), 699–721.
67.
MatsudaP. K. (2006a). Second language writers and writing program administrators. Writing Program Administration, 30(1–2), 11–14.
68.
MatsudaP. K. (2006b). The myth of linguistic homogeneity in U.S. college composition. College English, 68(6), 637–651.
69.
MatsudaP. K. (2012). Let’s face it : Language issues and the writing program administrator. Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 141–163.
70.
MatsudaP. K.SaenkhumT.AccardiS. (2013). Writing teachers’ perceptions of the presence and needs of second language writers: An institutional case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.10.001
71.
McKayS. (1981). ESL/remedial English: Are they different?English Language Teaching Journal, 35, 310–315.
72.
MendelsohnD. J. (1983). The case for considering syntactic maturity in ESL and EFL. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1983.21.4.299
73.
MoghtaderM.CotchA.HagueK. (2001). The first-year composition requirement revisited: A survey. College Composition and Communication, 52(3), 455–467.
74.
MooreC.O’NeillP.HuotB. (2009). Creating a culture of assessment in writing programs and beyond. College Composition and Communication, 4(3), 345–361.
75.
Mota de CabreraC. R. (2004). Teaching, tutoring, and revision: The experiences of two ESL students in a rhetoric class [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Iowa. Iowa Research Online. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.ra6xmz64
76.
MyersS. A. (2003). ReMembering the sentence. College Composition and Communication, 54(4), 610–628.
77.
NakamaruS. (2010). Lexical issues in writing center tutorials with international and US-educated multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 95–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.01.001
OrtegaL. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
80.
Ortmeier-HooperC. (2008). English may be my second language, but I’m not “ESL.” College Composition and Communication, 59(3), 389–419.
81.
OvandoC. (2003). Bilingual education in the United States: Historical development and current issues. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(1), 1–25.
82.
Perryman-ClarkS.KirklandD.E.JacksonA. (2015). Students’ right to their own language: A critical sourcebook. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
83.
RaimesA. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229–258.
RussellA. L. (2018). The politics of academic language: Towards a framework for analyzing language representations in FYC textbooks. Composition Forum, 38.
86.
SamuelsA. J. (2018). Exploring culturally responsive pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives on fostering equitable and inclusive classrooms. SRATE Journal, 27(1), 22–30.
87.
SantosT. (1992). Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 1–15.
88.
ScanlanM. (2007). An asset-based approach to linguistic diversity. Focus on Teacher Education, 7(3), 3–5, 7.
89.
SilvaT. (1988). Comments on Vivian Zamel’s “Recent research on writing pedagogy.” A reader reacts. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 517–520.
90.
SilvaT. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657–677. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587400
91.
SilvaT.LekiI. (2004). Family matters: The influence of applied linguistics and composition studies on second language writing studies—past, present, and future. The Modern Language Journal, 88(1), 1–13.
92.
SonomuraM. O. (1996). Idiomaticity in the basic writing of American English. Peter Lang.
93.
StaplesS.ReppenR. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
TaguchiN.CrawfordB.WetzelD. Z. (2013). What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 420–430.
96.
TaroneE. (2006). Interlanguage. In BrownK. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 747–752). Elsevier.
97.
TeranshiR. T.Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. (2011). Immigrants in community colleges. The Future of Children: Immigrant Children, 21(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2011.0009
98.
TroiaG. (2007). Research in writing instruction: What we know and what we need to know. In PressleyM.BillmanA.PerryK.ReffittK.ReynoldsJ. (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 129–156). Guilford.
99.
TruscottJ. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–272.
100.
VeyseyL. R. (1965). The emergence of the American university. University of Chicago Press.
101.
ZamelV. (1988). Comments on Vivian Zamel’s “Recent research on writing pedagogy.” The author responds. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 520–524.
