The present study documents everyday adult writing by type of text and medium (computer or paper) in an in vivo diary study. The authors compare writing patterns by gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, age and working status. The study results reveal that (a) writing time varied with demographic variables for networkers, but these variations disappear for workers; (b) all demographic groups spent more time writing documents than prose; (c) most demographic groups spent an equal amount of time writing using computers and paper, but younger and higher educated groups spent more writing time on the computer, while older and less educated groups spent more time writing using paper than the computer; and (d) workers spent more time writing using computers than paper. Implications of the study findings are discussed, and suggestions for future research are also given.
Applebee, A.N. ( 1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577-596.
2.
Barton, D. ( 2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language . Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3.
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. ( 1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community . London: Routledge.
4.
Barton, D., & Ivanic, R. ( 1991). Introduction. In D. Barton & R. Ivanic (Eds.) Writing in the community (pp. 58-77). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
5.
Barton, D., & Padmore, S. ( 1991). Roles, networks, and values in everyday writing. In D. Barton & R. Ivanic (Eds.) Writing in the community (pp. 58-77). Newbury Park: SAGE.
6.
Brandt, D. ( 2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brandt, D. ( 2005). Writing for a living: Literacy and the knowledge economy . Written Communication, 22, 166-197.
8.
Cohen, D.J., & Snowden, J.L. ( 2008). The relation between document prevalence, document familiarity, and document literacy among adult readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 9-26.
9.
Costa, M. ( 1988). Adult literacy/illiteracy in the United States. A handbook for reference and research. Oxford, UK: Clio Press.
10.
Fishman, A.R. ( 1991). Because this is who we are: Writing in the Amish community . In D. Barton & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Writing in the community (pp. 14-37). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
11.
Golledge, R.G. ( 1998) Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Haas, C. ( 1996). Writing technologies: Studies on the materiality of literacy . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Haas, C., & Hayes, J.R. ( 1986). What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 22-35.
14.
Hayes, J.R., & Flower, L.S. ( 1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Heath, S.B. ( 1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Juster, F.T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F.P. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33(1), 19-54.
17.
Kalman, J. ( 2001). Everyday paperwork: Literacy practices in the daily life of unschooled and underschooled women in a semiurban community of Mexico City . Linguistics and Education, 12, 367-391.
18.
Karlsson, A. ( 2009). Positioned by reading and writing: Literacy practices, roles, and genres in common occupations. Written Communication , 26, 53-76.
19.
Kellogg, R.T. ( 1993). Observations of the psychology of thinking and writing . Composition Studies, 21, 3-41.
20.
Kellogg, R.T. ( 1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
Levy, C.M., & Ransdell, S.E. (1994). Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 219-223.
22.
Munger, R. ( 1999). Emergency medical technician-run reports: A study of genre, practice, and reflection. Business Communication Quarterly , 62, 116-120.
23.
Nelson, J. ( 1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English , 24, 362-396.
24.
Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. ( 1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of a R&D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.) Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford.
25.
Parr, S. ( 1992). Everyday reading and writing practices of normal adults: Implications for aphasia assessment. Aphasiology, 6, 273-283.
26.
Robinson, J.P. ( 1985). The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 33-62). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
27.
Robinson, J.P., & Godbey, G. ( 2000). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
28.
Schryer, C.F. ( 1993). Records as genre. Written Communication , 10, 200-234.
29.
Schwartz, L.K. ( 2002). The American Time Use Survey: Cognitive pretesting. Monthly Labor Review, 125, 34-44.
30.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. ( 1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Smith, D. ( 1974). The social contract of document reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257-268.
32.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005). Current Population Survey (Technical Documentation: CPS-05; Contingent Work Supplement File). Washington, DC: Author.
33.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2009). Internet use in the United States: October 2009. Available from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/computer/2009.html
34.
Witte, S.P. ( 1992). Context, text, and intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotics of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
