The authors' goal was to model the role played by the relationship between a writing teacher and her students in the feedback and revision cycle they experienced in an English-as-a-foreign-language context. Participants included a nonnative teacher of English and 14 students enrolled in her English writing class in a Korean university. Data came from formal, informal, and text-based interviews; semester-long classroom observations; and students' drafts with teacher comments. Findings showed that caring was enacted in complex and reciprocal ways, influenced by interwoven factors from the greater society, the course, the teacher, and the student. Students' level of trust in the teacher's English ability, teaching practices, and written feedback, as much as the teacher's trust in particular students based on how they revised their drafts, played a great role in the development of a caring relationship between them.
Anson, C.M. (2000). Response and the social construction of error . Assessing Writing, 7, 5-21.
2.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257.
3.
Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal , 91, 169-188.
4.
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
5.
Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T.N., & Ackerman, J. (1989). Social context and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. Technical Report, 33, 1-20.
6.
Blakeslee, A. (2001). Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Braine, G. (1999). From the periphery to the center: One teacher's journey. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 15-28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Casanave, C.P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Casanave, C.P. (2007). Controversies in second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Dong, Y.R. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students' dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428-457.
12.
Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher written commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155-182.
13.
Flower, L., Hayes, J., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision . College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
14.
Fox, H. (1994). Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing. Urbana, IL: National Council for Teachers of English.
15.
Gascoigne, C. (2004). Examining the effects of feedback in beginning L2 composition. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 71-76.
16.
Goldstein, L.S. (1998, April). Taking caring seriously: The ethic of care in classroom life. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
17.
Goldstein, L.S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 647-673.
18.
Goldstein, L.M. (2005). Teacher written commentary: In second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Goldstein, L.S., & Freedman, D. (2003). Challenges enacting caring teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 441-454.
20.
Goldstein, L.S., & Lake, V.E. (2000). "Love, love, and more love for children": Exploring preservice teachers' understandings of caring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 861-872.
21.
Hedgcock, S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
22.
Herrington, A.J. (1985). Writing in academic setting: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
23.
Hillocks, G. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the composing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261-278.
24.
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286.
25.
Kepner, C.G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of feedback to the development of second language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
26.
Kim, M. (2005). Dialogical caring encounters between teacher and students: The role of computer-mediated communication in preparing preservice reading teachers. 53rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 53, 67-89.
27.
Lee, I. (in press). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17.
28.
Lee, G., & Schallert, D.L. (in press). Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing , 17.
29.
Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response . In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57-68). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Mathison-Fife, J., & O'Neill, P. (2001). Moving beyond the written comment: Narrowing the gap between practice and research. College Composition and Communication, 53, 300-321.
31.
Murphy, S. (2000). A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room? Assessing Writing, 7, 79-90.
32.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Noddings, N. (2001). The caring teacher. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4 ed., pp. 99-105). New York: Macmillan.
34.
Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings . In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 220-235). New York: Longman.
35.
Ortega, L. (2004, Spring). L2 writing research in EFL contexts: Some challenges and opportunities for EFL researchers [Featured article]. ALAK [Applied Linguistic Association of Korea] Newsletter.
36.
Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
37.
Park, J.K. (1999). Teaching English in Korean culture and context . English Teaching, 54, 3-21.
38.
Prior, P. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-310.
39.
Prior, P. (1995a). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
Prior, P. (1995b). Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: A case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation . Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 283-325.
41.
Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 272-292.
42.
Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners . TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46-70.
43.
Schulz, R.A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258.
44.
Silva, T., & Brice, C. (2004). Research in teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 70-106.
45.
Smith, S. (1997). The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher response to student writing. College Composition and Communication , 48, 249-268.
46.
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156.
47.
Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response. Assessing Writing, 7, 23-55.
48.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
