This research analyzed the composing processes of one high school student as she designed the interiors of homes for a course in interior design. Data included field notes, an interview with the teacher, artifacts from the class, and the focal student’s concurrent and retrospective protocols in relation to her design of home interiors. The analysis revealed that the object of activity in this setting included aspects of the motive (including the teacher’s constructed environment and attendant expectations, the teacher’s governing logic and common sense with respect to interior design, and the broader field of interior design as interpreted and implemented in the class) and both fixed and emergent goals. The student’s object-related problem-solving involved a hierarchy of problem-solving decisions and employed a variety of tools in solving these problems, particularly those derived from culture, reliant on knowledge from a discipline or field, and following from images such as narratives.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. Tenth anniversary edition. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Berlage, N. (1998). The establishment of an applied social science: Home economists, science, and reform at Cornell University, 1870-1930. In H. Silverberg (Ed.), Gender and American social science: The formative years (pp. 185-234). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bliss, R. K. (1953, June). Foundations laid early for Iowa’s home economics extension work. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.extension.iastate.edu/polk/history/homeec.html
4.
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
5.
Carter, T. (1998). Kitchen design tips—Geometry 101. Retrieved July 14, 2005, from http://www.askthebuilder.com/193_Kitchen_Design_Tips_-_Geometry_101.shtml
6.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Eco, U. (1985). Producing signs. In M. Blonsky (Ed.), On Signs (pp. 176-183). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Flood, J., Heath, S. B., & Lapp, D. (Eds.). (1997/2005). Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New YorkBasic Books.
15.
Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). “Once upon a time:” The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 115-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Hillocks, G., Jr. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). New York: Routledge.
20.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress.
21.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
23.
O’Donnell-Allen, C., & Smagorinsky, P. (1999). Revising Ophelia: Rethinking questions of gender and power in school. English Journal, 88(3), 35-42.
24.
Rossiter, M. W. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies until 1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
Sherwood, R. F. (1990). Homes: Today and tomorrow (4th ed.). Mission Hills, CA: Glencoe.
26.
Smagorinsky, P. (1995a). Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualizing writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103, 160-184.
27.
Smagorinsky, P. (1995b). The social construction of data: Methodological problems of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of Educational Research, 65, 191-212.
28.
Smagorinsky, P. (1997a). Artistic composing as representational process. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 87-105.
29.
Smagorinsky, P. (1997b). Personal growth in social context: A high school senior’s search for meaning in and through writing. Written Communication, 14, 63-105.
30.
Smagorinsky, P. (1998). Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 157-177.
31.
Smagorinsky, P. (2001a). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71, 133-169.
32.
Smagorinsky, P. (2001b). Rethinking protocol analysis from a cultural perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 233-245.
33.
Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., & Reed, P. M. (2005). The construction of meaning and identity in the composition and reading of an architectural text. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 70-88.
34.
Smagorinsky, P., & Coppock, J. (1994). Cultural tools and the classroom context: An exploration of an alternative response to literature. Written Communication, 11, 283-310.
35.
Smagorinsky, P., & Coppock, J. (1995a). The reader, the text, the context: An exploration of a choreographed response to literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 271-298.
36.
Smagorinsky, P., & Coppock, J. (1995b). Reading through the lines: An exploration of drama as a response to literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 11, 369-391.
37.
Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (1998a). The depth and dynamics of context: Tracing the sources and channels of engagement and disengagement in students’ response to literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 515-559.
38.
Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (1998b). Reading as mediated and mediating action: Composing meaning for literature through multimedia interpretive texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 198-226.
39.
Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2000). Idiocultural diversity in small groups: The role of the relational framework in collaborative learning. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 165-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Smagorinsky, P., Pettis, V., & Reed, P. M. (2004). High school students’ compositions of ranch designs: Implications for academic and personal achievement. Written Communication, 21, 386-418.
41.
Smagorinsky, P., Zoss, M., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2005). Mask-making as identity project in a high school English class: A case study. English in Education, 39(2), 58-73.
42.
Straussman, J. D. (2003). Public policy analysis and management as a field of professional education. School of Public Administration, Moscow State University E-journal, No. 2. Retrieved July 14, 2005, from http://www.spa.msu.ru/e-journal/2/32_1.php
43.
Swanson-Owens, D., & Newell, G. E. (1994). Using intervention protocols to study the effects of instructional scaffolding on writing and learning. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 141-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
45.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky (R. Rieber & A. Carton, Eds., N. Minick, Trans.), Collected works (vol. 1, pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum.
46.
Waring, M. (1999). Counting for nothing: What men value and what women are worth. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
47.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Witte, S. P. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
