This research analyzed the composing processes of two high school students designing horse ranch plans for a course in equine management and production. The investigation focused on understanding the problems driving the design process, the tools through which the students inscribed and encoded meaning in their compositions, and the integration, representation, and mediation of their emerging identities through the design process. The analysis revealed that the students solved problems suggested by the particular culture surrounding the production of a specific breed of horse and constructed unique problems based on their knowledge of horses and ranch facilities. The tools through which they constructed these texts suggested both the cultural dimensions and narrative inscriptions of their designs. The culturally mediated narratives in particular contributed to students’ construction of identities, especially with respect to their orientation as members of the managerial (Darin) and working (Riley) classes.
Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school: English and the content areas (NCTE Research Report No. 21). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
2.
Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
Blonsky, M. (Ed.).(1985). On signs. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.).(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
5.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. New York: Falmer.
6.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
9.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Dyson, A. Haas. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Elbow, P. (1981). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.
14.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Finders, M. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
17.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. New York: Falmer.
19.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). “Once upon a time”: The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 115-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Hillocks, G. (1995). Teaching writing as reflective practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). New York: Routledge.
23.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
25.
Lotman, I. U. M. (1977). The structure of the artistic text. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, University of Michigan.
26.
Moll, L. C. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
The New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy and learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). New York: Routledge.
28.
Newkirk, T. (1997). The performance of self in student writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29.
Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
30.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
32.
Schultz, K. (2002). Looking across space and time: Reconceptualizing literacy learning in and out of school. Research in the Teaching of English, 36, 356-390.
33.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Smagorinsky, P. (1995). Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualizing writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103, 160-184.
35.
Smagorinsky, P. (1997). Personal growth in social context: A high school senior’s search for meaning in and through writing. Written Communication, 14, 63-105.
36.
Smagorinsky, P. (1998). Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 157-177.
37.
Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71, 133-169.
38.
Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2). Retrieved July 14, 2004, from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/bs152.htm
39.
Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 247-257.
40.
Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
41.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.) & N. Minick (Trans.), L. S. Vygotsky, Collected works (Vol. 1, pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum.
43.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Vygotsky’s two minds on the nature of meaning. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Witte, S. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
