When writers plan a document together, they rely on gestures as well as speech and writing in constructing a common representation of their group document. This case study of a student technical writing group explores how group members used gestures to create a conversational interaction space that they then treated like a physical text that they manipulated, wrote on, and pointed at. These gestures suggested a group pretext that helped group members translate abstract goals into concrete plans. However, the close proximity of gesture to the physical act of writing may mislead students into thinking that the tricky work of translating abstract ideas into final written form had already been completed. Gestures and adaptor movements (such as fidgeting with a pen) also seemed to conspire to help individuals control the conversational space and call attention to themselves as writers. Implications for future research on gesture and collaborative writing, gender, and writing technologies are discussed.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79-90.
3.
Cohen, A. L., Cash, D., Muller, M. J., & Culberson, C. (1999). Writing apart and designing together. In CHI 99 (pp. 198-199). New York: ACM Press.
4.
Cross, G. A. (2000). Collective form: An exploration of large-group writing. Journal of Business Communication, 37(1), 77-101.
5.
Driskell, J. E., & Radtke, P. H. (2003). The effect of gesture on speech production and comprehension. Human Factors, 45(3), 445-454.
6.
Eakins, B., & Eakins, G. (1978). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. Paper presented at the Sociology of the Languages of American Women conference, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
7.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usages, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
8.
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981, December). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
10.
Furuyama, N. (2000). Gestural interaction between the instructor and the learner in origami instruction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 99-117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Haas, C., & Witte, S. (2001). Writing as an embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(4), 413-457.
13.
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 35-54). New York: Routledge.
15.
James, D., & Clarke, S. (1993). Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 231-280). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Chawla, P. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 389-450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Lind, M. R. (1999). The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(4), 276-285.
19.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Morgan, M. (1994). Women as emergent leaders in student collaborative writing groups. JAC, 14(1), 203-219.
21.
O’Hara, K., Taylor, A., Newman, W., & Sellen, A. (2002). Understanding the materiality of writing from sources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(3), 269-305.
22.
Roth, W. -M. (2002). From action to discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 535-554.
23.
Sauer, B. (1998). Embodied knowledge: The textual representation of embodied sensory information in a dynamic and uncertain material environment. Written Communication, 15(2), 131-169.
24.
Sauer, B. (1999). Embodied experience: Representing risk in speech and gesture. Discourse Studies, 1(3), 321-354.
25.
Sproull, L., & Keisler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Throne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 103-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
29.
Witte, S. P. (1987). Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 397-425.
30.
Wolfe, J., & Alexander, K. (2005). The computer expert in a mixed-gendered collaborative writing group. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(2), 135-170.
31.
Woods, N. (1988). Talking shop: Sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities. New York: Longman.
