Cities must equitably plan for heat resilience as heat risks increase but lack integrated approaches to coordinate strategies across community plans and prioritize heat mitigation for the most vulnerable communities. We adapted the Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard™ (PIRS™) methodology, originally developed for flood hazards, to heat and piloted it in five geographically diverse U.S. cities. We used PIRS™ for Heat to analyze how policies across community plans would affect urban heat and compared spatial patterns in policy attention with indicators of vulnerability. We find that heat mitigation policies are not targeting the highest heat risk areas.
BarnesJaniceDowKirstin. 2022. “Water AND Heat: Intervening in Adaptation Hazard Bias.”Frontiers in Climate4: 868017. doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.868017.
2.
BerkePhilip R.GodschalkDavid. 2009. “Searching for the Good Plan.”Journal of Planning Literature23 (3): 227–40. doi:10.1177/0885412208327014.
3.
BerkePhilip R.GodschalkDavidKaiserEdward J.RodriguezDaniel A.2006. Urban Land Use Planning. 5th ed.Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
4.
BerkePhilip R.KatesJustinMalechaMattMastersonJaimieSheaPaulaYuSiyu. 2021. “Using a Resilience Scorecard to Improve Local Planning for Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change: An Application in Two Cities.”Cities119: 103408. doi:10.1016/J.CITIES.2021.103408.
5.
BerkePhilip R.MalechaMatthew L.YuSiyuLeeJaekyungMastersonJaimie H.2019. “Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: Evaluating Networks of Plans in Six US Coastal Cities.”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management62 (5): 901–20. doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1453354.
6.
BerkePhilip R.NewmanGalenLeeJaekyungCombsTabithaKolosnaCarlSalvesenDavid. 2015. “Evaluation of Networks of Plans and Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change: A Resilience Scorecard.”Journal of the American Planning Association81 (4): 287–302. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1093954.
7.
BerkePhilip R.YuSiyuMalechaMattCooperJohn. 2023. “Plans That Disrupt Development: Equity Policies and Social Vulnerability in Six Coastal Cities.”Journal of Planning Education and Research43 (1): 150–165. doi:10.1177/0739456X19861144.
DeAngelisJosephPenaJohamaryGomezAlexsandraMastersonJaimieBerkePhilip. 2021. PAS Memo: Building Resilience through Plan Integration. Chicago: American Planning Association.
10.
DongShangjiaMalechaMatthewFarahmandHamedMostafaviAliBerkePhilip R.WoodruffSierra C.2021. “Integrated Infrastructure-Plan Analysis for Resilience Enhancement of Post-Hazards Access to Critical Facilities.”Cities117:103318. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103318.
11.
EliassonIngegaerd. 2000. “The Use of Climate Knowledge in Urban Planning.”Landscape and Urban Planning48 (1–2): 31–44. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00034-7.
12.
FrankThomas. 2022. “FEMA Program for Heat Waves Rejected a Cooling Center.”ClimateWire, August1.
13.
GabbeC. J.PierceGregoryPetermannEmilyMarecekAlly. 2021. “Why and How Do Cities Plan for Extreme Heat?”Journal of Planning Education and Research1–15. doi:10.1177/0739456X211053654.
14.
HibbardK. A.HoffmanF. M.HuntzingerD.WestT. O.2017. “Changes in Land Cover and Terrestrial Biogeochemistry.” In Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, edited by WuebblesD. J.FaheyD. W.HibbardK. A.DokkenD. J.StewartB. C.MaycockT. K., vol. I, 277–302. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.
15.
HoffmanJeremy S.ShandasVivekPendletonNicholas. 2020. “The Effects of Historical Housing Policies on Resident Exposure to Intra-Urban Heat: A Study of 108 US Urban Areas.”Climate8 (1): 12. doi:10.3390/cli8010012.
16.
HondulaDavid M.DavisRobert E.SahaMichael V.WegnerCarleigh R.VeazeyLindsay M.2015. “Geographic Dimensions of Heat-Related Mortality in Seven U.S. Cities.”Environmental Research138: 439–52. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.033.
17.
HopkinsLewis D.KnaapGerrit-Jan. 2018. “Autonomous Planning: Using Plans as Signals.”Planning Theory17 (2): 274–95. doi:10.1177/1473095216669868.
18.
IbsenPeter C.BorowyDorothyDellTylerGreydanusHattieGuptaNehaHondulaDavid M.MeixnerThomas, et al. 2021. “Greater Aridity Increases the Magnitude of Urban Nighttime Vegetation-Derived Air Cooling.”Environmental Research Letters16 (3): 034011. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdf8a.
19.
IPCC. 2023. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by Core Writing Team, LeeH.RomeroJ.36. Geneva: IPCC.
20.
JonesBryanDunnGillianBalkDeborah. 2021. “Extreme Heat Related Mortality: Spatial Patterns and Determinants in the United States, 1979–2011.”Spatial Demography9: 107–29. doi:10.1007/s40980-021-00079-6.
21.
KeithLaddGabbeC. J.SchmidtErika. 2023. “Urban Heat Governance: Examining the Role of Urban Planning.”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning25 (5): 642–62. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2023.2244446.
KeithLaddMeerowSaraBerkePhilipDeAngelisJosephJensenLaurenTregoShaylynnSchmidtErikaSmithStephanie. 2022. Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard™ (PIRS™) for Heat: Spatially Evaluating Networks of Plans to Mitigate Heat (Version 1.0). Chicago: American Planning Association. https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9257652/
KeithLaddMeerowSaraWagnerTess. 2019. “Planning for Extreme Heat: A Review.”Journal of Extreme Events6 (3 & 4): 2050003. doi:10.1142/S2345737620500037.
26.
KimSungyopSunFengpengIrazábalClara. 2020. “Planning for Climate Change: Implications of High Temperatures and Extreme Heat for Los Angeles County (CA).”Journal of the American Planning Association87 (1): 34–44. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1788415.
27.
KovatsR. SariHajatShakoor. 2008. “Heat Stress and Public Health: A Critical Review.”Annual Review of Public Health29 (1): 41–55. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090843.
28.
KrippendorffKlaus. 2004. “Reliability in Content Analysis.”Human Communication Research30 (3): 411–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x.
29.
MalechaMatthew L.BrandA. D.BerkePhilip R.2018. “Spatially Evaluating a Network of Plans and Flood Vulnerability Using a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: A Case Study in Feijenoord District, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.”Land Use Policy78: 147–57. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.029.
30.
MalechaMatthew L.MastersonJaimie HicksYuSiyuBerkePhilip. 2019. Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard Guidebook: Spatially Evaluating Networks of Plans to Reduce Hazard Vulnerability—Version 2.0. College Station, TX: Institute for Sustainable Communities, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University.
31.
MeerowSaraHannibalBryceWoodruffSierra C.RoyMaliniMatosMelinaGilbertsonPhilip G.2023. “Urban Flood Resilience Networks: Exploring the Relationship between Governance Networks, Networks of Plans, and Spatial Flood Resilience Policies in Four Coastal Cities.”Annals of the American Association of Geographers. doi:10.1080/24694452.2023.2284299
32.
MeerowSaraKeithLadd. 2022. “Planning for Extreme Heat: A National Survey of U.S. Planners.”Journal of the American Planning Association88 (3): 319–34. doi:10.1080/01944363.2021.1977682.
33.
MeerowSaraWoodruffSierra C.2020. “Seven Principles of Strong Climate Change Planning.”Journal of the American Planning Association86 (1): 39–46. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1652108.
34.
MiddelArianeSchneiderFlorian A.AlKhaledSaudSchneiderFlorian A.HagenBjoernCoseoPaul. 2021. “50 Grades of Shade.”Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society102 (9): E1805–20. doi:10.1175/bams-d-20-0193.1.
35.
NewmanGalenMalechaMatthewYuSiyuQiaoZixuHorneyJennifer A.LeeJaekyungKimYou JungLeeRyun JungBerkePhil. 2020. “Integrating a Resilience Scorecard and Landscape Performance Tools into a Geodesign Process.”Landscape Research45 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1569219.
36.
NordgrenJohnStultsMissyMeerowSara. 2016. “Supporting Local Climate Change Adaptation: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.”Environmental Science & Policy66:344–52. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.006.
37.
OkeT. R.1973. “City Size and the Urban Heat Island.”Atmospheric Environment7 (8): 769–79. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6.
38.
SailorDavid J.LuLu. 2004. “A Top–down Methodology for Developing Diurnal and Seasonal Anthropogenic Heating Profiles for Urban Areas.”Atmospheric Environment38 (17): 2737–48. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.034.
39.
ShandasV.VoelkelJ.WilliamsJ.HoffmanJ.2019. “Integrating Satellite and Ground Measurements for Predicting Locations of Extreme Urban Heat.”Climate7 (1): 5. doi:10.3390/cli7010005.
40.
ShindellDrewZhangYuqiangScottMelissaRuMuyeStarkKristaEbiKristie L.2020. “The Effects of Heat Exposure on Human Mortality Throughout the United States.”Geohealth4 (4): 1–12. doi:10.1029/2019GH000234.
41.
SpielmanSeth E.TuccilloJosephFolchDavid C.SchweikertAmyDaviesRebeccaWoodNathanTateEric. 2020. “Evaluating Social Vulnerability Indicators: Criteria and Their Application to the Social Vulnerability Index.”Natural Hazards100 (1): 417–36. doi:10.1007/s11069-019-03820-z.
42.
StevensM. R.LylesW.BerkeP. R.2014. “Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research.”Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (1): 77–93. doi:10.1177/0739456X1351361.
43.
StoneBrianRodgersMichael O.2001. “Urban Form and Thermal Efficiency: How the Design of Cities Influences the Urban Heat Island Effect.”Journal of the American Planning Association67 (2): 186–98. doi:10.1080/01944360108976228.
44.
TregoShaylynnMeerowSaraKeithLadd. 2023. “Heat planning in small and medium-sized cities: A Collaborative application of PIRS™ for Heat in Kent, WA, USA.” Socio-Ecological Practice Research. 5(2023): 409–422. doi.org:10.1007/s42532-023-00166-6
45.
TuholskeCascadeCaylorKellyFunkChrisVerdinAndrewSweeneyStuartGraceKathrynPetersonPeteEvansTom. 2021. “Global Urban Population Exposure to Extreme Heat.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (41): e2024792118. doi:10.1073/PNAS.2024792118.
46.
TurnerV. KellyFrenchEmma M.DialesandroJohnMiddelArianeHondulaDavidBan-WeissGeorgeAbdelattiHana. 2022. “How Are Cities Planning for Heat? Content Analysis of United States Municipal Plans.”Environmental Research Letters17: 064054. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/AC73A9.
47.
TurnerV. KellyRogersMorgan L.ZhangYujiaMiddelArianeSchneiderFlorian A.OcónJonathan P.SeeleyMegsDialesandroJohn. 2022. “More than Surface Temperature: Mitigating Thermal Exposure in Hyper-Local Land System.”Journal of Land Use Science17 (1): 79–99. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2021.2015003.
48.
USGCRP. 2018. Fourth National Climate Assessment. Volume II: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States. Edited by ReidmillerD. R.AveryC. W.EasterlingD. R.KunkelK. E.LewisK. L. M.MaycockT. K.StewartB. C., vol. II. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.
49.
WilsonBev. 2020. “Urban Heat Management and the Legacy of Redlining.”Journal of the American Planning Association86: 443–57. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1759127.
50.
WoodruffSierraMeerowSaraGilbertsonPhilipHannibalBryceMatosMelinaRoyMaliniMalechaMatthewYuSiyuBerkePhil. 2021. “Is Flood Resilience Planning Improving? A Longitudinal Analysis of Networks of Plans in Boston and Fort Lauderdale.”Climate Risk Management34: 100354. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2021.100354.
51.
WoodruffSierra C.MeerowSaraHannibalBryceMatosMelinaRoyMaliniGilbertsonPhilip. 2022. “More than the Sum of Their Parts: Approaches to Understand a Network of Plans.”Journal of Planning Education and Research 1–15. doi:10.1177/0739456X221096395.
52.
WoodruffSierra C.MeerowSaraStultsMissyWilkinsChandler. 2018. “Adaptation to Resilience Planning: Alternative Pathways to Prepare for Climate Change.”Journal of Planning Education and Research42(1): 64–75. doi:10.1177/0739456X18801057.
53.
YuSiyuBrandA. D.BerkePhilip. 2020. “Making Room for the River: Applying a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard to a Network of Plans in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.”Journal of the American Planning Association86: 417–30. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1752776.
54.
YuSiyuMalechaMatthewBerkePhilip. 2021. “Examining Factors Influencing Plan Integration for Community Resilience in Six US Coastal Cities Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”Landscape and Urban Planning215: 104224. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104224.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
