The profession of planning must act now to become an integral player addressing the existential crisis of climate change. This Commentary builds on the findings of the 2020–2021 Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning’s Presidential Climate Action Task Force, which assessed opportunities to enhance the academy’s climate leadership in research, teaching, and operations. We argue that our field must integrate climate research and education into all subfields, refocus on decarbonization, build a pipeline of diverse students involved in climate action, and develop the language and skills to grapple with planning for climate change.
AnguelovskiIsabelleLivia BrandAnnaConnollyJames J.T.CorberaEsteveKotsilaPanagiotaSteilJustinGarcia-LamarcaMelissa, et al. 2020. “Expanding the Boundaries of Justice in Urban Greening Scholarship: Toward an Emancipatory, Antisubordination, Intersectional, and Relational Approach.”Annals of the American Association of Geographers110 (6): 1743–1769. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579.
3.
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, University of Leeds, University of New South Wales, and Arup Partnerships. 2019. Consumption-Based GHG Emissions of C40 Cities. C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. https://www.c40.org/researches/consumption-based-emissions
4.
Coalition for Urban Transitions (CUT). 2019. “Climate Emergency, Urban Opportunity.” London and Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (WRI) Ross Center for Sustainable Cities and C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. https://urbantransitions.global/urban-opportunity
5.
FitzgeraldJoan. 2022. “Transitioning from Urban Climate Action to Climate Equity.”Journal of the American Planning Association88 (4): 508–23. doi:10.1080/01944363.2021.2013301.
6.
GohKian. 2021. Form and Flow: The Spatial Politics of Resilience and Climate Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
HsuDavidAndrewsClinton J.HanAlbert T.LohCarolyn G.OslandAnna C.ZegrasChristopher P.2023. “Planning the Built Environment and Land Use towards Deep Decarbonization of the United States.”Journal of Planning Literature38 (3): 426–41. doi:10.1177/08854122221097977.
8.
IPCC. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by ShuklaP. R.SkeaJ.SladeR.KhourdajieA. Alvan DiemenR.McCollumD.PathakM., et al. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009157926.001.
9.
RandolphJohnMastersGilbert M.2018. Energy for Sustainability. 2nd ed.Washington, DC and Covelo, CA: Perlego.
10.
RobinsonJennifer. 2002. “Global and World Cities: A View from off the Map.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26 (3): 531–54. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00397.
11.
SeasonsMarkInfieldElisabethLylesWard. 2023. “Teaching Climate Change: Fostering Hope While Building Capacity.”Planning Practice and Research. Forthcoming.
12.
ShiLindaFitzgeraldJoan. 2023. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Planning for Climate Transformations.”Journal of Planning Literature38 (3): 351–60. doi:10.1177/08854122231180216.
WilliamsPatrice C.BinetAndrewAlhasanDana M.RileyNyree M.JacksonChandra L.2022. “Urban Planning for Health Equity Must Employ an Intersectionality Framework.”Journal of the American Planning Association89 (2): 167–74. doi:10.1080/01944363.2022.2079550.
WorthGretchenFernandesAntheaHeiselFelixMinnerJenniferO’ MalleyChristine. 2022. “How Cities Can Stop Wasting Buildings: The Case for Deconstruction.” Pp. 32–37 in Circular Construction and Circular Economy, edited by HeiselFelixHebelDirk E.WebsterKen. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.
