A community’s resilience is strongly influenced by the growth management guidance provided by its network of plans. Wetland loss has been shown to amplify flood damage. This study explores the relationship between plan integration and wetland alteration, comparing the findings from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and League City, Texas. Combining spatial analytics, a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard™ evaluation, and correlational statistics, we find that wetland loss is significantly associated with plan integration and development patterns and is less acute in League City than Fort Lauderdale. Integrating wetland protection policies throughout a network of plans helps build resilience to flood hazards.
AlbrechtsL.MandelbaumS., eds. 2007. The Network Society: A New Context for Planning. New York: Routledge.
2.
AndersonJ. R.1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Vol. 964. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
3.
AnguelovskiI.ShiL.ChuE.GallagherD.GohK.LambZ.ReeveK.TeicherH.2016. “Equity Impacts of Urban Land Use Planning for Climate Adaptation: Critical Perspectives from the Global North and South.”Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (3): 333–48.
4.
BerkeP.KatesJ.MalechaM.MastersonJ.SheaP.YuS.2021. “Using a Resilience Scorecard to Improve Local Planning for Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change: An Application in Two Cities.”Cities119:103408.
5.
BerkeP.MalechaM.YuS.LeeJ.MastersonJ.2019. “Plan Integration Scorecard for Resilience: Evaluating Networks of Plans in Six US Coastal Cities.”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management62:901–20.
6.
BerkeP.NewmanG.LeeJ.CombsT.KolosnaC.SalvesenD.2015. “Evaluation of Networks of Plans and Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change: A Resilience Scorecard.”Journal of the American Planning Association81 (4): 287–302.
7.
BerkeP.YuS.MalechaM.CooperJ.2023. “Plans That Disrupt Development: Equity Policies and Social Vulnerability in Six Coastal Cities.”Journal of Planning Education and Research43:150–65.
8.
BrodyS. D.CarrascoV.HighfieldW. E.2006. “Measuring the Adoption of Local Sprawl: Reduction Planning Policies in Florida.”Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (3): 294–310.
9.
BrodyS. D.HighfieldW. E.BlessingR.2015. “An Analysis of the Effects of Land Use and Land Cover on Flood Losses along the Gulf of Mexico Coast from 1999 to 2009.”JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association51 (6): 1556–67.
10.
BrodyS. D.PeacockW. G.GunnJ.2012. “Ecological Indicators of Flood Risk along the Gulf of Mexico.”Ecological Indicators18:493–500.
11.
BrodyS. D.ZahranS.HighfieldW. E.GroverH.VedlitzA.2008. “Identifying the Impact of the Built Environment on Flood Damage in Texas.”Disasters32 (1): 1–18.
12.
BurbyR. J.BeatleyT.BerkeP. R.DeyleR. E.FrenchS. P.GodschalkD. R.KaiserE. J., et al1999. “Unleashing the Power of Planning to Create Disaster-Resistant Communities.”Journal of the American Planning Association65 (3): 247–58.
13.
BurbyR. J.FrenchS. P.1981. “Coping with Floods: The Land Use Management Paradox.”Journal of the American Planning Association47 (3): 289–300.
14.
BurbyR. J.ed. 1998. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
CostanzaR.Pérez-MaqueoO.MartinezM. L.SuttonP.AndersonS. J.MulderK.2008. “The Value of Coastal Wetlands for Hurricane Protection.”Ambio37:241–48.
19.
CutterS. L.BarnesL.BerryM.BurtonC.EvansE.TateE.WebbJ.2008. “A Place-Based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters.”Global Environmental Change18 (4): 598–606.
20.
DongS.MalechaM.FarahmandH.MostafaviA.BerkeP. R.WoodruffS. C.2021. “Integrated Infrastructure-Plan Analysis for Resilience Enhancement of Post-Hazards Access to Critical Facilities.”Cities117:103318.
21.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E.2000. “Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale.”Journal of Social Issues56 (3): 425–42.
22.
FinnD.ChandrasekharD.XiaoY.2023. “A Region Recovers: Planning for Resilience after Superstorm Sandy.”Journal of Planning Education and Research43:136–49.
23.
FlocksJ.EscobedoF.WadeJ.VarelaS.WaldC.2011. “Environmental Justice Implications of Urban Tree Cover in Miami-Dade County, Florida.”Environmental Justice4 (2): 125–34.
24.
FolkeC.CarpenterS.ElmqvistT.GundersonL.HollingC. S.WalkerB.2002. “Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations.”AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment31 (5): 437–40.
25.
FreelonD.2013. “ReCal OIR: Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Intercoder Reliability as a Web Service.”International Journal of Internet Science8 (1): 10–16.
GrubeL.StorrV. H.2014. “The Capacity for Self-Governance and Post-Disaster Resiliency.”The Review of Austrian Economics27 (3): 301–24.
28.
HaaseD.LarondelleN.AnderssonE.ArtmannM.BorgströmS.BreusteJ.Gomez-BaggethunE.GrenÅ.HamsteadZ.HansenR., et al2014. “A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation.”Ambio43 (4): 413–33.
29.
HaeuberR.1998. “Ecosystem Management and Environmental Policy in the United States: Open Window or Closed Door?”Landscape and Urban Planning40 (1–3): 221–33.
30.
HendricksM. D.NewmanG.YuS.HorneyJ.2018. “Leveling the Landscape: Landscape Performance as a Green Infrastructure Evaluation Tool for Service-Learning Products.”Landscape Journal37 (2): 19–39.
31.
HollingC. S.1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.”Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4 (1): 1–23.
32.
HollingC. S.GundersonL. H.LightS.1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
HomerC. H.FryJ. A.BarnesC. A.2012. “The National Land Cover Database.”US Geological Survey Fact Sheet3020 (4): 1–4.
34.
HopkinsL. D.2001. Urban Development: The Logic of Making Plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35.
HopkinsL. D.KnaapG. J.2018. “Autonomous Planning: Using Plans as Signals.”Planning Theory17 (2): 274–95.
36.
KahnM. E.2000. “The Environmental Impact of Suburbanization.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management19 (4): 569–86.
37.
KarayeI.StoneK. W.CasillasG. A.NewmanG.HorneyJ. A.2019. “A Spatial Analysis of Possible Environmental Exposures in Recreational Areas Impacted by Hurricane Harvey Flooding, Harris County, Texas.”Environmental Management64 (4): 381–90.
38.
KimY.YuS.LiD.GatsonS. N.BrownR. D.2022. “Linking Landscape Spatial Heterogeneity to Urban Heat Island and Outdoor Human Thermal Comfort in Tokyo: Application of the Outdoor Thermal Comfort Index.”Sustainable Cities and Society87:104262.
39.
LebelL.AnderiesJ.CampbellB.FolkeC.Hatfield-DoddsS.HughesT.WilsonJ.2006. “Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems.”Ecology and Society11 (1).
40.
LubellM.FeiockR. C.De La CruzE. E. R.2009. “Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth.”American Journal of Political Science53 (3): 649–65.
41.
MalechaM.MastersonJ. H.YuS.BerkeP.2019. Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard Guidebook: Spatially Evaluating Networks of Plans to Reduce Hazard Vulnerability—Version 2.0. College Station, TX: Institute for Sustainable Communities, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University.
42.
MalechaM. L.BrandA. D.BerkeP. R.2018. “Spatially Evaluating a Network of Plans and Flood Vulnerability using a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: A Case Study in Feijenoord District, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.”Land Use Policy78:147–57.
43.
MalechaM. L.WoodruffS. C.BerkeP. R.2021. “Planning to Exacerbate Flooding: Evaluating a Houston, Texas, Network of Plans in Place during Hurricane Harvey Using a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard.”Natural Hazards Review22 (4): 04021030.
44.
MastersonJ. H.BerkeP. R.MalechaM.YuS.LeeJ.ThapaJ.2017. Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard Guidebook: How to Spatially Evaluate Networks of Plans to Reduce Hazard Vulnerability. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
45.
MastersonJ. H.PeacockW. G.Van ZandtS.GroverH.SchwarzL. F.CooperJ. T.2014. Planning for Community Resilience: A Handbook for Reducing Vulnerability to Disasters. Washington, DC: Island Press.
46.
McPhearsonT.AnderssonE.ElmqvistT.FrantzeskakiN.2015. “Resilience of and through Urban Ecosystem Services.”Ecosystem Services12:152–56.
47.
MiletiD.1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
48.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
49.
MuñozL. A.OliveraF.GiglioM.BerkeP.2018. “The Impact of Urbanization on the Streamflows and the 100-Year Floodplain Extent of the Sims Bayou in Houston, Texas.”International Journal of River Basin Management16 (1): 61–69.
50.
MustafaA.BruwierM.ArchambeauP.ErpicumS.PirottonM.DewalsB.TellerJ.2018. “Effects of Spatial Planning on Future Flood Risks in Urban Environments.”Journal of Environmental Management225:193–204.
51.
National Research Council. 2012. Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
52.
National Research Council. 2014. Reducing Coastal Risk on the East and Gulf Coasts. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
53.
NewmanG.DongyingL.RuiZ.DingdingR.2019. “Resilience through Regeneration: The Economics of Repurposing Vacant Land with Green Infrastructure.”Landscape Architecture Frontiers6 (6): 10.
54.
NewmanG.MalechaM.YuS.QiaoZ.HorneyJ. A.LeeJ.KimY.-J.LeeR. J.BerkeP.2020. “Integrating a Resilience Scorecard and Landscape Performance Tools into a Geodesign Process.”Landscape Research45 (1): 63–80.
55.
NewmanG. D.SmithA. L.BrodyS. D.2017. “Repurposing Vacant Land through Landscape Connectivity.”Landscape Journal36 (1): 37–57.
NortonR. K.DavidN. P.BuckmanS.KomanP. D.2018. “Overlooking the Coast: Limited Local Planning for Coastal Area Management along Michigan’s Great Lakes.”Land Use Policy71:183–203.
58.
PattersonL.DoyleM.2009. “Assessing Effectiveness of National Flood Policy through Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Socioeconomic Exposure.”Journal of the American Water Resources Association45 (1): 237–52.
59.
PeacockW. G.Van ZandtS.ZhangY.HighfieldW. E.2014. “Inequities in Long-Term Housing Recovery after Disasters.”Journal of the American Planning Association804 (4): 356–71.
60.
PimmS. L.1984. “The Complexity and Stability of Ecosystems.”Nature307 (5949): 321–26.
61.
RejaM. Y.BrodyS. D.HighfieldW. E.NewmanG. D.2017. “Hurricane Recovery and Ecological Resilience: Measuring the Impacts of Wetland Alteration Post Hurricane Ike on the Upper TX Coast.”Environmental Management60 (6): 1116–26.
62.
ShiP.YuD.2014. “Assessing Urban Environmental Resources and Services of Shenzhen, China: A Landscape-Based Approach for Urban Planning and Sustainability.”Landscape and Urban Planning125:290–97.
63.
ThiagarajanM.NewmanG.ZandtS. V.2018. “The Projected Impact of a Neighborhood-Scaled Green-Infrastructure Retrofit.”Sustainability10 (10): 3665.
64.
WatsonK. B.RickettsT.GalfordG.PolaskyS.O’Niel-DunneJ.2016. “Quantifying Flood Mitigation Services: The Economic Value of Otter Creek Wetlands and Floodplains to Middlebury, VT.”Ecological Economics130:16–24.
65.
WilliamsL. R.KapustkaL. A.2000. “Ecosystem Vulnerability: A Complex Interface with Technical Components.”Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal19 (4): 1055–58.
66.
XuX.JiangB.TanY.CostanzaR.YangG.2018. “Lake-Wetland Ecosystem Services Modeling and Valuation: Progress, Gaps and Future Directions.”Ecosystem Services33:19–28.
67.
YuS.BrandA. D.BerkeP.2020. “Making Room for the River: Applying a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard to a Network of Plans in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.”Journal of the American Planning Association86 (4): 417–30.
68.
YuS.MalechaM.BerkeP.2021. “Examining Factors Influencing Plan Integration for Community Resilience in six US Coastal Cities using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”Landscape and Urban Planning215:104224.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
