We examine pervasive opposition to building market-rate housing and relate it to localism: a perspective that grants moral authority to incumbent residents. We argue that localism has become prevalent in housing planning in the United States and that its seeming equality—allowing all communities the right to define themselves—conceals profound imbalances that favor the affluent. We use survey data from California to measure localism, using opposition to state land use preemption as a proxy. We find that localism is concentrated among white, affluent homeowners. This suggests that localist beliefs are less prevalent in the population than they are in planning practice.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames. 2019. The Narrow Corridor. New York: Penguin Press.
2.
AhnT. K.OstromElinorWalkerJames. 2003. “Heterogeneous Preferences and Collective Action.” Public Choice117:295–314.
3.
AsquithBrian J.MastEvanReedDavin. 2019. “Supply Shock versus Demand Shock: The Local Effects of New Housing in Low-Income Areas.” Upjohn Institute Working Paper 19-316. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo. doi:10.17848/wp19-316.
4.
BabcockRichard F.1966. The Zoning Game: Municipal Practices and Policies. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
5.
BaldassareMarkBonnerDeanLawlerRachelDykmanAlyssa. 2019. PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Their Government. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
ChappleKaren. 2016. Integrating California’s Climate Change and Fiscal Goals: The Known, the Unknown, and the Possible. Bacon Public Lectureship & White Paper. Sacramento: University of California Center Sacramento.
17.
ChatmanDanielXuRuoyingParkJaniceSpevackAnne. 2019. “Does Transit-Oriented Gentrification Increase Driving?”Journal of Planning Education and Research39:482–95.
EtzioniAmitai. 1994. The Spirit of Community. New York: Touchstone.
30.
EtzioniAmitai. 1995. Rights and the Common Good: The Communitarian Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s.
31.
EwingReidTianGuangLyonsTorreyProffittDavidStingerPrestonWeinbergerRachelKaufmanBenShivleyKevin. 2017. “Trip and Parking Generation at Transit-Oriented Developments.” NITC-RR-767. Transportation Research and Education Center, Portland. doi:10.15760/trec.157.
32.
FeaginJoe R.2014. Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.
33.
FennellLee A.2006. “Exclusion’s Attraction: Land Use Controls in Tieboutian Perspective.” In The Tiebout Model at Fifty: Essays in Public Economics in Honor of Wallace Oates, edited by FischelWilliam A., 163–98. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
34.
FennellLee A.2010. The Unbounded Home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HortonJohn. 1995. The Politics of Diversity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
44.
IronsJenny. 2010. Reconstituting Whiteness: The Mississippi Sovereignty Commission. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
45.
JardinaAshley. 2019. White Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
KahnMatthew E.2005. Green Cities: Urban Growth and the Environment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47 (2): 263–91.
48.
KimJinwonBrownstoneDavid. 2013. “The Impact of Residential Density on Vehicle Usage and Fuel Consumption: Evidence from National Samples.” Energy Economics40:196–206.
49.
LefebvreHenri. 1968. The Right to the City [Le Droit de la Ville]. Paris: Economica.
50.
LensMichaelMonkkonenPaavo. 2016. “Do Strict Land Use Regulations Make Metropolitan Areas More Segregated by Income?” Journal of the American Planning Association82 (1): 6–21.
LukasJ. Anthony. 1987. Common Ground: A Turbulent Decade in the Lives of Three American Families. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
55.
Lung-AmamWillow. (2017) 2018. Trespassers? Asian-Americans and the Battle for Suburbia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
MangumKyle. 2016. “The Role of Housing in Urban Carbon Emissions.” Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series No. 16-15. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2863168.
57.
ManvilleMichael. 2017. “Automatic Street Widening: Evidence from a Highway Dedication Law.” Journal of Transport and Land Use10 (1): 375–93.
58.
ManvilleMichaelOsmanTaner. 2017. “Motivations for Growth Revolts: Discretion and Pretext as Sources of Development Conflict.” Cities and Community16 (1): 66–85.
59.
MasseyDouglasAlbrightLenCascaneRebeccaDickinsonElizabethKinseyDavid. 2013. Climbing Mount Laurel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
60.
Millard-BallAdam. 2015. “Phantom Trips: Overestimating the Impact of New Development.” Journal of Transportation and Land Use8 (1): 31–40.
61.
MonkkonenPaavoLensMichaelManvilleMichael. 2020. “Built-Out Cities? How California Cities Restrict Housing Production through Prohibition and Process.” UC Berkeley Terner Center Working Paper Series. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3630447.
62.
MorrowGregory. 2013. “The Homeowner Revolution: Democracy, Land Use and the Los Angeles Slow-Growth Movement, 1965-1992.” PhD diss., Department of Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles.
63.
MullinsDaniel. 2010. “Fiscal Limitations on Local Choice.” In State and Local Fiscal Policy: Thinking outside the Box, edited by WallaceSally, 201–65. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64.
MussoJuliet A.WeareChristopherElliotMarkKitsuseAliciaShiauEllen. 2007. “Toward Community Engagement in City Governance: Evaluating Neighborhood Council Reform in Los Angeles.” Neighborhood Participation Project, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California. http://venicenc.org/files/USC-10YrStudyOfNCeffectiveness.pdf.
O’HareMichaelBacowLawrenceSandersonDebra. 1983. Facility Siting and Public Opposition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
67.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68.
OsmanSuleiman. 2012. The Invention of Brownstone Brooklyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
PendallRolf. 1999. “Opposition to Housing: NIMBY and Beyond.” Urban Affairs Review35 (1): 112–36.
70.
PetersonPaul. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
PhillipsShaneManvilleMichaelLensMichael. 2021. Research Roundup: The Effect of Market Rate Development on Neighborhood Rents. UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, February17.
72.
PostrelVirginia. 1998. The Future and Its Enemies. New York: Free Press.
73.
PulidoLaura. 2017. “Geographies of Race and Ethnicity II: Environmental Racism, Racial Capitalism and State-Sanctioned Violence.” Progress in Human Geography41 (4): 524–33.
74.
PurcellMark. 2001. “Neighborhood Activism among Homeowners as Politics of Space.” The Professional Geographer53 (2): 178–94.
75.
PurcellMark. 2013. “Possible Worlds: Henri Lefevre and the Right to the City.” Journal of Urban Affairs36 (1): 141–54.
ReardonSean F.BischoffKendra. 2011. “Income Inequality and Income Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology116 (4): 1092–153.
78.
PeterRobinson, ed. 1996. Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
79.
RosenthalStuart S.2014. “Are Private Markets and Filtering a Viable Source of Low-Income Housing? Estimates from a ‘Repeat Income’ Model.” American Economic Review104 (2): 687–706.
80.
SamuelsWarren. 2003. “Why the Georgist Movement Has Not Succeeded.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology62 (3): 583–92.
81.
ScallyCorianne PaytonTigheJ. Rosie. 2015. “Democracy in Action? NIMBY as Impediment to Equitable Affordable Housing Siting.” Housing Studies30:749–69.
82.
SchivelyCarissa. 2007. “Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing Our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research.” Journal of Planning Literature21 (3): 255–66.
83.
SchwartzJonathan. 1997. “Prisoners of Proposition 13: Sales Taxes, Property Taxes, and the Fiscalization of Municipal Land Use Decisions.” California Law Review71:183–99.
84.
ShoupDonald. 1999. “The Trouble with Minimum Parking Requirements.” Transportation Research Part A33: 549–74.
85.
ShoupDonald. 2003. “Truth in Transportation Planning.” Journal of Transportation and Statistics6 (1): 1–16.
86.
SingerPeter. 1981. The Expanding Circle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SuttlesGerald. 1972. The Social Construction of Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago.
90.
TabarrokAlexanderCowenTyler. 1998. “Who Benefits from Progress?”Kyklos51 (3): 379–97.
91.
TajfelHenri. 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American223 (5): 96–103.
92.
TakahashiLois M.1998. Homelessness, AIDS, and Stigmatization: The NIMBY Syndrome in the United States at the End of the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Clarendon.
93.
TieboutCharles. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416–24.
94.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. 2018 American Community Survey, 1-Year Estimates. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
95.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKey LehmanBradyHenry E.1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
96.
WachsMarty. 1990. “Regulating Traffic by Controlling Land Use.” Transportation16:241–56.
97.
WalzerMichael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
98.
WarrenDonald. 1975. Black Neighborhoods. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
99.
WhittemoreAndrew H.2012. “Requiem for a Growth Machine: Homeowner Preeminence in 1980s Los Angeles.” Journal of Planning History11 (2): 124–40.
100.
WongWeihuang. 2018. Our Town: Support for Housing Growth When Localism Meets Liberalism. New York: Mimeo.
