This paper examines how local plans regulate residential development in Australia, where there has been intense concern over housing supply and affordability. Drawing on repeat surveys of the content of local land-use plans, the study asks: What are the main objectives and mechanisms for residential development control within local plans? To what extent do plans enable or constrain diverse and affordable housing? And how does the content of local plans vary between municipalities and over time? The study finds that newer plans are more likely to contain objectives for housing diversity, but few include specific mechanisms to deliver affordable homes.
AustinPatriciaGurranNicoleWhiteheadChristine. 2014. “Planning and Affordable Housing in Australia, New Zealand and England: Common Culture; Different Mechanisms.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment29 (3): 455–72. doi:10.1007/s10901-013-9356-3.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2006. 2006 Census of Population and Housing. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2011. 2011 Census of Population and Housing. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2013. “Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas, 2011. Table 2: Local Government Area (LGA) Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage, 2011.” Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2015a. National Regional Profile, 2009–13. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2015b. “Proportion of Low Income Rental Households Paying More than 30 Per Cent of Their Gross Income on Housing Costs, 2007–08 to 2013–14.” Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
7.
AyturSemraRodriguezDanielEvensonKellyCatellierDianeRosamondWayne. 2008. “The Sociodemographics of Land Use Planning: Relationships to Physical Activity, Accessibility, and Equity.” Health & Place14 (3): 367–85. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.08.004.
8.
BeatleyTimothy. 2000. “Preserving Biodiversity: Challenges for Planners.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1080/01944360008976080.
9.
BerkePhilipBackhurstMichaelDayMaxineEricksenNeilLaurianLucieCrawfordJanDixonJennifer. 2006. “What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand.” Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design33 (4): 581–600. doi:10.1068/b31166.
10.
BerkePhilipConroyMaria Manta. 2000. “Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? An Evaluation of 30 Comprehensive Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 21–33. doi:10.1080/01944360008976081.
11.
BoyleRobinMohamedRayman. 2007. “State Growth Management, Smart Growth and Urban Containment: A Review of the US and a Study of the Heartland.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management50 (5): 677–97. doi:10.1080/09640560701475337.
12.
BramleyGlen. 2013. “Housing Market Models and Planning.” Town Planning Review84 (1): 9–34.
13.
BramleyGlenWatkinsDavid. 2014. “‘Measure Twice, Cut Once’: Revisiting the Strength and Impact of Local Planning Regulation of Housing Development in England.” Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design41 (5): 863–84. doi:10.1068/b39131.
14.
BunkerRaymondSearleGlen. 2009. “Theory and Practice in Metropolitan Strategy: Situating Recent Australian Planning.” Urban Policy and Research27 (2): 101–16. doi:10.1080/08111140902971426.
15.
COAG Reform Council. 2012. Housing Supply and Affordability Reform. Canberra: COAG Housing Supply and Affordability Reform Working Party.
16.
DaltonLindaBurbyRaymond. 1994. “Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development Management.” Journal of the American Planning Association60 (4): 444–61. doi:10.1080/01944369408975604.
17.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2005. Why Not in Our Community? Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing: An Update to the Report of the Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing. Washington: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
18.
FischelWilliam. 2004. “An Economic History of Zoning and a Cure for its Exclusionary Effects.” Urban Studies41 (2): 317–40.
19.
GlaeserEdwardWardBryce. 2009. “The Causes and Consequences of Land Use Regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston.” Journal of Urban Economics65 (3): 265–278. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003.
20.
GlaeserEdwardGyourkoJosephSaksRaven. 2005. “Why is Manhattan so Expensive? Regulation and the Rise in Housing Prices.” Journal of Law & Economics48 (2): 331–69. doi:10.1086/429979.
21.
GurranNicole. 2003. “Housing Locally: Positioning Australian Local Government Housing for a New Century.” Urban Policy and Research21 (4): 393–412. doi:10.1080/0811114032000147421.
22.
GurranNicole. 2008. “Affordable Housing: A Dilemma for Metropolitan Planning?”Urban Policy and Research26 (1): 101–10. doi:10.1080/08111140701851985.
23.
GurranNicoleRumingKristian. 2016. “Less Planning, More Development? Housing and Urban Reform Discourses in Australia.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform19 (3): 262–80. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1065184.
24.
GurranNicolePhibbsPeter. 2013. “Housing Supply and Urban Planning Reform: The Recent Australian Experience, 2003–2012.” International Journal of Housing Policy13 (3): 381–407. doi:10.1080/14616718.2013.840110.
25.
GyourkoJosephSaizAlbertSummersAnita. 2008. “A New Measure of the Local Regulatory Environment for Housing Markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index.” Urban Studies45 (3): 693–729. doi:10.1177/0042098007087341.
26.
HirtSonia. 2007. “The Mixed-Use Trend: Planning Attitudes and Practices in Northeast Ohio.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research24 (3): 224–44.
27.
HochCharles. 2007. “How Plan Mandates Work: Affordable Housing in Illinois.” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (1): 86–99.
28.
IhlanfeldtKeith. 2004. “Exclusionary Land-Use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions.” Urban Studies41 (2): 261–83. doi:10.1080/004209803200165244.
29.
IhlanfeldtKeith. 2007. “The Effect of Land Use Regulation on Housing and Land Prices.” Journal of Urban Economics61 (3): 420–35. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.09.003.
30.
JabareenYosef Rafeq. 2006. “Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (1): 38–52. doi:10.1177/0739456x05285119.
31.
KnaapGerrit-JanMeckStuartMooreTerryParkerRobert. 2007. “Do We Know Regulatory Barriers When We See Them? An Exploration Using Zoning and Development Indicators.” Housing Policy Debate18 (4): 711–49.
32.
LandisJohn. 2006. “Growth Management Revisited: Efficacy, Price Effects, and Displacement.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (4): 411–430.
33.
LevineNed. 1999. “The Effects of Local Growth Controls on Regional Housing Production and Population Redistribution in California.” Urban Studies36 (12): 2047–68.
34.
LewisPaul GeorgeNeimanMax. 2000. Residential Development and Growth Control Policies: Survey Results from Cities in Three California Regions. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
35.
LibrettJohnYoreMichelleSchmidThomas. 2003. “Local Ordinances that Promote Physical Activity: A Survey of Municipal Policies.” American Journal of Public Health93 (9): 1399–403.
36.
LubellMarkFeiockRichardHandySusan. 2009. “City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California’s Central Valley.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (3): 293–308. doi:10.1080/01944360902952295.
37.
McClureKirk. 2005. “Deciphering the Need in Housing Markets: A Technique to Identify Appropriate Housing Policies at the Local Level.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (4): 361–78. doi:10.1177/0739456x04270126.
38.
McDonaldJohn F.McMillenDaniel P.2004. “Determinants of Suburban Development Controls: A Fischel Expedition.” Urban Studies41 (2): 341–361. doi:10.1080/0042098032000165280.
39.
NortonRichard K.2008. “Using Content Analysis to Evaluate Local Master Plans and Zoning Codes.” Land Use Policy25 (3): 432–54. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.006.
O’ConnellLenahan. 2009. “The Impact of Local Supporters on Smart Growth Policy Adoption.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (3): 281–91. doi:10.1080/01944360902885495.
43.
PendallRolf. 2000. “Local Land Use Regulation and the Chain of Exclusion.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (2): 125–142. doi:10.1080/01944360008976094.
44.
PendallRolfPuentesRobert. 2008. “Land-Use Regulations as Territorial Governance in US Metropolitan Areas.” Boletin De La Asociacion De Geografos Espanoles46: 181–206.
45.
PendallRolfPuentesRobertMartinJonathan. 2006. From Traditional to Reformed: A Review of the Land Use Regulations in the Nation’s 50 largest Metropolitan Areas. Washington: Brookings Institute.
46.
PogodzinskiJ. MichaelSassTim. 1994. “The Theory and Estimation of Endogenous Zoning.” Regional Science and Urban Economics24 (5): 601–30. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(94)02059-0.
47.
Productivity Commission. 2011. Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments; Productivity Commission Draft Research Report. Canberra: Australian Government.
48.
RumingKristianGurranNicoleMaginnPaulGoodmanRobin. 2014. “A National Planning Agenda? Unpacking the Influence of Federal Urban Policy on State Planning Reform.” Australian Planner51 (2): 108–21. doi:10.1080/07293682.2014.894105.
49.
SchuetzJenny. 2009. “No Renters in My Suburban Backyard: Land Use Regulation and Rental Housing.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management28: 296–320. doi:10.1002/pam.20428.
50.
TalenEmilyKnaapGerrit. 2003. “Legalizing Smart Growth: An Empirical Study of Land Use Regulation in Illinois.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (4): 345–59. doi:10.1177/0739456x03252486.
51.
van den NouwelantRyanDavisonGethinGurranNicolePinnegarSimonRandolphBill. 2014. “Delivering Affordable Housing Through the Planning System in Urban Renewal Contexts: Converging Government Roles in Queensland, South Australia and New South Wales.” Australian Planner52 (5): 77–89. doi:10.1080/07293682.2014.914044.
52.
WhiteMichaelAllmendingerPhilip. 2003. “Land-Use Planning and the Housing Market: A Comparative Review of the UK and the USA.” Urban Studies40 (5–6): 953–72. doi:10.1080/0042098032000074263.
53.
ZabelJeffreyDaltonMaurice. 2011. “The Impact of Minimum Lot Size Regulations on House Prices in Eastern Massachusetts.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41 (6): 571–83. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.06.002.
